Remarrying to your dead spouse's sibling as a substitute to continue the alliance is not so very rare in this time period (e.g. Miguel of Portugal remarrying to Maria of Aragon after her sister and his wife Isabel died). That's why we have dispensations, and that's why Ferdinand thought it...
Ah, the problem there is that this Elizabeth was never acknowledged, unlike our Elizabeth.
Actually, no. Neither Elizabeth nor Mary were ever legitimized again after their parents’ marriages were annulled, they were only just restored to the succession while remaining illegitimate. And Anne’s...
Descendants of Henry VIII of England in 1558, following the accession of Queen Mary I and the investiture of Lady Elizabeth Tudor as Marquess of Pembroke in her own right.
Henry VIII, King of England (28 June 1491 – 28 January 1547) oo a) 1477 Catherine of Aragon (16 December 1485 – 7 January...
Well, they do get married, but this Henry's own thoughts on religion reflects that of Henry VIII's so he doesn't really force Mary to do anything.
Wait, we have that now?
Descendants of Henry VIII of England in 1558
Henry VIII, King of England (28 June 1491 – 28 January 1547) oo a) 1477 Catherine of Aragon (16 December 1485 – 7 January 1536), b) - o|o - Elizabeth Blount (1498 – 1540), c) 1533 Anne Boleyn (1501 – 19 May 1536), c) 1536 Jane Seymour (1509 - 14...
Honestly, kind of unlikely for both of them, with Henry having a lot of spares running about from Jane. He could still do the equivalent of the Third Act, though, if he wants them to make Continental matches.
For Elizabeth, who doesn't have foreign backing, maybe. Charles would raise a fuss if Mary marries anyone below an Earl, so Blount is out of the question.
Speaking of which, do we think the Queen's brother would still try to fool around with Elizabeth ITTL? And what happens to the Poles?