But then - why marry Anne to Richard instead of Edward of Middleham?Why not? Richard has the bloodline, the anti-French connections, he's proven to be fertile and he's a seasoned warrior. Anne could do a lot worse.
But then - why marry Anne to Richard instead of Edward of Middleham?Why not? Richard has the bloodline, the anti-French connections, he's proven to be fertile and he's a seasoned warrior. Anne could do a lot worse.
If the POD is in 1481 then Mary of Burgundy’s accident is likely to NOT happen meaning who she will be still alive and married to Maximilian, while Elizabeth will marry Charles VIII in 1484 as planned. Anne of Brittany will marry either Edward V or Richard of York meaning his brother NOT his uncle. No way who both of them will be married elsewhereour POD is 1481, so she's alive as well for now at least assuming we're talking about Mary of York at least
IIRC Edwards was said to be a sickly child so I think Francis II would take no chance and choose a healthy husband for Anne.But then - why marry Anne to Richard instead of Edward of Middleham?
True enough, I suppose Richard with Brittany would be less paranoid tooIIRC Edwards was said to be a sickly child so I think Francis II would take no chance and choose a healthy husband for Anne.
I agree but it is still kinda neat for a Richard of Gloucester and Anne of Brittany match. Edward V could marry a Spanish infanta and Richard of York might he marry Margaret of Clarence to get the Neville lands?If the POD is in 1481 then Mary of Burgundy’s accident is likely to NOT happen meaning who she will be still alive and married to Maximilian, while Elizabeth will marry Charles VIII in 1484 as planned. Anne of Brittany will marry either Edward V or Richard of York meaning his brother NOT his uncle. No way who both of them will be married elsewhere
Seconded on the Anthony Woodville/Richard Grey being prominent courtiers. Hastings and Dorset will also stick around, and their sons might well end up taking their places as they grow.Before we get to Wolsey, More and Cromwell, there's Henry VII's men of Dudley, Morton etc. Morton was already in place under Edward IV (albeit not a cardinal or even massively important).
But Antony Wydeville and Richard Grey will definitely have places in the new government. As will Hastings (a diehard Edwardian who also hated Dorset AIUI).
From an old discussion:
https://www.alternatehistory.com/fo...york-court-and-the-tudor-court-of-otl.416225/
@isabella had the title of Viscount Mohun dusted off for the Stanleys. They also have Baron Strange going for them. Not as "grand" as earl but its better than nothingSeconded on the Anthony Woodville/Richard Grey being prominent courtiers. Hastings and Dorset will also stick around, and their sons might well end up taking their places as they grow.
Also, if Richard doesn't usurp his nephew, then that also takes out the 1483 rebellion, which means Buckingham keeps his head for a while longer, if not forever (the Staffords are going to do something stupid at some point...) and an awful lot of the Edwardian Yorkist gentry will also stay in place at Court. Lovell, Catesby and Ratcliffe, on the other hand, won't rise nearly so high, if their liege lord is never King.
And if Edward IV survives another couple of years, then Tudor might well be extradited to England and regain his lands as Earl of Richmond (Margaret Beaufort had managed to strike terms with Edward IV before his death, AIUI). He'll probably end up with a Herbert bride, or perhaps his stepfather will let him have a Stanley cousin or something.
The Stanleys also won't become Earls of Derby, so that's another title to play with for the Yorkist royals (though the Stanleys might continue to call themselves Kings of Mann TTL, rather than accepting a demotion to Lords as proof of their loyalty to Henry VII.)
A Stafford... doing something stupid? Never(!)Seconded on the Anthony Woodville/Richard Grey being prominent courtiers. Hastings and Dorset will also stick around, and their sons might well end up taking their places as they grow.
Also, if Richard doesn't usurp his nephew, then that also takes out the 1483 rebellion, which means Buckingham keeps his head for a while longer, if not forever (the Staffords are going to do something stupid at some point...) and an awful lot of the Edwardian Yorkist gentry will also stay in place at Court. Lovell, Catesby and Ratcliffe, on the other hand, won't rise nearly so high, if their liege lord is never King.
And if Edward IV survives another couple of years, then Tudor might well be extradited to England and regain his lands as Earl of Richmond (Margaret Beaufort had managed to strike terms with Edward IV before his death, AIUI). He'll probably end up with a Herbert bride, or perhaps his stepfather will let him have a Stanley cousin or something.
The Stanleys also won't become Earls of Derby, so that's another title to play with for the Yorkist royals (though the Stanleys might continue to call themselves Kings of Mann TTL, rather than accepting a demotion to Lords as proof of their loyalty to Henry VII.)
yeah, I've pretty much chosen Juana the mad for Edward V, whether or not he is unfaithful like her otl husband is up for debate, but hopefully she doesn't go crazy Margaret of Clarence isn't a bad idea. I currently have him with Louise of Savoy, but that feels a little random anywayI agree but it is still kinda neat for a Richard of Gloucester and Anne of Brittany match. Edward V could marry a Spanish infanta and Richard of York might he marry Margaret of Clarence to get the Neville lands?
😂😂😂😂😂A Stafford... doing something stupid? Never(!)
Richard of York might he marry Margaret of Clarence to get the Neville lands?
The Stanleys would get three baronies (Stanley plus Strange and Mohun from the wife of the OTL second Earl, who was also first cousin of Edward V from their mother’s side)@isabella had the title of Viscount Mohun dusted off for the Stanleys. They also have Baron Strange going for them. Not as "grand" as earl but its better than nothing
Oh geez I forgot about him!What of her brother Warwick, though?
thats a good point. Who should he marry?What of her brother Warwick, though?
thats a good point. Who should he marry?
Just push him to the church if neededthats a good point. Who should he marry?
Lady Anne Grey, daughter of the Earl of Kent? She's very young, but her father's first wife was a Woodville. Or maybe a FitzAlan girl, if one of the right age can be found?I think he was made a ward of Dorset during Edward IV’s reign? Presumably that situation would persist with Edward living longer and no Richard III coup.
Dorset would have some say over his marriage if so- Dorset doesn’t have any age appropriate daughters, but could probably turn up someone Woodville-affiliated?
Who told you who Dorset had no daughter of a compatible age to marry to Warwick? Dorset remarried to Cecily Bonville a year before Warwick’s birth and had seven sons and seven daughters and while we do not have the birth years of many children, Dorothy‘s birth year is given as 1480 (so five years younger) and the Eleanor/Elizabeth married to John Arundel must be born at the latest in the early 1480s as she had 4 children before dying in 1503 (and is likely who she was the eldest daughter). Elizabeth, Mary, Cecily and likely Margaret are all born in the 1490s and we have no date for Bridget, who died early, but the eldest daughter of Dorset (either Eleanor or Dorothy) has the right age for marrying Warwick.I think he was made a ward of Dorset during Edward IV’s reign? Presumably that situation would persist with Edward living longer and no Richard III coup.
Dorset would have some say over his marriage if so- Dorset doesn’t have any age appropriate daughters, but could probably turn up someone Woodville-affiliated?