Search results

I can't think of much right now, but I tend to agree the area around Perth, and the Murray valley region would probably be good places for states to form. The east is kind of hilly, so it might prevent the development of one unified state. Would they develop tech powerful enough to fight off the...

I really can't see why both powers would be willing to fight so far from their bases of power. The logistics would certainly make a campaign difficult for both sides. By exapanding, you mean that the Chinese control Persia? At this time, the Chinese would probably be still trying to hold it...

Still in control, though revolutionary ideas were slowly starting to develop in the Philippines.

The Japanese might have more room to expand their influence in that area.

People seem to forget that there was lots of racism even at the time of the movement. If Stobridge was killed, it would just make it that much easier for popular prejudices against those "damn chinks" to mor realdily manifest themselves.

Not to mention Venezuela's independnec movement was also well undeway

Maybe Portugla puts more effort into building routes in the New World? Or else they try to expand their influence out of the Kongo.

So, if the army of the low countries went to Venezuela, could we see British troops remain in Venezuela a little while after becoming independent? Bolivar would need time to help build a stable government. But trading one new master for another woudl not look good, hmmm

No way in hell! The guys who started the horrible practice(like slaveholders such as the Dukes) all need to be chopped up into tiny pieces and thrown in the ocean! Hail the Slave Liberation Army!

It woudl probably depend on what state the Mexican army is in when they get independence. But I can't see them takign the PAcific territories, no way. that icon is a mistake

It's interesting how you have France going through a little split. Will things remain that way?

Fuck. The Soviets seem rather determined.

Yeah, I was thnking more abotu Alexander, to tell the truth. It seems like there mgith be a bit of a civil war. It wou;d be hard to launch a coup from where he's at.

Assumign he was, I'd say genetics mught be slightly farther along. But if the church excommunicated him, it might be hard to find outisde support.

I don't think so. Iturbide was about as egotistical as Santa Anna and wasn't very smart where it came to establishing support either. He'll just end up overthrown a few years later.

The Armenians seem pretty safe for now. The last paragraph seems to bode an ominous forebodign for the new emperor. It seems, though, that the end of the Empire would come that much quicker if Alexander was able to raise a force. But then, one who looked at Byzantium in 1000 AD probably was...

It's hard to say what they woudl be able to do about it, except maybe the Philippines.

Yeah, Anastasio Bustamante might rule for 10-20 years or so. And Texas might not win it's independence if a more competant general is in charge. Juarez might still come to power, as the basic conditions prevalent in mexico at the time wouldn't change.

Disunited india that was pretty much dighting themselves when the British invaded. Pleassse....they were too busy fighting themselves to think of new technology that could improve their lives. In Africa, no, any states that existed were too isolated to really follow the model.

A more rational Soviet Union that will still likely form a powerful rival to the Scanavian Union? Interesting, but depending on how the conflict plays out, the communists may be greatly weakened by the time this is all over.