I find it ironic that UK Built CVEs operated by British crews did not suffer a any similar incidents neither did US CVEs operated by US Crews. Only HMS Dasher. There maybe different
philosophies at work here: The RN relying on a safe design, the USN relying on training, supervision etc.
This from wiki - "The US blamed it on poor RN petrol handling procedures, the British on bad design of the stowage and handling. There were merits in both arguments, but thereafter the stowage on her British operated sister ships was reduced from 75,000–88,000 US gal (280,000–330,000 l) down to 36,000 US gal (140,000 l), and the USN reduced theirs also but not as drastically."
Obviously both sides made changes after the tragedy but I imagine
Dasher herself just had some flaws, mainly due to poor quality of construction because these were to a certain extent rush jobs. HMS
Archer was plagued by engine problems and was decommissioned early. Keep in mind that these were also both early model escort carriers,
Dasher was part of a four ship class and
Archer was part of a two ship class so the overall designs were not even considered satisfactory by either navy given how quickly both the British and Americans moved to better designs. It's probably also worth pointing out that the only US escort carrier in
Dasher's four ship class (USS
Charger) spent her whole career training pilots in the Chesapeake Bay instead of being used operationally. I think you have a case of rushed conversions to get flight decks into the fleet as quickly as possible led to a certain degree of trial and error and probably some poor quality control and the end result was at least a couple of ships that had some inherent flaws before the escort carrier construction programs were fully established and producing ships of better quality.
Keep in mind, I don't have anything to support the above, it's just a theory that makes sense.