Bear in mind that this is opinion. YMMV and it should.
European Tourist Guide - France - Douvres Würzburg Radar Museum: Normandy, D-day, 6th of June 1944, Landing, Sherman tank, Beach, Battleground, Nazi Germany, World War II
www.euro-t-guide.com
It is a pleasure to observe that the hope for further studies on the WW II German radar camp of Saint-Pabu (Brittany-FR) formulated in a previous publication has materialized. The Doll’s archive provided new documentation from the RAF Operations Rhubarb permitting to reconstruct the first camp...
www.scirp.org
One knows that Wurzburg and Freya had surface search mode? CVs put up a CAP they will be seen in real time?
Here are a few klinkers.
a. Fulmars instead of Wildcats for CAP?
b. It was common USN practice to use the Dauntless as part of an anti-torpedo plane patrol at low altitude, while saving the limited Buffaloes and Wildcats for dive bombers. The Dauntless was designed to be used that way.
c. What is the sea state in the Bay of Biscay? What are the prevailing winds? This missing data is important as I have rarely seen any flattop in WWII do book flank in the Atlantic without serious pitch and yaw issues for wind and wave are rarely parallel there. For example, the USS Ranger rarely exceeded 25 knots in a speed run into the wind. She tended to banjo.
c. No way to get that
35 TBD and 36 SBD over Cerberus Force after a touchdown and refuel? It would be a good way to retrieve this operation if Ciliax can be hammer and anvilled just off Calais.
d. Beaufighters? Why are they out"? Hudsons for ASW probably need single engine fighter cover (Wildcat?) that is better than a Beaufighter *(Suggest Mosquitos if available if using RAF assets for that mission.). The Beaufighter is AShW oriented. Blenheims? Ugh. LW meat on the table. Spitfires have 90 minutes tops air endurance. They lack reach.
e. I have yet to see at this stage of the war, a RIKKO and SAG operate together. I am simming in an ATL for such an operation for Operation Merry Christmas You Bastards. There are real world problems with rendezvous times, radio communications, target identification, recon, navigation and just interoperability air to sea that makes the op very iffy. Expect limited success at best. Hit Ciliax with air power, clear the boards and then send in the PT boats and destroyers to kill the cripples. Also, drop mines in front of the Germans!
f. Time from Scapa to Dover is 30 hours at 28 knots. Tovey will be out of fuel when he gets there and Ciliax will be past him off the Dutch coast headed for German waters.
g. Dudley Pound is incompetent. He will okay f.. Tovey was not an idiot.
h. Crete success was based
on motionless targets or straight running non-maneuvering ships. The Pacific War showed that maneuvering ships were hard to hit. US dive bomber pilots, the BEST on Earth, were getting 15% PH against aircraft carrier-sized targets in 1942. German torpedo bombers in 1941 were a joke. Any Italians present?
i. Radar. St Nazaire site should detect Standards out to 40 km. Need to also remark that CVs putting aircraft up means 160 km and the Germans should be scrambling anything with wings that they have local. Of course the seacoast gun defenses will be manned and ready.
k. While the Fulmars will be slaughtered, I expect the FAA pilots will RAM if they have to, to defend their charges below. USN pilots would and did. I expect no less from the RN FAA.
l. Pushover for a Stuka was about 4,000 meters and pull-out was about 1,000 meters (60-70 degree dive). That is .50 cal range at pullout. Worse is that the dive is 30-45 seconds depending on angle of dive. A Standard in a hard turn can in 30 seconds throw the aim point out by 240 meters. The Stuka was not noted for Dauntless like flap and tail control correction. The Stuka is a land warfare bird after all. The Ju-88 is even worse. Those birds have a shallower attack angle, are longer in the dive (60 seconds at about 45 degrees) and far more vulnerable to mid band AAA which is what the US 5/25 was designed to defeat.
m. German aerial torpedoes have a 50% dud rate until improved in 1943.
n. From Pearl Harbor, a Standard yoked up, should be able to take three to four LW type torpedoes and still stay afloat. I account the USS California's loss due to her incompetent captain and damage control officer. Both I presume will be court martialed, as they should have been at Pearl Harbor.
o. Note that I have found no incident on WWII record to show such a result against maneuvering ships, barring GUIDED WEAPONS. Even the German Fritz X attacks did not achieve these results.
p. Hmm. RAF tactics are incompetent. Send in a wave of fighters ahead of the torpedo bombers to strafe and suppress the German shipboard AAA (Blenheims?). The Alpha should have been flak suppressors followed by the TBs and with Spitfire top-cover all as a single package. A strike coordinator would have marked the flag or failing that option, would have gone for Gniesenau and swamped her, sunk her and then RTBed for another go at Scharnhorst in a second package. Boy, the allies are incompetent. In the interlude, British PTs and destroyers should have a go.
q. Score one for USS Mississippi.
r. Hmmm. I think 2500 high capacity shells would have been better spent on
smashing up the harbor infrastructure. Also the Americans are cycling 14 shells per minute from 18 barrels. That is unusually fast for shore bombardment.
s. Admiral Pye, if that drydock was only shelled, should be court martialed. Drydocks are difficult targets to neutralize by bombs or gunfire. Pearl Harbor lesson learned. There was a reason, the British packed a four stacker to the gunwales with explosives, rammed the drydock gate and blew it all up.
t.
Depends. At terminal at 25,000 to 40,000 meters the plunging fire can penetrate 75 mm of deck armor.
u. Musashi and Yamato. Burn down and kaboom. Torpedoes hurried it along, but they were kaput from dive bombing.
v. ??? Most of the sinkings in the Battle of the Philippine Sea and a significant % of Leyte Gulf were submarine kills as mentioned. And there is the I-19 which had the best day, any IJN sub ever had.
w. Kimmel will be cursed for the incompetent fool he is in this action.
x. Have commented on the Crete data.
y. Not according to Pearl Harbor results.
z. I kind of find that math puzzling especially as that is not usual FAA practice. Nor would the USN CTF sail into battle without a F4F and SBD CAP of its own. See my previous comments.
a1. Agreed.