Sārthākā is there any chance to see an independent Nakhchivan State Zhirinovsky's Russian Empire-style?
Something akin to this:
Something akin to this:
I mean it's possible but highly unlikely. Armenia doesn't want to escalate things that far.Sārthākā is there any chance to see an independent Nakhchivan State Zhirinovsky's Russian Empire-style?
Something akin to this:
View attachment 651497
Well, this could also make Turkey intervene in the conflict and escalate the situation. Armenia could surely conquer a bit more territory than in OTL but apart from that, I do not see any major change. However, one country that could be different in this timeline is Czechoslovakia. With Russia keeping Crimea and Belarus we could see the Czech and the Slovac decide to remain united on a much-reformed basis that would come into being in the early 1990s and be strongly inspired by at the time ongoing Belgian state reforms.I mean it's possible but highly unlikely. Armenia doesn't want to escalate things that far.
Except the EU already has happened, it existed long before the PoD. If anything, it would just see the EU as more of the continuation of an economic union rather than becoming more of a pseudo-political union.
Yup, my poorly explained idea was that because Germany, Benelux, Scandinavia (and the UK) are actually quite closely interlinked economies, they could see benefits of a NEURO (😉), even without France, Italy and Spain / Iberia.the European Union does exist, its monetary league doesn't. There's a slight difference.
A Euro with only those countries would be a beast of a currency. All the weak links removed from the chain.Yup, my poorly explained idea was that because Germany, Benelux, Scandinavia (and the UK) are actually quite closely interlinked economies, they could see benefits of a NEURO (😉), even without France, Italy and Spain / Iberia.
Of those countries only Germany , the 3 Benelux and Finland actually use the Euro , the other 4 nations said no thanks we are not giving up the ability to control our currency.A Euro with only those countries would be a beast of a currency. All the weak links removed from the chain.
The UK is a contrarian at the best of times, it's better if they stay out. The Scandinavians (minus Denmark) may very well jump on board if it's clear it's just going to be Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg.Of those countries only Germany , the 3 Benelux and Finland actually use the Euro , the other 4 nations said no thanks we are not giving up the ability to control our currency.
Are you suggesting that Czechoslovakia stays united? Well, apart from a divergence for the sake of it I don't really see any difference on the European or World stage apart from there being one country less.Well, this could also make Turkey intervene in the conflict and escalate the situation. Armenia could surely conquer a bit more territory than in OTL but apart from that, I do not see any major change. However, one country that could be different in this timeline is Czechoslovakia. With Russia keeping Crimea and Belarus we could see the Czech and the Slovac decide to remain united on a much-reformed basis that would come into being in the early 1990s and be strongly inspired by at the time ongoing Belgian state reforms.
But a still united Czechoslovakian football team might have more success such as winning Euro 96! In which OTL had the Czech team reached the final in which it might not be hard they could take down a pretty poor German team who only won by a Golden goal, so might it be not out of the realms of possibility for them to sneak the victory? The same thing goes for Yugoslavia in which if we don't get a complete break apart and leave with just Croatia, Slovenia, Macedonia and what is left of a rump Yugoslavia then less teams in Europe will give others a chance to qualify for major tournaments *Cough*Scotland*Cough*.Are you suggesting that Czechoslovakia stays united? Well, apart from a divergence for the sake of it I don't really see any difference on the European or World stage apart from there being one country less.
No way Norway would join, their historical path to independence means they have certain Red Lines policy wise, one of which is their own currency. Sweden refused the Euro after a referendum, on the polls there does seem to be a bit of a split but all subsequent opinion polls are not trending nearer acceptance.The UK is a contrarian at the best of times, it's better if they stay out. The Scandinavians (minus Denmark) may very well jump on board if it's clear it's just going to be Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg.
At this point in time the Deutsche Mark is already so powerful having 'control' of your own currency is a nationalist myth. Truth is the European central banks called Frankfurt before doing anything because making a wrong move against the Deutsche Mark could end up costing you tons of money. It's a bit like having the freedom to burn your house down.
that is certainly possible as a compromise.@Sārthākā what do you think about this map that I have found about a possible future solution to the Nagorno-Karabakh war:
View attachment 655746
The so-called Meghri proposal ( also known as the "Goble Plan" ) was proposed in March 2001 by French President Jacques Chirac and included an exchange of territory whereby Azerbaijan would be granted sovereignty over a corridor across the southern Armenian region of Meghri that linked Nakhichevan and the rest of Azerbaijan, while the Lachin corridor linking the Republic of Armenia and the NKR, which Armenia has controlled since the spring of 1992, would be recognized as Armenian territory.
What do you think?
Very plausible solution indeed but I think that the Armenians wouldn't like to cede their border with Iran: maybe the Meghri corridor remains in Armenia but the Meghri highway is transformed into a condominium between both parties to connect Nakhchivan to Azerbaijan that however can't be used by the Azerbaijani military. They could also reopen the railway, originally constructed in 1941, that linked Moscow with not only Azerbaijan, Armenia and Nakhchivan, but with the Iranian rail network as well via Julfa in Nakhchivan.that is certainly possible as a compromise.
Well, you have made a good point as in OTL it was exactly the cession of the Meghri corridor that made Armenia unwilling to sign. In any case, Azerbaijan could always be coerced by Russia into accepting such a deal but not in a too overt way since we have to remember that Baku has the Russian-operated Gabala Radar StationVery plausible solution indeed but I think that the Armenians wouldn't like to cede their border with Iran: maybe the Meghri corridor remains in Armenia but the Meghri highway is transformed into a condominium between both parties to connect Nakhchivan to Azerbaijan that however can't be used by the Azerbaijani military. They could also reopen the railway, originally constructed in 1941, that linked Moscow with not only Azerbaijan, Armenia and Nakhchivan, but with the Iranian rail network as well via Julfa in Nakhchivan.
Me tooi totally dig this timeline and i am eagerly waiting for more updates
Well, everything depends on how relations are between Russia and Ukraine.... the Antonov An-418, the Sukhoi KR-860 and the An-218 are still out of question but we can easily see more Tu-204s, Il-86s and Il-96s being produced. We would also likely see the introductions in the early 2000s of the Tupolev Tu-324 alongside the SSJ 100.I wonder how the domestically built Post-Soviet Airliner manufactures are going to preform TTL.
Thanks to the OTL economic crash in the 1990s Tupolev and Ilyushin failed to sell their next generation airliners.
It would be challenging for Russia to keep a hold on Ukraine with such a late POD.I have one question, OTL Ukraine was very integrated with the Russian economy before 2014, but ITTL Russia has both Belarus and Crimea without the war to make Kiev grow distant from Moscow. Furthermore, the EU is going to be much weaker in this world. With all those things in mind, it's safe to say Ukraine is going to be much more economically dependent on Russia, being surrounded and all.
Does this mean Ukraine will be even more close to being a Russian puppet state than pre-2014 OTL's Ukraine? Or maybe all this influence will make things fall apart quicker?
Will Russia try to create the situation for a re-anexation some decades down the road?
I believe making Russia a monarchy is going to help with the Ukranian issue, most of the grievances the Ukranians have with Russia have to do with Stalin's genocide. If Russia becomes a monarchy again they can claim to also be victims. And if they can keep being a democracy, then the chances become even better in the long run.