Thank you for the update
@Red_Galiray! I really thought Lincoln would become the Union's figurehead, but it seems Providence isn't done with him yet. It seems clear that the attempt on his life will only increase the zeal for Radicalism in Lincoln. As we have seen, radicalism does not mean peace and good feelings and happiness... While the Confederacy deserves the Terrible Swift Sword, won't this event push the Union into extremes? Could be a fascinating cause for further departure from OTL... Thank you for the update!
Your comment regarding Providence reflects how Lincoln would interpret and rationalize events. He came to believe in predeterminism as a way to deal with the guilt and stress of the war, that God himself had willed the war as an expiation of the national sins and a necessary fiery trial for the United States. Within this great plan, he was merely "an instrument in God's hands". But unlike, say, McClellan, this was not a self-aggradizing "I'm God's chosen one" stance. Rather, Lincoln came to believe that he was an
incidental instrument, and that he had to fulfill his part of God's plan. You can see how such a doctrine would probably convince him that if he survived this attempt is because Providence indeed requires further help from him. And what could that help be? Certainly, completing the destruction of slavery and the Old South. Yet, I believe that no matter what, Lincoln would never become a sanguinary tyrant. The ultimate objective will remain with malice towards none, with charity for all. It's just that the idea of what charity means has expanded - Black people deserve that charity in the form of the vote, land, citizenship, protection and hope. And to enact well-deserved justice is not malice, but it's needed for the Union to prosper.
Damn, that was a gripping fight scene! Lincoln's earned himself that badass cred!
I agree, if it's not enough for a full update that a mini-update seems perfect for the naval war. I love me some battleboats!
Thanks! I was afraid that the scene would not flow well or fall flat. I'm glad you liked it.
Yeah, I may write it soon then.
Glad Texas got some action and Rosecrans episode was hilarious but wish they were more successful in bring the war to Texas.
I'll admit that I intended Rosecrans' plot to be something of a comedic breather. But it did manage to get farther into Texas than Banks did OTL, at least.
One thing I continue to like about this TL, especially when compared to other optimistic TLs, is how much it operates on "You can always count on the Americans to do the right thing after they have tried everything else" logic. Makes the more optimistic elements of this TL feel a lot more real.
That's basically the second theme of the TL. The first, I guess, would be the irony that the South, in trying to prevent a radical revolution, brought it about sooner and more radical. Together, it means that often Southern actions end up pushing the Union in the right direction, and even with shaky stumbling steps it ends up arriving to the right conclusions, and realizing that they have to do some things not only because they are useful but because they are right. I believe it's better and more realistic that way.
There can be no mercy for traitors and reprobates. The glorious Grand Army of the Republic will descend upon the Southrons as the instrument of the Lord's righteous judgement.
More seriously, at this point, I'm not sure many in the Union will be too concerned about the costs of holding to an extreme position.
The overton window is way to the left here. Even the most conservative Republican is by now bound to accept the destruction of slavery and the punishment of the rebel leaders.
Honestly at this point, the Union may act with such a religious *zeal* to free the slaves that actions to bring slavery to an end in Brazil might actually be a policy of the post war government. Whether that is likely to speed up or conversely slow down the process in Brazil is an open one. (Slavery in Brazil had characteristics that simply weren't found in the USA, including the Brazilian government having no problem with Mulattos owning slaves)
It's been discussed, but this all may lead to a different flavor of American exceptionalism that sees the US as an instrument for spreading freedom. Ending slavery in Cuba and Brazil may be part of that.
I wonder if Lincoln's going to get a bunch of logs in his mail now, with letters attached asking him to do the same with the rest of the rebels.
Actually, I could totally see this - it seems pretty inline with mid-19th century American forms of political discourse. At least the White House shouldn't have to spend as much on their heating bll for the coming winter
Someone else already made a 'Lincoln log' joke - but I actually wonder if some enterprising merchant doesn't start selling rough-hewn staffs or bats and call them Lincoln Logs (or if it becomes a slangterm for a staff or shillelagh).
Oh yeah, that's definitely something that could happen. The man that canned Charles Summer received a lot of cans. So Lincoln may expect logs with a "Do it again Uncle Abe!"
I don't think it would be called a Gendarmerie, though; this is well past the time when the U.S. was French-obsessed, and it just doesn't fit as a name, to me. Something like "National Militia" (akin to Soviet practice), "National Guard," "Civil Patrol," "Republican Guard," or the like feels more like something they would choose. Perhaps "Interior Guard," by analogy with the Coast Guard? (Even though the Coast Guard didn't actually exist yet by this point)
Similar organizations the US made in occupied territories (Philippines, Hati, etc) the US named Constabularies
I agree that Gendarmerie is too French. I was leaning towards National Guard myself. Constabulary on the other hand sounds too English to me.
As to Abraham Lincoln and guards during the otl war He had company K 150th Pennsylvania as a guard in fact it's commander often had breakfast with him.
Yeah but it wasn't a constant bodyguard, an idea that Lincoln disliked.
Tbh, If Sherman is overseeing the trial, the results will not at all be what you hope for. The man belived in ruthless war, yes, but he also belived in magnamity and amnesty after victory. Even on record as saying he’d be proud to serve with Nathan Bedford Forrest if the US ever got around to punking Cuba from Spain.
Yeah... Sherman was opposed to Reconstruction, people. This strained his friendship with Grant.
If not Sherman, which Union general or politician is radical enough to start issuing hangings and firing squads for the traitors?
That's already happening. Guerrillas are hanged without trial if caught in the middle of raids or attacks, while soldiers who have committed war crimes are routinely trialed and executed if found guilty. The update mentions, for example, 82 men of Forrest's command, guilty for the Fort Pillow massacre, being hanged.
I’d say Thaddeus Stevens.
A representative working as a judge would be highly irregular. I believe he'd do more good in the Congress, where he could help frame amendments to better destroy the Old South.