Discount the above - I checked the older maps and @Grand Prince Paul II. was right about Oaxaca, not sure how that error crept into these maps. I will fix on the earlier ones later.
Here's a first draft, deliberately without key or annotations, for a postwar map. There's no really good date to show one for (much like OTL WW1 where 'postwar maps' in books usually cavalierly mix parts from any year from 1918 to 1923 to avoid the messiness of the Greco-Turkish conflict, the Russian Civil War, the short-lived states in Eastern Europe, etc...) but I've tried to be reasonably consistent with a map for 1901.
Can any of you eagle-eyed viewers spot anything that explicitly contradicts the text here before I add clarifications? Note that the same colour on either side of black borders can indicate military occupation, as in the case of the ENA occupation of North Arizpe, (most of) the Superior Republic, Carolina and Nouvelle-Orléans for example. Also note that a pink colour has been added for Siam, and the lighter shade to the east indicates that the Philippine Republic is now being subject to Siamese influence. There are a handful of 'spoilers' here for things not yet mentioned in the text, like the fact that the Russians have created an independent (but vassalised) kingdom of Romania.
View attachment 441327
Shouldn't England and Scotland be marked as separate? I think you may have forgotten to recolour a bit of Venezuela and Cornwall.
EDIT: What's going on in Cape Verde and Sao Tome? And is Bohemia still part of Germany, despite being taken by Russia - shouldn't a bit of Silesia have been retained by another German state (Saxony, probably)?
Last edited: