The map is amazing and the notes even more so - thanks again!
My only correction, aside from those discussed below, is that both Gobir and Dahomey are numbered 11 for Africa. Maybe the boojum could give back number 49 for one of them? BTW, the Gobir city-states are now British protectorates; their formal name is the Gobir Agency, although no one outside Whitehall uses it.
EDIT: Also, Formosa should be Japanese.
You know, I'd never heard of Chan Santa Cruz until now - I had a vague impression that the Caste War ended in 1849-50, and didn't realize that the Maya hung on in a few areas until the end of the century. Thanks for the history lesson, and for helping to fill in another part of the world!
Anyway, if Wikipedia is anything to go by (and if it isn't, please tell me), the Maya had unofficial British backing until 1893, at which time they lost that support because they executed British citizens. That would seem fairly easy to butterfly, and in TTL, Britain was... otherwise occupied by 1893. On the other hand, the conflict between the Mayans and the Yucatecan creoles, which was the context in which the massacre occurred, would still be there and could lead to Mexican intervention on one side or the other.
I'll flip a coin and say that as of 1898, Chan Santa Cruz is still there, that it's legally Mexican but de facto independent, and that the Mexican government doesn't care enough to force the issue right now, especially since TTL Britain still has an unofficial treaty with the Maya. However, both the Mexicans and the British are trying to broker an end to the Maya-creole conflict, which will likely see both being brought more firmly into the Mexican orbit (albeit still autonomous).
Pretty much. The British picked it up because (a) the highlands are suitable for cash crop agriculture; and (b) it was a step along the planned Zanzibar-to-Cape Town railroad (which is still being built, BTW; Britain secured an easement across Portuguese territory in exchange for giving up its claims).
You're correct about the Baltic ports; however, Japan did get Kamchatka (it took the port of Petropavlovsk during the war and was able to keep it). I'm pretty sure I mentioned that in connection with the peace conference.
South Australia and Fiji are both states, although Fiji has parallel governments for the indigenous Fijians and the whites (as it did for quite a while in OTL).
This is correct.
Correct about Georgia/Armenia, Bhutan and Nepal. Laos became independent because, although Siam switched in time from a French client state to a British one, it didn't earn any favors in Britain's eyes, and the British wanted a buffer between Indochina on the one hand and Siam and China on the other. Siam still has a claim, though.
Also, you're right on both counts about the Ionian Islands and Grão Pará, although I think the latter's status is reflected on the map.
It was annexed to Prussia as a sop to the remnant Prussian nationalists - it has the status of a Prussian province, or maybe two of them.
It's a looser federation than OTL, largely at the insistence of the New Zealanders. The states control citizenship and immigration (meaning that the Maori are citizens while Aborigines, for the most part, aren't) and also have police power. NZ and Fiji can run their internal affairs more or less their own way. There is an American-style senate/house of states which is more powerful than OTL's Australian senate - essentially coequal to the House of Commons (as the House of Representatives is called in TTL).
Melbourne is the capital, and Canberra will not be built.
Thanks, I was hoping you'd comment on the Spanish situation.
Was this power still used in the 19th century, or had it fallen into disuse? If the latter, then it might not be illegal for the government to appoint bishops, but it would certainly be a breach of custom and might be politically explosive. Still, as long as it was never formally abolished, I expect that the Spanish crown is getting increasingly blunt with the Pope - "appoint better bishops or we'll start doing it ourselves."
Yes, there's nothing worse for the development of political Catholicism than having the boss right there and willing to meddle. There are major conflicts now between the Catholic right and center-left, and the Pope is putting a heavy thumb on the scale in favor of the former, which means that the Catholic liberals in Spain often have to buck their local church institutions. Of course, the Pope's presence also gives the Catholic right less freedom of action, because they can't take positions vis-a-vis the monarchy or party politics that are different from his.
The republicans are getting emboldened by this situation, and are demanding that the government take steps to rein in the church. They're taking on an increasingly anti-clerical and socialist/anarchist cast. And in Barcelona, the right-wing Legion veterans, the anarchists (a few of whom are ex-Legionnaires themselves) and the Catalan nationalists are in a three-cornered brawl, with the bourgeois parties trying to contain it all.
My only correction, aside from those discussed below, is that both Gobir and Dahomey are numbered 11 for Africa. Maybe the boojum could give back number 49 for one of them? BTW, the Gobir city-states are now British protectorates; their formal name is the Gobir Agency, although no one outside Whitehall uses it.
EDIT: Also, Formosa should be Japanese.
Actually looking at that map I have one question, what is the situation of the Mayan in ITTL? This seems like the perfect timeline for screwy weird counries like the Tran Santa Cruz Republic to prosper.
You know, I'd never heard of Chan Santa Cruz until now - I had a vague impression that the Caste War ended in 1849-50, and didn't realize that the Maya hung on in a few areas until the end of the century. Thanks for the history lesson, and for helping to fill in another part of the world!
Anyway, if Wikipedia is anything to go by (and if it isn't, please tell me), the Maya had unofficial British backing until 1893, at which time they lost that support because they executed British citizens. That would seem fairly easy to butterfly, and in TTL, Britain was... otherwise occupied by 1893. On the other hand, the conflict between the Mayans and the Yucatecan creoles, which was the context in which the massacre occurred, would still be there and could lead to Mexican intervention on one side or the other.
I'll flip a coin and say that as of 1898, Chan Santa Cruz is still there, that it's legally Mexican but de facto independent, and that the Mexican government doesn't care enough to force the issue right now, especially since TTL Britain still has an unofficial treaty with the Maya. However, both the Mexicans and the British are trying to broker an end to the Maya-creole conflict, which will likely see both being brought more firmly into the Mexican orbit (albeit still autonomous).
I can't remember how Britain got control of Nyasaland ITTL. Was it the work of David Livingstone and suchlike?
Pretty much. The British picked it up because (a) the highlands are suitable for cash crop agriculture; and (b) it was a step along the planned Zanzibar-to-Cape Town railroad (which is still being built, BTW; Britain secured an easement across Portuguese territory in exchange for giving up its claims).
I don't recall Japan being given Kamchatka, nor Lithuania and Latvia being made independent - the peace conference post explicitly stated Baltic ports being allowed into the Zollverein(sic), Hansa-style.
You're correct about the Baltic ports; however, Japan did get Kamchatka (it took the port of Petropavlovsk during the war and was able to keep it). I'm pretty sure I mentioned that in connection with the peace conference.
Why is South Australia being given the UCS Australian Territory colour? And shouldn't Fiji be in this colour as well? Actually, given that it's more of a loose-confederation thing, wouldn't just having it being outlined with the Australia colour be better?
South Australia and Fiji are both states, although Fiji has parallel governments for the indigenous Fijians and the whites (as it did for quite a while in OTL).
Actually, I'm not too sure of the internal borders given for Germany. Johnathan did say (or imply, anyway) that, although Hanover was seperate, Prussia still annexed Hesse-Kassel and Nassau in whatever passed for the Seven-Weeks' War*.
This is correct.
Shouldn't Georgia and Armenia be given colours to indicate Ottoman influence? And why is Laos seperate , wasn't it returned to Siam during the Washington Conference? And Bhutan should be given the British Protectorate colour, not Nepal, as the latter was never really under de jure British domination (though that could be different ITTL).
Correct about Georgia/Armenia, Bhutan and Nepal. Laos became independent because, although Siam switched in time from a French client state to a British one, it didn't earn any favors in Britain's eyes, and the British wanted a buffer between Indochina on the one hand and Siam and China on the other. Siam still has a claim, though.
Also, you're right on both counts about the Ionian Islands and Grão Pará, although I think the latter's status is reflected on the map.
Actually, what status does the Sudetenland(sic) even have in Germany, anyway?
It was annexed to Prussia as a sop to the remnant Prussian nationalists - it has the status of a Prussian province, or maybe two of them.
Question to Jonathon now - what sort of political structure does Australiasia have? Is it essentially the same as OTL Australia except with a few new states? Where would the capital be?
It's a looser federation than OTL, largely at the insistence of the New Zealanders. The states control citizenship and immigration (meaning that the Maori are citizens while Aborigines, for the most part, aren't) and also have police power. NZ and Fiji can run their internal affairs more or less their own way. There is an American-style senate/house of states which is more powerful than OTL's Australian senate - essentially coequal to the House of Commons (as the House of Representatives is called in TTL).
Melbourne is the capital, and Canberra will not be built.
Actually, the kings of Spain has had since the late 1400s, early 1500s the faculty to advice the Pope on whom to appoint as bishops for the Spanish bishoprics, which if the monarchs used in a more liberal manner, could mean they could appoint the bishops themselves regardless of the Pope's own beliefs.
Thanks, I was hoping you'd comment on the Spanish situation.
Was this power still used in the 19th century, or had it fallen into disuse? If the latter, then it might not be illegal for the government to appoint bishops, but it would certainly be a breach of custom and might be politically explosive. Still, as long as it was never formally abolished, I expect that the Spanish crown is getting increasingly blunt with the Pope - "appoint better bishops or we'll start doing it ourselves."
Of course such a reactionary Pope will be a tremendous problem for the development of the political Catholicism based on OTL's Rerum Novarum of the likes of Eduardo Dato and will only make the opponents of the monarchy, which would support the Church financially (even with a more liberal, 1869 style constitution) bolder and particularly the republicans. I suppose Barcelona's constant (pre-)revolutionary situation (depending on the day and the mood of employers and employees) will only worsen.
Yes, there's nothing worse for the development of political Catholicism than having the boss right there and willing to meddle. There are major conflicts now between the Catholic right and center-left, and the Pope is putting a heavy thumb on the scale in favor of the former, which means that the Catholic liberals in Spain often have to buck their local church institutions. Of course, the Pope's presence also gives the Catholic right less freedom of action, because they can't take positions vis-a-vis the monarchy or party politics that are different from his.
The republicans are getting emboldened by this situation, and are demanding that the government take steps to rein in the church. They're taking on an increasingly anti-clerical and socialist/anarchist cast. And in Barcelona, the right-wing Legion veterans, the anarchists (a few of whom are ex-Legionnaires themselves) and the Catalan nationalists are in a three-cornered brawl, with the bourgeois parties trying to contain it all.
Last edited: