Exactly, like even Stalin can't compare to fucking Leopold 2 in real life, he killed 50% of all the people in the congo. And the other european powers weren't much better in how they treated their subjects.
Well, in the introduction there's a passage from an ITTL anti-socialist book that discusses how Hitler was ruthless. And as an example, they use 'revolutionary terror in france'. Not ethnic cleansing, not concentration camps, not even Stalinesque deportations. If ITTL Hitler did anything close...
Stalin, maybe doesnt. But Hitler ITTL is much less evil than the Hitler IOTL, he's a pseudo-anarchist. So he would probably care more abot people's lives
Yeah, you're right, they'd probably nuke a place that doesn't cause needless deaths.
Though the Americans would probably be quite close to developing nukes themselves. Albeit without the intellectual resources they had in our time, they'd probably get there eventually through domestic research.
I'd be willing to bet that the Comintern gets nukes first (given that the Great Purge would likely be butterflied away and Jewish Scientists like Einstein would probably stay behind in the new Socialist Germany) and just nukes London to secure an armistice where they'd control most of Eurasia.
Does this mean Stalin backstabs Hitler and then installs a puppet in the DAR?
Also I think it is highly likely that Albert Einstein et al do not flee the DAR, and thus give Germany a chance of getting the bomb to end the war in the 11 year stalemate. Especially since it was Einstein who...
Comrade, it would have been so much worse with out the leadership of Lenin. He only attacked bourgeois intellectuals, not revolutionary comrades and proletarian scientists. His programmes for the revolutionary sciences attached many bright idealists from around the world, like Nikola Tesla the...