Um, there are 37 distinct subdivisions on that map, and 37 stars on that flag.
I've been wondering about this.I thought the Cherokee trail of tears was averted ITTL? Why would they name Oklahoma Sequoyah if the Cherokee are still in the southeast?
I'd think they'd keep those territories but they'd have a large anglophone population who would include descendants of slave-holding republicans. I'd imagine they'd be like Quebec: always threatening to break away, and getting close on a couple of occasions, but never actually doing it.I'm personally not too sure if Mexico will be able to hold all of its far Northern territories and it wouldn't surprise me if much of it is lost to America, Texas, Britain, France, etc.
Empress Charlotte is truly one of the greats, and her life story is just amazing. In fact, now that I think about it, the women of the American Royal Family have been more often than not quite extraordinary, and I plan to keep it that way.And so Charlotte the Great grew from an adventure loving princess to the stern yet loving motherly figure of the Nation after winning the civil war, abolishing slavery and transforming the monarchy into a constitutional model.
A truly remarkable woman, shame that her beloved husband and son were taken away from her.
And i loved that Sherman still made Georgia Howl.
Interesting question, especially since there would be more of a support for the "republican" aspect of the South from European intellectual circles. However, consider that in OTL Marx was a very adamant writer rejecting the "States' Rights" justification and putting slavery front and center for the goals of the Civil War, I could see him doing much of the same here. I could also imagine an argument of "the Northern workers, armed for the war and now returning with the emancipatory spirit, will certainly turn on their bosses and princes", but then again I'm not sure how much that kind of rhetoric would be used back them, in comparison with the twentieth century, when it would just be commonplace among Marxist circles.What did Karl Marx make of the situation of this AU of the American Civil War?
Ok so this is an important catch, and certainly it is a question I struggled to answer, the future of Oklahoma (which wouldn't be called Oklahoma either). So when I was researching a proper name, I read through the wiki page on Sequoyah the man himself and found it interesting that his particular group of Cherokee had started to move west in the 1810s, which led me to read about how, despite the Trail of Tears as a dramatic conclusion happening under Jackson, the truth was that it was just the climax of a decades-long affair that, in many ways, was greater than any one man and impossible to prevent as long as a United States were to exist (that is, impossible to prevent in this TL either). So, given that, I thought I could at the same time have Native Americans continue having a presence more to the East and, to the West, having a better deal as well. Especially because I really do like the idea of a Native American State. Is it a case of wanting to have my cake and eating it? Perhaps. But I found it a good workaround.I thought the Cherokee trail of tears was averted ITTL? Why would they name Oklahoma Sequoyah if the Cherokee are still in the southeast?
That's going to be one hell of a powerful Mexico come the 21st century if it can sort its shit out.
I see the entirety of the American Southwest is still in Mexican hands around that time. Wonder how that will change in the coming years ahead.
Mexicowank let's go!
Wouldn't the presence of an American monarchy make American support for a restored Mexican Empire almost inevitable? I am sure the US would not support a French intervention, but the idea of Max, or someone else, would have alot of appeal in Havre de Grace.
Possibly, especially with Republicanism being associated with Southern slavery and filibustering. However, the POD is well before Mexican independence so we don't know how Mexican independence was achieved (much less if there was a "first Empire" to fall at all). If Mexican independence went more or less as OTL, I can see the following scenarios:
Without the American example, the liberals in Congress might actually be less radical in advocating for a republican system; so whoever is chosen as a monarch, should have an easier time managing congress than Iturbide did in OTL. In which case the first Empire might just be able to last.
- Due to the precedent of a European royal accepting the American throne, an offer is made to a European royal and it is accepted. There are three immediate candidates: Ferdinand VII's brothers, Don Carlos or Don Francisco - The former is more interesting as it ends up butterflying the Carlist Wars in Spain -or his cousin the Duke of Teschen. Alternatively,
- Ferdinand VII can accept a compromise and establish a personal union between Spain and Mexico, so he remains King but Mexico keeps a separate parliament and laws. Or, as in OTL,
- A Mexican is elected to the throne, most likely Iturbide, but depending on how the war goes there could be some opportunists.
I would prefer Maximilian (I'm a Habsburg fan) but Iturbide would do.
I promise we will get to talk more about Mexico soon, and that I have plans for the country, at least one essay for after the biographies. What I can guarantee is that it will maintain its territorial integrity, because I do enjoy a big Mexico. But that doesn't mean that poor Mexico still isn't too far from God and too close to the United States.I'm personally not too sure if Mexico will be able to hold all of its far Northern territories and it wouldn't surprise me if much of it is lost to America, Texas, Britain, France, etc.
That looks like around 25 states to 37.
I guess in TTL some states can still be divided up later on? Or Dakota will be split into 8 states (which I guess is more unlikely)
As pointed out, there are already 37 states on the map, and those will be the way they will be for the rest of the timeline. This is as much as the US will be expanding, I'm afraid.Um, there are 37 distinct subdivisions on that map, and 37 stars on that flag.
Ahah I even stole most of the Upper Peninsula from Michigan, so this is a certifiable Michigan-screw TL.Yet another TL in which Michigan is denied the full extent of it's natural territory.
View attachment 820319
Yes, I found that border change in Arkansas and decided to keep it just because I liked the look. Glad it was noticed and gladder still it as a pleasant surprise.I am pleasantly shocked someone knew that Arkansas Territory extended a bit west of its current border till an OTL receding. Otherwise, that's one big Megakota, though in TTL it makes sense since there's so much less of the Great American Desert and the bit of OTL Montana west of the Rockies in Waldemar.
Guess the question is how Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Cuba, Guam, and the Philippines would develop ITTL.As pointed out, there are already 37 states on the map, and those will be the way they will be for the rest of the timeline. This is as much as the US will be expanding, I'm afraid.
Max came a bit later, as in 1821 the candidates were mostly Bourbons of Italy and Spain. Also it greatly depends on how the war of Independence wentI would prefer Maximilian (I'm a Habsburg fan) but Iturbide would do.
Well if they have more competent military leadership (keyword; no Santa Anna) and a more stable government (almost a given here considering Mexico would be a monarchy) Mexico would automatically be rather powerful.I'm personally not too sure if Mexico will be able to hold all of its far Northern territories and it wouldn't surprise me if much of it is lost to America, Texas, Britain, France, etc.
Hawai will innevitably become a British protectorate unless the Americans take it for themselves, and sooner or later Russian America will also fall into the hands of Britain - the Russians sold it to America to prevent this happening IOTL.Guess the question is how Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Cuba, Guam, and the Philippines would develop ITTL.
I doubt Britain will care enough to establish a protectorate over Hawaii, when they didn't IOTL. Of course, the Americans played a big part in this, but Mexico/Spain will have a much greater presence in the Pacific to counteract that.Hawai will innevitably become a British protectorate unless the Americans take it for themselves, and sooner or later Russian America will also fall into the hands of Britain - the Russians sold it to America to prevent this happening IOTL.
This is actually an interesting thing that I might as well discuss here and see what people think.Guess the question is how Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Cuba, Guam, and the Philippines would develop ITTL.
I mean, if Spain has recently been utterly destroyed in a war, or is otherwise suffering from severe economic issues, it might be open to selling off a few islands.Guam - good question... Can anyone tell me how plausible German Guam or something is? I'm unsure of what to do here
Well, as a Filipino, I could see an ATL version of the 1896 Revolution ending in a Tagalog Republic (the Katipuneros preferred to call their state as such) being forged by Filipino revolutionaries.Philippines - another case of pondering what to do, but with a weaker American imperialism in the Pacific (lacking California) I could see it become independent much earlier, but not sure in what form. Suggestions are quite welcome
... and since nobody has commented and I think I forgot to mention...
I would prefer Maximilian (I'm a Habsburg fan) but Iturbide would do.
Max came a bit later, as in 1821 the candidates were mostly Bourbons of Italy and Spain. Also it greatly depends on how the war of Independence went
Well if they have more competent military leadership (keyword; no Santa Anna) and a more stable government (almost a given here considering Mexico would be a monarchy) Mexico would automatically be rather powerful.
I like this path that Mexico could take! Though I imagine that Angel would choose a more common regnal name upon becoming Emperor of Mexico, perhaps Jose?Since Prince di Corsica is ignoring the butterflies for fun and centering this in the US, I'd venture we could have this possible scenario:
This way, the line is kept roughly the same as OTL (dodging the butterflies) and Mexico gets an American Empress / Empress Dowager (keeping the American focus of TTL).
- Agustin de Iturbide still gets crowned as Agustin I and is succeeded by Agustin Prince Imperial (who had an amazing career in OTL after his father was deposed and was educated in Britain) as Agustin II.
- As in OTL Agustin II dies childless and he is succeeded by his brother Angel. And again, as in OTL, Angel could serve as Secretary to the United States and end up marrying the American Alice Green.
- Angel has a short reign - he died 6 years after his brother in OTL - and would be succeeded by his son with Alice Green, Prince Agustin de Iturbide y Green, who in OTL was adopted by Maximilian I to serve as his heir.
- And the line could be kept roughly the same from there, with Agustin III being succeeded by his niece Maria Josefa.