The eagle's left head

Maybe not insurmountable, but certainly a factor as far as him vs. Peter for the Catholic Sicilians.

Not sure how much the second will matter, but it's a thing.


Yeah. I suspect Alexander is not just going to get himself killed, but where from there - that is sure a thing.
Apparently Peter was indifferent to the Sicilians at first to make them feel more desperate.If he does that here,it’s a chance for the MC to assert leadership.At any rate Peter is definitely coming.He has been preparing for war quite some time now.
 
Last edited:
@Lascaris What do you think about the possible italianisation of Vatatzes to Vatacci? Could be plausible?
I'm not speaking Italian to have an opinion on the matter... but then if you want to get technical neither do the Sicilians of the time. Siculo-Arabic and Greek are still spoken by parts of the population, the last reports of the latter still being around are the town of Enna having a Greek speaking district in... 1812, while the Latin speakers are speaking Sicilian, which is distinct enough from Italian proper to be classified as a separate language.
 
Part 5
Palermo, March 30th, 1282

it would be said that what triggered the revolution had been a French sergeant at arms named Drouet trying to molest a married Sicilian woman in the church of Santo Spirito on the way to the Vespers liturgy in the second day of Easter. He husband had defended his wife killing the would be rapist in the ensuing fight. Drouet's comrades had attacked the husband only to be swarmed by the enraged Sicilians. Soon the church bells would be joined by cries of "moranu li Francisi" kill the French as Palermo rose in revolt. Soon from Palermo the revolution would start to spread over the rest of the island. Thousands of French would be slaughtered over the ensuing weeks as the report spread through the island.

Augusta, Sicily, April 12th, 1282

Alexandros puked one last time, over the rail as his galleys moved towards the coast. His ships had done good time, crossing over in 5 days despite a storm on the way but thanks to the storm were uncertain of their exact positional the moment. No Imperial fleet had operated in Italy since the days of emperor Manuel a hundred and thirty years ago, till then only diplomatic missions and raiders had crossed over to Italy. A lot of raiders the last few years as Imperial fleets had gotten stronger. Luck would smile to him as his ships intercepted a small fishing boat. Then smiled to him a bit more when the crew proved to be for the most part local Greeks and Sicilian speakers. "Agusta" they had answered his question about the fortified town nearby. Augusta. His grandfather had built the town on the site of Yblaia Megara fifty years ago. The fishermen had turned all smiles when they had realized his ships were not French and even more cooperative when told who he was, or at the prospect of gold the man turned cynic from 25 years in Michael's court thought.

Augusta, Sicily, April 14th, 1282

Alexandros and a handful of men had infiltrated the city as fishermen, then at first light had managed to secure one of the gates. His marines had poured into the town and the citizens Greek and Latin alike had risen up in revolt. Then Augusta, or rather its citizens, no nobles were around had proclaimed for him. For him as what? King of Sicily? Basileus of the Romans? Both? Neither? Just lord of the city? Not even he was certain. What he was certain was that Augusta was his. Augusta, it's people and all of four galleys with the gasmouloi and prosalentai manning them. It was a start. It was not enough...

Ortygia, Sicily, April 15th, 1282

The French garrison of Syracuse had holed up in the port and its forts, hoping reinforcements would reach them before the city openly rose in revolt. Much to the local Sicilians dismay it seemed they were in luck as a quartet of galleys bearing the golden fleur-de-lis on azure and the cross of Jerusalem that made up the arms of Charles of Anzou. A more suspicious mind might had noticed certain oddities on the crews and ships, but the French garrison had its mind mostly on the city, after all the Sicilian rebels had no fleet of their own, Charles was ruling the seas around Sicily. By the time a French veteran of the fighting in Greece gotten suspicious and raised the alarm it was too late. The ships were already inside the harbor striking down the Angevin colours and raising the double headed eagle of John III and Frederick II...
 
So two small cities on the first 4 days is not a bad development for out young OP. I wonder if the citizens will enlist on the Imperial(?), Alexandrian army. God knows he needs a lot of troops.
raising the double headed eagle of John III and Frederick II
Is this a new flag like half and half?
 
So two small cities on the first 4 days is not a bad development for out young OP. I wonder if the citizens will enlist on the Imperial(?), Alexandrian army. God knows he needs a lot of troops.
Well, the first one, yes, but , I'd think that taking control of a so important city such as Syracuse and especially from its port, in the way in what it was achieved, besides of a great strategic victory it'd have secured him with an excellent and prestigious base of operations...
 
Last edited:
So two small cities on the first 4 days is not a bad development for out young OP. I wonder if the citizens will enlist on the Imperial(?), Alexandrian army. God knows he needs a lot of troops.
Syracuse may be far from her ancient glories but is not exactly small at the moment either. Now recruiting troops could get interesting with the Sicilian barons. Not all would be necessarily happy with a Greek Hohenstauffen showing up and making claims of his own.
Is this a new flag like half and half?
Nope. Frederick supposedly also introduced double headed eagle as holy Roman emperor, at least the Chronica Majora from 1250 claims so, while house Vatatzes supposedly was this (courtesy Wikipedia)
Coat_of_Arms_of_Vatatzes_family.png


Well, the first one, yes, but , I'd think that taking control of a so important city such as Syracuse and especially from its port, in the way in what it was achieved, besides of a great strategic victory it'd have secured him with an excellent and prestigious base of operations...
Alexander would either take Syracuse by coup de main or not take it at all. He's depicted as very capable but he's not his nameshake. On the other hand the ruse de guerre he used is straight out of the Byzantine playbook and the French garrison about to be overwhelmed by the revolution thus was keeping most its attention on the city not on supposedly friendly ships...
 
Syracuse may be far from her ancient glories but is not exactly small at the moment either. Now recruiting troops could get interesting with the Sicilian barons. Not all would be necessarily happy with a Greek Hohenstauffen showing up and making claims of his own.
To think that this was once called the most beautiful city in the greek world (or something like that) by Cicero. Kinda hope that Alexander moves his seat of power to this city (as unrealistic that might be), pulling a Constans.

Also, I haven't had the chance before to post my thoughts on what you said earlier, but Alexander is indeed not a Laskaris. Would a marriage with one of his nieces (or nieces' daughters) be a good idea to fully claim that legacy as his own? I think at least one of them is in Western Europe now.

Finally, can't wait for Alexander to pull a Maniakes. Ironically, he could pull an invasion of the empire in the same fashion of his Norman ancestors, except this time he would be able to count on the support of the people.

Keep doing the great job you are doing!
 
Last edited:
To think that this was once called the most beautiful city in the greek world (or something like that) by Cicero. Kinda hope that Alexander moves his seat of power to this city (as unrealistic that might be), pulling a Constans.

Also, I haven't had the chance before to post my thoughts on what you said earlier, but Alexander is indeed not a Laskaris. Would a marriage with one of his nieces (or nieces' daughters) be a good idea to fully claim that legacy as his own? I think at least one of them is in Western Europe now.

Finally, can't wait for Alexander to pull a Maniakes. Ironically, he could pull an invasion of the empire in the same fashion of his Norman ancestors, except this time he would be able to count on the support of the people.

Keep doing the great job you are doing!
MC is already married to the sister of OTL rebel Alexios Philanthropenos.
 
Last edited:
To think that this was once called the most beautiful city in the greek world (or something like that) by Cicero. Kinda hope that Alexander moves his seat of power to this city (as unrealistic that might be), pulling a Constans.
Alexander is intriguing, at least for me when I got the idea, in combining some pretty interesting heritage from both sides of his ancestry....
Also, I haven't had the chance before to post my thoughts on what you said earlier, but Alexander is indeed not a Laskaris. Would a marriage with one of his nieces (or nieces' daughters) be a good idea to fully claim that legacy as his own? I think at least one of them is in Western Europe now.
Leaving aside Alexqnder being married at the moment, after all it's the Middle Ages and birth a dangerous thing, the Orthodox church just like the Catholic one was not allowing marriages of relatives up to the 7th degree, ie not even 2nd cousins. Now exceptions could be made but if anything the Orthodox church hierarchy was even more difficult about it than the catholic in this period as seen in the delays they caused in the marriage between Thomas of Epirus and Anna Palaiologina. I'll also note his mother is still in Constantinople...

Finally, can't wait for Alexander to pull a Maniakes. Ironically, he could pull an invasion of the empire in the same fashion of his Norman ancestors, except this time he would be able to count on the support of the people.
Some of the people for certain but at the moment he has more pressing issues. Now if he does well in Sicily...
Keep doing the great job you are doing!
Thanks a lot!
 
Part 6
Taormina, April 15th, 1282

A Messinese army under William Chiriolo, took control of the city lest it join the Sicilian rebellion. Messina despite rumblings among the commoners remained loyal to the house of Anjou, aside from the army under Chiriolo a fleet of 7 galleys under Richard Riso would be sent to attack Palermo, only for its crews to refuse attacking their fellow Sicilians.

Messina, April 28th, 1282

The city rose in revolt against the French. While the French garrison retreated to the fortress of Mategriffon, the Messinese killed any French they could get their hands on and more imprtantly burned the Angevin fleet that had been gathered in the port of the city. Messina would declare itself a commune and elect Baldwin Mussone, captain of its militia who would arrange the surrender of Mategriffon under terms. The Messinese would then decide to send a Genoese merchant, Alafranco Cassano as an envoy to Constantinople, to inform emperor Michael of the revolt.

Orvieto, May 7th, 1282

A Palermitan embassy had gone to the pope seeking to place themselves as free commune under papal protection. Pope Martin IV had given his answer in Ascension day excommunicating the Sicilian rebels, anyone who might help them and "the so called emperor of the Greeks" Michael VIII for good measure. Neither the Sicilians or Michael would be much impressed by the news...

Catania, May 11th, 1282

Two Sicilian forces had approached the city. From the south had come Alexandros Doukas Vatatzes and his army. Over the previous weeks volunteers had flocked to his banners as his forces had spread out of Syracuse first securing the ground between Syracuse and Augusta, then Lentini before he had turned his eyes towards Catania. It had not been the easiest of things. Neither the Latin bishop of Syracuse nor many of the barons of eastern Sicily were particularly happy to submit themselves to a schismatic Greek Hohenstauffen, that had appeared out of the blue. But fortunately for him Sicily since the time of his Norman ancestors had been for the most part a royal demesne with fewer feudal lords than other parts of western Europe. If the barons wanted to rule the land for themselves the commoners, gentry and minor nobles did not, better a prince than a baron. And if for the bishop of Syracuse, who had succeeded Simon de Lentini two years, being a Hohenstauffen Greek schismatic was a bad thing, for the commoners and peasantry many if not most of them Greeks themselves it was not, particularly when their bishop was thought of as a French creature. Someone who was the son of John III and brother of Theodore II did not need much instruction of what to do with such a situation. He had immediately sided with the commoners as his father and brother had done back in the east. It was perhaps too early but for now he had their loyalty.

From the north had come Macalda di Scaletta, the wife of Alaimo da Lentini, of of the three barons that had been the main conspirators of the vespers revolts. The French garrison had reasons to negotiate with Macalda instead of Alexandros, she had been raised to her position by Charles of Anjou after all who had also arranged her marriage to Alaimo. Macalda was all to happy to negotiate planning to ransom the French and then betray them to the locals [1]. But the Catanians had not waited for her negotiation to bear fruit. Rebels had contacted Alexandros and secured a gate in the middle of night. His troops had poured into the city as it rose up against the hated French. Macalda had been enraged, for a little while it was threatened the two rebel armies would come to blows. How Macalda was placated would remain unknown. Later Sicilian oral traditions would fancy that there had been an affair between her and Alexandros. But given Macalda's place in Sicilian folklore it is not known whether this had been true or not.

Constantinople, May 30, 1282

Michael VIII, had every reason to be happy with himself over the news he had just received from Sicily. The island was in revolt and Charles fleet destroyed making an invasion of the empire impossible. The only complication, so young Alexandros Vatatzes had taken his ships west and somehow had managed to seize Syracuse from under the nose of its French garrison, like Stratigopoulos had done in Constantinople? Not bad, the youngster was a good commander. What the hell was he doing in Sicily in the first place? Seized the initiative at rumours of the revolt his letter said, a somewhat plausible story, after all imperial ships had not been shy about raiding the Italian coast the past few years. Just as likely feared Michael had gone suspicious of him and put himself suitably far away. Either way he was not a danger in Sicily if anything he was useful there. Michael ordered his secretary to draft a letter, congratulating despot Alexandros Doukas Vatatzes of his successes, wishing him further success and telling him not to worry about his family and mother who were secure from the enemy here in Constantinople. He smiled to himself. Theodore had made Alexadros despot when he was born, he was giving nothing from using the title. And Alexandros was a clever young man. He certainly could read between the lines...

[1] That's what she did OTL.
 
Indeed, though for an 'veiled menace', this seems a very straightforward warning 'to behave/obey' or else...
Or "stay where you are till I tell you to come back". But yes Michael was a consummate diplomat but that's not the same as being polite/ mincing words if he did not need to. And I short of doubt he feels he needs to be overly polite in his treatment of Vatatzes, any more than he is with any other member of his extended family.
The Emperor better hope nothing happens to Anna then if he's going to use her as such.
He's also married, with the family in Constantantinople. Of course the better nothing happens to Anna goes both ways and aside from Vatatzes, Anna's niece is queen of Aragon...

Did Michael accompany the letter with some gold?
Nope. The Messinese for the time being have done his work for him burning down the fleet concentrated in their harbour to invade east. He has more pressing needs closer at home with all the allies of Charles arranged against him from Serbia, to the Despotat of Epirus, to Thessaly to the Latin principalities further south.
Syracuse, Augusta, Lentini and Catania is not an insignificant power base...
In OTL Sicily by early summer was effectively one area controlled from Palermo and one area under Alaimo da Lentini from Messina. Here things are shaping towards Sicily being split in three between Palermo, Alaimo and Vatatzes, the latter controlling rougly Val de Noto, Etna being the border between the two in the north. How is the relation between Vatatzes and Alaimo? That's an interesting question. On one hand Alaimo betrayed his uncle. On the other this had not stopped Constance working with him and Manfred was her father...
 
Part 7
Messina, July 25th, 1282

The Angevin army under the personal command of Charles of Anjou landed to the north of Messina and proceeded to invest the city. While the claims of the later chroniclers that it was 75,000 men strong were likely largely exaggerated, there was little doubt that it was one of the strongest armies seen in its time. The Angevins would launch two assaults on the city first on August 6th and then again on August 8th only to be beaten back by the defenders under Alaimo da Lentini. Undeterred Charles just tightened his blockade of the city while preparing for a renewed assault. Meanwhile a papal legate appointed by pope Martin would enter the city and try to induce it to surrender. But the Messinese when told that they should submit themselves to Charles would refuse outright.

Syracuse, August 1st, 1282


Over the past few months Alexandros Doukas Vatatzes, taking advantage of the flux of the revolution had expanded his control to most of the south-east of Sicily, south of mount Etna. Aside from his victories against the French at Augusta and Syracuse this had been done more by persuasion than force of arms, as commoners and town communes had rallied to him, others thanks to his ancestry, others thanks to his proclamations in their support and the land forfeited from the French nobles Charles of Anjou had installed in Sicily. So had the minor nobles, for a local knight the calculation of following Alexander was little different than their fellow gentry. There were limits to his power of persuasion, the Sicilian barons further west had no reason to accept a Greek upstart over them. Someone less daring might had thought that the prudent thing to do would be to stay put to further consolidate his hold on Syracuse. Vatatzes instead marched north against Charles...

Trapani, August 30th, 1282


The Sicilian parliament had initially tried to turn the island to a group of communes under the protection of the pope only for this to be turned down by the papacy who had instead backed Charles of Anjou claim on the island and demanded the Sicilians surrender to him. The option gone they had sought a king, preferably one who could protect the island. The only close relatives of king Manfred were his daughter Constance marries to king Peter III of Aragon and Alexandros Vatatzes his nephew from his sister. Constance had arguably the better claim on the throne and just as importantly, her husband had a large army and navy and contacts with the Sicilian barons. A Sicilian embassy had been sent to Peter offering Constance and her sons the crown of Sicily. Peter had accepted, landing on the island from Africa with an army and a fleet.

Palermo, September 4th, 1282

Peter was proclaimed king of Sicily. In his first acts as king he promised to observe the rights and liberties of the Sicilians and then called all men who could bear arms in western Sicily to join his army as he marched east to lift the siege of Syracuse. His cousin in law was an additional complication he did not have in mind when he had originally planned his takeover of Sicily. For the past month as Charles of Anjou was besieging Messina launching several assaults against the city, Vatatzes had been constantly harassing the Angevin army and Charles had failed to chase him off. His actions may not had lifted the siege but were certainly inconveniencing the besiegers and just as importantly raising his popularity among Sicilians particularly among his people. Vatatzes had not failed to send letters to him, proclaiming his loyalty to his cousin signed "despot Alexander duke". If Alexander's price of loyalty was recognition for the duchy [1] he had already established this was one he could pay for now. Messengers were dispatched to Messina informing "our cousin the duke of Syracuse" that his army was on the way...

[1] Of course Alexander signes by his surname Doukas, which the Aragonese misinterpret to be the title instead of the name. The same thing had happened with John of Thessaly.
 
Messengers were dispatched to Messina informing "our cousin the duke of Syracuse" that his army was on the way...

[1] Of course Alexander signes by his surname Doukas, which the Aragonese misinterpret to be the title instead of the name. The same thing had happened with John of Thessaly.
Perhaps, Alexander could use/take advantage of the Peter's translation mistake avoiding to have to battle with the Aragonese army until it could be done in his terms, in the time and place that would suit him better...
 
Well now with Peter on the island a complete takeover is rather improbable. That Dukas-Duke mistranslation could go on to mean that Alexander gets a duchy on Syracuse which is better than nothing really. Maybe he can grab Bari as well when Naples is invaded due to the orthodox Greek population there. But on the other hand he traded Manuel for Peter and who knows how that will go?
 
Excellent update !

Now Alexander has his duchy and will soon become much more powerful than any other individual Sicilian magnate. When Peter dies in 1285 and the Sicilians realize that the Catalans have bigger fish to fry and Alfonso doesn't really care... Well at the same time Andronikos will dismantle one of the biggest fleets of the Mediterranean.
 
Top