Miscellaneous >1900 (Alternate) History Thread

Why was Civil Rights in the US punctuated equilibrium? (Short stretches of massive change separated by large stretches of few changes?)
 

McPherson

Banned
Eventually yes since sooner or later a nuclear reactor would have been built, as nuclear fission had already been discovered before the war.
It's hard to tell when since there are a lot of possible outcomes and it depends on what circumstances WW2 doesn't happen. Also Manhattan Project required a lot of resources and funds, they basically built a small town from scratch to make the bomb.
But if some government (most likely the US as it's the biggest economy) funds Nuclear Reactor development projects, eventually they will fund a project looking to use nuclear power for military purposes.
1950 at the latest. Depends on Fermi and the funding source.
 

Driftless

Donor
Why was Civil Rights in the US punctuated equilibrium? (Short stretches of massive change separated by large stretches of few changes?)

I have no scholarship to support my thoughts, but there you are:
1. The struggle to get issues identified and raised to a legislative level have been exhausting exercises in commitment, organizing, fund-raising(its necessary), and frequently flat-out danger. Once you've had even a modest level of legislative success, there was a period of mental exhaustion for many of the foot-soldiers of the movements.
2. Legislators, even those committed to civil rights often burned up their political capital getting legislation passed - even modest levels. That took/takes recovery time.
3. There's a collective dusting off of hands - "Job done" Even though the job's not done.
4. Those opposed to civil rights advancements need time to sort out strategies to negate the gains made.
5. See step 1......
 

McPherson

Banned
I have no scholarship to support my thoughts, but there you are:
1. The struggle to get issues identified and raised to a legislative level have been exhausting exercises in commitment, organizing, fund-raising(its necessary), and frequently flat-out danger. Once you've had even a modest level of legislative success, there was a period of mental exhaustion for many of the foot-soldiers of the movements.
2. Legislators, even those committed to civil rights often burned up their political capital getting legislation passed - even modest levels. That took/takes recovery time.
3. There's a collective dusting off of hands - "Job done" Even though the job's not done.
4. Those opposed to civil rights advancements need time to sort out strategies to negate the gains made.
5. See step 1......
There is some political science research on this phenomenon.

Plug in environmentalism, or military reform, or infrastructure or judicial reform or fill-in-the-blank and steps 1-5 seem identifiable, and not just in the American case.
 
It is often the case that people on this forum have miscellaneous or frivolous questions that could be easily answered by the many experts on this forum but are difficult to find the answer to on Google Scholar/Books or Wikipedia because they don't often deal in alternatives.

There are other cases where people have miscellaneous or frivolous scenarios or challenges that they want to share about an idea they encountered that could perhaps provoke inspiration in other users but isn't deserving enough to be posted as a thread on its own.

These issues have been addressed in the Shared Worlds, ASB and <1900 forums but haven't been dealt with here.

This thread is intended to be a resource for those with questions about a timeline they want to construct which are minor and undeserving of their own thread, and a place to share ideas that people don't have time, skill or knowledge to write themselves.
expand...
Could wideapread Bazooka Planes had been effective against tanks in WW2 ?
 

Driftless

Donor
@Byzantion As we've mentioned to you previously in other threads (for example here, here, here and here), there's no need to quote the first post when asking your question - it just clutters up the thread. Thank you.

Sorry, I will just reply next time.

I'll throw in a disclaimer. If the prior post being referenced is a few notches earlier in a thread, I appreciate having the context for the response.
 
In a world were Max Gaines Kept All-American Comics and continued to support Siegel & Shuster's trail against DC over ownership of Superman, do you think if Siegel & Shuster own that Max Gaines would make an offer to them for the rights to Superman?
 

Driftless

Donor
What if famed producer, writer, and editor Irving Thalberg had remained at Universal Studios?

Either way, what if he had lived to his sixties?
I'm not much of a movie business historian, but if Thalberg remains at Universal, doesn't that suck some wind out of MGM? And if that's so, does MGM even become the home of big-budget musicals, or even top line dramas?

A couple of big speculative questions: how might he handle movies in the war years, and then again with the shift in public sentiments in the years following the war?
 
Has this been done before?
Corporatist America ? (Not modern US, and not the same as The Glowing Dream on the pre-1900 thread)
 

McPherson

Banned
How many U-boats did Germany operate on 1st September 1939?
Here.
Major Warship Strengths

Navies
Royal Navy
French Navy
German Navy
Warship types
Home waters (a)​
Atlantic (b)​
Atlantic and Channel
European waters
Atlantic station
Battleships
9​
-​
2​
3​
2(c)​
Carriers
4​
-​
1​
-​
-​
Cruisers
21​
14​
3​
7​
-​
Destroyers
82​
13​
20​
22​
-​
Submarines
21
4
-
41(d)
16
Totals​
137​
31​
26​
73​
18​
plus escorts​
-​
-​
plus torpedo boats​

Notes:

- Royal Navy was a mix of World War 1, modernised and recently completed ships. The French warships allocated to the Atlantic and the German were mainly modern.

(a) Home Fleet commanded by Adm Sir Charles Forbes with 7 capital ships, 2 carriers and 16 cruisers based at Scapa Flow and Rosyth; Channel Force with 2 battleships, 2 carriers and 3 cruisers; Humber Force with 2 cruisers; and various destroyer flotillas.

(b) North Atlantic Command based at Gibraltar with 2 cruisers and 9 destroyers; America and West Indies Command at Bermuda with 4 cruisers; and South Atlantic at Freetown with 8 cruisers and 4 destroyers.

(c) Pocket battleships "Admiral Graf Spee" in the South and "Deutschland" in the North Atlantic.

(d) included U-boats on patrol in the North Sea and British coastal waters.​

About half of the U-boats were coastal types or "training boats".
 
How much better off would the world be economically in the decades after a late May/early June 1918 Central Powers surrender and similar peace terms? The major European powers would obviously still be heavily in debt and badly wounded by the loss of so many people and the spending of so much money, but would they be in a significantly better position economically in the coming decades compared to OTL?
 
Plausibility:
Instead of making Irish a mandatory subject in state-funded schools across Ireland, what if the government of the Irish Free State back in 1922 decided that their official policy would be language immersion across the country, most specifically outside the Gaeltacht, particularly the establishment of a network of earlier version of the Gaelscoileanna(Irish-language medium school) with the collaboration of Conradh na Gaeilge (Gaelic League)?
 
How much better off would the world be economically in the decades after a late May/early June 1918 Central Powers surrender and similar peace terms? The major European powers would obviously still be heavily in debt and badly wounded by the loss of so many people and the spending of so much money, but would they be in a significantly better position economically in the coming decades compared to OTL?
Not sure you can have similar peace terms. OTL those were more or less negotiated without CP input, and then offered as sign or die. If there is an earlier surrender I'd assume CP do get to attend negotiations, with the ever present threat of going back to war. OTL terms likely won't be considered acceptable.

Economically I'd assume the situation would stay similar. With less leverage, reparation payments will be less, but then again, those will still be eaten up by loan repayments from France and the UK (even if those are lesser as well).
Germany might be slightly better off, but just by degrees, not overall.
The wildcard is A-H. With half a year less of warfare to drive it apart (though the movements are significant and not to be ignored) and possibly an incentive to the Entente to keep them together (so that they can pay reparations just as Germany, unlike OTL where the successors couldn't) and the US/Wilson having less say (so less self-determination of peoples) it could become a chaotic heart of central Europe.
 
Top