Orville_third
Banned
The main reason such civilian targets were used was for blackmail. The same thing happened in WWII.
I can understand the Soviet Union suffering such losses, or even Canada or Germany maybe, but this isn't doable for the U.S.
The main reason such civilian targets were used was for blackmail. The same thing happened in WWII.
I am sorry but my point was that this would have been doable for the Soviet Union in 1983. I don't think they would have, even in an all-out nuclear conflict. But, they might have and it was certainly an option for their nuclear forces as they existed at that time. In fact if your point is that you can imagine that the Soviet Union could receive such an attack but for the US it was unlikely because of the US's greater counterforce capacity, wouldn't the sensible policy for the Soviet Union be launch such a target aimed at most US settlements if it thought all out nuclear war was inevitable?
Well, there were some small towns that did have some pretty important targets, you are correct on that. But still, there were probably at least a few thousand towns out there in the U.S. alones with a population of 20,000+ in their general vicinity.....and let's not forget the U.K., Germany, China, France, Italy, Holland, etc., and there were probably a few dozen other countries the USSR would've wanted outta the way{e.g. Indonesia, Malaysia, Iran, Turkey, etc.}.............so thankfully, even in a full out conflict, they would have fallen short had they decided to go that route...............
I'd agree with atomicpenguin. During the CW both sides were led by sane(ish) leaders who knew the consequences and effects of nuclear war.
Today we face enemies who don't care that they might die, in fact some of them relish it. If they got hold of a WMD they'd use it.
British, American, Soviet/Russian, French and Chinese nuclear weapons have never scared me because I know they'll almost certainly never be used. OTOH Iranian, North Korean, Indian and Pakistani nukes do because I think they might be.
But the nukes under the control of the sane(ish) leaders of the Cold War could have caused damage orders of magnitude larger than that caused Iranian or North Korean nukes. People feel better accepting a low probability, high impact risk, just human nature I guess.
I'd agree with atomicpenguin. During the CW both sides were led by sane(ish) leaders who knew the consequences and effects of nuclear war.
Today we face enemies who don't care that they might die, in fact some of them relish it. If they got hold of a WMD they'd use it.
British, American, Soviet/Russian, French and Chinese nuclear weapons have never scared me because I know they'll almost certainly never be used. OTOH Iranian, North Korean, Indian and Pakistani nukes do because I think they might be.
Do you think that the "sane(ish)" nations might consider (now, not in the CW) using their nukes in a situation where one of the others uses theirs (Say, N.Korea nuking Seoul for the sake of this)?
I think what generally reassures me is that I'm pretty sure that the nuclear powers I mentioned would not use their weapons unless they had been attacked with some, or many WMD. I'm not so confident about Iran, or N. Korea not using them in a first strike. I do really worry that if either of them ever gets a viable nuclear capability (the jury is still out on North Korea) then it would be like giving a box of matches and a can of petrol to a pyromaniac.
If you click on the map pin marking ground zero a legend will appear.Hi Macragge1
Now it might just be because I have become adicted to this time line, but I was wondering if you have a rough idea of when we can expect an update on the TL? Im curious to see how you will develope the prospero sortie.
Can anyone help me on this, I was using the Carloslabs predictor to try and figure out my chances, Ive worked out I would be pretty safe provsio that all the weapons hit there targets bang on (ironic i must be the only person in the UK to actually want the intended targets to get hit ) I was wondering though does anyone know what the range circles denote, as am struggling to find a legend on the carlos labs site to explain the various levels , for either the fallout, blast or thermal effects?
Im probably being dumb but if anyone can point me in the right direction on this I would be obliged
Cheers
Hi Macragge1
Now it might just be because I have become adicted to this time line, but I was wondering if you have a rough idea of when we can expect an update on the TL? Im curious to see how you will develope the prospero sortie.
Can anyone help me on this, I was using the Carloslabs predictor to try and figure out my chances, Ive worked out I would be pretty safe provsio that all the weapons hit there targets bang on (ironic i must be the only person in the UK to actually want the intended targets to get hit ) I was wondering though does anyone know what the range circles denote, as am struggling to find a legend on the carlos labs site to explain the various levels , for either the fallout, blast or thermal effects?
Im probably being dumb but if anyone can point me in the right direction on this I would be obliged
Cheers
Gonna get a Prospero done at the weekend; just fine tuning it at the moment