Ronald Reagan's wishlist?

The Reagan Revolution undoubtedly changed the United States forever. However, there was still a lot of compromise to be had. What if the margins were fiddled around with to give Reagan a very friendly Congress, what would he he able to get through that he couldn't in OTL?
 
That's a good point. I'd been thinking of taxes, budgets and social issues but different supreme court nominees are possible as well.

Bork and his ilk getting onto the SCOTUS almost guarantees you right-wing victories on social issues, though alot of that will be states taking the initiative themselves via court-mandated devolution.
 
Lots of powers turned over to the states and localities. Except for a few exceptions big enough to drive a truck through, eg. pornography and the War On Drugs.
Could this possibly include education being kicked down to the state level and abolishing the Department of Education?
 
Lots of powers turned over to the states and localities. Except for a few exceptions big enough to drive a truck through, eg. pornography and the War On Drugs.
Interesting how Republicans are all about "states' rights" and "getting the government closer to the people", until it comes to some social/moral issue they care about - then they have no qualms at all when it comes to using the power of the federal government to bulldoze their way as they see fit...
Any time some Republican Pol claims to worship at the Shrine of the Almighty Ronnie and spouts off "we're the party of *small government*!", I just have to laugh....
 
Interesting how Republicans are all about "states' rights" and "getting the government closer to the people", until it comes to some social/moral issue they care about - then they have no qualms at all when it comes to using the power of the federal government to bulldoze their way as they see fit...
Any time some Republican Pol claims to worship at the Shrine of the Almighty Ronnie and spouts off "we're the party of *small government*!", I just have to laugh....

I can't post the link myself, but for a real laugh, go read a Politico article called How Reagan's Childhood Home Gave Up On Reaganism.
 
Interesting how Republicans are all about "states' rights" and "getting the government closer to the people", until it comes to some social/moral issue they care about - then they have no qualms at all when it comes to using the power of the federal government to bulldoze their way as they see fit...
Any time some Republican Pol claims to worship at the Shrine of the Almighty Ronnie and spouts off "we're the party of *small government*!", I just have to laugh....
Well I suppose that would only be magnified in a world where Reagan got his way more.
 
He and Gorbachev discussed a phased elimination of both side's nuclear weapons. It foundered on the issue of SDI, but Regan was committed to the elimination of nuclear weapons. Predictably, the European NATO members hit the roof when they found out, so perhaps it still wouldn't have happened.
 
Interesting how Republicans are all about "states' rights" and "getting the government closer to the people", until it comes to some social/moral issue they care about - then they have no qualms at all when it comes to using the power of the federal government to bulldoze their way as they see fit...
Any time some Republican Pol claims to worship at the Shrine of the Almighty Ronnie and spouts off "we're the party of *small government*!", I just have to laugh....
All politicians and political parties are hypocrites, this is nothing new.
 
He and Gorbachev discussed a phased elimination of both side's nuclear weapons. It foundered on the issue of SDI, but Regan was committed to the elimination of nuclear weapons. Predictably, the European NATO members hit the roof when they found out, so perhaps it still wouldn't have happened.
I guess if the obstacle was Europe and not domestic even in his best case scenario he wouldn't be able to get away with it. Interesting to think about though.
 
I guess if the obstacle was Europe and not domestic even in his best case scenario he wouldn't be able to get away with it. Interesting to think about though.
I’m sure there would have been domestic opposition. Reagan did encounter GOP opposition to the INF treat, IIRC and depended on the DNC to get it passed. So, if he had tried to pass a total disarmament treaty it would have faced opposition in Congress. That now does make me think I was wrong in my first post. Reagan would only have gotten something like that passed with a DNC dominated Congress and even then it would be a stretch.

It can also be argued whether the USA and the getting rid of all of their nuclear weapons is a good idea, or not. But, that’s a separate thread.
 

bguy

Donor
The Senate was 53-47 R.

Bork's nomination was voted down in October of 1987. The Senate was 54-46 D at that time. (Though 6 Republican senators did vote against Bork, so his nomination might have failed even in a Republican controlled senate.)
 
Bork's nomination was voted down in October of 1987. The Senate was 54-46 D at that time. (Though 6 Republican senators did vote against Bork, so his nomination might have failed even in a Republican controlled senate.)

Thought it was 1986 for some reason.
 
Greater deregulation, less public (non-defense) spending, balanced budgets, potentially more gun control.
 
Top