Why not Flanders and Hainault just like Bosnia and Herzegovina.
The problem with that name is that several parts of Belgium actualy were part of the Union of Utrecht, at least a large part of Flanders and Brabant were. And of course the bishopric of Liege never was part of the Spanish Netherlands.The United States of Arras
The Remnant (i.e. those left when the Union of Utrecht broke away)
The problem with that name is that several parts of Belgium actualy were part of the Union of Utrecht, at least a large part of Flanders and Brabant were. And of course the bishopric of Liege never was part of the Spanish Netherlands.
Also it is weird to call a country after a city that lies in another country.
It used to be part of the Netherlands, but France conquered Arras after the Union of Arras (and before Belgium was founded). I think somewhere in the 17th century, not sure of the exact date.My bad. Why did they call it the Union of Arras then? I mean, Utrecht is still in the Netherlands, but if Arras was in (I'm assuming France ATM), styling themselves that makes as much sense as naming the country that, surely.
It used to be part of the Netherlands, but France conquered Arras after the Union of Arras (and before Belgium was founded). I think somewhere in the 17th century, not sure of the exact date.