Crazy Boris
Banned
2 is what I prefer personally. 3 is okay but I think colouring like that is better suited for if the country in question is fully militarily occupied by Rome or Persia
The Quarter-BAM project
- Thread starter DJjablonski
- Start date
2 is what I prefer personally. 3 is okay but I think colouring like that is better suited for if the country in question is fully militarily occupied by Rome or Persia
I said this is a very early post on this thread, but it doesn't seem my early criticism had any effect on the final product, but lakes/reservoirs are still highly exaggerated in many areas. I also don't understand why some minuscule lakes/reservoirs are mapped but others aren't, it just seems all random.
Seconding this. I think a lot of the 1 pixel lakes could be removed, and the rest trimmed down in number. It may look fine enough with just a blank map, but once you start adding borders, subdivisions, country colors, etc, an overabundance of lakes can add a lot of unnecessary clutter.
I think part of the lakes looking wrong is due to the fact that they have all been enlarged to fit water colored pixels inside. It would look much better if we had some lakes just one or two pixels wide with only coastline color.
Crazy Boris
Banned
I like to give the mandates an outline to reflect their status (it’s just that I often forget to do so)
Also, Iraq is independent by this point, but other than that I’m not noticing any inaccuracies
qazse
Gone Fishin'
Do you think you could work on the 1936 map's internals so i can show the warlords?
That's excellent, as - going from those - it will be easier and easier to compile more historical maps. For example, this provides an excellent base for 1938 to 1945...
Were the Bantustans excluded deliberately? Or have you just not gotten around to them?
It isn't. I think it's a reference to RoC territorial claims.