Names for a British New Orleans and British Louisiana

If Britain conquered New Orleans in the 7YW, presumably they wouldn't want the place named after French Kings and cities. What would be some good alternatives?
 
It would be interesting TL where say, British take Louisiana long before ARW ( say instead of Acadia ), and then after it, newly-conquered Canada and Acadia ( still French populated ) go with the US ( but not with the Constitution, they part ways with the rest of the US there and become independent ) while British manage to keep Louisiana and Louisiana becomes new "Canada". And so, end result: USA ( 13 colonies plus trans-Appalachian area ), British Louisiana ( OTL Louisiana, Arkansas, up to St. Louis, east Texas, western Mississippi ) and independent French Canada.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps the British of the 7 Years’ War would harken back to 100 Years’ War, to their defeat at the hands of Joan of Arc at the original (old) Orleans. They might want to avenge that costly failure to take Orleans which, according to Wikipedia (see below), prevented them from conquering all of France by wiping out all the French place names in Louisiana.

By taking New Orleans, they would thereby also have all of Louisiana fall into their hands and irrevocably weaken, if not eliminate, the French menace forever in North America. So why not eliminate the very names too ?

Louisiana could become Plantagenetia, after the English royal family, the Plantagenets, at the time of the 100 Years’ War. As for their present King George II or III, “Georgia” was already taken and “Hanoveria” doesn’t recall heroic English warrior kings like the glorious history of the Plantagenets does .

New Orleans could be renamed Lancastria, after John of Lancaster, the English regent, for Henry VI. Lake Pontchartrain could be renamed Lake Agincourt, for one of the greatest English victories in history.

Baton Rouge, meaning “red stick” in French, could be renamed for another 100 Years’ War hero, the Black Prince. Or “Prince Noir” if the British really wanted to stick it to the defeated French.

Biloxi and Mobile could retain their names since they were derived from Indian tribe names and not obviously French.

Wikipedia said:
The Siege of Orléans (12 October 1428 – 8 May 1429) was the watershed of the Hundred Years' War between France and England. It was the French royal army's first major military victory to follow the crushing defeat at the Battle of Agincourt in 1415, and also the first while Joan of Arc was with the army. The siege took place at the pinnacle of English power during the later stages of the war. The city held strategic and symbolic significance to both sides of the conflict. The consensus among contemporaries was that the English regent, John of Lancaster, would have succeeded in realizing his brother the English king Henry V's dream of conquering all of France if Orléans fell. For half a year the English and their French allies appeared to be winning, but the siege collapsed nine days after Joan's arrival.
 
I guess if they captured New Orleans in 1815 they could name it New Liverpool as both are port cities and the British PM at the time was Robert Jenkinson, Earl of Liverpool.
 
I'm tempted to say that they probably don't change either name. Probably a lot of the other names get switched out, but those are pretty easy on the Anglo tongue and probably get a pass.
 
Top