No GNW (or “Peter goes South”)

It is probable that Spain first offered France to return Louisiana for more investments but the French ended up refusing for X reason and as you say, then the Spanish ended up selling it to the Americans to consolidate in Texas.

Since we are approaching the division of Africa, I wonder what the British are planning, I doubt they will give Morocco to Spain.
 
The ruler
221. The ruler
«Где раз поднят русский флаг, там он уже спускаться не должен.» [1]
«Лучшая теория права — добрая нравственность, и она должна быть в сердце независимо от этих отвлеченностей и иметь своим основанием религию.»
[2]
Николай I
«Оригинал похож на бюст:
Он так же холоден и пуст

Анонимная эпиграмма на Николая I [3]
«II y a beaucoup de praporchique en lui et un peu du Pierre le Grand.»
Пушкин [4]
«Император Николай был очень живого и весёлого нрава, а в тесном кругу даже и шаловлив
Модест Корф [5]
Possessing great and undoubted energy, Emperor Nicholas is so full of consciousness of his power that it is difficult for him to imagine that any people or events could resist him.”
Bavarian ambassador
“Russia is governed by a class of officials <...> and it often governs against the will of the monarch”
Astolphe-Louis-Léonor, Marquis de Custine



The new broom. Introduction.
Nicholas I was brought up, by his own definition, “to be a brigade commander” and even after the unexpected death of his elder brother, Constantine, which made him heir to the Russian throne, nothing changed. His education remained one of a military engineer (mathematics, artillery, engineering, tactics, architecture) plus the subjects mandatory for his rank: languages, religion, some history, dances, etc. Even as a heir he was never allowed to participate in any state business and the death of Alexander found him completely unprepared to the task of ruling the huge empire.

With this background, it should not be a big surprise that at the start of his rule he viewed an army as the ideal model for the whole society:
Here is order, strict unconditional legality [the tsar means rigid paragraphs of the military regulations], no omniscience and contradiction, everything follows from each other, …. I look at human life only as a service, because everyone serves".

And, the army being an ideal and example to the rest of the society, it had to become an ideal in the terms of strict obedience to the regulations. Not that he was unique in this area: most, if not all, European armies put the parade ground training at the top of their priorities, especially at the times of peace. Even the top Russian military authority, deeply respected by Nicholas, the Generalissimo, liked the parade ground drill, smart uniforms and discipline. The difference was in the desirable degrees but not in a principle.
1664210560594.png


Needless to say that, being absolutely sincere in his beliefs, Nicholas was fully intended to led by example. He was almost perfect drill master (the “perfect” one was his younger brother, Michael) with this mastery being backed up by his physique: over 2 meters tall, athletically built, possessing a good “command voice”. And to this a handsome face and you are getting a great parade ground figure. 😉 To be fair, while being a strict disciplinarian, he was not inherently cruel and always ready to award what he considered a good service and, being a talented actor [6], usually was quite successful in inspiring loyalty.
1664213173853.jpeg

Being quite intelligent, Nicholas did not have illusions about practicality of turning the whole empire into a military camp or even to force the bureaucrats to walk military style or adopt the general military bearings but he could not restrain himself from designing the new uniforms for the civic services, regulating dress code (and appearances [7]) for the nobility, and issuing the countless regulations in most areas of life. For example, being fond of an architecture and a competent painter, he prepared an album of the “standard” designs for the new churches.

His attempts to …er… regulate dishonesty were much less successful because corruption was too deeply entrenched to be effectively dealt with. And what could you really do if the leading Russian liberal, Senator Mordvinov, insisted that the fact of the marked money being found in a person’s pocket are not a proof that this person took a bribe? Of course, not all the caught officials got that lucky but the bribes were a part of the prevailing mentality and could not be eradicated by the decrees, especially if corruption was endemic all the way to almost the very top. [8]. Practice of the military appointments to the civic positions proved to be not an ideal solution because, with some exceptions, even quite honest military figures either succumbed to the temptation or were simply bypassed by their experienced subordinates. Eventually, Nicholas pretty much gave up on that subject.

Well, truth to be told, in his idealization of the Russian army as a shining example of the honesty and other virtues Nicholas also was more than a little bit on the optimistic and naive side. When he was a commander of an engineering battalion and then brigade he was not exactly in the same position as an ordinary commander of the same rank. To start with, he did not have to care about his own expenses and financing the mandatory functions like regularly inviting subordinate officers for dinner, organizing celebrations of the various events, maintaining his stable, etc. were not a problem. The same goes for the various purchasing operations (forage, food, etc.): he was not conducting them personally and, if needed, could be easily convinced to request the extra funds. An ordinary absolutely honest commander had to count money very carefully and, almost always, to cut some corners because the allocated funds rarely were adequate. A more realistic commander would have to be much more creative because he would need to get some money for his own needs (for example, to provide his daughter with a dowry or to have something besides his pension after retirement). There was a joke that the richest people in the Russian army are commanders of the reserve battalions because they were in charge of all types of the regimental property and could easily find the way to profit by skillfully conducting purchases and sales.

With the main attention being paid to the parade ground side of a service a dishonest commander relatively easily could avoid unnecessary attention of his superiors by putting extra effort into the drill and if a regiment was making a good impression on a review, who was going to criticize such a good commander? Nicholas himself, when he was a commander, was classifying his subordinates exclusively by the willingness to “serve”, which meant following the regulations and not trying to show any initiative or, God forbid, questioning the superiors.

The simplest area to apply these attitudes was, obviously, the Imperial court. Various branches of its services had been regulated and provided with the newly designed uniforms (a hobby of pretty much each and every Russian emperor was design of the new uniforms). The courtiers (those who held various honorary positions involving or not involving some kind of a real service) also got the newly-designed uniforms.
1664232449200.jpeg

The ladies admitted to the court did not get uniforms but had to appear on the ceremonial occasions in the “Russian style” dresses. Samples of these costumes for the members of the imperial household were designed a personally approved by Nicholas (below is an official dress of a lady overseeing female staff of the empress and grand duchesses). The ladies less involved but entitled to attend the court events could limit themselves with a “Russian style” of a headgear.
1664232810499.png

The next issue was to take care that the uniforms had been worn properly and this was challenging for both sides. Both Nicholas and his brother could stop on a street an officer who did not wear his uniform properly buttoned and adjusted and, if he was lucky, put him under arrest. For the greater sins the punishment was being fired from the service (a great shame).

To understand situation, keep in mind that the uniforms had been extremely tight and, to look better, the officers (Nicholas including) had been wearing a tightly tied corset under them. Pretty much the same goes for the tight collars. So one officer of the Guards had been fired for slightly unbuttoning his uniform during a public dinner. He was immediately fired with a resolution forbidding him to wear the uniform in retirement (usual courtesy to the retirees) “because he is seemingly uncomfortable” with it. Another unlikely officer after a friendly banquet by mistake put on an overcoat of an officer of a different regiment (silver buttons instead of the gilded ones). On a street he had a misfortune to met Grand Duke Michael who (even at night) recognized a lapse (keep in mind that the Romanovs had a phenomenal memory so Michael, being commander of the Guards, knew all his subordinate officers by face and name) and unlucky one had been fired. Keep in mind that in both cases we are talking ablut the members of prominent aristocratic families.

One more historical anecdote is about Nicholas himself. He was inspecting the honorary guard arranged for meeting the visiting King of Prussia. Everybody was seemingly perfect, even the mustaches had been vaxed and forming a perfect line. Nicholas stood for a while watching formation from the side and then turned around and went away issuing a deep sight of unhappiness. The aid accompanying him dared to ask a question:
- Your Majesty, are they breathing?
- They are, the scumbags!

Another is related to the first photo made in Russia. Of course, it was of a military parade and Grand Duke Michael found his brother studying it with a magnifying glass. “Look, a third soldier in the fifth row has his headgear slightly skewed. And this is a parade in my presence!”

Probably you got an idea.

Well, as long as he was concentrating upon the seemingly harmless areas, it was more or less OK at least for a time being: everybody liked the well -drilled military and even Pushkin wrote a verse expressing his admiration.

Much more serious problem would be to keep Nichols’ activities out of the Russian economics: being a man pf the principle and sincerely trying to micromanage everything he was trying to take control of everything working sometimes for 14-16 hours. Fortunately for everybody, he was routinely drown in a huge volume of a paperwork and simply could not physically perform what he considered his duty. As a result, most of the areas were rarely a subject of the Emperor’s close attention and kept functioning on their own. To be fair, his interventions quite often were quite useful and intelligent, more so than the actions of his ministers [9]. So for a while his contribution in these areas were more or less limited to designing the uniforms for the personnel of state-owned railroads and design of the standard stations for these railroads. To be fair, when the issues related to the economics had been brought to his attention he was honestly professing his ignorance refusing to make judgements:
I don't know that, and how do I know about my poor education? At the age of 18, I entered the service and since then - goodbye, teaching! I passionately love military service and is devoted to it in body and soul. Since I've been in my current post <...> I've been reading very little <... > If I know something, I owe it to conversations with smart and knowledgeable people.”

Now, for playing with his favorite toy (the army) he needed a perfect playground and such a playground did exist.


Getting back in history.
St.Petersburg was founded by Peter I with the rather ambitious goal in mind but it did not materialized due to the impracticality obvious even to Peter. However, the coastal area near the city was steadily developing as a set of the imperial and aristocratic summer residencies. The reasons were mostly two-fold:
  • In the summer weather on the Baltic coast was much more pleasant than the suffocating heat in and near Moscow.​
  • The area being initially very sparsely populated (and mostly by the insignificant people), it was much easier to build the huge palace complexes there than in the overcrowded region near Moscow.​
Easy communication with Sweden allowing mutual visits, easy access to the imported luxury goods and a set of the food products different from those of the Central Russia were providing a nice change of the company, scenery and the diet.

St. Petersburg soon enough became the biggest Russian port and the second biggest city in Russia but, being built from the scratch, it was developing along the lines near and dear to each and every Romanov monarch: the straight lines and general western-style appearance. Something that was almost impossible achieve in Moscow (except having Tverskaya) without burning it to the ground. 😂

So, besides the “imperial/aristocratic” suburbia, few palaces of the imperial and aristocratic families had been built there (as the part time dwellings), banks of the Neva and small rivers got granite facings, the small and big bridges had been constructed and some of the important institutions had been moved. Eventually, the major edifice, the Winter Palace, was built on the bank of Neva [10]. The suburban summer palaces and relatively small ones in the city were nice but functionally not enough and there was a need for a single very big one suitable for the big ceremonies, receptions and, in general, capable to serve as a major showcase for the visiting dignitaries: until the end of the XVIII the road to Moscow, while gradually improving, was not up to the top European standards, scenery along it also was not very impressive, as almost any stretch of the road in the Central Russia and travel was taking 3 - 4 days. Having something suitable at the main port city was much better in the terms of creating a proper “European” atmosphere, especially when combined with a huge art collection and the central part which was not inferior to any European capital. OTOH, none of the prominent foreigners visiting Moscow missed an opportunity to comment, with or without an admiration, on how exotic and asiatic it looks like. Even crowd on the central streets of St.Petersburg was much more European looking then one in the center of Moscow where you simply could not get rid of the numerous civilians wearing the (more or less) national dress. Of course, the major official ceremonies and important state functions still had been happening in the capital but the emperors tended to spend more and more time in and around St. Petersburg gradually moving there more and more state institutions, completely or partially (like the Senate, which had both Moscow and St. Petersburg departments).

1664239016357.jpeg

The Admiralty was obvious but in 1819 construction of a huge General Staff building started to be completed in 1829.
1664215689457.png

As a result, there was a big flat paved square between this building and the Winter Palace forming an ideal ground for the major parades. Setting something equal in the center of Moscow was practically impossible. Nicholas fully appreciated potential of the place and after the Turkish war started spending much more time in St.Petersburg than in Moscow. When the railroad between the capital and St.Petersburg was completed, the first few special trains transported part of the Guards to be stationed in the new barracks constructed in St.Petersburg. Time of the travel being shortened to 20 hours, communication with the capital became easy and after in 1832 Schilling von Cannstatt successfully demonstrated his electromagnetic telegraph, getting the important news fast ceased to be a problem [11] allowing Nicholas and the court to spend even more time away from the capital.
1664241290694.jpeg


Back to the main subject.
Strange as it may sound, in the middle of all luxury of the Winter Palace Nicholas’ own study/bedroom was quite simple and even spartan.
1664242974267.png

Nicholas was raising at 7 o'clock, at 9 he started to accept reports, solve large and small state issues. His working day lasted 16-18 hours. Having closed all the control of the huge empire on himself, he worked, by his own admission, "as a slave in galleys." Hating bureaucratic bureaucratic red tape, he never allowed delays at home: “I don't have any papers there [in the study] . I finish my work every day and pass on all my decisions and commands to the ministers at the same time.” Which was probably not quite true because the members of his household had been remarking that he simply could not handle the volume of work he was taking upon himself. Quite possible that in a reality he was getting just a small fraction of the documents carefully filtered by his ministers.

For rest and relaxation, Nicholas walked around the city every day, walked in the morning and evening, or in the carriage during the day, in summer in an open stroller, in winter in a small sleigh, sometimes with a coachman, sometimes he drove himself, and sometimes he was taking an ordinary city cabman. The sovereign especially liked pedestrian walks in St. Petersburg. The Russian emperor, the powerful lord of the vast Russian Empire, alone, without any protection, walked around his capital, among the people, always at the same time, on the usual routes, and it never occurred to anyone to make an attempt on him.

While the court banquets were famous for their luxury, in a close circle he ate little and preferred a simple food. There was a funny episode with a famous Russian writer who was invited to the dinner with the imperial family. Besides writings, he was famous for his gluttony (there is at least one description of what he was considered an adequate dinner). Even with the empress seeing his misery with an available food and ordering to give him more he came home hungry to find out that there was no food there. Since then, when being invited again to the imperial dinner he was ordering his house staff to prepare and ample food supply for his return. Nicholas did not smoke and did not even tolerate when somebody was smoking in his presence and drunk very little of an alcohol so basically the life style as healthy as it goes. Plus, a loving husband and a devoted father taking care of providing his children with the best available education. [12]

Pretty much an ideal figure just made to be admired. Yeah, sure….

________
[1] Where the Russian flag was raised once, it should never be lowered.
[2] The best theory of law is good morality, and it should be in the heart regardless of these distraction and have to be a religion based.
[3] The original is similar to a bust:/He’s just as cold and empty. Anonymous epigram on Nicholas I
[4] He has a lot from the ensign, and a little from Peter the Great. Pushkin
[5] Emperor Nicholas was a very lively and cheerful temper, and even playful in a close circle. Modest Korf
[6] His ability to “play roles” was noted both by his friends and enemies.
[7] Among the nobility only the military (serving or retired) had a right to wear the mustaches. The beards were strictly forbidden.
[8] In OTL it was computed that, in the case of an absolute honesty the railroad Moscow-Petersburg could be stretched all the way to the Crimea.
[9] In OTL on the issue of breaking up with the Nerchinsk Treaty and all related consequences, he approved project of the governor-general of the Eastern Siberia, Muraviev, allowing expeditions down the Amur and establishing port in its delta against opinion of his own cabinet.
[10] Inotially, it was painted golden. The turquoise color that “everybody knows” appeared only in 1947.
[11] Baron Павел Львович Шиллинг (Schilling von Cannstatt) from the noble family that moved from Revel to Russia. Did invent the 1st electromagnetic telegraph (which, unfortunately, required multiple wires), conducted the first electricity-controlled explosion of an underwater mine (in 1812) triggering Russian works on creation the mine defenses (in OTL the mine belt protecting approaches to Kronstadt during the CW) , created the first telegraph code and very effective encryption. Also specialist in oriental history and Tibetan literature. Also a corresponding member of the National Corporation of French Orientalists and a member of the British Society of Asian Literature. In 1818, he opened Russia's first lithographic workshop at the College of Foreign Affairs in St. Petersburg, adapting it to the needs of cartography. Probably I missed few things…😜
[12] Unfortunately, the best anecdote related to their education is not translatable. 😢
 
And, the army being an ideal and example to the rest of the society,
Well, truth to be told, in his idealization of the Russian army as a shining example of the honesty and other virtues Nicholas also was more than a little bit on the optimistic and naive side.
This guy is so roman, holy shit, give him a legion and he's good to go!
Needless to say that, being absolutely sincere in his beliefs, Nicholas was fully intended to led by example. He was almost perfect drill master (the “perfect” one was his younger brother, Michael) with this mastery being backed up by his physique: over 2 meters tall, athletically built, possessing a good “command voice”. And to this a handsome face and you are getting a great parade ground figure. 😉 To be fair, while being a strict disciplinarian, he was not inherently cruel and always ready to award what he considered a good service and, being a talented actor [6], usually was quite successful in inspiring loyalty.
Oh my God, with such a Chad leading Russia how the hell did they not turn into a utopia?
Then again in this timeline they might
Much more serious problem would be to keep Nichols’ activities out of the Russian economics: being a man pf the principle and sincerely trying to micromanage everything he was trying to take control of everything working sometimes for 14-16 hours.
To be fair, when the issues related to the economics had been brought to his attention he was honestly professing his ignorance refusing to make judgements:
I don't know that, and how do I know about my poor education? At the age of 18, I entered the service and since then - goodbye, teaching! I passionately love military service and is devoted to it in body and soul. Since I've been in my current post <...> I've been reading very little <... > If I know something, I owe it to conversations with smart and knowledgeable people.”
Really like that, he knows what he's good at and stick to his guns instead of inserting his nose where he's ignorant
The fact he goes so far to fulfill his "royal duties" is a great signal of his character
 
Yes Nicholas seems he will be a good Emperor for the simple reason he knows when he should back down due to something he admits he is ignorant about while being good in what he knows about. Hopefully any crisis thrown at him will be a baptism of fire he can survive.
 
Yes Nicholas seems he will be a good Emperor for the simple reason he knows when he should back down due to something he admits he is ignorant about while being good in what he knows about. Hopefully any crisis thrown at him will be a baptism of fire he can survive.
You and @Aluma are slightly too optimistic. 😉

Not sure, yet, about alt-Nicholas but the real one ended up as a synonym of a very bad and repressive ruler. To be fair, this reputation was created by combination of two main factors:
(a) he inherited state in a very lousy shape in pretty much each and every aspect.
(b) most of the bad PR was coming from the left side which hated him on a pathological level because he was extremely conservative.

Of course, it could be said that (a) was going from bad to worse during his reign due to his extremely conservative course and fear of the fundamental changes but it is not that his son, who made these changes, fared much better in the liberal PR or in general. To be objective, by the end of AI’s reign Russia already was in such a deep trouble that it is absolutely not clear how it could get out of it without getting into a greater trouble. NI for 30 years was trying to to postpone the unknown trouble sticking to the known one. AII took a risk (by that time regime run out of options) and certain substance seriously hit the fan leaving his successors with the huge problems.

Needless to say that putting in charge of the state apparatus the military persons who had no clue of the civic administration, no knowledge besides the military regulations, a complete ignorance of the laws and a classic military attitude “I’m a law for you!” was not a good idea even if there were some examples to the contrary. Neither was a strict enforcement of the conservative views in the form he understood them: this produced a long term negative effect making the educated classes a principled opposition to the regime. Speaking of which, most of the sinister descriptions of his appearance and character comes from the people who most probably never saw him personally and definitely did not have a chance to communicate with him. Which did not prevent the future historians from quoting them as the “contemporaries” while ignoring those who did know him personally.

ITTL situation is not bad and even a “man of principle” like NI may avoid making it catastrophic economically and technologically. The social aspect is a different story but there is a very good prompt in the Russian classics, which I’ll try to use. Actually, the whole two of them. 😜
 
The ruled
222. The ruled
“Его я просто полюбил,
Он бодро, честно правит нами.
Россию вдруг он оживил
Войной, надеждами, трудами.”

Пушкин, ‘Друзьям’ [1]
«Да будет целью солдатской амбиции
Точная пригонка амуниции
»
Прутков ‘Военные афоризмы’ [2]
“Emperor Nicholas the First went to the regiment. By oversight, one button on the sleeve was not fastened, which the aide-de-camp reported, intending to help. The emperor said in a voice that was heard by the whole regiment:
- I'm dressed in a proper uniform. This regiment is not.
And immediately the regiment unbuttoned one button on the sleeves.


“Russia suffers from two problems: the roads and the fools”
Nicholas I


The toy
The army was not just a favorite toy to play with, it was a main force guaranteeing stability of the regime. The Russian soldier - mostly serious, obedient and devout - was by nature a monarchist, although he did not know this word. For him, there was no one on earth above the Tsar. Service in the guard was the most honorable, but also the most difficult one. Here, in front of the emperor, there were more marching and rifle exercises, stricter requirements for uniforms, stricter regulation of all official trifles. But the Tsar was not an abstract figure here, but a real, visible earthly father who could easily talk to any of the soldiers, ask about their needs, especially when visiting his favorite units.
1664302777462.png

Nicholas I had his favorite regiment of guards infantry, Life-Guards Preobrazhensky regiment.

Possessing a magnificent memory, the emperor knew by the names of all the soldiers of the battalion, of whom there were 1000 people, and spoke about them "my children". One of the officers of the regiment, Dmitry Grigorievich Kolokoltsev, noted in his memoirs: "His Majesty every year, together with the Empress, without any retinue, came to the barracks of the 1st Battalion, located on Millionnaya, next to the palace... The Sovereign treated all the soldiers with unusually merciful attention and, visiting the chambers of the married, His Majesty did not leave without doing some special favor for some soldier's family on that day. And us, the society of officers of the Preobrazhensky regiment, the sovereign addressed such words that everyone who only had the honor to serve in the Preobrazhensky Regiment would remember. His Majesty did not stop repeating to us that he considers us his own family."
1664303307498.png

In cavalry the favorite was Life-Guards Cavalry Regiment, “my old Horse Guards”. Their uniform was Nocholas’s favorite costume and this regiment also was receiving the regular imperial visits.
1664303523217.png

The third favorite was his old Sappers battalion which became the 1st Life-Guards Sappers battalion. “"...In the Sapper battalion in Sovereign Nicholas Pavlovich, since his appointment as his chief (in 1818, July 3), are used to seeing a benevolent, charming boss with his merciful treatment..." with a resulting absolutely sincere devotion.

With the Guards Corps expanding and new units moving into the “playground” (and the army units moving out) the new stone barracks had been built and improved. During the time of peace the Guards had been spending most of the year in these barrack except for the summer when they were moving into the summer camps for “maneuvers”. Every summer the regiments had been moving into exactly the same spot and every year this exercise was producing a huge commotion due to the inadequate space. But the site was chosen by the Emperor personally and nobody dared to push the imperial nose into the mess he created. He was arriving to the area only after everything was settled (including renting the private lodgings by the officers) and there were perfectly ordered rows of the tents ready for the imperial inspection. The same goes for the summer maneuvers of the Guards. Not being satisfied with a role of a drill master, Nicholas, by whatever reason, liked to imagine himself a strategist and personally led one of the sides during the maneuvers, which actually were something of a well-rehearsed ballet. The same units had been always marching over the same area in exactly the same pattern making exactly the same mistakes and demonstrating exactly the same problems, which had been always ignored because the only purpose of the exercise was Emperor’s “victory”. Initiative and not playing by the rules would be detrimental to a further career and, as such, carefully avoided.

But the “public” of all social classes loved the military, especially when they were marching in the perfect formations, and the Guards had been quite proud of their own performance especially taking into an account that, with all inconveniences of accommodation, the summer maneuvers were presenting a perfect opportunity for the banquets on the open air and other military entertainments of a similar nature. Keep in mind that the site was just near the high classes’ summer resort area, which was providing extra opportunities for pleasurable spending of a free time: being themselves members of the high society, officers of the Guards could expect invitations to the summer residences and as for the soldiers, well, the military being popular, soldiers of the Guards being picked for their appearances and aristocratic residences having a lot of the female servants, …
Well, the summer maneuvers were a really good time. 😉

Unfortunately, slowly but steadily the spirit of the “show above the substance” was creeping its way into the army units. Of course, the units garrisoning the troublesome or potentially troublesome parts of the Russian border (Caucasus, CA, Far East, Danubian Principalities) were not too much into the “acrobatics” and, unless they were getting an above the average a—hole of a commander, the same goes for most of the army units located in the provinces. However, the troops located in Moscow suffered from the same disease, which is not a big surprise because the capital was regularly visited by the Emperor and was getting its fair share of the imperial attention to the “frunt”.

The “legacies” of Suvorov and Bonaparte [3] still were remembered and respected but to a certain degree this was a lip service because the only military authority which now mattered was the Emperor. Fortunately, the only remaining general whom the Emperor did respect, Nicholas’ “father commander” since the time of him commanding a brigade, Paskevich, was a reasonable and competent person with an openly skeptical attitude toward the “acrobatics”. Being now promoted into fieldmarshal, he was able to put some restraint on the excessively “energetic” commanders of the army units.

1664324094692.jpeg



The general public.
The stories, real or planted, about his kindness to the people and general accessibility had been widely circulating.

Officer of Preobrazhensky Regiment, G.P. Samsonov, who stood in the guard at the Winter Palace, cites a “characteristic” case of manifestation of the love of ordinary people for Nicholas I: "Sovereign emperor often came from the theater on a simple cabman, and since I witnessed a case when a surprised cabman was given a 25-ruble assignation, together with an information that he brought the sovereign. Hearing this, the astonished cabman began to kiss his horse, asking her if she knew who she brought."

“In Peterhof, retired non-commissioned officer Ivanov served as a caretaker of the retired naval officer at the park. For his representative appearance, he was nicknamed Neptune, and he responded to this nickname. One day a cow climbed the flowerbed in front of the royal palace. Nicholas noticed this and shouted to the servant who was nearby:
- Neptune, the cow is trampling on my flowers. Look, I'll put it under arrest!
The answer followed immediately:
- Cow, it's not on my responsibility! - My wife missed it!
Tsar.
- Well, I'll put her under arrest!
Neptune:
- It's high time!
How this dialogue ended is unknown
.”

Having met a drunken officer, Nikolai scolded him for appearing in public in an unworthy form, and ended his reprimand with the question:
- Well, what would you do when you met your subordinate in this state?
This was followed by an answer:
- I wouldn't talk to this pig!
Nikolai laughed and summarized: "Take a cabman, go home and sleep!
"”

Nicholas unexpectedly visited the Pulkovo Observatory. Its director, Vasily Yakovlevich Struve, was so embarrassed that he hid behind the telescope. Nikolai noticed the timidity of the subject and asked Prince Menshikov what caused this behavior.
"Probably, Mr. Struve was scared to see so many stars out of place," the prince replied.”


Inspecting the Brest-Lithuanian fortress, Emperor Nicholas I picked up the brick and asked one of those around him if he knew what the brick was made of?
— I guess it's made of clay, Your Majesty.
"No, from gold," the emperor replied, "at least I paid so much for it.”

One of the court officials filed a complaint to the emperor against an officer who stole his daughter and married her without the permission of his parents. Nicholas wrote a resolution: "To demote the officer, to cancel the marriage, to return the daughter to his father and to consider her a virgin."


Of course, there were certain things which Nicholas, in his never-ending search for popularity, was taking quite seriously. While St. Petersburg was his his favorite place, Moscow remained the capital and loyalty of its nobility was extremely important politically. During one of his visits Nicholas got angry with one well-known person and put him under arrest [4]. Don’t start imagining a dungeon, or a dark prison cell or something of the kind. Standard procedure for these occasions looked as following. There was an apartment in one of the Kremlin buildings allocated to that purpose. An arrested person had been moving into it with his own furniture, necessary household items, food and servants. While under arrest, he could not walk outside but everybody who wanted could freely visit him. Usually the punishment lasted for few days after which a “prisoner” was released. However, this was a matter of principle. The “society” (Moscow nobility) was considering his arrest unjust and the next day he had a flood of the visitors expressing they sympathies. On the evening of that day Nicholas was attending performance in Bolshoy Theater. As was a custom, his appearance was greeted by the applause of those present. But this time it was a polite applause, not the ovation which he used to expect. The next day he invited Predvoditel of the Moscow nobility [5] and asked him about the reason for the “underexcitement”. Upon getting response that the society does not approve arrest of that distinguished person Nicholas immediately ordered his release (and got his ovation the same day).

For the nobility of both official and unofficial capitals there were additional bonuses in the form of the huge state balls (which will be a separate topic) and other social occasions and provincial nobility was enjoying similar entertainments even if on much more modest scale. Needless to say that the military always were the important part of any social event. Nicholas was traveling extensively, presenting the provincials with an opportunity to see their emperor and even, if lucky, to communicate with him, which could be a person’s most memorable event in the whole life.




The government

The government, generally speaking, consisted of two layers. The top level consisted of the Nicholas’ appointees, mostly with a military background. Exceptions were Minister of the Foreign Affairs, Finances Minister and, surprisingly, Director of the Imperial Theaters [6]. The main criteria was a personal loyalty but the problem was that quite a few of these loyal people had little or no education beyond strictly military one and did not even try to improve it. Some of them had been intelligent and could adjust and learn the needed things “on the fly” but many could not and there were numerous examples of the idiotic activities like an order to the homeowners to inform the local administration about a fire two hours prior to it happening.
1664334257538.jpeg

Of course, when being placed into the civic administrative position such a person could tell his subordinates “Now, I’m the law for you!” but then the reality was kicking in and the brave warrior had no idea how to navigate within framework of a strongly bureaucratic state. He could keep shouting and stomping his feet at his subordinates but he was completely dependent upon them because without a properly written official document nothing would happen. And only these professional bureaucrats knew what and how should be done to keep the system working and the more they were working the more complicated the system become. And, with the Emperor being a strong believer into micromanagement, there was a never-ending flow of the instructions and regulations going from top to bottom. All that avalanche had to be properly processed and executed making (with the best possible intentions) life of those inside and outside the apparatus close to impossible.
1664333438531.jpeg

Fortunately for everybody, the bureaucrats also wanted to live and, preferably, enjoy the life so the received orders had been dying within a protracted letters exchange or simply ignored because it was technically impossible to either implement all of them or to check their implementation.

Of course, a person outside the system could not completely avoid contacts with it but in most cases these contacts could be minimized to a mutually-acceptable level.

As far as the business was involved, contacts with the system were mostly along the lines of various permissions and regulations and it was taken for granted that those in charge will cooperate if properly stimulated. While being officially illegal, various forms of a gratitude (also known as “bribes”) had their historic roots going back if not to the pre-Mongolian Rus then at least to the foundation of the Muscovite state and as such could be considered a venerable cultural tradition with no shame attached. The shame was to take money and not to deliver the promised service. With both sides being well-aware of the rules of the game, the Russian economy kept functioning as usually, even the state-owned enterprises. The main obstacle to overcome, for the state-sponsored projects, was a long-term Minister of Finances, Count Kankrin, the only person who was permitted to attend the court wearing glasses and a warm scarf.

1664329111477.png

In 1839-1843 he carried out a monetary reform that established a system of silver monometallism. Kankrin's achievements also include the exchange of all assignations (paper money not supported by anything) for government credit papers exchanged for gold and silver, as well as the issue of a platinum coin. An adherent of protectionism, but only with the mandatory development of economic competition within the country, in connection with which he was opposed to the development of state factories, retail banks, railways, etc., undermining the possibility of competition between similar private ones. He was a supporter, after the ransom by the state of peasants and land from the landlords, to use the potential of the peasant community to develop agriculture in the direction of creating large collective farms where possible.

Besides the competitiveness issue, his reluctance to spend money on the state projects was a clear understanding of the fact that a big part of the allocated funds is going to be stolen. As a result, a direct imperial order was required to have things moving. But the private enterprises, if all the necessary wheels had been properly greased, did not have any new problems comparing to the previous reign.

In their private lives the people, mostly the city dwellers, had been subjects to various regulations related to the appearance of their homes, dirt and snow removal, etc. Strictness of enforcement was usually in declining proportion to the distance from the city center and while in St.Petersburg it remained relatively strong throughout the whole city, Moscow traditionally had much more relaxed attitudes allowing not only the deep dirt on the peripheral streets but all types of the untidy flea markets.
1664330948770.jpeg


Nicholas issued numerous regulations regarding cleanness of the streets, personal appearances (for the nobility), general behavior in the public places (smoking on the streets was forbidden) and they were echoed by the orders of the local administrators but their enforcement was, again, limited to the prestigious parts of the big cities and almost completely ignored in the small ones. Except when a visit of an important person had been expected.
1664334392517.png

Basically, except for the areas personally impacted by the imperial presence, the life continued in its usual manner with the minimal changes. The never-ending PR campaign was quite successful in promoting an image of the “father-tsar” as an object of an adoration on all social levels. However, a new element of a society started to appear threatening to destroy the “idyll”. 😢



_________
[1] “I just fell in love with him,
He rules us cheerfully, honestly.
He suddenly revived Russia with
War, hopes, labors.” Pushkin, “To friends”
[2] “Let it be the goal of soldier's ambition
Precise fit of uniform”. Prutkov, ‘Military aphorisms’
[3] ITTL died in 1844. Probably it does not make sense to provide a detailed description of his funeral and, anyway, I have no idea what the proper ceremonial would be.
[4] I don’t remember the exact reason except that it was something very minor.
[5] Nobility of every administrative entity was electing its official leader (Predvoditel) who basically represented his electorate in communications with administration. Predvoditel of Moscow was a VIP.
[6] Later this was fixed and position was held by the former military.
 
The ruled (cont. 1)
223. The ruled (cont. 1)
«Ты просвещением свой разум осветил,
Ты правды лик увидел,
И нежно чуждые народы возлюбил,
И мудро свой возненавидел

Пушкин [1]
« …по моим многочисленным наблюдениям, никогда наш либерал не в состоянии позволить иметь кому-нибудь своё особое убеждение и не ответить тотчас же своему оппоненту ругательством или даже чем-нибудь хуже…»
Достоевский [2]
«Умеренный либерализм: нужна собаке свобода, но все-таки её нужно на цепи держать.»
Чехов [3]
«Чтоб Русская держава спаслась от их затеи,
Повесить Станислава всем вожакам на шеи!
»
А.К. Толстой [4]
«Всякий иностранец кажется ему [россиянину за границей] высшим организмом, который может и мыслить, и выражать свою мысль…»
«Он обнаружил, что шел слишком быстро и в неправильном направлении»

Салтыков-Щедрин [5]​


Being extremely busy with putting things in a proper military-style order, Nicholas overlooked, for a while, resurgence of an unfamiliar beast which was threatening the very foundations of the perfect system he envisioned. The name of this apocalyptic beast was “liberalism”.

Russian liberalism prior to Nicholas
Of course, it was not like it suddenly appeared of a nowhere, some ideas regarding limitations of the royal power and some similar things had been expressed on a regular base since the Time of Troubles and, if one had a creative mind, they could be found even in the reforms of Peter the Great (at some point Peter said something along the lines that both the ruler and the subjects are responsible for well-being of the Fatherland but, taking into an account the methods of his rule, nobody could tell for sure what the hell did he mean by this statement). Well, to think about it, even Ivan the Terrible was demonstrating at least some important symptoms of a liberal behavior: after all he was shouting on the people before ordering their execution.

Since then there were certain government’s actions which could be considered “liberal” but which were actually a result of a pure pragmatism rather than ideology. Actually, a consistent state ideology was pretty much absent except for a formula “the Emperor is the only source of the laws but he has to abide to the existing laws”. For a short while, the French Revolution almost resulted in in some coherent conservative (or at least anti-revolutionary) program but reigning at that time Emperor Paul started with the abolishing the “revolutionary” hats and neckties and before he was completely done with this part of his program, the whole revolutionary brouhaha ended up with a quite acceptable Consulate and, as a gesture of a good will and open-mindedness, he allowed not just a return of the huge neckties (regarding the hats he put his feet down) but even the “semi-naked” female fashions grudgingly acknowledging that even the revolutions can produce some positive results. Alexander did not have any specific ideology except the demand of being an object of everybody’s adoration and even allowed wearing of the top hats, which was justifiably considered as a great step toward the European liberalism.
1664386471587.jpeg

Even more so when this headgear became popular among the Russian peasants making it a truly egalitarian act and raising the expectations that Alexander may declare some kind of a republic. Or something.
1664386589435.jpeg

Everybody was holding his (or her) breath awaiting for the new steps toward the European-style liberalism but, fortunately or unfortunately, at that time he met Beate Barbara Juliane von Krüdener (granddaughter of Fielmarshal Munnich) who just decided to switch from writing the sentimental novels to being a religious prophetess and preacher. Her predictions were dark, uncertain, easily amenable to all sorts of interpretations, but made a strong impression on many listeners. Some of them sold their property and went to look for new places at the foot of Ararat Mountain where the kingdom of Christ could be founded on earth.
1664386916986.jpeg

Alexander decided to go into the mysticism because it definitely looked like fun and did so quite successfully even if the baroness lost her influence after through her “the Holy Spirit started giving commands to the Emperor about some loans at the cash desk of the Board of Guardianship.” After this she was politely asked to travel to her estates and Alexander was left fully on his own, which was more than a little bit scary. Nobody could tell for sure how far Alexander would go in his mystical mood (and if the military settlements were a part of it) but he suddenly died before making any official pronouncements on this subject, leaving his successor, and the Russian society in general, in the ideological limbo.

Nicholas and the “beast”.
At the time Nicholas ascended the throne the Russian liberalism was mostly a tame animal limited to the noble class and being even, to a certain degree, fashionable: “During the argument about the racing horses an opponent called him a liberal. He was so happy that for the next week he was making the social visits telling everybody the story”. Making the liberal speeches became almost as popular as discussing taste of a broiled sturgeon even if everybody agreed that the second issue was much more important.
1664397770306.jpeg

But, to be objective, the administrative subclass of the species (the liberals, not sturgeons) often proved to be useful because, besides making speeches on the banquets, quite a few of them had been engaged in setting up some charitable institutes, overseeing creation of the schools and some other activities fitting for a good christian and often being patronized by the persons of unquestionable virtues, all the way up to the Empress herself. Unless overdoing things to a degree which would warrant the Emperor’s resolution “The fool or a scumbag? Find out!”, this subclass was officially approved and encouraged all the way to someone being able to raise to the rank of the “civilian general” (“Your Excellency” by the Table of the Ranks) just by making the big contributions to the right charities.

The military subclass was a more complicated issue due to a general assumption that for an officer reading the books, teaching the soldiers literacy and improving their living conditions is inevitably associated with a damage to the discipline and parade ground drill. However, soon enough this misconcept was dispelled by the realities of life: the suspected officers predominantly were just as strict disciplinarians as their less enlightened colleagues and quite often were serving as an example [6]. Not that the reading (occupation of a questionable usefulness for a good officer with the allowances for a frivolous poetry and certain type of the French novels) prevented these officers from being as good in drinking and card games as anybody else. In other words, they were not considered a major problem, especially when result of their activities was a proper patriotic excitement and a perfectly stretched toe during a ceremonial march.
1664400006894.png

However, there was also a dangerous subtype of the species, Russian Liberal Philosopher. One, and for a while the only representative of that group, Chaadaev, was preaching something that nobody could quite comprehend except for the catchy sentences like “the only purpose of the Russian state is to show the bad example to the world” , “We have something in our blood that rejects any real progress.” or “We have never gone hand in hand with other nations; we belong neither to the West nor to the East, and we have no traditions of either. Standing as if out of time, we were not affected by the upbringing of the human race.” Which, as everybody agreed, sounded quite offensive, especially the part which denied the “European” status, and author’s refusal to celebrate the Russian diplomatic and military victories. Taking into an account that his ideas on how to remedy these alleged problems were quite vague and could be interpreted as a rejection of a notion that Russia is one big family which has to obey its father-monarch and call for some kind of a national atonement for what supposed to be a normal behavior, he was declared mentally ill and held and the house arrest.

Nicholas made his conclusions and ordered a drastic decrease of the students studying philosophy in the Russian universities declaring that Russia needs, engineers, doctors and teachers, not the philosophers. But this measure proved to be inefficient because the beast of a liberalism appeared in a completely different and seemingly safe area, Russian literature. So far, this area was occupied by the people who belonged to the society and could even be admitted to the court or, at least by the people of the unquestionable loyalty. The results were quite good [7] and there was no reason for paying too much of attention except an occasional need to deal with the literary squabbles:

“... in today's issue of "Bee" there is again an unfair and vulgar article directed against Pushkin; <...> there will probably be a continuation; therefore, I propose to call on Bulgarin and forbid him printing any criticism of literary works from now on…”

But a relative freedom of the press [8] greatly extended the numbers of both readers and writers with the first group now going well beyond the members of a “society” and having quite different tastes to which the second group was trying to attend: after all, the literature was a business and the more readers you have, the better off you are. Of course, it did not happen overnight and the first crop of the writers still belonged to the society. Their modus operandi was surprisingly uniform:
( a) Bemoan about the suffering of the simple people. Not that they ever had any serious contact with the “oppressed masses”, except when visiting their estates for hunting, and sometimes the results looked rather peculiar, which did not prevent it from being printed in a progressive magazine. An acceptable option was to write something nasty about their socially equals and/or administration.
(b) Get the results printed and receive royalty.
(c) Go back to the estate for hunting and card playing with the visiting friends with the options of getting to Paris or London for entertainment or playing cards in Moscow/St. Petersburg.
(d) When the money had been spent, go back to (a).

The model was working just fine unless specific individual tended to spend more money on cards and hunting than he was gaining by his literary activities. To have the model complete, it was something like a requirement for this generation of the progressive writers to live with the wives of their friends (and for their wives, if they had any, to do the same with the friends of their husbands) [9].

As long as the writers were relatively few and mostly belonged to the “society” it was at least tolerable and could be controlled by a censorship but in this area Nicholas was not quite consistent allowing a relatively easy process for opening the new publications. The censors simply were too few to read constantly growing volume of a literarily production and the dam was broken. The immediate byproduct was fast spreading of the “wrong ideas” within now a broad group of the educated (and semi-ecucated) people outside the literary class. University professors (predominantly of the humanitarian specialties), students, doctors, teachers and all other types of what was defined as “intelligentsia” and what actually became a subculture which, ideologically, amounted to following: concern about the fate of their fatherland (civil responsibility); desire for social criticism, to combat what hinders national development (the role of the bearer of public conscience); the ability to morally empathize with the "humiliated and insulted". At the same time, the intelligentsia began to be determined primarily not by education or occupation but through the opposition of official state power. Which, of course, started being a problem for the said state.

Besides the principles listed above the intelligentsia had a firmly established framework of knowledge developed mostly based upon the writings of its ideologists:
  • The Russian peasants are good for nothing drunkards because they are being oppressed. Have to be taken care of because they are too stupid to take care of themselves. Russian merchant class are thieving bastards. Russian administration are thieving oppressors. An ideal occupation for Russian intelligent was to put on a peasant dress [10] and go to the village spending his time singing the Russian people songs and explaining the peasants that they are a bunch of good for nothing idiots (after the first enthusiasts returned with the seriously damaged faces this part of a social mission lost most of its popularity).
1664417522443.png

  • The Germans - law-abiding, accurate, industrious, honest, sausage-eating, beer drinkers. Could be admired if not being so law-abiding.
  • The French - easygoing, frivolous, eating frogs and drinking Absinthe. Should not be taken seriously. Are designing fashions for the socially unconscious women (a socially conscious one, even if French, must look as a scarecrow). In their time free from the occupations listed above are dancing can can. All of them, all the time.
  • The Brits - just perfect in all respects, especially because they are not dancing can can, which indicates that they are serious people. Eat roast-beef and oatmeal and drink ale and gin. Must be admired but the attempts to copy a perfection are pointless. The Scots are also perfect and wear skirts, except when they are coming to Russia.
  • Spaniards - exotic. Live on the banks of Guadalquivir (or in Alhambra) and dance cachucha.
1664413320526.png

  • Italians - also exotic. Are living in the ancient ruins, by selling all types of the ancient junk to the tourists and writing operas (of which a true intelligent does not approve due to the absence of a social content). What one has to know about the local geography boils down to the following: the Rome has the Acropolis, Acropolis contains Necropolis and Necropolis contains the Naples.
  • Hungarians - all are wearing a hussar uniform.
  • Austrians - treacherous
  • Romanians - this is a profession.
  • Americans are somewhat a mystery because nobody, even the most progressive writers, saw them. Presumably should be admired but nobody is sure for what exactly. The issue of a cannibalism has to be clarified [11].


1664413994744.png

For a while Nicholas tended to ignore the reports about this emerging problem expecting that the Corps of the Gendarmes will take care of it but this did not quite work out because it was not clear even how the part of its duties defined as “Detection and study of state crimes; the protection of external order” is applicable. So far, these people had been reasonably quiet and the part of their views related to the peasant completely coincided with the official point of view on the same subject and who really cared about their views regarding the French? Concern about the fatherland was, of course, questionable: on one hand, it was not exactly their business because this is what the administration was for, but OTOH if this implied that they are not going to steal everything that is not securely nailed, then this sentiment has to be lauded. But “criticism” part was troubling. Of course, as long as it did not result in some actions, it was not punishable by law and so far none of the subgroup’s members was noticed in doing anything except causing vibrations of the air called “sound” and even then, as often as not either in a state of inebriation or during the card game (both occupations being considered a behavior of a law-abiding citizen). But who knows what may happen tomorrow?

Being first and foremost a military man Nicholas started with considering a military style solution: arrest everybody and send to serve as the soldiers. Or, as an option, send to katorga. Don’t care about the numbers: Russian army and Siberia can accommodate as many people as necessary.

It is not known who gave him an alternative idea but, before the full lists of the future soldiers and lumberjacks were composed, the order was rescinded. By the new ukaz a list of the most influential members of the group was to be prepared by the Corps of Gendarmes with the indication of their importance. To surprise of the Corps, instead of being used for the arrests, the list had to be sent to the Chapter of the Imperial Orders. And the Chapter got an imperial ukaz to award those on the list with the order of St. Stanislaw of the III or II class depending on their importance.
1664416694569.jpeg

This was not an end of the Russian liberalism and probably not even the beginning of the end but perhaps the end of the beginning.😂

__________
[1] “You have illuminated your mind with enlightenment,
You saw the truth,
And you loved the tenderly alien peoples,
And in your wisdom hated your own.”
Pushkin
[2] “...According to my numerous observations, our liberal is never able to allow someone to have his own special conviction and not to respond immediately to his opponent with swearing or even something worse...” Dostoevsky, “The Idiot”
[3] “Moderate liberalism: a dog needs freedom, but still it needs to be kept on a chain.” Chekhov
[4] “To save the Russian state from them, give high state awards to their leaders!” A.K. Tolstoy
[5] “Every foreigner seems to him [a Russian abroad] to be the highest organism that can both think and express his thoughts...”
“He found that he was going too fast and in a wrong direction”
Saltykov-Schedrin
[6] In OTL Pestel, one of the most radical leaders of the Decembrists, was routinely sent to various regiments “to shape them up”.
[7] This was the “golden age” of the Russian literature.
[8] We are talking alt-Nicholas. 😂
[9] The international revolutionary community condemned Herzen for exposing his wife to "moral coercion" and hindering her happiness with her lover.
[10] Rather its “civilized” version.
[11] Of course NI was not a member of intelligentsia but while giving one Russian professor permission to attend one of the reputable East Coast colleges he instructed: “don’t eat the human meat.”
 
Emperor Paul started with the abolishing the “revolutionary” hats and neckties and before he was completely done with this part of his program, the whole revolutionary brouhaha ended up with a quite acceptable Consulate and, as a gesture of a good will and open-mindedness, he allowed not just a return of the huge neckties (regarding the hats he put his feet down) but even the “semi-naked” female fashions grudgingly acknowledging that even the revolutions can produce some positive results.
Bwuahahahaha now we know the Emperor does think with his head 😅
Alexander did not have any specific ideology except the demand of being an object of everybody’s adoration
Oh my God
He's me!
foot of Ararat Mountain where the kingdom of Christ could be founded on earth.
Im pretty sure God has founded Christ already but you do you Alex :openedeyewink:
: “During the argument about the racing horses an opponent called him a liberal. He was so happy that for the next week he was making the social visits telling everybody the story”.
Adorable
“the only purpose of the Russian state is to show the bad example to the world”
Accurate?
(to OTL at least)
“We have something in our blood that rejects any real progress.”
Standing as if out of time, we were not affected by the upbringing of the human race.”
Oh come on someone tell this guy to eat a nut before the Tsar tells him to eat a bullet
he was declared mentally ill and held and the house arrest.
Based
The Germans - law-abiding, accurate, industrious, honest, sausage-eating, beer drinkers.
Glorious
The French - easygoing, frivolous, eating frogs and drinking Absinthe. Should not be taken seriously.
"They hated Jesus because he spoke the truth"
The Brits - just perfect in all respects
The Scots are also perfect and wear skirts
INDEED
  • Austrians - treacherous
Accurate, also applies to above
[1] “You have illuminated your mind with enlightenment,
You saw the truth,
And you loved the tenderly alien peoples,
And in your wisdom hated your own.”
Pushkin
Stray dog syndrom in a nutshell
 
This is a great avenue and you're handling it well. I look forward to it moving to some OTL key players, or maybe even being complete new ones. Are we getting close to OTL's Japanese - Russian War?
 
223. The ruled (cont. 1)
«Ты просвещением свой разум осветил,
Ты правды лик увидел,
И нежно чуждые народы возлюбил,
И мудро свой возненавидел

Пушкин [1]
« …по моим многочисленным наблюдениям, никогда наш либерал не в состоянии позволить иметь кому-нибудь своё особое убеждение и не ответить тотчас же своему оппоненту ругательством или даже чем-нибудь хуже…»
Достоевский [2]
«Умеренный либерализм: нужна собаке свобода, но все-таки её нужно на цепи держать.»
Чехов [3]
«Чтоб Русская держава спаслась от их затеи,
Повесить Станислава всем вожакам на шеи!
»
А.К. Толстой [4]
«Всякий иностранец кажется ему [россиянину за границей] высшим организмом, который может и мыслить, и выражать свою мысль…»
«Он обнаружил, что шел слишком быстро и в неправильном направлении»

Салтыков-Щедрин [5]​


Being extremely busy with putting things in a proper military-style order, Nicholas overlooked, for a while, resurgence of an unfamiliar beast which was threatening the very foundations of the perfect system he envisioned. The name of this apocalyptic beast was “liberalism”.

Russian liberalism prior to Nicholas
Of course, it was not like it suddenly appeared of a nowhere, some ideas regarding limitations of the royal power and some similar things had been expressed on a regular base since the Time of Troubles and, if one had a creative mind, they could be found even in the reforms of Peter the Great (at some point Peter said something along the lines that both the ruler and the subjects are responsible for well-being of the Fatherland but, taking into an account the methods of his rule, nobody could tell for sure what the hell did he mean by this statement). Well, to think about it, even Ivan the Terrible was demonstrating at least some important symptoms of a liberal behavior: after all he was shouting on the people before ordering their execution.

Since then there were certain government’s actions which could be considered “liberal” but which were actually a result of a pure pragmatism rather than ideology. Actually, a consistent state ideology was pretty much absent except for a formula “the Emperor is the only source of the laws but he has to abide to the existing laws”. For a short while, the French Revolution almost resulted in in some coherent conservative (or at least anti-revolutionary) program but reigning at that time Emperor Paul started with the abolishing the “revolutionary” hats and neckties and before he was completely done with this part of his program, the whole revolutionary brouhaha ended up with a quite acceptable Consulate and, as a gesture of a good will and open-mindedness, he allowed not just a return of the huge neckties (regarding the hats he put his feet down) but even the “semi-naked” female fashions grudgingly acknowledging that even the revolutions can produce some positive results. Alexander did not have any specific ideology except the demand of being an object of everybody’s adoration and even allowed wearing of the top hats, which was justifiably considered as a great step toward the European liberalism.
View attachment 777735
Even more so when this headgear became popular among the Russian peasants making it a truly egalitarian act and raising the expectations that Alexander may declare some kind of a republic. Or something.
View attachment 777737
Everybody was holding his (or her) breath awaiting for the new steps toward the European-style liberalism but, fortunately or unfortunately, at that time he met Beate Barbara Juliane von Krüdener (granddaughter of Fielmarshal Munnich) who just decided to switch from writing the sentimental novels to being a religious prophetess and preacher. Her predictions were dark, uncertain, easily amenable to all sorts of interpretations, but made a strong impression on many listeners. Some of them sold their property and went to look for new places at the foot of Ararat Mountain where the kingdom of Christ could be founded on earth.
View attachment 777739
Alexander decided to go into the mysticism because it definitely looked like fun and did so quite successfully even if the baroness lost her influence after through her “the Holy Spirit started giving commands to the Emperor about some loans at the cash desk of the Board of Guardianship.” After this she was politely asked to travel to her estates and Alexander was left fully on his own, which was more than a little bit scary. Nobody could tell for sure how far Alexander would go in his mystical mood (and if the military settlements were a part of it) but he suddenly died before making any official pronouncements on this subject, leaving his successor, and the Russian society in general, in the ideological limbo.

Nicholas and the “beast”.
At the time Nicholas ascended the throne the Russian liberalism was mostly a tame animal limited to the noble class and being even, to a certain degree, fashionable: “During the argument about the racing horses an opponent called him a liberal. He was so happy that for the next week he was making the social visits telling everybody the story”. Making the liberal speeches became almost as popular as discussing taste of a broiled sturgeon even if everybody agreed that the second issue was much more important.
View attachment 777782
But, to be objective, the administrative subclass of the species (the liberals, not sturgeons) often proved to be useful because, besides making speeches on the banquets, quite a few of them had been engaged in setting up some charitable institutes, overseeing creation of the schools and some other activities fitting for a good christian and often being patronized by the persons of unquestionable virtues, all the way up to the Empress herself. Unless overdoing things to a degree which would warrant the Emperor’s resolution “The fool or a scumbag? Find out!”, this subclass was officially approved and encouraged all the way to someone being able to raise to the rank of the “civilian general” (“Your Excellency” by the Table of the Ranks) just by making the big contributions to the right charities.

The military subclass was a more complicated issue due to a general assumption that for an officer reading the books, teaching the soldiers literacy and improving their living conditions is inevitably associated with a damage to the discipline and parade ground drill. However, soon enough this misconcept was dispelled by the realities of life: the suspected officers predominantly were just as strict disciplinarians as their less enlightened colleagues and quite often were serving as an example [6]. Not that the reading (occupation of a questionable usefulness for a good officer with the allowances for a frivolous poetry and certain type of the French novels) prevented these officers from being as good in drinking and card games as anybody else. In other words, they were not considered a major problem, especially when result of their activities was a proper patriotic excitement and a perfectly stretched toe during a ceremonial march.
View attachment 777787
However, there was also a dangerous subtype of the species, Russian Liberal Philosopher. One, and for a while the only representative of that group, Chaadaev, was preaching something that nobody could quite comprehend except for the catchy sentences like “the only purpose of the Russian state is to show the bad example to the world” , “We have something in our blood that rejects any real progress.” or “We have never gone hand in hand with other nations; we belong neither to the West nor to the East, and we have no traditions of either. Standing as if out of time, we were not affected by the upbringing of the human race.” Which, as everybody agreed, sounded quite offensive, especially the part which denied the “European” status, and author’s refusal to celebrate the Russian diplomatic and military victories. Taking into an account that his ideas on how to remedy these alleged problems were quite vague and could be interpreted as a rejection of a notion that Russia is one big family which has to obey its father-monarch and call for some kind of a national atonement for what supposed to be a normal behavior, he was declared mentally ill and held and the house arrest.

Nicholas made his conclusions and ordered a drastic decrease of the students studying philosophy in the Russian universities declaring that Russia needs, engineers, doctors and teachers, not the philosophers. But this measure proved to be inefficient because the beast of a liberalism appeared in a completely different and seemingly safe area, Russian literature. So far, this area was occupied by the people who belonged to the society and could even be admitted to the court or, at least by the people of the unquestionable loyalty. The results were quite good [7] and there was no reason for paying too much of attention except an occasional need to deal with the literary squabbles:

“... in today's issue of "Bee" there is again an unfair and vulgar article directed against Pushkin; <...> there will probably be a continuation; therefore, I propose to call on Bulgarin and forbid him printing any criticism of literary works from now on…”

But a relative freedom of the press [8] greatly extended the numbers of both readers and writers with the first group now going well beyond the members of a “society” and having quite different tastes to which the second group was trying to attend: after all, the literature was a business and the more readers you have, the better off you are. Of course, it did not happen overnight and the first crop of the writers still belonged to the society. Their modus operandi was surprisingly uniform:
( a) Bemoan about the suffering of the simple people. Not that they ever had any serious contact with the “oppressed masses”, except when visiting their estates for hunting, and sometimes the results looked rather peculiar, which did not prevent it from being printed in a progressive magazine. An acceptable option was to write something nasty about their socially equals and/or administration.
(b) Get the results printed and receive royalty.
(c) Go back to the estate for hunting and card playing with the visiting friends with the options of getting to Paris or London for entertainment or playing cards in Moscow/St. Petersburg.
(d) When the money had been spent, go back to (a).

The model was working just fine unless specific individual tended to spend more money on cards and hunting than he was gaining by his literary activities. To have the model complete, it was something like a requirement for this generation of the progressive writers to live with the wives of their friends (and for their wives, if they had any, to do the same with the friends of their husbands) [9].

As long as the writers were relatively few and mostly belonged to the “society” it was at least tolerable and could be controlled by a censorship but in this area Nicholas was not quite consistent allowing a relatively easy process for opening the new publications. The censors simply were too few to read constantly growing volume of a literarily production and the dam was broken. The immediate byproduct was fast spreading of the “wrong ideas” within now a broad group of the educated (and semi-ecucated) people outside the literary class. University professors (predominantly of the humanitarian specialties), students, doctors, teachers and all other types of what was defined as “intelligentsia” and what actually became a subculture which, ideologically, amounted to following: concern about the fate of their fatherland (civil responsibility); desire for social criticism, to combat what hinders national development (the role of the bearer of public conscience); the ability to morally empathize with the "humiliated and insulted". At the same time, the intelligentsia began to be determined primarily not by education or occupation but through the opposition of official state power. Which, of course, started being a problem for the said state.

Besides the principles listed above the intelligentsia had a firmly established framework of knowledge developed mostly based upon the writings of its ideologists:
  • The Russian peasants are good for nothing drunkards because they are being oppressed. Have to be taken care of because they are too stupid to take care of themselves. Russian merchant class are thieving bastards. Russian administration are thieving oppressors. An ideal occupation for Russian intelligent was to put on a peasant dress [10] and go to the village spending his time singing the Russian people songs and explaining the peasants that they are a bunch of good for nothing idiots (after the first enthusiasts returned with the seriously damaged faces this part of a social mission lost most of its popularity).
View attachment 777838
  • The Germans - law-abiding, accurate, industrious, honest, sausage-eating, beer drinkers. Could be admired if not being so law-abiding.
  • The French - easygoing, frivolous, eating frogs and drinking Absinthe. Should not be taken seriously. Are designing fashions for the socially unconscious women (a socially conscious one, even if French, must look as a scarecrow). In their time free from the occupations listed above are dancing can can. All of them, all the time.
  • The Brits - just perfect in all respects, especially because they are not dancing can can, which indicates that they are serious people. Eat roast-beef and oatmeal and drink ale and gin. Must be admired but the attempts to copy a perfection are pointless. The Scots are also perfect and wear skirts, except when they are coming to Russia.
  • Spaniards - exotic. Live on the banks of Guadalquivir (or in Alhambra) and dance cachucha.
View attachment 777822
  • Italians - also exotic. Are living in the ancient ruins, by selling all types of the ancient junk to the tourists and writing operas (of which a true intelligent does not approve due to the absence of a social content). What one has to know about the local geography boils down to the following: the Rome has the Acropolis, Acropolis contains Necropolis and Necropolis contains the Naples.
  • Hungarians - all are wearing a hussar uniform.
  • Austrians - treacherous
  • Romanians - this is a profession.
  • Americans are somewhat a mystery because nobody, even the most progressive writers, saw them. Presumably should be admired but nobody is sure for what exactly. The issue of a cannibalism has to be clarified [11].


View attachment 777825
For a while Nicholas tended to ignore the reports about this emerging problem expecting that the Corps of the Gendarmes will take care of it but this did not quite work out because it was not clear even how the part of its duties defined as “Detection and study of state crimes; the protection of external order” is applicable. So far, these people had been reasonably quiet and the part of their views related to the peasant completely coincided with the official point of view on the same subject and who really cared about their views regarding the French? Concern about the fatherland was, of course, questionable: on one hand, it was not exactly their business because this is what the administration was for, but OTOH if this implied that they are not going to steal everything that is not securely nailed, then this sentiment has to be lauded. But “criticism” part was troubling. Of course, as long as it did not result in some actions, it was not punishable by law and so far none of the subgroup’s members was noticed in doing anything except causing vibrations of the air called “sound” and even then, as often as not either in a state of inebriation or during the card game (both occupations being considered a behavior of a law-abiding citizen). But who knows what may happen tomorrow?

Being first and foremost a military man Nicholas started with considering a military style solution: arrest everybody and send to serve as the soldiers. Or, as an option, send to katorga. Don’t care about the numbers: Russian army and Siberia can accommodate as many people as necessary.

It is not known who gave him an alternative idea but, before the full lists of the future soldiers and lumberjacks were composed, the order was rescinded. By the new ukaz a list of the most influential members of the group was to be prepared by the Corps of Gendarmes with the indication of their importance. To surprise of the Corps, instead of being used for the arrests, the list had to be sent to the Chapter of the Imperial Orders. And the Chapter got an imperial ukaz to award those on the list with the order of St. Stanislaw of the III or II class depending on their importance.
View attachment 777837
This was not an end of the Russian liberalism and probably not even the beginning of the end but perhaps the end of the beginning.😂

__________
[1] “You have illuminated your mind with enlightenment,
You saw the truth,
And you loved the tenderly alien peoples,
And in your wisdom hated your own.”
Pushkin
[2] “...According to my numerous observations, our liberal is never able to allow someone to have his own special conviction and not to respond immediately to his opponent with swearing or even something worse...” Dostoevsky, “The Idiot”
[3] “Moderate liberalism: a dog needs freedom, but still it needs to be kept on a chain.” Chekhov
[4] “To save the Russian state from them, give high state awards to their leaders!” A.K. Tolstoy
[5] “Every foreigner seems to him [a Russian abroad] to be the highest organism that can both think and express his thoughts...”
“He found that he was going too fast and in a wrong direction”
Saltykov-Schedrin
[6] In OTL Pestel, one of the most radical leaders of the Decembrists, was routinely sent to various regiments “to shape them up”.
[7] This was the “golden age” of the Russian literature.
[8] We are talking alt-Nicholas. 😂
[9] The international revolutionary community condemned Herzen for exposing his wife to "moral coercion" and hindering her happiness with her lover.
[10] Rather its “civilized” version.
[11] Of course NI was not a member of intelligentsia but while giving one Russian professor permission to attend one of the reputable East Coast colleges he instructed: “don’t eat the human meat.”
Marvellous! x'D
 
This is a great avenue and you're handling it well. I look forward to it moving to some OTL key players, or maybe even being complete new ones. Are we getting close to OTL's Japanese - Russian War?
Why are you itching for this specific war? First of all, there is more than half a century to it and second it was a byproduct of the easily avoidable massive stupidity, not something objectively inevitable.
 
Accurate?
(to OTL at least)

I wouldn't say so, while bad decisions were made one cannot say that Russia was particularly bad example as it still managed to stay afloat as a great powers, on second hand most states had it more, or less far worse .

This is a great avenue and you're handling it well. I look forward to it moving to some OTL key players, or maybe even being complete new ones. Are we getting close to OTL's Japanese - Russian War?

I doubt it will happen, for starter's even otl there was offer that basically specified Manchuria as Russian sphere while Korea was to be under Japanese sphere, i don't see the reason for Russia to alienate Japan over N. Korea as peer otl.

That is speaking about even wanting to build pacific fleet and divide already divided navy, or start dividing China in sphere's of influence as Russia stands to lose in both cases.

In Japanese case it's far better to give up Port Arthur and sign a deal that opens most of Korean ports and Japanese waters to Russian commercial interests. Regarding sphere's of influence, by otl Anglo - Russian entente Russia gets Manchuria, Xingijang and Outer Mongolia as it's sphere, one of these Russia already owns, while other two have a little commercial value , not speaking about possible acquisition of Outer Mongolia down the line as Qing Empire decays and before other European powers establish themselves. Otherwise support Qing territorial integrity (within reasonable limits ) and keep entire Chinese market open to Russian commercial interests.
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't say so, while bad decisions were made one cannot say that Russia was particularly bad example as it still managed to stay afloat as a great powers, on second hand most states had it more, or less far worse .

The whole perception was based upon the illusion/delusion and intentional disinformation.

The first Russian “free thinkers” had been nobles, mostly with the experience of campaigns of 1813-14 and, being who they are, their experience abroad was mostly limited to the …er… bright aspect of the things like the restaurants in Paris and communications with their socially equals. They could read something “philosophical” but they would not be interested in the lower classes and their life. Most of the next generation even did not get abroad and had been getting their information from the printed sources and how many of the French and British “classics” of the 1st half of the XIX were describing realistically or at all conditions of the peasants or working class? So it was all about these countries being, to one degree or another, parliamentarian, constitutional, and generally free of the annoying regulations. In other words, the ideal or close to the ideal.

Actually, while the future decembrists liked to invent various emancipation schemas, none of them (AFAIK) liberated his own serfs (unlike the “terrible” Benkendorf who did).

So the nasty things like the opium wars, colonialism, genocidal activities were overlooked not to spoil a general picture. Not that the Russian Empire was not doing all these things but it surely was not unique.

And slightly later, when it came to the dedicated ideologists like Herzen (who was expelled from Russia but kept receiving income from his estate) it was even more of the same but intentionally.


I doubt it will happen, for starter's even otl there was offer that basically specified Manchuria as Russian sphere while Korea was to be under Japanese sphere, i don't see the reason for Russia to alienate Japan over N. Korea as peer otl.That is speaking about even wanting to build pacific fleet and divide already divided navy, or start dividing China in sphere's of influence as Russia stands to lose in both cases.

The whole Far East schema was a byproduct of a bureaucratic delusion promoted by the unquestionably great statesman and economist, Witte. The main idea behind the whole drive, involving East China Railway as opposite to the completely Russian route of the TransSib, was a dramatic increase of the Russian exports into China. AFAIK, this proved to be a failure because the exports remained quite limited. With the exception of locally made Smirnov vodka, which almost immediately faced strong Chinese competition) and kerosine (which also had been facing some problems), there were few or none major export items and it looks like the whole schema did not produce a serious enthusiasm among the Russian manufacturers (the textile producers had been refusing to adjust their products to the specifics of Chinese market).

In OTL. Witte changed Russian traditional policy of the close relations with Japan to one oriented toward China in expectation that after the China-Japan War China is going to be a huge market for the Russian goods. China got Russian loans (with which it paid contribution to Japan providing it with the funds for rearmament) and Russia got concessions based upon the excessively optimistic schemas most probably not supported by any serious research of the Chinese markets and willingness/ability of the Russian manufacturers to go into that market.

The RR was seemingly making profit mostly by carrying cargo inside China. The Korea and finally Bezobrazov’s Affair were more of the same: failed efforts to get some money (mostly by a group of the well-connected people).

The Pacific fleet was a concession to the “military ambitions” (I may be wrong but this was seemingly pushed by NN) and out of all possible places PA was probably the worst one for the naval base. And both before and after Russian Empire was just fine with having on the Pacific a relatively small fleet of the fast light cruisers and lesser ships: mantra of the power projection did not make sense because there was very little Russian trade off the Pacific coast.
Linked to the idea ice free commercial port at Dalnii followed the pattern: expensive, not competitive with the Chinese ports (nothing to export) and by the end of construction not even ice free. Needless to say that by that time the ice free thingy was not important because Russia already had icebreakers and kept ordering more (UK was building them based on the Russian designs).


In Japanese case it's far better to give up Port Arthur and sign a deal that opens most of Korean ports and Japanese waters to Russian commercial interests.

As I said, PA was a byproduct of a fundamentally mistaken policy and should not be an issue at all.
Regarding sphere's of influence, by otl Anglo - Russian entente Russia gets Manchuria, Xingijang and Outer Mongolia as it's sphere, one of these Russia already owns, while other two have a little commercial value , not speaking about possible acquisition of Outer Mongolia down the line as Qing Empire decays and before other European powers establish themselves. Otherwise support Qing territorial integrity (within reasonable limits ) and keep entire Chinese market open to Russian commercial interests.

See above. This market was a fiction. Chinese were not buying and Russians were not selling. With all its industrial development Russia was not an exact replica of the UK or US, especially in the terms of commercial attitudes and a balance between the domestic consumption and overall production volume: the domestic market was not saturated with the locally produced manufactured goods and there was no pressing need to look for the outside markets for them. And, with the Russian manufacturing base being mostly in Europe, just the transportation was increasing costs dramatically. Add to this a relative weakness of the Russian merchant fleet and a limited capacity of the TransSib and you’ll get a picture.
 
Why are you itching for this specific war? First of all, there is more than half a century to it and second it was a byproduct of the easily avoidable massive stupidity, not something objectively inevitable.
Is it? Darn, I felt we were progressed further in to the 19th century. This timeline is so much superior for Russia to OTL its not even funny. I always felt Russia is a land of wasted potential, its probably what attracted me to her as well.

I get that from the Russian side it was useless and they did not gain what they told themselves they'd gain. Was that the same case for the Japanese? I thought they were looking for a fight to establish them on an equal level to the Western world? Or is that bad propaganda?
 
Is it? Darn, I felt we were progressed further in to the 19th century. This timeline is so much superior for Russia to OTL its not even funny. I always felt Russia is a land of wasted potential, its probably what attracted me to her as well.

I get that from the Russian side it was useless and they did not gain what they told themselves they'd gain.

Taking into an account a general state of confusion which passed at that time for the Russian foreign policy, I’m not quite certain what exactly who exactly wanted to gain from the ongoing schemas and to which end.

Was that the same case for the Japanese? I thought they were looking for a fight to establish them on an equal level to the Western world? Or is that bad propaganda?
One thing I can tell for sure. After the RJW was over, the relations were restored and there was a mutual cooperation in Manchuria with a purpose not to let the Yanks into the area.
 
The ruled (cont. 2)
224. The ruled (cont. 2)

There are two schools or methods [of animal training]: wild - wilde Dressur, in this manner - fire and iron, and gentle - zahme Dressur, in which not only is it not supposed to shoot, but even a scourge is clapped only in the air just for show, and meanwhile the results are achieved the most brilliant: the animals obey like silk, and there is a calm and complete complacence in the public. “
He experienced the highest joy available to an advanced Russian intelligent: learned nasty things about his neighbor”
N. Leskov, ‘Administrative grace’
“The serfdom is a powder cellar under the state.”
“Laws are written for subordinates, not for superiors, and you have no right to refer to them and justify them in explanations with me.”

A. Benkendorf
“…He is a honest and decent person, too careless to be vindictive and too noble to try to hurt you…”
Pushkin about Benkendorf
… he is much more loved than feared.”
M. Korf about Benkendorf
"I need an employee: cook, groom and carpenter”
Puskin, ‘The tale of the priest and his worker Balda’
“Trouble, if the shoemaker starts baking pies, and baker start making boots”
Krylov, ‘Pike and cat’​

The tool
Nicholas could a parade ground addict but this does not mean that he was completely unaware of the numerous domestic problems, which were going far beyond, so far insignificant, the beast of liberalism. OTOH, having a primarily “military” mindset, he was looking for a single and simple tool that will be dealing with all problems. Preferably, there must be somebody, preferably a military person whom he personally knew, to volunteer for such a task. And there was such a volunteer.
1664562112702.jpeg

Alexander Christophorovich Benkendorf was an officer who fought with the distinction in all Russian military conflicts starting from the Great Polish War. During the peaceful times by order of Emperor Alexander I, he went on a secret expedition, which was supposed to "circle Asian and European Russia for a military-strategic inspection". For few years he served in the Russian embassy in Paris performing the functions about the Consulate members never found out. Well, except for one: in 1808, Mademoiselle Georges suddenly violated her contract with Comedie Française (which threatens her with a huge penalty) and left with Benkendorf (by that time he had become her lover) to Russia.
1664562685343.jpeg

Of course, the story was a little bit exaggerated: few month before this “dramatic event” happened, the Consulate received communication from the Russian Court that Emperor Alexander would be greatly pleased if some of the leading French actors would come to perform in Russia. So together with her in 1808, several more French artists left France and went to Russia, including the famous dancer L. Dupor, immediately admitted to the Imperial ballet troupe. But the story involving a lover and a secret flight is definitely much more romantic and who cares that Benkendorf remained in Paris for a considerable time after this event? Everybody knows that he was a womanizer so here you go. 😉

During the huge deluge of 1824 in St.Petersburg he (already lieutenant general and commander of the Guards cavalry division) jumped into a boat and was personally participating in saving the people.

On April 12, 1826, Benkendorf filed a report to His Imperial Majesty containing a project to establish a higher police under the leadership of a special minister and inspector of the gendarme corps with a task of dealing with the Russian domestic problems. Nicholas knew and liked Benkendorf and appreciated a rare occasion when somebody volunteered for a duty [1]. So Nicholas him chief of the gendarmes on June 25, 1826, and on July 3, 1826 - chief of the III Department of His Imperial Majesty's own office and commander of His Imperial Majesty's Headquarters.
1664569346332.jpeg

The good news ended approximately at that point because while both Nicholas and Benkendorf had the best intentions, neither of them had a right idea regarding their implementation. The newly-created Corps of the Gendarmes had a dual subordination. In the inspection, drill and economic parts it was subordinated to the Ministry of War but in its functional activities it was subordinated to the III Department. The Corp had its Staff and 8 districts. Each district had 5-6 departments, each department covering 2-3 gubernias.

In general, the tasks of the corps included: informing the emperor about the riots and abuses committed by both government officials and persons in public service, monitoring moods in society, power support for the ranks of the Third Division during arrests, searches, escort of detainees. The corps commander had the rights of commander of the army.

Taking into an account that the scope of intended activities included pretty much everything from investigating corruption and anti-government activities and all the way down to investigating the domestic abuses (with the counterfeiting, fires, etc. in between), size of the intended tool was plain pathetic. The main Staff included 15 officers, 1 doctor, 3 civilian employees and 23 soldiers not fit for the regular army service. Moscow and St-Petersburg gubernias has in their offices 4 officers, 1 secretary and 2 soldiers while other gubernias only 1 or 2 officers, a secretary and 2 soldiers. Later some special units had been added but they were used for strictly policing purposes including security of the railroads.

The III Department was equally unimpressive. It had only 16 people [2] responsible for: watching over the revolutionary activities with a duty to provide Emperor with the annual report about general political situation in the country, oversight of the religious sects, technological innovations, counterfeiting, main Russian prisons, foreigners living in Russia, all types of the popular disturbances, prognoses regarding the harvest, censorship, secret oversight of the state institutions and high-ranking officials. In the archives of the III department for the period from 1826 to 1848 there were only 11 cases related to the revolutionary movement. The vast majority were cases of bribery and immoral actions of officials, unfair court decisions, landlords abusing their power and various “family issues”.

The silliest thing is that pathetic apparatus did manage to keep the whole Russian Empire scared. But “keeping scared” is not the same as “producing results”.

The head of this terrifying tool, Benkendorf, also was nothing like Joseph Fouche both in the terms of a personal integrity and professionally. In the first are he was immeasurably higher (well, this was not a challenge) and in the second he was hopelessly lower. He was a personally honest and rather idealistic figure with a typical for a Russian general attitude to the law and legalistic (the laws are written for the subordinates). It can be said that he had the right ideas and even understood the problems his organization was facing but did not see any practical solution:

Officials. This name should be understood as all those who exist due to their service. This class is perhaps the most morally corrupt. Decent people are rarely found among them. Theft, forgery, misinterpretation of laws - that's their craft. Unfortunately, they rule, and not only some, the most important of them, but, in fact, everybody, since they all know all the subtleties of the bureaucratic system. They are afraid of the introduction of justice, exact laws and the eradication of theft; they hate those who persecute bribery and flee them like an owl of the sun. They systematically ruin all government activities and form cadres of dissatisfied people; but, not daring to display the causes of their discontent, they also pretend to be patriots.” From an official report of the III Department.

Being himself a member of the “society” he succumbed in his personal activities mostly to the issues involving its members, mostly those engaged in the literature. Here his record was sketchy: some considered him a terrible figure (usually without getting into the boring details) but quite a few had a very high regard of him [3]. Most definitely, he would not have any idea how to deal with the complicated issue like the potentially revolutionary activities of the recently appearing Russian intelligentsia. His subordinate officers were not much better in that regard even if few of them of them were not above the perusal of a private correspondence and using the paid informers, they openly treated these useful individuals as the low and despicable life form. Something more complicated, like having the agents provocateurs, was well beyond the scope of their imagination. How could it be otherwise when it was stated that their commander “…makes every effort to invite kind and honest people to the corps entrusted to him - and, in case of an unsuccessful choice, immediately removes the unworthy”? One of the young army officers who was entering the Corps wrote to his wife “If I, entering the gendarme corp, become a scammer, an informer, then my good name, of course, will be tarnished. But if, on the contrary, without interfering with cases related to the internal police, I am the support of the poor, the protection of the unfortunate; if I, acting openly, enforcing justice to the oppressed, I will watch that in courts they give direct and fair justice, then what do you call me? Won't I be worthy of respect then, won't my place be the most excellent, the noblest? So, my friend, that's the goal for which I join the gendarme corps.”

In society, the news of the creation of the police was taken on caution. A. Dmitriev wrote: "The gendarmes, instead of respect, were in general contempt". At least for a while the blue uniform was viewed with a contempt. OTOH, among the lower classes the gendarmes were generally considered as the defenders against corruption and injustice.

Anyway, for the effective fight against corruption the Corps was too small and, anyway, its functions had been limited to the investigation and bringing cases to the court and the judicial system was one of the most corrupted branches of the Russian administration. Neither would the Senate be of a great help because general IQ of its members was questioned even by his creator, Peter I, who wrote about its members (make a guess who did appoint them): “The senators must speak without using prepared notes so that idiocy of each of them will be clear to everybody”. Not too much changed since then and some of the members of this venerable institution (out of those not in advanced stage of Alzheimer or other age-related problem) tended to have very peculiar ideas about the similar obvious things like “caught red-handed”. Add to this numerous other mandatory activities and it starts looking as a very unlikely miracle that there was a considerable number of the effective dealing with the corrupt officials.

But for dealing with the real and imaginable “internal enemies” these officers were pretty useless or even counter-productive because, as the former army or navy people, they had nothing but contempt to all these professors, publishers and other members of “intelligentsia” and as a result could not and would not to recruit agents in it and tended to react on all problems, real and imaginable, in a true military style of a wilde Dressur producing a lot of a noise and some drastic, and usually foolish, actions which were just creating “martyrs of the cause”. A popular publisher amenable to the “gentle persuasion” coming from the Department and capable to prevent some undesirable event was absolutely useless in Siberia while his social status was greatly elevated and stupidity of the authorities was going to produce protests in his defense, etc.

However, while being naive, the “blue officers” were not stupid and soon enough it was figured out that all these blabbing heads represent some danger in one and only case: when they are being supported by the students of local universities. It would rather hard to imagine that a prominent writer or a publisher of a very liberal magazine is going to start throwing stoned in the windows of his less liberal colleague or even start loudly booing him on a street (except for the cases when the said liberal person is being seriously drunk, which would put his activities into a totally different category). But the progressive students could easily do all of the above and much more on a greater scale just because there were much more of them and because they tended to operate in the crowds.

Enemy’s territory.
Of course, a general view of the Russian system of the high education as one big source of trouble was based mostly on a blissful ignorance not only of the Corps of Gendarmes but of Nicholas himself as well: university education was a necessary evil and must be controlled and restricted but not to a degree which will hurt the state interests: Russian Empire needed a lot of well-educated people not to fall behind the rest of Europe.

But the students were not an uniform mass. Many of them had been nobles and the members of a society (high education, in general, was if not a “must” then “very desirable” for those who was not joining the military) paying for their education. Unless they were rich enough for getting education for the sake of it, this was a way to start a civic career from a good position.
1664586968508.jpeg


Many of those of a humbler origin also were going into jurisprudence with a similar purpose even if their starting position could be lower than for those with the better connections. Still, this branch of a government was numerous, prestigious and, if one was properly positioned, could be quite awarding. And a graduate with degree in that area could get a good employment in other branches of the state apparatus as well. The top officials could consider themselves a “law” or adopt a popular principle “if you feel that the law restricts you, take it from your desk, put it on your chair and sit on it: not seeing it you’ll feel yourself much freer in your activities” but all this had been applicable to their activities within their jurisdictions and even then only for as long as nobody on a higher level paid attention. So there was always a need in the subordinate officials who knew the legalities and “could find a legal justification of the violation of the laws”.

1664585759269.jpeg

Then there were numerous students who were going into the technical education, which will give a chance for a future career both in the state-run and private enterprises [4]. By the very nature of their future profession these people tended to be disciplined, concentrated on their studies and tended not to bother excessively with all types of non-technical nonsense.
1664585904743.jpeg

Medics tended to be on a more relaxed side in their appearances and politically problematic. Some of the progressive writers depicted them as the pillars of nihilism based upon a rather logical conclusion that cutting the frogs results in a cynical (or at least anatomical) attitude toward the women and general denial of any authorities [5]. But even the highest ranking (military) people, all the way to the Very Top, were acknowledging that the doctors were, regardless of their questionable attitudes, a necessary and even useful evil and even provided their protection when the …er… oppressed classes were accusing them of spreading the cholera and trying to drown them in the river or kill in some other way.
1664589149278.png

The humanitarians were more problematic both because their usefulness was much less clear and because, by nature, they were much less disciplined. The main potential source of troubles.

1664585873819.jpeg

Then there were so-called “students forever” who kept studying and studying never being able to graduate. They tended to be very active socially.
1664586231155.jpeg

Well, of course, there were various types of students’ social activities some of which were not considered harmful by anybody except for the denizens and members of the local constabulary. As far as the Corps and even many high-ranking personages (but not Emperor himself - he did not approve of drinking and unruly behavior) were concerned, this was excusable and quite natural behavior of the loyal young men.
1664586440839.jpeg

Approximately the same could be said about professors in the universities so there is no need to provide a special classification [6]. However, one thing should be remembered: they were paid based upon the number of attendees of their lectures. Which means that while in the technical, medical and jurisprudence areas the winners would be those with the highest knowledge, in the “humanitarian” areas the winners would be the greatest demagogues. But as long as the “oversight” had been conducted by the former military with, generally, zero knowledge of the civic educational system, all these subtleties had been lost and university within their jurisdiction was a solid menacing unknown which, unfortunately, can’t be treated by a cavalry charge or, as the late Generalissimo would say, with a whiff of a grapeshot.

Fortunately (for the Corps), on the initial stages of its existence the apocalyptic beast of intelligentsia was quite young, not too numerous and relatively timid.


___________
[1] The fundamental principle of the military being, never volunteer for nothing, this was a case too rate not to be used.
[2] By another source 18.
[3] In OTL in the Soviet times all the positive remarks had been filtered out. Especially silly was situation with Pushkin. As the greatest Russian poet he had to be a revolutionary and being oppressed by the regime. So a lot of a creative filtering and quoting out of context had been done to put him into a correct position toward the regime even if he was often asked for B’s help and rarely if ever was rejected. Through Benkendorf, Pushkin obtained a pension to the widow of General Raevsky, transferred younger brother Lev from one regiment to another. The poet asked to print the play "state criminal" Küchelbecker. And Benkendorf didn't refuse him that. The play was printed in a printing house of ... III department! Benkendorf also helped the poet in matchmaking. Natalia Goncharova's mother did not like the poet too much. Pushkin asked Alexander Khristoforovich to give him a positive written recommendation. It was written, and very benevolent. Moreover, the approval of Nicholas I for the poet's marriage was added to it. What was left for Natalia Nikolaevna's parents to do after that? Only one thing is to bless your daughter to marry Pushkin.
[4] By the early XX Pyotr Wrangel was the only person with the high technical education accepted at the high society.
[5] Turgenev, “Fathers and children”
[6] A pure demagoguery: I simply could not find a series of the caricatures similar to the “types of the students”. 😉
 
Uphill, downhill
225. Uphill, downhill

“To rule the French, you need an iron hand in a velvet glove.”
Bernadotte [1]
“During social turmoil, every indifferent becomes dissatisfied, and every dissatisfied becomes an enemy, every enemy becomes a conspirator.”
“The more confident we are, the better we can develop and show our abilities. The greater the chances that our abilities will be appreciated.”

Guizot
When it came to the implementation of the operational plans he developed, he was no longer so good.”
“I should... shoot Soult, the biggest looter”

Napoleon about Soult
“Share prices rose continuously, and the speculators’ profits soon drew every class of society into the whirlpool … Anyone who had a penny in savings, or who had the merest glimmer of credit to dispose of, speculated in railway shares.”
Marx [2]
Intermission. 1844 was not a good year for France. On March 8 Bernadotte, the last of three original consuls, died. For the last two decades he was first among the equals, the most active and popular among the consuls, and the good times had been, at least in the popular perception, associated with his domestic and international policies.
1664819413883.jpeg

He was given a pompous state funeral with 21 rounds of salute. The soldiers carried the casket to the funeral carriage. Resting on four massive gilt wheels, it consisted of a gilded base, 25 feet long and 6 feet high, with a semi-circular platform in front. On this platform were statues of genies holding garlands and the trumpet of fame. At the back rose a pedestal, 18 feet long and 7 feet high, covered with gold and purple cloth. Behind was a profusion of flags. The carriage, weighing 13 tons, was drawn by 16 black horses. The latter were richly caparisoned in gold cloth, their manes adorned with gold tresses and white plumes. The National Guards and troops stationed along the route fell into line after the passage of the funeral carriage, closing the procession. At 1:00 the funeral carriage arrived. It passed under the Arc de Triomphe, where it remained stopped for a few minutes and then proceeded to the Les Invalides where the former consul was buried. The event attracted huge crowds and, disregarding the government's plan to keep procedure strictly military, a huge group of the medical and law students formed a procession of their own and marched through the city, four abreast, preceded by a tricoloured flag covered with black crepe.


Well, of course even while Bernadotte was still alive, the things were not always going in a right direction but the crisis was seemingly far away and he ended up getting all credits and no blame and this reflected upon his son and what after the deaths of Joseph and Lucien Bonaparte could be considered a “Bernadottist” party or movement even if neither formally existed, yet, with “peace and prosperity for all” being something of a trademark.

Of course, death of a consul meant a need to chose a substitute and, as the leading figure, Soult broke with a military tradition and (with Sebastiani’s guaranteed approval) chose a non-military figure, François Pierre Guillaume Guizot, a distinguished figure in the French politics, a historian, orator, patently honest man who already served as Minister of Education, ambassador to London, and Foreign Minister.
1664823726346.jpeg

Guizot's influence was critical in expanding public education, which under his ministry saw the creation of primary schools in every French commune. In the domestic politics he was supporting limitations on further expansion of the political franchise advocating restricting suffrage to propertied men and advising those who wanted the vote to "enrich yourselves" (enrichissez-vous) through hard work and thrift. In the foreign policy he was a strong proponent of the close relations with Britain and, at least for as long as it was suiting the Brits, managed to achieve this goal. In other words, a classic French “moderate liberal” of that period.

There was a tiny problem: he had no clue about the trifles like the economic situation in France and Europe in general and did not care to learn. Slogans like “hard work and thrift” were quite enough for him. This was putting the Consulate in a very precarious position because its now leading figure, Soult, got himself busy with creating for himself a luxurious quasi-royal court and Sebastiani was quite satisfied with having a good life doing nothing.

And situation in France was anything but trouble free.

The French Revolution confiscated the nobility-owned lands, broke them into the small parcels and gave peasants for free. These revolutionary measures cleared the way for the development of small-scale peasant farming, which has become the dominant form of agricultural production. With the growth of the peasant population, small farms, of course, became even more fragmented. By the 1840 over 70% of the landowners possessed less than 2 hectares of land. The dominance of small farms was the main reason for the relatively slow pace of development of capitalism in the French village. In terms of agricultural production, France in the first half of the XIX century was inferior not only to England with its farming, capitalist agriculture, but also to Prussia and Austria, where lord feudal lords dominated. Fragmentation and small holdings predetermined a weak level of agricultural machinery, low labor productivity in agriculture, special exposure to the whims of nature. The total output was growing (in a long term) but the French wheat remained costly. Then, there was a financial issue. Of course, the farmers needed loans. By 1840, the mortgage (land) debt of French landowners amounted to 11 billion francs. Banks ruthlessly exploited the peasantry, whose situation was essentially not much different from that of hired workers. Peasants in the form of mortgage interest, as well as interest on other usury loans, gave the capitalists not only land rent, not only all net income, but even part of their necessary product. Bankers used peasant proprietary psychology: a peasant continued to consider himself the owner, not realizing that this property had long been fictitious. But, starting from some point, the further investments into these farms ceased to make sense: the farmers already had been paying all that they could and the same goes for the small enterprises.

Huge funds were accumulated by the banking industry and they were not invested in the national economy, because profits from small businesses and farms were significantly lower than from foreign investment and foreign securities. In addition, banks avoided distributing funds between thousands of small enterprises and depending on the success of their activities.
Thus, the characteristic features of the French economy in the 1840s were:
  • Slow pace of industrial development; among other reasons this was due to the shortage of the labor force: the peasants were sticking to their farms and did not want to turn themselves into the hired workers. There were additional factors related to the governmental policies: it supported usage of the existing canals as opposite to the intensive development of the railroads and, with the same intention of supporting the existing businesses, it kept promoting usage of the stage coaches and other traditional means of transportation. The main exception was Belgian territory with its traditional highly developed manufacturing.
  • Increasing the role of capital export abroad;
  • Increased influence of bank capital;
  • Relative backwardness of agriculture; as far as the government was involved, it was supporting the big estates leaving small farmers to their own fate.
  • Numerous layer of rentier.
As a result, France was ill-prepared to face the coming storm.

The perfect storm
Nothing, as far as having a crisis situation, was missed by 1847 and, not a big surprise, it all started in Britain [4].

In 1841-1848, the British railway network increased by 6,900 km, while less than 1,300 km were laid from 1825 to 1840. Such successes required huge costs: in 1844-1847 they exceeded £100 million. During the same period, exports to China did not exceed £10 million. Capital invested in railways brought 8-9%. Revenues per mile of the operated network increased. Shares of railway companies have become the object of unprecedented speculation. Parliament easily authorized blown projects of new lines. The speculative rush moved to other countries, followed by the British capital. From 1837 to 1847, exports of iron and iron-based products (including locomotives, factory engines, etc.) from Britain increased by 226%.

In Europe, the length of the rail lines has increased from 3 to 24 thousand km. Growth of the railways was the fastest in Germany. The weak industry of the German states created favorable conditions for British exports. In 1839-1847, the supply of cast iron to Germany increased ninefold, reaching 114 thousand tons - 42% of total German production. Steam locomotives, iron bars, rolling products and much more were also imported. Similarly, English exports to the United States expanded.

The British edge was technological. Metal smelting in Britain was carried out by coal in blast furnaces equipped with hot blowers. About 75-80% of cast iron in Germany, about 90% in the United States and more than half in France was smelted when using charcoal in low-capacity furnaces.
1664843573905.png


The volume of railway construction in France was less than in the United States and Germany. However, events as a whole developed according to the English scenario: speculation took on a large scale. The railway boom caused a rise in metallurgy. The import of iron from England was hampered by very high duties. In 1837-1845, iron was steadily getting cheaper. But in 1846-1847, the cost of it rose by 37%. The rise in prices prompted the construction of new plants. In the 1840s, volume of pig iron smelting in France increased 1.8 times. The use of coal has increased. By 1845, about a third of the furnaces was equipped with hot blowing. In 1842-1847, production of rails almost tripled. Growth of investments into the textile industry was happening relatively slowly in France. By 1847, mechanical machines were widely used only in the production of cotton fabrics, which gave 40-50% of all products. Along with the growth of domestic demand, the export of fabrics increased in the 1840s. In 1836-1847, it increased by 63%. In the French economy, the use of steam engines grew rapidly: in 1836-1847, their capacity increased from 19 to 62 thousand horsepower. The success of large-scale industry in France has not yet led to its predominance. There was an increasing production gap between Britain and France. Even the silk industry in Lyon was far behind the English factories by 1848.

The lack of sufficient foreign markets, as a result of previous failures in the fight against England, hampered the development of industry in France. This also created an obstacle to the expansion of the domestic market. Bank capital was stronger than the industrial bourgeoisie, including politically. However, the economic growth of the 1840s associated with the construction of railways prepared great changes in the country.

British industry was overproducing and there were not enough markets to consume its production. The expected Chinese market proved to be a bubble: it was not absorbing huge volumes of the British manufactured goods flooding its open ports. The hopes placed on China and the East Indies gave rise to speculative exports. Its downside was the speculative import of tea, indigo and other Asian products into Britain. Numerous bankruptcies followed: the growth period came to an end. The next wave of crisis ended railway speculation. The English recession quickly became the world crisis.

1664827751617.jpeg

The collapse of projects related to railway construction was the result of the collapse of ambitious trade plans. The demand created by the railway boom was originally derivative, while the main one for the economy was demand in foreign markets. British exports peaked as early as 1845, then began to decline steadily. Exports were reduced in all directions: the markets of Asia, Europe, America and Africa were overcrowded. Supply exceeded solvent demand. The expectation of profit resulted in losses and a reduction in trading operations. Export growth on the eve of the crisis of 1847-1850 was accelerated thanks to affordable loans.

1664828364847.jpeg

The crop failure of 1845 in a number of countries had a negative impact on the sale of English goods. Rising food prices compressed domestic markets. After the first signs of oversaturation of the world market, in 1846 the export of British products began to decline. Suddenly, the cotton industry was hit by an increase in cotton prices due to the bad cotton crops in the United States in 1845-1846. The overflow of the world market with English products became apparent by the end of 1845, which immediately negatively affected railway speculation. In October 1845, a stock market crisis followed. Stock prices fell by 30-40%. A lot of speculators were ruined, companies were liquidated or merged to avoid ruin. But the industrial downturn followed later: many sectors of the economy still continued to grow in 1846. English goods were looking for sales everywhere, causing an overflow of markets. In the United States, customs duties were reduced in 1846, which was immediately used by British trade. Imports of English goods into the United States in 1847 were 60% higher than in 1846. The situation was similar in other markets. The slowdown in the development of the crisis in England was due to its strengthening in other countries. As a result, work on the construction of railways in England has not decreased, but increased. The Panic of October 1845 destroyed only weak fraudulent projects.
1664845825639.jpeg

In 1846, the number of railway plans authorized by Parliament doubled. The railway mania has reached its peak. But the active commissioning of new lines unfolded at the time of increasing sales difficulties. The railways did not bring the expected profit. Raw material prices have risen. There was an increase in production costs at a time when it was necessary to reduce them. The need for loans for enterprises has increased. Loan capital supply decreased. Funds invested by banks during the years of growth have already begun to burn along with enterprises affected by the crisis. The private discount rate reached 8% in April 1847. But often the loan could only be obtained at 12-13%, which was a curse for the industry burdened with problems. The recession intensified the second crop failure in Central and Southern Europe, England and Ireland. In 1847, the price of wheat was on average 37% higher than in 1845. In spring, it was twice as high as the level of 1845. There was a famine in Ireland and the living conditions of the lower classes in England noticeably worsened. All this expanded the base of the crisis: the English market was shrinking.
1664845726194.jpeg

In the spring and autumn of 1847, Britain was gripped by financial panic. The huge import of bread into the country in the spring was followed by the collapse of bread speculation in the autumn. Many firms have gone bankrupt. Banks that credited speculators found themselves in a difficult situation. The outflow of deposits followed. By the end of October, the British Bank raised interest rates to 8%. Private rates soared to 15%.
The next victims of the bankruptcy epidemic were companies trading with India and China. Textile and metallurgical enterprises joined them. The losses were enormous: only 20 of the ruined firms had debts of £9-10 million.

In the autumn of 1847, railway construction was quickly curtailed. Mass layoffs were made. The pace of work decreased wherever it was not stopped. But many lines were in the final phase of construction: in 1848-1849 a large number of tracks were put into operation. The slow development of the crisis in the field of railway communication had a downside of its depth and duration. The volume of railway construction in England has been steadily declining for five years. At the worst - 1852, the number of workers employed in the construction of railways was less than a fifth of their number in 1847. From 1847 to 1851, the increase in the length of the railway network decreased by 77%.

Brick production in 1847-1848 fell by 34%. In the textile industry, cotton yarn production decreased by 29% from 1846 to 1847. But if the export of cotton products decreased by 13% in 1845-1848, domestic consumption fell much more. Production of cotton yarn for domestic consumption decreased from 1845 to 1847 by 53%. England's total exports decreased by 12% in 1845-1848. At the same time, the number of bankruptcies soared by 88% over the same period.

From Britain the crisis quickly spread to other countries, developing according to similar scenarios. In France, coal production decreased by 23% from 1847 to 1848, extraction of iron ore decreased by 35% from 1847 to 1849. Cast iron smelting fell by 31% in 1847-1850. The fall in rail production turned out to be crushing. In 1847-1850, it decreased by 74%. Cotton consumption decreased by 30% from 1846 to 1848. Imports of raw materials fell by 39%. The number of bankruptcies from 1844 to 1847 increased by 49%. The silk industry was almost paralyzed in Lyon. Silk prices decreased by 40%. The production of luxury goods in Paris decreased by 70% in 1848. The total decline in production in the French capital amounted to 54% that year. The workers resigned en masse. Wage delays were a serious problem.

In Germany, pig iron production decreased by 14% from 1847 to 1849. Coal production in Prussia decreased by 9% from 1847 to 1848, and railway length growth fell by 75%. The sluggish economic growth of the 1840s in Germany did not generate noticeable export growth and stock speculative fever. However, with the advent of the crisis, the rates of railway securities fell sharply. The already weak money market has received a serious blow.

There was an acute industrial and commercial decline in Batavian Republic, it was only in March 1848 that 14 bank offices went bankrupt in Amsterdam.

The United States benefitted from the high grain prices: exports of grain and flour increased 7 times in value in 1845-1847. Revenue from the sale of cotton remained stable, although exports decreased by 1.5 times. The railroad crisis there was short living but noticeable: construction of new railway lines in 1847-1848 decreased by 40%. Cast iron smelting fell by 34% from 1847 to 1851. Cotton consumption decreased by 28% from 1849 to 1851. Since the end of 1847, the fall in grain prices has begun to have a negative impact on American agriculture. In 1848, the export of bread decreased. The credit cost has risen. But crisis in metallurgy was a protracted one: the Tariff of 1846 lowered import dues from 75 - 110% to 30% and the local industry could not compete with a cheaper British cast iron. OTOH, the US was gaining from the gold found in California and from massive immigration which allowed to lower the wages.

Russia was not, of course, fully immune from the world-wide crisis. At the beginning of the crisis, Russian landlords benefited from crop failure in Europe: cost of the exports increased more than one and a half times in 1843-1847, from 82 to 148 million rubles. However, in 1848, exports collapsed by 41%, down to 88 million rubles, aka pretty much to pre-crisis level. The volume of exports remained pretty much the same before, during and after crisis. So basically in the grain exports there was a short period of the unusually high profits followed by return to the costs slightly higher then the pre-crisis level.
But the other than that the landing was reasonably soft due to the strong protectionist policy [5] which many decades ago strongly limited imports from Britain to the “necessary items”: mostly samples of the new types of equipment that did not have the domestic analogues and which had been used for creating these analogues. Metal and textile had been explicitly tariffed out of competition as a response to the British corn laws.

Most of the Russian industry had been working for domestic market which, unlike British, was far from being saturated. The railroad speculations pretty much did not happen both because there were strong regulations limiting access to this business to the financially strong companies and because the area of the productive growth was huge and far from getting anywhere close to the saturation.

Of course, the crisis reduced the world-wide demand for Russian raw materials: flax, hemp, timber and other goods but they could be consumed domestically because gold mining in Siberia had been more than adequately covering needs for the foreign imports and, even before the crisis kicked in, there were considerable French investments into the Russian economy which were now growing because the French banks had been looking for a reasonably safe heaven in the ongoing turmoil. Then, there were smaller but not completely unimportant markets for the Russian manufactured goods which did not suffer from the world crisis just because they were only marginally integrated in a larger economy, Persia, Japan and China.

The furs ceased to be a main item of trade with China and textiles gained only a relatively small market, to a great degree because for those produced in the European Russia cost of their transportation, both by land and by the ocean, was making them at least as expensive as the British textiles and textile manufacturing in the CA still was relatively small in volume and had been mostly oriented toward the domestic market and to the territories South of the border. But the products of metallurgy of Baykal area had the growing market in Kjakhta: these items were cheap and well-adjusted to the needs of a local market. Persia was a stable, if rather limited, market and Japan was gradually getting more interested in extending nomenclature of the imports coming through the ports open to Russia, especially after appearance of the steamships in these ports: Bakufu was conservative but not stupid.

Sweden and Denmark, as the members of the Baltic League, also got it relatively easily: a combined market of the three League members allowed them to isolate their economies to a great degree from the ongoing crisis and prevent their economies from being ruined by the British imports.

Needless to say that the stubborn protectionism of the Baltic League and especially Russian (as a potentially biggest market) was generating a growing irritation in Britain which at that time was vocally pro free trade. But so far all the eloquence of the British politicians and journalists did not produce any results: the stubborn members of the League had no intention to get themselves destroyed for the sake of the British manufacturers. To one degree or other their bad influence started spreading across various parts of Europe forcing the most far-sighted British politicians to come to conclusion that Britain should start actively looking for expansion of its possessions and dependent territories in Asia and Africa.

Crisis and the Consulate
The ongoing economic crisis inevitably led to the political consequences. In France government had been blamed, and not without a good reason: not only none of three consuls had any idea of how to handle the crisis but none of them was personally popular, especially Soult who at the time of crisis was adopting the luxurious life style. There were rumors that he is planning to declare himself a king and nickname “King Nicholas” stuck to him not adding popularity to the regime. But Soult, who was now closing 80, did not pay too much attention to what is going on.

1664852686170.jpeg

Sebastiani, who was just few years younger, had been looking for a comfortable retirement and, while figuring out how to get out of the “for life” position, had been successfully making himself obscure and almost completely forgotten by the public.

Guizot was openly blamed for ruining the French economy with his pro-British policies. Which, of course, was not a completely justified accusation because serious problems were there well before he became even the Foreign Minister. But his orientation toward Britain was, indeed, preventing him from offering a strong protectionist policy at the time when it could at least somewhat prevent French manufacturing from being smashed by the British competition. Being the most (pr just the only) energetic figure of the Consulate, he was trying to handle the situation by banning the political gatherings, including the “banquet campaign” organized by his fellow liberals.
1664854592802.jpeg

In his opinion, if the situation is going to deteriorate further, the military force must be used to deal with the rebellion…

________________
[1] Attributed to Bernadotte (Marmont A.-F.-L. Memoires. – Paris, 1857, t. 7, p. 26.). Later, this expression began to be attributed to other persons, starting with Emperor Charles V.
[2] About crisis of 1847
[3] In OTL he did this in Andalusia and presumably even planned to make himself a king of Portugal
[4] It really did in OTL
[5] In OTL this did not work because the domestic market was underdeveloped and Russian economy strongly dependent upon the exports of the raw materials and imports of the manufactured goods. In both cases Britain was the main partner.
 
When Paris sneezes
226. When Paris sneezes

At 11 o'clock, when everyone around me said it was over, I saw a striking picture on the boulevards. The Hôtel des Capucines has no longer a single soldier, the post was occupied by the National Guard - a terrible emptiness, and in full length it was echeloned by barricades of stones, felled trees and latrines.”

“Guizot in the House, announcing his dismissal , declared that before drawing up a new Cabinet, he would restore order in the city by force, a "Journal des débats" (the last No. of the monarchical magazine "des Débats"), announcing revolt, firmly believes that it will be suppressed, and is engaged, it seems, as if nothing had happened, in an analysis of the meeting of the Academy of Sciences and a book about ancient costumes of Normandy!”

P. Annenkov, ‘Dairies of the French Revolution of 1948’
What a sad necessity, however! - he exclaimed thoughtfully and then, almost in a whisper, continued: - And do you often have revolutions?”
Saltykov-Schedrin
“If an idea becomes global, you can destroy the world rather than uproot this idea out of it.”
Shandor Petefi
My homeland is more extensive than Germany, and I am called to serve humanity not with my fist, but with my head.”
Arthur Schopenhauer
“Use only when the bayonet rules undividedly.”
Frederich Wilhelm IV about Bismarck
“The people don't need to see the Prussian kingdom melt in the rotten swamp of South German disorder. Our loyalty does not belong to imperial rule, which exists only on paper... it belongs to the living and free king of Prussia...”
Bismarck, 1848
“When Paris sneezes, Europe catches a cold”
Metternich
The west of Europe is suddenly excited by the current turmoil threatening the overthrow of the legitimate authorities and any social order… Now, not knowing the limits, audacity threatens, in his madness, and our God-entrusted Russia … But let it not be so!
Nicholas I, Manifesto of March 26, 1848
“What business is it of ours to ask whether the French nation thinks proper to be governed by a king, an emperor, a president, or a consul? Our object and our duty is to cement the closest ties of friendship between ourselves and our nearest neighbour...”

Palmerston, Speech in the House of Commons (2 February, 1849)
1848.

France

1664918722881.jpeg

For a while it looked like the crisis of 1847 is over or at least will be over soon enough. The rise in the bank rate and interest rates was sufficient to attract capital seeking investment opportunities, and Paris retained its function in international transactions, which brought on gold d eposits. The economical recovery occurred in the last quarter of 1847 lightened the pressure on companies' accounts. The Bank of France's monetary reserves reached 150 million francs in June 1847: 43 percent of the value of notes in circulation were covered by specie on deposit in the central bank. That enabled the regents to lower the bank rate to 4 percent in September 1847, indicating that the investors' and liquid assets holders' confidence had been revitalized since the crisis had not brought on a general crash.

Moreover, the Russian government granted a long-term credit to France by subscribing 50 million of state bonds, which allowed France to pay for purchases of Russian grain. [1] In fact, the state hardly seemed solidly attached by budgetary tensions, because it called on the money market, profiting from recovery of confidence. The French treasury issued short-term bonds of 193 million francs from April to June 1847; it floated a long-term loan of 350 million in August 1847. Als o the state co uld try to help troubled industries, in particular the railway companies. It afforded them some liquidity, returning a portion of their security bonds, according them small advances of a few millions. One thing is sure: at the turn of 1848, the cyclical financial crisis seemed over, even if the companies' health remained fragile.

However, one never should underestimate an amount of trouble which could be caused by the incompetents in power and both the French legislature and the Consulate were blissfully unaware of the reasons of economic and resulting social troubles and did nothing to address them. The people, especially in Paris, had been pissed off and anything could trigger a major rebellion. And, with the government being catastrophically inept, the trigger was provided. On 14 January 1848, ahead of the highly awaited political banquet in Paris, the Consul François Guizot outlawed it. Nonetheless, the banquet's organizers decided that it would still be held, alongside a political demonstration, and scheduled it for 22 February. On 21 February Guizot outlawed the banquet again but the workers and students, mobilising in the previous days, refused to back down over the demonstrations. 22 February started quietly, and at 9 a.m., members of the Municipal Guard who had been assigned to arrest the banquet leaders were recalled to their normal duties by the Prefect of Police. Only a small number of troops remained at critical points. Shortly after the noon the large crowds started gathering all over Paris and when the government’s forces tried to disperse them, they spread out around the Champs-Élysées and back into southeast Paris, building the first barricades. In the evening, early skirmishes took place with the Municipal Guard. On 23 February, the Ministry of War requested more regular troops from outside Paris. Crowds marched past Guizot's residence shouting "Down with Guizot" (À bas Guizot) and "Long Live the Reform" (Vive la réforme). The National Guard was mobilized, however its soldiers refused to engage the crowds, and instead joined them in their demonstrations against Guizot and Consulate in general. At around 9:30 there was the first encounter between the crowd and soldiers guarding Ministry of the Foreign Affairs in which, in response to a shot fired from the crowd, the soldiers fired a salvo that dispersed a crowd leaving 52 killed and 74 wounded.
1664926424605.jpeg

The results were easy to predict: during the night over 1,500 barricades were erected throughout Paris, and many railways leading to the city were sabotaged. To deal with the revolt, the Consulate gave the command of the troops in Paris to Marshal Bugeaud, who was despised by the crowds for his reputation of brutality. The Marshal assessed that crushing the insurrection would take approximately 20,000 killed and sent four columns through the city in an attempt to defeat the insurgents at the barricades. He had in his disposal approximately 12,000 troops which were short on ammunition.
1664920954853.jpeg

The intensive fighting broke throughout the city and it was not in favor of the government’s troops because the National Guard joined the rebellion. Eventually, the members of the Consulate fled and Bugeaud ordered his troops to withdrew from the city. Tuileries, Soult’s residence, was taken by storm and looted. The seat of the city administration, the Hôtel de Ville, was taken by the revolutionary National Guards. There, on the evening, the final list of the eleven individuals who would form the Provisional Government was drawn up, with its members then being announced one by one to the crowd outside. Consulate was declared abolished.

If somebody expected that this will be the end of turmoil, this person was extremely naive because there was an immediate quarrel between the factions forming Provisional Government: while the moderates (those waiving a tricolor) wanted the country-wide universal suffrage [2], the radicals (those with the red flag) wished for the republic of Paris to hold a monopoly on political power. The moderates prevailed and, with the participation of “uneducated masses” the Constitutional Assembly was elected on 4 May 1848. The provisional government having resigned, the republican and anti-socialist majority on 9 May entrusted the supreme power to an Executive Commission consisting of five members. But the socialists would not give up easily. On 15 May, an armed mob headed by the socialist leaders and supported by the proletariat-aligned part of the National Guard, attempted to overwhelm the Assembly, but were defeated by the bourgeois-aligned battalions of the National Guard. After this, the June Days Uprising broke out, over the course of 24–26 June, when the eastern industrial quarter of Paris, led by Pujol, fought the western quarter, led by Louis-Eugène Cavaignac, who had been appointed dictator.
1664927824945.png

The estimated losses by dead and wounded were up to 10,000 including the deaths of about 1,500 troops and about 3,000 insurgents. This was pretty much business as usual: the rebels had been building the barricades and the government’s troops had been storming them. Among other things, the events demonstrated, once more, that to have a cobbled streets was not such a good idea.

1664928286467.jpeg

The socialist party was defeated and afterwards its members were deported. But the republic in its present form had been discredited and had already become unpopular with both the peasants, who were exasperated by the new land tax of 45 centimes imposed in order to fill the empty treasury, and with the bourgeoisie, who were intimidated by the power of the revolutionary clubs and disadvantaged by the economic stagnation. By the "massacres" of the June Days, the working classes were also alienated from it. Cavaignac was left by the Assembly as a temporary head of the Executive Power. His government gave support to producers' and workers' cooperatives, sponsored legislation on maximum working hours for adult factory workers, and promoted the modernization of the French postal system. But it did nothing to reduce the tax burden on the peasants and it was not reputable enough to generate trust in the financial institutions. The treasury was reduced to extremities after the revolution; it had to extend its date of payment by six months, particularly for the floatin g debt. The crisis in state credit limited the treasury in issuing new securities, treasury bonds or government bonds. Without cash, the state was unable to contribute to the budget sustaining the economy, for example with a huge program of public works or financing the railway construction. The ministry of finance and the assembly's budget committee gave the rejuvenation of public credit priority at the expense of expansionist tactics: "The state will have more credit, when it does not ask for it ". This was, of course, a step in the right direction but the positive results will be seen in a long term while the immediate cutting spending on the public works had been hurting the poorest right now.

The new constitution, proclaiming a democratic republic, direct universal suffrage and the separation of powers, was promulgated on 4 November 1848. Under the new constitution, there was to be a single permanent Assembly of 750 members elected for a term of three years by the scrutin de liste. The Assembly would elect members of a Council of State to serve for six years. Laws would be proposed by the Council of State, to be voted on by the Assembly. The executive power was delegated to the President, who was elected for four years by direct universal suffrage. [3]

As a side note, the universal suffrage was, indeed, a huge step forward but this does not mean that its results will benefit whatever was left pf the “left” and even those considered the “modern republicans” like the savior of the Republic general Cavaignac: majority of the peasants were rather conservative in their views and nostalgic about the good times of the “initial Consulate”. The bourgeoisie wanted a strong hand which could guarantee law, order and stability without which the credit market could not be restored. As one newspaper remarked, "Without confidence, no money, no commerce." And all these things had been routinely associated with the same name so it was not a big surprise that this name appeared on the list of presidential candidates. Besides name recognition, the candidate was handsome, had a good military record (but was not killing French), possessed very important international connections and no less important domestic ones (which did not hurt his election campaign, to put it mildly). Honestly, Cavaignac did not have too many chances.

Domino effect.

On a wake of the French Revolution there was a whole avalanche of the revolutionary event throughout a big part of Europe. While the events in France were something of a trigger, they hardly had been a cause (and the tempting analogy of a handful of yeast being thrown into a latrine will be probably inaccurate 😜). Of course, the biggest “theater” was the HRE in which it took form of the uncoordinated events in the numerous German states with the various degrees of violence.

Of course, an absolute “winner” was Hapsburg “empire” but chronologically the brouhaha started in Bavaria where Elector Ludwig had problems with pretty much everybody … because he openly lived with his mistress Lola Montez (Eliza Rosanna Gilbert), an Irish dancer and actress who became famous as a Spanish dancer, and courtesan whom Ludwig made Gräfin von Landsfeld (Countess of Landsfeld).
1664933323705.jpeg

She tried to launch liberal reforms through the Protestant Prime Minister. On February 9, conservatives took to the streets in protest. This demonstration on February 9, 1848 was the first in the revolutionary year. This was an exception to the wave of liberal protests. The Conservatives wanted to get rid of Lola Montes, and they had no other political program. The Liberals took advantage of Lola Montez's case to emphasize their demands for political change. Throughout Bavaria, students began demonstrations for constitutional reform. Ludwig tried to carry out several minor reforms, but they were not enough to suppress a storm of protests. On March 16, 1848, Ludwig I abdicated in favor of his eldest son Maximilian II. Lola had to flee to the US and later went on a performance tour to Australia producing an uproar “raising her skirts so high that the audience could see she wore no underclothing at all”. Upon return she arranged to deliver a series of moral lectures in Britain and America written by Rev. Charles Chauncey Burr. She spent her last days in rescue work among women.

Austria
1664934179821.jpeg

Austria had it all. First there was an uprising in Vienna where the students demanded a constitution and a constituent assembly elected by universal suffrage of men. The troops had been sent to disperse the demonstration and (how original!) it all ended up with the firing and few demonstrates being killed after which the students had been joined by the workers and the shooting began on both sides forcing the Emperor to fire Metternich and appoint the liberal ministers who wrote a draft of constitution which had been rejected by the public because it would give vote only to a minority. Residents of Vienna returned to the streets from May 26 to 27, 1848, erecting barricades to prepare for an army attack. Ferdinand fled to Innsbruck (the peasants of Tyrol had been loyal and did not care for the constitution). Finally, Ferdinand gave up and reformed the Imperial Sejm into popularly elected Constitutional Assembly after which he returned to Vienna after which the local proletariat got to the streets again, this time to protest against high unemployment and government’s decision to lower the wages (the European crisis was not over, yet and there were neither jobs nor money). The troops fired at the demonstrates again killing few people. At the end of September 1848, Emperor Ferdinand, who was also King Ferdinand V of Hungary, decided to send Austrian and Croatian troops to Hungary to suppress a democratic uprising there. On September 29, 1848, Austrian troops were defeated by Hungarian revolutionary forces. From October 6 to 7, 1848, the residents of Vienna opposed the emperor's actions against Hungary. As a result, on October 7, 1848, Emperor Ferdinand fled Vienna and settled in the fortress city of Olomouc in Moravia. On December 2, 1848, Ferdinand abdicated in favor of his nephew Franz Joseph.
1664935605319.jpeg

On 12-17 June 1848 there was an uprising in Prague (Pražské červnové povstání). There was a petition with the requests for the language equality, permission to publish a national newspaper and to create a National Assembly. The commanding general in Bohemia, Alfred Windischgrätz, decided that the growing tensions would be dampened by military demonstrations of force. Result was easy to predict: a demonstration had been stopped by the troops. This ignited a spark of rebellion led by students and radical Democrats. The barricades had been built and shooting started with one of the first victims being Windischgrätz's wife as she stood at a window watching street fights. The army withdrew to the left bank of the Vltava and from there began shelling the Old Town, where there were the most barricades. On June 17, the insurgents capitulated. About 43 people died during the fighting. The Austrian conservative power tested that a military solution to the political situation was possible, and it was Windischgrätz who was called to Vienna for this task.
1664936734113.jpeg

But the biggest splash was, of course, Hungary. Revolution there started on 15 March 1848, when Hungarian patriots organized mass demonstrations in Pest and Buda(today Budapest) which forced the imperial governor to accept their 12 points of demands, which included the demand for freedom of press, an independent Hungarian ministry residing in Buda-Pest and responsible to a popularly elected parliament, the formation of a National Guard, complete civil and religious equality, trial by jury, a national bank, a Hungarian army, the withdrawal of foreign (Austrian) troops from Hungary, the freeing of political prisoners, and the union with Transylvania. Lajos Kossuth and some other liberal nobility that made up the Dietappealed to the Habsburg court with demands for representative government and civil liberties. The demands of the Diet were agreed upon on 18 March by Emperor Ferdinand. Although Hungary would remain part of the monarchy through personal union with the emperor, a constitutional government would be founded. The Diet then passed the April laws that established equality before the law, a legislature, a hereditary constitutional monarchy, and an end to the transfer and restrictions of land use. However, the new emperor revoked all the concessions granted in March, outlawed Kossuth and the Hungarian government and sent Windischgrätz to crush the rebellion.
The revolution grew into a war for independence from the Habsburg monarchy when Josip Jelačić, Ban of Croatia, crossed the border to restore Hapsburg control and to make Croatia independent from Hungary. Kossuth managed to create the Hungarian army practically from the scratch and it was able defeat the Croatians, the invading Austrian armies and the Serbs of Vojovodina who, just as the Croats wanted independence from Hungary and as a result had been loyal to the Hapsburgs. The Hungarians, being understandably pissed off with the Hapsburgs, declared their independence and the war kept going on.
1664938277216.jpeg

Prussia.
In March 1
848, crowds of people gathered in Berlin. to present their demands in an "advert to the king." King Frederick William IV, taken by surprise, orally ceded all the demands of the demonstrators, including parliamentary elections, the constitution and freedom of the press.
On March 13, after police warnings about public demonstrations were ignored, the army attacked a group of people returning from a rally in Tirgarten, leaving one person dead and many wounded. On March 18, a major demonstration took place. After two shots, the demonstrators erected barricades, and a battle followed until 13 hours later the troops were ordered to retreat. After that, Frederick William tried to assure the public that he would continue to reorganize his government. The king also approved the armament of citizens. On March 21, the king proceeded through the streets of Berlin, attending a mass funeral at Friedrichshain Cemetery in memory of the civilian victims of the attack. uprising. He, his ministers and generals wore a revolutionary tricolor of black, red and gold colors.

King Frederick William IV of Prussia unilaterally introduced a monarchical constitution with a purpose to undermine democratic forces. This constitution entered into force on December 5, 1848. Prussia got a parliament which consisted of two chambers: Herrenhaus (upper chamber) and Landtag, a lower chamber elected by universal suffrage, but in accordance with the three-class voting system based upon the size of taxes paid.

There were also revolutionary excesses in Baden, Saxony, and some other states resulting in an attempt to create an unified German state. Constitutional Assembly met in Frankfurt with a purpose to develop a common constitution and predictably failed.

Sweden.
On 2 March 1848, news of the French Revolution of 1848reached Stockholm. On the morning of 18 March, the police encountered proclamations all over the capital defying the government and demanding reforms, among them elective and suffrage reform. On the evening, a crowd gathered near the Royal Palace. The King met the protesters, listened to their complaints and ordered the release of the arrested, which dissolved the crowd. Another crowd formed later the same day, however, which threw stones through windows at Gustav Adolfs torg, Drottninggatan and Blasieholmen, among them at the windows of Arch Bishop Wingård. On 19 March, mobs gathered again and shops were plundered. When a crowd on Storkyrkobrinken refused to dissolve, the monarch called out the militia. Shots were fired, leading to 18 casualties among the protesters. At Norra Smedjegatan, the military stormed a barricade. Among the wealthy merchant class, private militias were formed to keep the peace. The following day was calm. On 21 March, reinforcements from the army arrived to the capital to be at hand in case of further riots, but none occurred.

Spain was in the midst of the Second Carlist War and a little bit too busy for having a revolution on a top of it. 😉

Britain. In Britain, while the middle classes had been pacified by their inclusion in the extension of the franchise in the Reform Act 1832, the consequential agitations, violence, and petitions of the Chartist movement came to a head with their peaceful petition to Parliament of 1848. The repeal in 1846 of the protectionist agricultural tariffs – called the "Corn Laws" – had defused some proletarian fervour. In Ireland there was so-called Young Irelander Revolution but its first encounter with the armed police was a failure after which the leaders were arrested and uprising collapsed though intermittent fighting continued for the next year.

Russia. Nicholas …. issued a manifesto declaring that the ongoing madness will not be permitted to spread to Russia. On that he considered his mission accomplished and got back to his usual occupations quoting a popular verse «нас это не касается: сам тонет, пускай сам и спасается» [5]. The only exception had been made for the Sultan when he asked help with the unrest in his Danubian Principalities.

So far the Russian Empire had been quite safe: majority of the Russian population had been under the impression that “constitution” is probably a wife of the Grand Duke Constantine Nicholaevich who just got married to a foreign princess. Most of those who knew better hold an opinion that Russia already has everything it needs and Annenkov’s account about the events in France, which was immediately published, comtained graphic and rather unappealing scenes of the activities of the revolutionary mob. Well, anyway, the system of the “domestication” of the influential liberal figures so far worked quite well, there was no questionable institution like National Guard and Russia was not seriously hit by the ongoing financial crisis. Rather on a contrary, being considered a safe heaven, it kept attracted serious investments from the more volatile parts of Europe.



_______
[1] OTL, as the rest of the numbers.
[2] Of course, only for the males.
[3] In OTL constitution he was not eligible for re-election.
[4] In a violation of the historic tradition nobody was thrown out of the window.
[5] “It is not our business: whoever is thinking should save himself”. Actually, it is from a play “Cat in the boots” written in XX century. 😂
 
Top