In reguards of the navy, remember the SU has not many viable ports to allow for training of crews all year around, let alone use of a increased navy and even if it would, they are essentialy easily blockaded, either in the Baltics, or the Japanese Ocean (for now), so that propblem needs to be adressed as well.
Of course, good point
 
Of course, good point
It is however a problem the Russian Empire already faced, which was why direct control or allies in the baltics, the Balkans (not optimal thanks to Gibraltar and Suez) and even Southern Asia (Iraq and Persia) were high on the list of regions to heavily influence and operate within.
 
It is however a problem the Russian Empire already faced, which was why direct control or allies in the baltics, the Balkans (not optimal thanks to Gibraltar and Suez) and even Southern Asia (Iraq and Persia) were high on the list of regions to heavily influence and operate within.
Yes no matter if its USSR or Russian Empire the geopolitical goals and conditions will stay the same - in this case access to warmwater ports
 
Well we could support Turkey's socialist/communist parties so we can have access to both the straits and be able to use their docks since their also rebuilding.
 
Last edited:
In reguards of the navy, remember the SU has not many viable ports to allow for training of crews all year around, let alone use of a increased navy and even if it would, they are essentialy easily blockaded, either in the Baltics, or the Japanese Ocean (for now), so that propblem needs to be adressed as well.
Way not just focus on building navy for defence,its better to have some then have none
 
It is however a problem the Russian Empire already faced, which was why direct control or allies in the baltics, the Balkans (not optimal thanks to Gibraltar and Suez) and even Southern Asia (Iraq and Persia) were high on the list of regions to heavily influence and operate within.
Well comrade i have good news for you and i think that i've found a solution to this problem, at least from the side of Asia/Pacific, unfortunately the situation for now in Europe leaves almost no place for maneuver
 
Similar to the Lithuanian-Byelorussian SSR of our timeline? In concept at least.
Yeah or plans for Transcaucasus and Central Asia OTL.
Way not just focus on building navy for defence,its better to have some then have none
That at least to some extent would not be a bad idea?
Well comrade i have good news for you and i think that i've found a solution to this problem, at least from the side of Asia/Pacific, unfortunately the situation for now in Europe leaves almost no place for maneuver
Let's hear it then :D
 
Let's hear it then :D
As you wish comrade

My initiative number 11
Solving the perpetual problem -
as it was already discussed earlier USSR just like Russian Empire lacks access to any warm-water port. And in order to solve this problem I propose the following
a) long - time solution - put simply reaching a deal with chinese socialist and communist groups right now. USSR will provide our chinese comrades with all resources to achieve the final victory but nothing comes for free - USSR will support China on some conditions - and these conditions will be: 1. After the victory the soviet navy will gain access to all chinese ports 2. After the final victory the future chinese communist government will agree to 99-year lease of Port Arthur to the USSR (similar to British lease of Hong Kong).
b) short - time solution - an agreement withJapanese Empire - here we can use changing geopolitical situation between Japanese Empire and the US and British Empire. As the relations between them become worse and worse and Japan is more and more desperate to gain access to various natural resources , at some point USSR will enter the game by proposing following deal:

1. Non-agression pact between Japan and USSR lets say for 20 years
2. Japan will begin trade with USSR similar to our deal with Germany or France
3. In exchange for our natural resources Japan will invest money into our economy/infrastructure and provide us with various advanced technologies
4. Japan will provide us with a low-interes loan used to rebuild and modernise our port in Vladivostok
5. In exchange for unlimited access to soviet oil Japan will allow USSR to build naval bases in Japanese controlled Korea and/or the Soviet Navy will be allowed to use chinese ports under Japanese control.

What is more right now our ports are in very bad condition and I think that this problem can also be solved without spending a single ruble in the near future - and we will use the greed of the West to achieve it, because they will simply finance it. The justification will be simple, if your country wants to increase the volume of trade with the USSR you have to help us to rebuild and modernize our ports. Unfortunately right now we don't have money, so we will take a low-interest loan from you, which will be repaid when our country is rebuild sometime in the future. And this way the West will finance rebuilding and modernisation of most important Soviet ports on credit of course.

Here's the list of who will finance what port:
Odessa - France
Sevastopol - Italy
Leningrad - Germany
Vladivostok - Japan
Murmansk - British Empire
Arkhangelsk - USA
 
Last edited:
Also i have proposal and that is to change a flag of Soviet Union,hammer and sickle are to backward and dont represent bright future that our Soviet Union is heading toward
 
As you wish comrade

My initiative number 11
Solving the perpetual problem -
as it was already discussed earlier USSR just like Russian Empire lacks access to any warm-water port. And in order to solve this problem I propose the following
a) long - time solution - put simply reaching a deal with chinese socialist and communist groups right now. USSR will provide our chinese comrades with all resources to achieve the final victory but nothing comes for free - USSR will support China on some conditions - and these conditions will be: 1. After the victory the soviet navy will gain access to all chinese ports 2. After the final victory the future chinese communist government will agree to 99-year lease of Tsingtao to the USSR (similar to British lease of Hong Kong).
b) short - time solution - an agreement withJapanese Empire - here we can use changing geopolitical situation between Japanese Empire and the US and British Empire. As the relations between them become worse and worse and Japan is more and more desperate to gain access to various natural resources , at some point USSR will enter the game by proposing following deal:

1. Non-agression pact between Japan and USSR lets say for 20 years
2. Japan will begin trade with USSR similar to our deal with Germany or France
3. In exchange for our natural resources Japan will invest money into our economy/infrastructure and provide us with various advanced technologies
4. Japan will provide us with a low-interes loan used to rebuild and modernise our port in Vladivostok
5. In exchange for unlimited access to soviet oil Japan will allow USSR to build naval bases in Japanese controlled Korea and/or the Soviet Navy will be allowed to use chinese ports under Japanese control.

What is more right now our ports are in very bad condition and I think that this problem can also be solved without spending a single ruble in the near future - and we will use the greed of the West to achieve it, because they will simply finance it. The justification will be simple, if your country wants to increase the volume of trade with the USSR you have to help us to rebuild and modernize our ports. Unfortunately right now we don't have money, so we will take a low-interest loan from you, which will be repaid when our country is rebuild sometime in the future. And this way the West will finance rebuilding and modernisation of most important Soviet ports on credit of course.

Here's the list of who will finance what port:
Odessa - France
Sevastopol - Italy
Leningrad - Germany
Vladivostok - Japan
Murmansk - British Empire
Arkhangelsk - USA
Will add that in one of the following chapters :D
Also i have proposal and that is to change a flag of Soviet Union,hammer and sickle are to backward and dont represent bright future that our Soviet Union is heading toward
What do you suggest istead? We might take a few examples and then hold a poll ^^
 
Also i have proposal and that is to change a flag of Soviet Union,hammer and sickle are to backward and dont represent bright future that our Soviet Union is heading toward
The hammer and sickle has been the symbol of the Union from the beginning, and has become the universal banner of the global communist movement as a whole. Its symbolism perfectly represents the unity of workers and farmers and is by no means backwards. Even if the Union's productive forces have become significantly advanced, the hammer and sickle would still be there as a reminder of what we are fighting for. I propose that the hammer and sickle should remain the USSR's official state symbols.
 
The hammer and sickle has been the symbol of the Union from the beginning, and has become the universal banner of the global communist movement as a whole. Its symbolism perfectly represents the unity of workers and farmers and is by no means backwards. Even if the Union's productive forces have become significantly advanced, the hammer and sickle would still be there as a reminder of what we are fighting for. I propose that the hammer and sickle should remain the USSR's official state symbols.
seconded
 
The hammer and sickle has been the symbol of the Union from the beginning, and has become the universal banner of the global communist movement as a whole. Its symbolism perfectly represents the unity of workers and farmers and is by no means backwards. Even if the Union's productive forces have become significantly advanced, the hammer and sickle would still be there as a reminder of what we are fighting for. I propose that the hammer and sickle should remain the USSR's official state symbols.
But Soviet Union is more then just workers and farmers.The flag need to represent the new people the Soviet people and not the class of workers and farmers
 
Btw sorry for double post but what abut making Esperanto language official language of new Union of Socialist Nations(a communist version of Europe Union)I think language was banned by Stalin in original Soviet Union due security concerns

 
Btw sorry for double post but what abut making Esperanto language official language of new Union of Socialist Nations(a communist version of Europe Union)I think language was banned by Stalin in original Soviet Union due security concerns
Indeed, the people's hovercraft is full of eels, comrade.
 
But Soviet Union is more then just workers and farmers.The flag need to represent the new people the Soviet people and not the class of workers and farmers
Also true, sorry for the short replies, sick with flu at the moment...
Btw sorry for double post but what abut making Esperanto language official language of new Union of Socialist Nations(a communist version of Europe Union)I think language was banned by Stalin in original Soviet Union due security concerns
That could be a interesting idea, especialy given how the Nazis and Fascist disliked it.
 
Last edited:
Top