Search results

The USA is using native Americans as patsies?

I honestly doubt that the Japanese would have been able to invade Ceylon any more than they would've been abe to invade Hawaii. Logistics wouldn't allow either.

Congrats!

I would assume the French navy sinks the former American navy. They were technologically advanced - keeping pace with the Royal Navy - while I really don't see the cesspit formerly known as the USA in this Timeline being able to keep up. And if the RN gets involved, it's curtains anyway.

Does "Look Who's Back" count? Hitler reappears in Berlin in 2011 and becomes a TV star when he is mistaken as a method actor imitating Hitler as satire.

How did Italy get Corsica? Is that a mistake?

Louisiana can hold the land against natives easily, and the only real threat - the "USA" - is kept in check by politics and diplomacy, mainly the threat of the UK attacking in support of Louisiana should the USA attack Louisiana.

I think that unless the Union suffers a total collapse and disgrace ska Germany 1945, they eon't ever catch up to Britain and Canada. Just too much rot.

A solid cadre of well-trained officers and, as or even more important, NCOs, will do wonders in any conflict with the USA, who still rely on militia for the bulk of their war time forces.

I don't see the USA in this timeline as the USA OTL. It's just the CSA with a different flag.

I hope the First Nations will benefit from the deal.

The could do "The Birth of a Nation (2016)" about Nat Turner, couldn't they? John Brown wouldn't be much different.

My point is exactly that - no matter who wins in the USA, the odds of there being any "USA" expanding west of the Mississippi aren't good now.

I don't think any expansion west will be as easy as OTL. ITL, native nations are a thing - if settlers start pushing native American tribes around, they can look for allies who can push the USA - whatever form it takes - right back. Please, folks, having a Native American Nation on the...

After the emancipation proclamation, slaves are legally free, so the legal argument won't help. But even if one went the despicable route of sparing the rapists and murderers, those who enslaved free men would still be punished for their crimes. And, honestly, a peace bought by letting rapists...

Not really. A thief losing what he had no right to own is not a punishment. That would be better.

I think "Well, there were too many rapists and murderers, so we can't punish them" is one of the worst stances you can take. It not only tells the racists that as long as they are the majority, all is fine, it also tells the recently freed slaves that they aren't worthy of receiving justice.

What about those who kidnapped free men and enslaved them? What about those who raped and murdered slaves?

I argued exactly against the part of your statement I quoted. That's why I quoted it, and not the rest of your post: They cannot be allowed to keep their culture - which is, as the fuckheads stated proudly and went to war for, based on slavery. So, yes, I'll say it again: They cannot be...

You asked how I suggest changing the culture, which I answered. I ignored your second question since I never was a slave-owning racist scumbag, so I never had to change such a toxic opinion. Kindly don't put words into my mouth, please. I said the racist culture has to be destroyed, I didn't...