alternatehistory.com

17
@IamtheEmps
The thing about that though is that the romanization of Britain was less thorough than the rest of western europe, despite having been under the Romans since the first century. Most of the island was a Roman frontier, always threatened by barbarians, and a frequent source of usurpers. The most romanized parts where in the South East, a place that has now become ruled and at least partially settled by germans.

And as mentioned above by someone else, Latin was a mostly used in urban areas and by elites. Enough to leave an impact for sure, but in this scenario not enough to make it a romance language.

And also, technically there aren't more celtic language's in this scenario anyway, it's actually one short, with "cornish" and "welsh" merging into a single language. I'm not sure Breton would even survive in this scenario, with fewer elites fleeing to Armoricia, and likely a few returning to Britain, in which case that's 2 fewer celtic languages.

One could argue that there might well be enough distinct dialects in Britain that might themselves be almost separate languages. England itself has a lot of different variants OTL. With the less Roman influenced Coelings in the north, the Germanic peoples absorbed and integrated into the most Roman influenced groups in the southeast and the moderately Roman-influenced but potentially closely trading with Gaelic people, there's already the impetus for three distinct dialects in OTL England. This is without debating whether the Picts might survive in this timeline, possibly being integrated into an earlier united Great Britain. Similarly, the Bretons might see less settlement but in return see more support from their kinsmen across the Channel Mor Bretannek.

Top