TL: The UK Overseas Regions

That's a fair few bases though Kind of curious what will happen with Bermuda? It's a pretty handy sub list for the British Shipping list at the end of the day.

Will it integrate in this timeline or still be a overseas territory or a crown dependency?

Also have to wonder who or what is left to integrate into the UK proper right now as well? A lot of places seem to have been covered as of recent years.

Also in terms of effect on the RN to cover all this territory I can see the escoet force getting a boost. Also maybe a patrol craft something along the lines of a River Class in terms of size developed to cover all the territory as well. This would probably have the knock on effect for something like the Cod Wars actually since Iceland probably won't want to pick a fight with a larger RN especially if they have some patrol craft attached for Fishery protection. Also hey RN still keeps the Mediterranean Squadron as well given Malta is integrated into the UK.
 
I found this by chance and I have enjoyed it so far I'm waiting for that tiny little place in the South Atlantic that has a ton of oil around it and caused a war.
 
Will any of the Pacific territories try to go for integration. Especially once China start becoming a threat.

Also what's gonna happen with the looming elephant in the future room: Hong Kong.
 
What a fun timeline ! :) Intrigued to see where it goes

Last POD for that is like 1909.

Why?
At this point in time, the PRC isnt recognised internationally, the ROC is. And technically the lease was only the Kowloon and New territories, that Britain could renegotiate for with the ROC in the international arena. Or even promise to return it too them, and make it a Gibraltar of China, which the Americans would probaly back, like they do with Taiwan now.
 
Part 4

Devvy

Donor
The Heath Premiership (1977-1986, won 1977, 1982)

1633638747266.png


The Heath Premiership came to power as Labour fractured, with the breakaway "gang of four" forming the left-wing "British Socialist Party" (over Labour's reply to the industrial unrest and economic turbulence during their time in power). Whilst not admitting any new territories to the United Kingdom, unlike several of his predecessors, Heath is credited with causing fewer constitutional updates then Callaghan, but arguably of greater impact. The 1970s had made clear the impact of Commonwealth economic integration - there was little to be found. Commonwealth nations across the globe were rapidly moving away from imperial trade towards regional trade. Britain's trade with the larger Dominions had fallen off a cliff; Australian trade with the USA had been rapidly growing, and even in the 1960s Australia-US bilateral trade exceeded Australia-UK bilateral trade. Canada and the USA had already signed the Automotive Pact, with growing economic links, and the US already counted for 2/3 of Canada's external trade. Correspondingly, the European Free Trade Agreement, signed in 1960, had reduced trade barriers across many European countries, and stimulated trade between Britain and it's geographically closest neighbours. Even though trade had continued to improve Britain's economy, growth had not been as fast as within the European Economic Community (despite the UK now having integrated close to a million extra citizens across the overseas regions), and to Heath it seemed that Britain needed Europe to try and aid the economic recovery after the turbulence of the 1970s.

Heath's first actions were more domestic minded though, as an almost reflex action to the actions of coal mining unions in the 1970s. As part of a multi-faceted move, Heath was to authorise a programme of new nuclear power construction. This would draw upon French technical assistance, further improving Anglo-French relations to "smooth" Britain's EU accession plan, whilst also reducing the power of the coal unions by substantially diversifying power generation away from coal. With the price of oil and gas and record highs following political instability in the Middle East, nuclear power would hopefully allow Britain to export much of the oil and gas now coming out of the North Sea, improving Britain's economic position - especially after the 1979 oil crisis as Iran moved towards Islamic government. Many of the existing nuclear sites were reused; several had older reactors which either generated little power, were dual purpose for Britain's former nuclear weapons programme (now out of date due to the Polaris agreement with the United States), or were coming towards the late stages of their operational life, whilst one smaller one ended up - in controversial circumstances in the Maltese Assembly - situated on the grounds of the RAF Hal Far in Malta, for whom the Royal Air Force has just closed the base to concentrate all assets at RAF Ta Kali. Malta still uses the plant, generating over two thirds of it's electricity by nuclear and the plant laid the foundations for the closing of the coal-burning power stations, although it's future is in doubt given changes in public opinion.

Britain's application to the European Economic Community in 1978 was received with interest in Europe, who were already in the midst of studying Greece's application, and was immediately followed by applications from the Republic of Ireland, Denmark and Norway who had close links with Britain. Negotiations and alignment continued throughout 1979 and 1980, progressing rapidly - and faster then Spain & Portugal due to their transition from military rule and poorer economic state, until later in the year other foreign global events started to take precedence. The first was an attempted coup in Grenada, following the "Black Power Revolutions" in Trinidad & Tobago, and this was followed by an invasion of the Falkland Islands by Argentina. Whether the timing was a coincidence or opportunistic by Argentina was not clear at the time, but later found to be mostly co-incidental.

The action in Grenada was easier to solve; HMS Bulwark by chance was on the way to British Honduras anyway with an array of troops of the Royal Marines; they were rapidly redirected to Grenada to restore order in collaboration with the local police force. The events in Grenada actually had the opposite effect intended by the revolutionaries on many of the UK West Indies islands, in demonstrating that democracy was not to be taken for granted. The effects of UK membership were evidently on show; a rapid force to reinstate law & order (by chance or not), having a stabilising effect on the islands, and thereby further cemented support for UK membership if there had been doubt before. Unfortunately it also had an impact in Great Britain, helping cement racist views that "white people brought democracy, law & order" and similar views, empowering some right-wing groups in the 1980s.

The second issue, in the South Atlantic, was more difficult to sort, and took 24 hours of rapid discussions at the top level of Westminster as to potential actions. As some put it "what's the use of having a military if we don't use it, and what good will a defence agreement with the UK be if the UK does not uphold it?", underlining the belief that no action would undermine every other defence pact the UK had if it did not uphold the defence of a British territory. As it turned out, the Argentine move swiftly conquered the Falkland Islands, but was predicated on the assumption that Britain would not care about tiny islands at the opposite end of the Atlantic, well away from any strategic areas and minimally populated. They could not have been more wrong as it turned out.

British deliberations eventually settled on a plan for action, not inaction regarding the Falklands. A rapidly assembled carrier strike group, based around the HMS Prince of Wales aircraft carrier saw the flotilla set sail for the South Atlantic. After a long sail south, the group reached the South Atlantic. The use of new airborne early warning and control after a period of time lacking such facilities following the abolition of the Gannet AEW.3 craft allowed Fleet Air Arm fighters to largely repulse any Argentinian efforts to locate and target the Royal Navy ships, whilst strike missions targeted the airport on the Falklands itself, restricting Argentinian planes to operating out of mainland Argentina. The complete denial of Argentine air power by the Royal Navy further cemented the role of carrier based power projection in the UK, and the difficulty in supplying the Falkland troops by Argentina made it a swift recapture of the islands by the United Kingdom. The utter defeat of Argentina led to the swift downfall of the Argentine junta, whilst reinforcing Britain's position in the world, and securing the value of the defence treaties which Britain participated in.

With one eye continuing on European Community membership, Heath's government continued negotiations. By 1981, all issues had been resolved, despite the UK's large grievances over the fledgling European Fisheries Policy. The election of 1982 was largely fought over the very topic of European membership., with Heath winning re-election on his manifesto commitments (and off the back of victory over Argentina), and seeing the UK (along with Ireland, Denmark, Spain and Portugal) joining the European Community in 1986. Crucially, the admission of both the UK and Spain allowed Heath to use European law to force Spain to open the border with Gibraltar. The telecoms dispute had been largely worked around to Spanish frustration, by integrating all the UK overseas regions in to the UK +44 numbering plan, which made it difficult for Spain to block telecoms calls to British-numbered Gibraltar without cutting off telecoms to the entire of the United Kingdom. Likewise, as Gibraltarians now held a full UK passport, they could not be easily discriminated against without disadvantaging all UK travellers to Spain. European Community law mandated the equal treatment of all European citizens, and thus de facto forced Spain's hand; Spain continue to claim Gibraltar, but in reality could do little about it. UK membership of the European Community also began to ease another burning issue in the United Kingdom; that of Northern Ireland. The presence of both the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland in the European Community and thus the Customs Union meant that border between the two Irish jurisdictions became a lot more open, with no customs border or checks required. Tensions continued to simmer, but at a far lower level then previously seen.

Integration in to the UK also continued in the West Indies. The introduction of British taxation to the islands caused a shock - especially the new Value Added Tax, but the provision of publicly funded services and investment in to the islands brought new funding to the islands. Renovation of the main airport in Barbados began in Heath's post-war period as Prime Minister, serving a dual purpose as the key aviation hub in the British Caribbean, whilst also being a principal military base for both the Royal Air Force and Royal Navy in the aftermath of the Grenada affair. The integration of the West Indies to the United Kingdom also presented an element of regional integration; for the first time it produced full freedom of movement for citizens, and also freedom of movement for business and goods. With full integration, West Indies produce began to appear more frequently in UK shops, whilst a small trickle of people began to migrate, enticed by British universities & further education, or just the prospect of better jobs and wages.

Heath would be the first Prime Minister since Churchill not to welcome any new territory in to the United Kingdom; the focus was firmly on integrating what had already been accepted. Malta and Gibraltar were also integrated in to the UK-Irish Common Travel Area, allowing for passport-less travel between the UK (or Ireland) and both the Mediterranean regions, which further encouraged holiday travel with Malta becoming a firm British favourite for family holidays. Territory continued to slip away from the British Empire however; Zimbabwe (former Rhodesia), Vanuatu, Solomon Islands, and several other smaller Pacific island territories gained independence. Fiji was a notable case; it applied to the UK Government for integration given it's inability to square Indo-Fijian demands for equality with ethnic Fijian fears of domination and losing their lands. Fiji was, however, far to far from Great Britain to be integrated in any realistic fashion; over 10,000 miles apart and roughly 12 hours ahead, making the territory about as far from London as it could be before closing in from the other side of the globe, and so eventually gained independence in 1985. Heath was also the first Prime Minister to visit China (People's Republic of), where initial discussions began over the future of Hong Kong - much of the territory being under a lease which would expire in 1997.

Heath would be undone by 1986 though, being 70 years old and looking increasingly frail against a rejuvenated Labour opposition who were now a solidly centre-left party (with the far-left elements now forming the Socialist Party). By election day, Heath was increasingly seen as a liability before a Conservative loss. When that result came through, Heath's time in politics were largely over as he handed over the reins of the Conservative Party to new blood and waved goodbye to Number 10.

------------------------------
Notes:
I pondered this chapter for a long time, and would like the keep the world somewhat recognisable from OTL. So Heath has become PM and led the UK in to the EEC/EU (although later than OTL, when the lack of trade partners was really beginning to show as the empire unwinds), and been a bit more successful as PM - a bit later then OTL, but still only makes him 61 when he is PM.
The nuclear plants were based on the idea of the Tories wanting to crush the ability of the coal miners to disrupt the entire country, Thatcher's "a nuclear plant a year" strategy, and the Heath's desire for a closer relationship with France, so I'd imagine these nuclear plants closely resembling France's P4 reactors. Given Malta's prior dependence on coal, and continuing dependence on gas, it seemed an obvious step for a UK-integrated Malta.
I looked long and hard to see if I could use a different war to the Falklands, but there are few territorial claims in the Pacific, the Caribbean and Med islands are either independent or UK-integrated. The Falklands is one of the few where there is a right-wing nationalistic junta making firm claims over a British territory which is a long way away from any British interests and so conceivably would invade despite British power.
 
The nuclear plants were based on the idea of the Tories wanting to crush the ability of the coal miners to disrupt the entire country, Thatcher's "a nuclear plant a year" strategy, and the Heath's desire for a closer relationship with France, so I'd imagine these nuclear plants closely resembling France's P4 reactors. Given Malta's prior dependence on coal, and continuing dependence on gas, it seemed an obvious step for a UK-integrated Malta.

Nice update, I'll nitpick a bit on this point as I used to be in the industry and still follow it ;-)

It is plausible to see Britain following this course of action, as British nuclear power development may have been vastly different TTL so there is a chance that AGR technology was abandonned in the 1970s in favour of PWRs.
 
Well more nuclear power is good and given they are settling on a standard design it will be a major boon as well since thats a major issue with the current ageing reactors here and why quite a few are so expensive to maintain. Also good to see the Falklands went well and the RM demonstrated why they are the tip of the spear.

I have to wonder though if the next PM will look to a general modernisation of the UKs infrastructure and industry on top of everything else which I think is needed.

Also have to wonder if there are any territories left that want integration right now?
 
This must absolutely suck from Hong Kongese point of view, with the integrations into Britain compared to their own 1997 due date. A benefit would be that all the newly integrated overseas states will have modern infrastructure which will be a boon to their development and financial future.
 

Devvy

Donor
Nice update, I'll nitpick a bit on this point as I used to be in the industry and still follow it ;-)

It is plausible to see Britain following this course of action, as British nuclear power development may have been vastly different TTL so there is a chance that AGR technology was abandonned in the 1970s in favour of PWRs.

Would welcome the comments and feedback! I understand electricity after it comes out, but the nuclear technologies themselves are not a strong suit for me! :)

Or maybe Canada finally scores a big sale with CANDU!

I did ponder Canada's CANDU, but decided against it as the French designs were more powerful for Britain's increasing energy needs, but also Heath's desire to align with the EEC and get it's foot in the door.

Well more nuclear power is good and given they are settling on a standard design it will be a major boon as well since thats a major issue with the current ageing reactors here and why quite a few are so expensive to maintain. Also good to see the Falklands went well and the RM demonstrated why they are the tip of the spear.

I have to wonder though if the next PM will look to a general modernisation of the UKs infrastructure and industry on top of everything else which I think is needed.

Also have to wonder if there are any territories left that want integration right now?

There are a few. I'd imagine several of the South Atlantic islands (Falklands especially, but also Tristan da Cunha, etc) are now investigating integration, whilst other Caribbean/North Atlantic islands (ie. British Virgin Islands, Turks & Caicos, Bermuda) are now thinking about their future, independence / continued "dependency" / integration.

Are the British Caribbean islands part of the EEC?

Does this affect anything in regards to the French and Dutch islands in the Caribbean?

Full integration in to the UK for the overseas regions means they are part of the EEC under the UK membership. And as per OTL, the remaining dependencies (ie. Bermuda, Falklands) are not part of the EEC. For the West Indies, it's ended up forming some regional integration with Martinique and Guadeloupe given those islands position in the middle of the UK-integrated islands. Not so much change for the Dutch ABC islands as they are further away. Whilst not so many butterflies in the EEC/UK/France, the EEC could become a vehicle for regional integration in the Caribbean due to the different UK/French/Dutch islands. Obviously no outright Caribbean sovereign nation would be allowed to accede to the EU (as they are hardly European!), but it does present another option with EEC membership via European integration.

This must absolutely suck from Hong Kongese point of view, with the integrations into Britain compared to their own 1997 due date. A benefit would be that all the newly integrated overseas states will have modern infrastructure which will be a boon to their development and financial future.

HK is an awkward one. By the PoD here, the UK has already recognised the PRC as the legitimate representative of China. And the New Territories lease will end in 1997. Whatever the population may want, there's no easy way around those restrictions. The UK has no cards to play on this, save evacuating the entire population and handing over an empty piece of land. But despite some "interesting" ideas (ie. related to Northern Ireland) in OTL, I can't realistically see anything but OTL happening with maybe a larger visa scheme for those wishing to leave.

why haven't the Falklands been integrated?

Gibraltar, the smallest integrated territory in this TL so far has a 1985 population of just shy of 30,000. Small, but close to the UK, and just about workable for a Westminster constituency - and also an important Navy base at the mouth of the Mediterranean.
The Falklands in 1985 has a population of somewhere around 3,500 (I think). It's tiny and a long, long way from the UK. Completely unworkable for a constituency themselves. Even if you combine the Falklands, South Sandwich, Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha, it's still a population of less then 10,000 people. I'm sure the Falklands, post-war, would be asking for integration, but I think there would be hesitancy given the Falklands size, but also the efforts to digest what has already been integrated. There's little pressing defence/strategic need to integrate the Falklands either, the UK can stick defence on the island without integrating them if needs be (as per OTL).
 
Gibraltar, the smallest integrated territory in this TL so far has a 1985 population of just shy of 30,000. Small, but close to the UK, and just about workable for a Westminster constituency - and also an important Navy base at the mouth of the Mediterranean.
The Falklands in 1985 has a population of somewhere around 3,500 (I think). It's tiny and a long, long way from the UK. Completely unworkable for a constituency themselves. Even if you combine the Falklands, South Sandwich, Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha, it's still a population of less then 10,000 people. I'm sure the Falklands, post-war, would be asking for integration, but I think there would be hesitancy given the Falklands size, but also the efforts to digest what has already been integrated. There's little pressing defence/strategic need to integrate the Falklands either, the UK can stick defence on the island without integrating them if needs be (as per OTL).
The Falklands War prompted changes to British nationality laws OTL and the status of British Overseas Territories citizen.
Given the precedent of integrating territories OTL, I think that post-war there will be a huge momentum towards ending any distinctions between the United Kindgom and any remaining overseas territories.
This will be a good thing in my opinion as it is a chance to rationalise legislation, end any loopholes and end some of the usual "plodding along" that's been a signature of Britain OTL and always led to disaster eventaully.

Who cares if the Falklands only have 3,000 inhabitants. Saint Pierre et Miquelon only has 6,000 and yet it has one député in the French parliament. A South Atlantic islands constituency would be large enough to be represented.

Another side effect of integrating the South Atlantic means that St Helena will have an airport perhaps as early as 25 years before it did OTL. The Falklands may also see significantly more development than OTL too, especially if air links to the islands are subsidised and regular.

Integrating the final few remaining territories could also be a chance to create a development agency and investment bank aimed specifically at projects in the territories. The extra certainty that UK integration would provide in the Falklands may also drive up more oil and gas exploration than OTL. How have things with North Sea oil been TTL btw? Has there been a British wealth fund set up? If there is somewhat more Government involvment in the sector à la Norway. Then the Falklands are a chance to give an extra decade of life to UK energy exports.
 
Gibraltar, the smallest integrated territory in this TL so far has a 1985 population of just shy of 30,000. Small, but close to the UK, and just about workable for a Westminster constituency - and also an important Navy base at the mouth of the Mediterranean.
The Falklands in 1985 has a population of somewhere around 3,500 (I think). It's tiny and a long, long way from the UK. Completely unworkable for a constituency themselves. Even if you combine the Falklands, South Sandwich, Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha, it's still a population of less then 10,000 people. I'm sure the Falklands, post-war, would be asking for integration, but I think there would be hesitancy given the Falklands size, but also the efforts to digest what has already been integrated. There's little pressing defence/strategic need to integrate the Falklands either, the UK can stick defence on the island without integrating them if needs be (as per OTL).
My thinking was that the public/political pressure would be the deciding factor - in a world where Britain actively integrated bits and pieces, to have the most British territory of them all be invaded, and find out with shame that the people living there aren't even citizens would produce a big enough outcry
 

Devvy

Donor
The Falklands War prompted changes to British nationality laws OTL and the status of British Overseas Territories citizen.
Given the precedent of integrating territories OTL, I think that post-war there will be a huge momentum towards ending any distinctions between the United Kindgom and any remaining overseas territories.
This will be a good thing in my opinion as it is a chance to rationalise legislation, end any loopholes and end some of the usual "plodding along" that's been a signature of Britain OTL and always led to disaster eventaully.

Who cares if the Falklands only have 3,000 inhabitants. Saint Pierre et Miquelon only has 6,000 and yet it has one député in the French parliament. A South Atlantic islands constituency would be large enough to be represented.

Another side effect of integrating the South Atlantic means that St Helena will have an airport perhaps as early as 25 years before it did OTL. The Falklands may also see significantly more development than OTL too, especially if air links to the islands are subsidised and regular.

Integrating the final few remaining territories could also be a chance to create a development agency and investment bank aimed specifically at projects in the territories. The extra certainty that UK integration would provide in the Falklands may also drive up more oil and gas exploration than OTL. How have things with North Sea oil been TTL btw? Has there been a British wealth fund set up? If there is somewhat more Government involvment in the sector à la Norway. Then the Falklands are a chance to give an extra decade of life to UK energy exports.

My thinking was that the public/political pressure would be the deciding factor - in a world where Britain actively integrated bits and pieces, to have the most British territory of them all be invaded, and find out with shame that the people living there aren't even citizens would produce a big enough outcry

Whilst not 100% committing to this ( :) spoiler alert!), my thoughts were that although Heath isn't bothered about integrating the Falklands yet; he is more bothered about getting the UK in to Europe, his successors will not necessarily follow that line of thought. Roughly as Dunois said, as the Cold War ends and the 1990s optimism sets in and a new mindset, there is scope for many of the existing dependencies to either be integrated or jettisoned unless a bloody good reason for keeping them, although I can see ups and downs in this.

I've read a lot of threads about the Falklands War on these boards, and even outside of this board, my feeling is that the UK was never bothered about the Falklands, and going to war to reclaim the islands was an act of a) not wishing to lose face, b) stubborness, and c) geopolitical strategy to avoid any further similar moves, rather then any particular desire to retain the Falklands themselves. I think the same will roughly apply in this TL, although without Suez having happened in this TL, Britain is a little more "adventurous" herself anyway.

My thinking was that the public/political pressure would be the deciding factor - in a world where Britain actively integrated bits and pieces, to have the most British territory of them all be invaded, and find out with shame that the people living there aren't even citizens would produce a big enough outcry

Basically yes; they aren't British citizens here either; as above, it's a question for Heath's successors. Although notably, neither are the Crown Dependencies, for whom apparently nationality law in 1948 were lumped together with the colonies. 1971 granted the Crown Dependencies people right of abode in UK, and 1981 granted them treatment as the UK for nationality. Jersey, Guernsey and Manx are something to be worked out later!
 
Last edited:

Devvy

Donor
is hms prince of wales a real carrier or is an light carrier

It's a "real" carrier (this TL version of a CVA-01). The CVA-01 project went through as the RAF TSR-2 was cancelled earlier by the Labour government at the time, choosing to favour the Royal Navy CVA-01 project. It did this partly because of a need to project mobile force in the Mediterranean to defend Malta and also enforce British transit rights through the Suez Canal (well everyone had transit rights, but obviously the UK only really cares about the British transit rights!). It also helps secures a future for the Royal Navy dock in Malta at the time, the new Maltese constituencies, and all those dock workers who are likely Labour (or associated party) voters.

Is a King George V. Battleship sunk when Japan invade Malaya

Erm, maybe I've misunderstood you, but Japan invaded Malaya during World War 2, well before the PoD for this shortish TL....?
 
Top