“It takes three years to build a ship; it takes three centuries to build a tradition.” Admiral Cunningham.
Also, while I knew that the Japanese had not really gotten all their wishes fulfilled, I never really put it all together with other things that happened in this time frame. Can anyone else give some input on what any of the three main navies were thinking, of their relations with each other?
In addition to the above, we should also think about an inter-axis military and industrial cooperation setup during this time frame, so that we can have some ideas of what the future threadmarks unlock.
I'll put that on my list of things to do. I remember reading that the Japanese thought highly of the Germans for their conduct of the land defense at Tsingtao, so I don't think that it is impossible for the Germans and Japanese to work together.there is a good book Reluctant Allies dealing with the relative lack of cooperation between Germany-Japan, for the 1920's it seems the only possible cooperation would be between Italy and Japan?
Perhaps, but the Germans have a known capacity to build a Navy, have fought the UK/RN in the recent past, and might just be worth the effort of 'helping' to once again become a threat/distraction for the British/RN, as some point in the future. What ways could the Japanese help out the Italians? Germany is going to be desperate for the things the Japanese can off them, because of the ToV restrictions, which Italy isn't suffering under, so I doubt that the Italians will be so interested in investing in infrastructure in Japan, when they could just build their own in their own country. Could the Japanese secure Italian cooperation by opening up a naval gun production line in Italy, perhaps as a joint venture? The IJN already has 16" guns in service in 1923, so some limited gun building facilities built in Italy can function to get the Italians bigger guns, earlier.(Germany was a pariah state during the period, with almost no navy, whereas Italy was firmly anti-Communist and at least a putative member of the Stresa Front, a more appealing partner for Japan?)
You get a carrier sinking along with the battleships.I'm not sure the resources tied up had much benefit for the Germans. I mean, it's nice that the Bismarck and Tirpitz tied up a few battleships and a carrier in Scapa Flow, but they were of little use against Germany anyway. So it didn't help the German wareffort a lot. It mostly helped Japan*, and maybe Italy. But the med was mostly a distraction for Germany anyway.
Although the battleships got a fair bit of attention of the RAF, so that was a benefit.
* PoW and Repulse sailing with a carrier might have made a big difference, i.e. no ships sunk and loads of G3Ms/G4Ms shot down.
Not necessarily, the attacking planes were very flammable and unescorted.You get a carrier sinking along with the battleships.
The Bf-109 is extremely limited as a carrier fighter (even more than the Spitfire) and the RN is likely to attack at night if there's a German carrier present. With no command experience of operating carriers and a fighter that did its best to kill a lot of pilots on dry land where the runway generally doesn't move by tens of feet in three dimensions, I wouldn't put money on the Germans killing many RN aircraft even if they are unescorted.Not necessarily, the attacking planes were very flammable and unescorted.
Me neither.The Bf-109 is extremely limited as a carrier fighter (even more than the Spitfire) and the RN is likely to attack at night if there's a German carrier present. With no command experience of operating carriers and a fighter that did its best to kill a lot of pilots on dry land where the runway generally doesn't move by tens of feet in three dimensions, I wouldn't put money on the Germans killing many RN aircraft even if they are unescorted.
Guys, can we follow the rules and keep the discussion focused, right now, on the 1923 - 1926 time period? I'm attempting to make the thread easily followable by using the threadmark feature to guide the discussion along the path, because we are attempting to achieve a thread where we end up with optimized navies for all three axis nations, right?The Bf-109 is extremely limited as a carrier fighter (even more than the Spitfire) and the RN is likely to attack at night if there's a German carrier present. With no command experience of operating carriers and a fighter that did its best to kill a lot of pilots on dry land where the runway generally doesn't move by tens of feet in three dimensions, I wouldn't put money on the Germans killing many RN aircraft even if they are unescorted.
Near as I can tell Indomitable had an air group in April 1942 with.Not necessarily, the attacking planes were very flammable and unescorted.