A Better Rifle at Halloween

A night patrol
27th September 1914, near Sottegem.

Lieutenant Angus Ross, D Coy, the Queens Own Cameron Highlanders was leading the patrol, it consisted of him corporal and 11 other ranks. They were all men from the area around Portree on Skye and several of them were known to have taken a deer or two. The men had seen hard fighting in the past weeks as they defeated the First Army and their morale was excellent, they had met the enemy in the field and defeated him. Casualties had been light for the battalion and reinforcements were due soon. The patrol was being sent forward to scout the German front line, the men were lightly equipped with only their rifles and battle order webbing belts. The officer and the corporal had carefully checked over each man’s kit to ensure that nothing work clink or clank or otherwise make any noises that might alert a German Sentry to their activity.

The men had moved forward soundlessly from the British front line, they were careful to move slowly and avoided bunching up. The Lieutenant led the section with the private from the Braes whilst the corporal in the rear. Every man had blacked his face with cork to try and further reduce the risk of being spotted, the moon was waxing gibbous with scattered clouds, sufficient light for careful movement to be possible. Lt Ross was leading his men slowly along a drainage ditch, the ditch was just a few feet lower than the surrounding crop land and provided good cover for the section. Their advance was slow and steady, with the men signalling by means of hand gestures, frequent halts were taken to listen and look for any movement that might indicate German Troops doing the same thing. The plan for the patrol was to advance until the German front line was detected, once it had been identified it was to be observed to determine how strongly it was held. If it looked to only be weakly held or any positions looked to be unsupported an attempt was to be made to gather additional intelligence by capturing prisoners.

The drain was beginning to disappear, they paused and an order to spread out into a shallow chevron was given, with each man to advance carefully forward. They continued to advance in this manner for a further 200 yards before another broader drainage ditch blocked their path. Thus far they had travelled some 600 yards without any sign of German positions, ahead there was a small copse, with a large brick building behind it. Lt Ross paused the section and summoned the corporal forward, he agreed with the Lt that if their were Germans in the vicinity the building was likely to be occupied. They sent the poacher and his cousin forward now to scout the copse, the remained of the section slithered forward and using the drain for concealment prepared to provide covering fire should the two privates get into trouble.

The rest of the section watched their assigned sectors, there was little or no noise nothing to indicate the presence of the foe. The two privates, men from Upper Ollach whose fathers had taught them the patience of their ancestors, oozed forward, their movements gradual and patient, experienced night stalkers this would be the first time they had hunted men in the dark. That said they had both excelled in the carnage of the early fighting, shooting steadily with an unhurried accuracy. The two privates disappeared into the copse, after a few tense minutes the clicking call of the capercaillie could be heard. The rest of the section then moved forward into the trees.

The big building was now clearly visible, a single German sentry was standing outside, he looked listless and bored. The section again spread out using the edge of the trees as cover, watching to see if any other sentries or patrols were evident. After another long tense wait the Lt again sent out the poacher, this time with another man from the section, unlike the Braes men he was from Trotternish but had moved to Portree, he was a butcher by trade and a popular local shinty player.

The butcher lived up to his name, he crept up behind the sentry, reaching forward he clamped his left hand onto the man’s jaw yanking it down and back. Before he could shout a warning the butchers right arm slipped round his body sliding his sword bayonet expertly between the 8th and 9th ribs the 17” blade splitting the liver in two, cutting the aorta and the vena cava, before continuing to slice upwards to pierce the diaphragm and a lung. Giving the bayonet a savage twist, he pulled the bayonet out releasing a gush of blood and the hot stink of iron.

The section again advanced, splitting into two parties they moved to into position so that they could assault the front and rear of the building simultaneously. The Lt lead the assault, with his FHSLR at the shoulder with bayonet fixed he moved into the building, immediately by the entrance there was a small room. In it was a pair of German soldiers, the rifle roared twice, neither man had a chance to get up from their chairs before they were shot. Meanwhile the rest of the party continued to move into the house firing as they went, the rapid fire of the FHSLR proving its worth, the bolt action rifles of the German Troops unable to match the rapid fire of the British rifles. After what seemed like hours but was only minutes the cry of Kameraden and nicht schieszen came from a small group of soldiers pinned down in a bedroom being used as a barracks.

“Hands up” was the order given and the four surviving Germans came out with their hands high, the building was quickly searched for any documents, the highlanders dressed their own wounds, one man had been grazed by a bullet and was bleeding badly enough to warrant a shell dressing. The remainder of the section had suffered nothing worse than cuts and bruises, as well as the four prisoners a German Junior officer had been wounded and was being guarded by two men near the entrance, he was whimpering in pain and unable to walk and so the four prisoners were instructed to load him onto a stretcher. The intelligence haul valuable, a map showing the German frontline positions and the units holding them was taken and would be sent back to battalion headquarters as soon as possible. Looking at the map Lt Ross was surprised to note that the next position was several hundred yards away the front line being more a series of strong points rather than a continuous line.

The patrol returned back to the battalions lines, again the call of the capercaillie was used as a signal, but this time instead of being recognised, it was met with a rifle fire as a sentry panicked. The rest of his section then began to blaze away wildly before the sergeant restored order with shouts and blows. The Sergeant called the password “Port Righ” and the now wounded Lt Ross replied “Raasay”, the section was then able to cross back over the front line. As well as the wounds suffered by Lt Ross which would result in his hospitalisation for several weeks, two men from the section and one prisoner were dead. The map was sent backwards to be scrutinised by the Brigade Commander before making its way up to Third Army Headquarters, it along with the results of other patrols would be evaluated before the next move was planned.
 
...the rapid fire of the FHSLR proving its worth...
Glad to see the rifle making an appearance.
As well as the wounds suffered by Lt Ross which would result in his hospitalisation for several weeks, two men from the section and one prisoner were dead.
F-----ing "friendly fire". They complete the entire mission with one serious casualty, and then lose almost a quarter of the unit because of some clumsy fools. One hopes the commander of that unit gets a stripe torn off for inadequate training of his men.
 
Glad to see the rifle making an appearance.

F-----ing "friendly fire". They complete the entire mission with one serious casualty, and then lose almost a quarter of the unit because of some clumsy fools. One hopes the commander of that unit gets a stripe torn off for inadequate training of his men.
I was trying to make it a bit more realistic, my understanding is that coming back to friendly lines was nearly as nerve wracking as being out in no mans land.
 
I was trying to make it a bit more realistic, my understanding is that coming back to friendly lines was nearly as nerve wracking as being out in no mans land.
You really succeeded in adding that realism. It is suprisingly hard to recognize your own troops from the enemy. There is a reason why ukrainian soldiers use large amounts of easily visible bright tape. Most of the time it is more important to recognize friendly troops than to use effective camouflage
 
King Albert plans
28th September 1914, Antwerp.

King Albert was back in Antwerp, he had spent the morning at the railway station watching as wounded men were arriving in a steady stream from the front. They would be sent on by ambulance to the city’s hospitals. Albert had spent the last week in the field with his army, despite the casualties experienced, the men’s morale was excellent. The war had been brutal for the Belgian army, first had come the bloody slogging siege of Liege with its endless bloodletting. Then following its fall, they had watched as the German forces pushed further and further south and west in a seemingly relentless tide, but with equal suddenness they had stalled and then the British and French had counter attacked. Their own attack had been advancing steadily for most of the past week, there had been no lightning thrusts simply a steady advance. The Belgian army now controlled the area from Kappelle-op-den-Bos through Zemst to Kortenbourg, they had finally forced the Germans out of Louvain (Luevan) the day before but much of the city was flattened in the fighting with many casualties amongst the civilian population. The front line then ran back north towards Heist-op-den-Berg before re-joining the fortifications at Fort van Lier.

Some 100,000 Belgian troops from the field army had taken part in the attack, casualties had been heavy, but all the divisions remained capable of conducting further offensive action.

With the capture of Louvain there were several courses of action open to the King Albert as commander of the Belgian Army. The first was to hold Louvain and attack west towards Brussels aiming to liberate the city, this coupled with a British attack from the west of the city would likely result in its liberation but would also result in significant damage to the city and high civilian casualties. The second option was to advance directly south from Louvain towards Namur. A successful attack in this direction would isolate the Brussels Garrison and cut the railway lines still supplying the forces to the west of the thrust. It could well result in the capture of large numbers of German troops replicating the victory against the First Army. If the Germans chose to retreat in this scenario, Brussels would be liberated without suffering the damage that an assault on the city would entail. The third option was to hold Louvain and then attack east towards Hasselt, this attack would have the initial advantage of not facing heavy German resistance, as this area was only lightly garrisoned and mainly by older reservists of the landwehr. If the attack succeeded it would provide an excellent springing of point for the liberation of Liege, with the possibility of placing an even larger portion of the German army at risk of envelopment.

King Albert would spend the rest of the day in consultations with the military representatives of France and Britain whilst he planned for the next series of attacks. He was expecting another visit from Winston Churchill as well, likely he would demand another tour of the frontline. King Albert was very fond of the British Politician but his frenetic pace in person and constant blizzard of telegrams when absent was hard to keep up with. King Albert spoke to the British Envoy, requesting details of the promised additional support. Apparently some 40 British naval guns on improvised carriages were to be shipped over to Belgium within the week, he would use men from some of the fortresses to crew them. He also pressed for more aerial reconnaissance, his own aviation section was worn out from near continuous operations and he was almost entirely reliant of French and British support in that area. Once he had some more intelligence on the Boche and had consulted with his allies, he would issue his orders.
 
Glad to see the rifle making an appearance.

F-----ing "friendly fire". They complete the entire mission with one serious casualty, and then lose almost a quarter of the unit because of some clumsy fools. One hopes the commander of that unit gets a stripe torn off for inadequate training of his men.
Happened with nauseating frequency

I once saw a lecture years back were it was claimed that in some campaigns up to 70% of casualties were friendly fire either from trigger happy sentries or artillery fire dropped on friendly's etc

And its still an issue to this day
 
Happened with nauseating frequency

I once saw a lecture years back were it was claimed that in some campaigns up to 70% of casualties were friendly fire either from trigger happy sentries or artillery fire dropped on friendly's etc
Yabbut TBF if the opponents are ineffectual, that could be 70% of a very small number. There's also the situation where you call fire on your own position because you're being overrun.

But in this case, friendly fire caused 3/4 of casualties, and the casualty rate is substantial (over 30%).
 
Happened with nauseating frequency

I once saw a lecture years back were it was claimed that in some campaigns up to 70% of casualties were friendly fire either from trigger happy sentries or artillery fire dropped on friendly's etc

And its still an issue to this day
I was just rereading "Steel and Tartan" which is a history of the 4th Cameron Highlanders their first casualty was a soldier killed by another during a fight when he fell on a bayonet during a fight. I don't know what happened to Fraser in the long term, he was given 15 months with hard labour for manslaughter, so I guess he was called up after that.
 
In pursuit
29th September 1914, Cook Islands

Vice Admiral Yamaya Tanin was watching the coaling gangs labour to bring the last of fuel aboard, he had pushed his ships hard from Ocean Island when he heard of the attack on Papeete. He had originally planned on sailing there directly but reports received by radio indicated the coal stocks had been burnt, that had necessitated his stop here in Rarotonga. The island had provided not only coal but also bunker oil to top up his fuel tanks and enable him to continue his pursuit of the German East Asian Squadron.

His Signals officer had received several more messages from both British and Japanese shipping in the area, thus far there was no indication that the Germans had doubled back towards the North Pacific or the Philippines, their course appeared to be towards Cape Horn and on into the Atlantic.

Tanin’s squadron was nearly ready to resume the chase, as well as fuel they had taken on additional food stocks including many tropical fruits, yams, fish and pork that would reduce the monotony of the normal rations in the Imperial Japanese Navy.

Coal would be the greatest challenge for both his squadron and that of the Germans, if the East Asia Squadron was attempting to return to Germany it would have to round the Horn and to do that it would need coal. It could coal on the Chilean mainland but that information would enable the Royal Navy to track them with ease. The Eastern Pacific was sparsely supplied with islands, few would have the thousands of tonnes of coal needed by a squadron of warships but Easter Island would have coal in sufficient quantity for von Spee’s squadron.

Vice Admiral Tanin made the decision he would push on to Easter Island, his own squadron had the range to make it with coal to spare if he kept his speed to 12 knots. He wrote a dispatch to Navy Headquarters in Tokyo and his signals officer ciphered it before dispatching it to the telegraph station. He sent a shorter dispatch to the Royal Navy Admiral commanding the China Station, Vice Admiral Sir Martyn Jerram summarising his actions. He was sure that Jerram a thoroughgoing professional would use the information he had provided to its best possible outcome.
 
Last edited:
Cowardice
30th September 1914,

The General Court Martial was arrayed before the prisoners, both men had been arrested for cowardice, members of the 1st (City of London) Battalion, London Regiment (Royal Fusiliers) they had fled the line during the Battle of Ath, ten days previously.

They were being charged under the Army Act, specifically Section 4 item 7 “Misbehaves or induces others to misbehave before the enemy in such manner as to show cowardice, shall on conviction by court-martial be liable to suffer death, or such less punishment as in this Act mentioned.”

Acting under the orders of General Smith Dorrien the court had been assembled to rapidly conduct the Court Martial under the provisions in the Army Act for Field General Courts Martial, the president of court was a Brigader General attached to the Army Staff, the other members included an artillery colonel and 3 majors drawn from the other battalions of the brigade.

Evidence of the soldiers cowardice had been presented by the mens section commander, platoon sergeant and the military police corporal who had arrested them. The platoon commander, who in civilian life was a junior barrister, had acted as prisoners’ friend to both men. He had been admonished several times by the courts president for attempting to badger the witnesses and bring in in admissible evidence. The trial took most of a day, with the president of the court adjourning the trial to consider the verdict.

The two prisoners stood as the five members of the court filed back in, they had been adjourned for a mere 15 minutes. The president of the court ordered the two ashen faced privates to stand up, “you have been tried under the Army Act for cowardice, you have been convicted by a General Court Martial appointed by the General Officer Commanding the British Expeditionary force, Field Marshal Smith-Dorrien. In accordance with the Army Act the Penalty for Cowardice before the enemy is Death. As there is no compelling reason to reduce your penalty and for the good of the discipline of the whole army you are to be shot 5 days hence. Provost sergeant take these men away.”
 
Ah, there were very good reasons why the death penalty was never applied to AIF members - it was simply not allowed in the Australian Military Law Manual after the sorry episode of Harry "Breaker" Morant in South Africa during the Second Boer War in 1901 when Australians were tried under the British Military Law Manual and sentenced to death. Australia decided this wasn't on and instituted it's own Military Law Manual. Made it harder for the British to discipline the "unruly mob" from downunder but it made Monash's rule dear to their hearts...
 
Ah, there were very good reasons why the death penalty was never applied to AIF members - it was simply not allowed in the Australian Military Law Manual after the sorry episode of Harry "Breaker" Morant in South Africa during the Second Boer War in 1901 when Australians were tried under the British Military Law Manual and sentenced to death.
Morant was guilty as hell and the sentence was justified by the laws in every country at the time even if the verdict may or may not have been decided before court martial.
 
Ah, there were very good reasons why the death penalty was never applied to AIF members - it was simply not allowed in the Australian Military Law Manual after the sorry episode of Harry "Breaker" Morant in South Africa during the Second Boer War in 1901 when Australians were tried under the British Military Law Manual and sentenced to death. Australia decided this wasn't on and instituted it's own Military Law Manual. Made it harder for the British to discipline the "unruly mob" from downunder but it made Monash's rule dear to their hearts...
I hold the view that the Australian armies ill discipline in the First World War should have been reduced if the death penalty had been applied.
from the 1903 act
According to Section 98 of the Commonwealth Defence Act 1903, no member of the Defence Force shall be sentenced to death by any court martial except for four offences:

  • mutiny
  • desertion to the enemy
  • traitorously delivering up to the enemy any garrison, fortress, post, guard, or ship, vessel, or boat, or aircraft
  • traitorous correspondence with the enemy

  • the death penalty had to be confirmed by the governor general and due ro the conscription debate it never happened.
 
Morant was guilty as hell and the sentence was justified by the laws in every country at the time even if the verdict may or may not have been decided before court martial.
I am not disputing his guilt. I am merely pointing out the how and the why we ended up with a separate Military Law Manual. As has been pointed out there was a death penalty, however it could not be applied without the Corps and the Army commander giving his OK before supmitting it to the GG for approval. As Monash was both the Corps and the Army commander, his approval was not a foregone conclusion. Just as well as good from my viewpoint. As an ex-soldier I am well aware of the conditions which they experienced on the Western Front. I am not sure I could have withstood it.
 
Last edited:
the death penalty had to be confirmed by the governor general and due ro the conscription debate it never happened.
It had to be first confirmed by the Corps and the Army commander. Sir John Monash was both, at the same time and did not give his OK to the use of the death penalty.
 
It had to be first confirmed by the Corps and the Army commander. Sir John Monash was both, at the same time and did not give his OK to the use of the death penalty.
I found this site on the Australian approach to the death penalty. http://www.diggerhistory.info/pages-discipline/details.htm
It paints a more nuanced picture I would say, Monash was not entirely anti death penalty. I am away from any of my books so I can’t refer to his biographies.
 
I am not disputing his guilt. I am merely pointing out the how and the why we ended up with a separate Military Law Manual. As has been pointed out there was a death penalty, however it could not be applied without the Corps and the Army commander giving his OK before supmitting it to the GG for approval. As Monash was both the Corps and the Army commander, his approval was not a foregone conclusion. Just as well as good from my viewpoint. As an ex-soldier I am well aware of the conditions which they experienced on the Western Front. I am not sure I could have withstood it.
Totally agree with this. Morant was a war criminal. I am also Australian military, albeit in a much lower role than vetinari, in almost 40 years of service, I only ever met one person who thought Morant was anything but that. The most positive position to him I have heard was " Right verdict, wrong reason". That said, like vetinari, I am not sure I could have withstood the Western Front.
 
I am not disputing his guilt. I am merely pointing out the how and the why we ended up with a separate Military Law Manual. As has been pointed out there was a death penalty, however it could not be applied without the Corps and the Army commander giving his OK before supmitting it to the GG for approval. As Monash was both the Corps and the Army commander, his approval was not a foregone conclusion. Just as well as good from my viewpoint. As an ex-soldier I am well aware of the conditions which they experienced on the Western Front. I am not sure I could have withstood it.
Sorry I just get fed up of this murderer being held up as some sort of martyr.
 
Top