A Better Rifle at Halloween

Papal Conclave
7th September 1914, Rome.

The Papal Conclave had just concluded and Cardinal Désiré-Joseph Mercier, Archbishop of Mechelen and Primate of Belgium was returning home. He had tried to get Giacomo della Chiesa to commit to condemning German aggression, telling him of the shooting of Priests and Religious by the German Army, but his commitment to neutrality was absolute, he refused. This led Mercier to switch his support to Domenico Serafini, who was subsequently elected after denouncing the waging of aggressive war, quoting St Augustine extensively he spoke of the need to bring the war to a rapid conclusion before it destroyed all of Europe.
Domenico Serafini was elected as pope choosing the papal name Pius XI out of respect for his predecessor.
 
7th September 1914, Rome.

The Papal Conclave had just concluded and Cardinal Désiré-Joseph Mercier, Archbishop of Mechelen and Primate of Belgium was returning home. He had tried to get Giacomo della Chiesa to commit to condemning German aggression, telling him of the shooting of Priests and Religious by the German Army, but his commitment to neutrality was absolute, he refused. This led Mercier to switch his support to Domenico Serafini, who was subsequently elected after denouncing the waging of aggressive war, quoting St Augustine extensively he spoke of the need to bring the war to a rapid conclusion before it destroyed all of Europe.
Domenico Serafini was elected as pope choosing the papal name Pius XI out of respect for his predecessor.

That sounds like a big POD - although would a different pope really make that big of a difference?
 
I've just bought them on Kindle. Are you using From the dreadnaught to Scapa Flow by Arthur Marder?
 
I've just bought them on Kindle. Are you using From the dreadnaught to Scapa Flow by Arthur Marder?
Sorry. That was supposed to be a reply to Diesal; Re Percy Scott's memoirs:
I suspect that the Germans would be unlikely to sail out to contest salvaging of any of their vessels at this stage, given the hammering they would have just had.

That is a very good point, I am using Percy Scotts memoirs as one of my sources, he speaks bitterly of the quality of German gunnery, elevation of guns, directors etc. His memoir includes a note he received from his son who died at Jutland bemoaning the relatively greater range of the German guns on their cruisers.

Unfortunately From the dreadnought to Scapa Flow is rather more expensive, even on Kindle.
 
Sorry. That was supposed to be a reply to Diesal; Re Percy Scott's memoirs:


Unfortunately From the dreadnought to Scapa Flow is rather more expensive, even on Kindle.
No I am using 50 years in the Navy by Percy Scott himself.
 
Last edited:
That sounds like a big POD - although would a different pope really make that big of a difference?
Not really, I am not intending to write a story about the change of Popes but Mercier was an important figure and he got pretty roughly treated by the Germans, it's for something further into the future.
 
The Grand Duke
7th September 1914, St Petersburg.
The funeral had been held, the Tsar his family and many Russian notables had been present. One man who had remained away from the funeral was the Tsar’s brother Grand Duke Michael, he had taken command of the Caucasian Native Cavalry. A unit comprising of Muslim recruits from throughout the empire including Chechens, Tartars, and Ingush.
He was training this unit in the North Caucasus Region and could not return in time. He had telegraphed his brother to express his grief, he also pressed him to change the law to allow the Grand Duchess Olga to be his heir.
Another man who was absent was the healer, with his failure he had lost the protection of Empress Alexandra. He had first been given over to the attention of the Okhrana, however with the return of the Tsar and the revelations of the depths of the man’s treason their comparatively tender ministration had been replaced by that of Military Intelligence. A cynical Polish born German speaking officer had taken over as lead interrogator, he was ably assisted by several Guards NCO’s. Men drawn from the Tsarevich’s own bodyguard as well as a medical orderly who had tried to save the boy initially before the healer had stepped in and botched it all.
The healer was hoarse from screaming, he had confessed to such a litany of crimes as to condemn him a dozen times over. As well as the soldiers another man was present, he was a representative of Patriarch of Moscow, his role was to pray with the healer and question him on other matters, matters which impacted on the Orthodox Church.
Eventually all that could be wrung from the man was extracted, he would never run again, he bore the marks of his questioning on his body, but he was fit to stand trial. A trial at which a subset of his confession would condemn him, that trial would be held in-camera, he would be allowed an appeal to the Tsar, which would be refused and then he would executed by firing squad. The Patriarch had wanted to burn him for heresy, apostasy, and blasphemy. But the Tsar claimed his life for the death of his son.
 
I suspect that the Germans would be unlikely to sail out to contest salvaging of any of their vessels at this stage, given the hammering they would have just had.

That is a very good point, I am using Percy Scotts memoirs as one of my sources, he speaks bitterly of the quality of German gunnery, elevation of guns, directors etc. His memoir includes a note he received from his son who died at Jutland bemoaning the relatively greater range of the German guns on their cruisers.
I think at least part of that was the ever present belief that the enemy has better weapons.
Sometimes they do, sometimes warriors only think they do.
For example, in the vietnam war there was a common belief amongst GIs that the AK47 was a better weapon, while the North Vietnamese thought the M16 was better.
In the 18th century French ships were thought, in Britain, to be better than British. This article http://www.navweaps.com/index_tech/tech-057.php suggests, with hindsight, otherwise.
Doesn't mean there weren't lessons that could have been learned from the german ships, or ideas/techniques/technology worth nicking but by no means everything german was better than everything british.
 
Namur
7th September 1914, Namur.

The guns had fallen silent for the first time in 7 days, the shell supply situation had been better than expected the railway lines through Liege had been repaired to the extent that trains were able to run close to the front line without needing to be unloaded early, as a result each team could move 2 loads of shells per day.
The mortar shells were huge, weighing in at almost 300kg, each wagon had a team of 6 horses and could move 12 shells at a time. The stream of wagons moving from the railhead to the siege artillery positions was continuous, with one wagon providing one hour of fire. The eight guns needed 192 wagon loads of shells per day, with 576 horses needed just for the wagons. That didn’t count all the other equipment that need to move, shells for all the other guns, food, fodder and the myriad objects needed to fight a modern war. As it stood the war had already been hard on horse numbers, due to the damage to the railways it had been necessary to work the stock harder than planned and wastage had been higher than anticipated. Already every horse in Belgium that was available had been confiscated, wellbred saddle horses were cavalry remounts and draught horses were pulling guns. The same was true of fodder, part of the reason for the high attrition rate was the shortage of feed, the horses were being worked harder than they were being fed and were losing condition.
The beneficiaries of this waste were the regimental kitchens, all that wasted horse meat was being turned the rations for the army. This combined with an aggressive requestioning of food from the Belgian populous was reducing the demand for freight for rations. Whilst it was helping now, it was storing up two major problems, the very real risk of an induced famine in Belgium and the other running short of horses in the future. But the needs of the plan and the war demanded the steps be taken now, the future would have to look after itself.
The silence of the guns only lasted a few seconds, the infantry officers had issued their orders whilst the shelling was going on and with silence came the blast of whistles and the bugles of the Guards regiments. The attacking infantry stormed forward, initially there was little resistance, the defenders who had just endured 5 days of savage bombardment were shocked, slowly though they began to open fire. Individual soldiers manned the trenches and breastworks which they had laboured to construct. The Belgians were generally more poorly equipped than the French, however they did have a small number of Lewis Guns, these were a light machine gun which had been manufactured in Liege under license and soon they were spitting death at the German attackers. The French infantry were also fighting back, their relentless indoctrination in the spirit of the bayonet, meant that they had done less training in defensive fighting than many armies but they settled into their positions and opened a steady fire on the oncoming horde.
The Germans had learnt from the siege of Liege, they were not attempting to capture the entirety of Namur, they were intent on capturing Fort Cognelee, the siege guns shifted their focus and resumed firing, the shells now falling deeper in the Franco Belgian defences, targeting Artillery positions and troop concentrations which had been identified by aerial reconnaissance. Advaning with the infantry were smaller field guns, these were able to provide additional artillery support against machine guns and other strong points. Effectively shooting the German infantry onto the position, the fortress, its guns dismounted and its defences shattered resisted for a few futile minutes and then the appeared a white flag thrust out of an embrasure.
An assault party made their way into the fortress to accept its surrender, they rest of the attacking German troops continued to advance rolling over the outlying trenches and causing the defenders to flee in panic back to a secondary defensive line.
The German army paused, secured its flanks and the bombardment resumed, the next fortress would fall soon.
 
I think at least part of that was the ever present belief that the enemy has better weapons.
Sometimes they do, sometimes warriors only think they do.
For example, in the vietnam war there was a common belief amongst GIs that the AK47 was a better weapon, while the North Vietnamese thought the M16 was better.
In the 18th century French ships were thought, in Britain, to be better than British. This article http://www.navweaps.com/index_tech/tech-057.php suggests, with hindsight, otherwise.
Doesn't mean there weren't lessons that could have been learned from the german ships, or ideas/techniques/technology worth nicking but by no means everything german was better than everything british.
The elevation on the Von der Tann was certainly greater than that of New Zealand, it is something which Percy Scott wrote about. I think the British ships were better than their German equivalents on average, but they were hobbled by worse shells, directors and elevation. the shells weren't fixed in OTL till 1917-8.
 
Equipping the RNAS Armoured Cars
7th September 1914, Ostend.

Wing Commander Samson’s head hurt, he had wet his swab with some of the officers of HMS Cressy and HMS Aboukir, in particular the First Lieutenants of both vessels, he had served with them on the china station in the past and they had shared happy memories of a wild run ashore. He had been discussing his action against the German cavalry, discussing the effectiveness of mounting a machine gun aboard the scout car. As the pink gins flowed, they had discussed improvements to the cars with ever more outlandish suggestions, the Gunnery Lieutenant of Cressy had promised him a pair of 1-pounder guns, something like a Maxim gun but on an altogether grander scale. This had led the First Lieutenant of HMS Aboukir promise him a pair of his 1-pounders and to suggest a spare 6-pounder gun, but it was felt that this was much too heavy to mount onto a Rolls Royce car. The suggestion then came that perhaps a truck could be modified to carry the 6-pounder gun, this would give the armoured car detachment some additional punch should they encounter artillery.
He had already taken receipt of 4 Rolls Royce Silver Ghosts shipped over from Britain with his orders and his promotion, he had also been issued a pair of Thornycroft J Type trucks as well. He had not intended to armour the trucks but simply use them for cargo carrying, but perhaps a six-pounder could be carried. As Samson nursed his head a team of Artificers were fitting the cars with ½” of boiler plate over the vulnerable sections, the Rolls Royce had been chosen as a number were available to the RNAS and they had the power to carry the armour and a gun.
Once the cars were finished, they could set to work on the Lorries, his plan was to take the cars out on another fighting patrol as soon as they were ready.
There were reports of German cavalry advancing towards the coast, they were working along the open flank of the British Forces in Belgium. The RNAS were still short of aircraft, and so he and his pilots were somewhat idle, so Samson felt that he could do valuable work with his cars, with one he had shot up a cavalry squadron, four cars would let him smash a regiment.
 
Wing Commander Samson

Interesting update

but minor query: AIUI WingCo was created as a rank only in the RAF after it was formed by merging the Naval Air Service and Army Flying Corp
That was not till 1918. with naval captains and army colonels getting this senior level.

At this date, Sampson would still hold a naval rank and be junior
- perhaps Lieutenant promoted up to LieutenantCommander for both his success and forethought?
 
Interesting update

but minor query: AIUI WingCo was created as a rank only in the RAF after it was formed by merging the Naval Air Service and Army Flying Corp
That was not till 1918. with naval captains and army colonels getting this senior level.

At this date, Sampson would still hold a naval rank and be junior
- perhaps Lieutenant promoted up to LieutenantCommander for both his success and forethought?
From Wikipedia.


Officer ranks[edit]​

In the RNAS both pilots and observers held appointments as well as their normal Royal Navy ranks, and wore insignia appropriate to the appointment instead of the rank. The insignia consisted of standard Royal Navy cuff stripes corresponding to their normal ranks, surmounted by an eagle (for pilots) or a winged letter "O" (for observers). In addition, Squadron Commanders and Squadron Observers with less than eight years' seniority had their insignia surmounted by two eight-pointed stars, one above the other, while Flight Commanders and Flight Observers had their insignia surmounted by one such star.

Rank groupGeneral/flag officersField/senior officersJunior officersOfficer cadet
23px-Naval_Ensign_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg.png
Royal Naval Air Service

(1914–April 1918)
RNAS Wg Cpt.png RNAS Wg Cdr.png RNAS Sqn Cdr 8 yrs.png
RNAS Sqn Cdr.png RNAS Flt Cdr.png RNAS Flt Lt.png
Squadron Commander
(less than 8 years seniority)
Flight CommanderFlight Lieutenant
Squadron Observer
(less than 8 years seniority)
Flight ObserverObserver Lieutenant
RNAS Flt SLt.png
Wing CaptainWing CommanderSquadron Commander
(more than 8 years seniority)
Flight Sub-Lieutenant
Wing ObserverSquadron Observer
(more than 8 years seniority)
Observer Sub-Lieutenant
After the RNAS merged with the Royal Flying Corps to form the Royal Air Force in 1918, the RNAS pilot appointments became the basis of certain RAF officer ranks, most notably Wing Commander and Flight Lieutenant.
 
The insignia consisted of standard Royal Navy cuff stripes corresponding to their normal ranks,

Thanks for picking me up on that. It's truly interesting that the term Wing Commander existed in the RNAS before it was merged as part of the RAF in 1918

However looking at the associated rank insignia shown, it's clear that Wing Co was only applied to "Three Stripers" (or better) even that early

Fortunately, @diesal has already shown Sampson is currently a lower rank than that

Lieutenant Commander Samson had taken a Rolls Royce car out to scout the German lines and to recover a downed Short S.41 aircraft,

However, that does mean he does not need the promotion I proposed for him

perhaps Lieutenant promoted up to LieutenantCommander for both his success and forethought

I missed both these nuggets 💰Mea culpa, mea maxima culpa on both counts o_O
 
Last edited:
The RNAS was certainly ambitious with its armoured cars.

1632181994904.png


(I still say this mob looks like a bunch of overly militant bus drivers on a picket line (scabs will be harshly dealt with))
 
Wing Commander was a RNAS rank equivalent to a Commander, three broad stripes. Samson was a Lt Commander when he went to France in OTL but was a Commander by the end of the mobile period of the war. He missed out on promotion to Wing Captain later on in the war, he was to join the RAF in OTL. We shall see what he does in this story.
 
Actually, that picture gives an interesting idea. A motorcycle or two to scout for the scout cars to help set up the ambushes could be quite useful.
 
Top