The Challenge
So the challenge, inspired by these two excellent examples (all credit to @Wolfram and @TheNixonator , respectively), is to create an alternate political party system for a country using obscure, defunct or marginal political parties or factions that existed in that country historically. Paramilitaries and secret societies pulling a Know-Nothing are allowed. There was some support for Social Credit in the US so I'm counting it as an example.
Consensus:
  • The government should be willing to intervene in society.
    • The free market can be made to work, but is unsustainable on its own.
  • The United States should avoid foreign entanglements unless there is an overwhelming reason not to.
Prohibitionist beliefs:
  • The most important issues Americans face are threats to the social fabric.
  • Rights are individual in nature, and relate strongly to individual virtue.
    • Women should have more rights as individuals and not be forced or guided into the household.
  • Immigration should be controlled to maintain the present culture and the least economic competition for the native-born.
    • Immigrants should assimilate to the dominant culture to the greatest practical degree.
  • The market should be subject to widespread intervention to increase equality and freedom.
    • However, the provision of zero-interest credit by the Federal Reserve, the prohibition on unregulated creation of credit through loans, the subsidizing of products to reduce their list price, and the National Dividend do not make economic sense and should be reformed or abolished.
    • Government social programs such as the provision of universal health insurance should be monopolies.
  • Social engineering, whether to establish a common culture or to eliminate prejudices and unwelcome practices (for example, racism, homophobia, and smoking) is a legitimate use of government.
    • Robust systems to prevent discrimination (whether on the grounds of race, gender or gender identity, sexuality, or many other factors, but not cultural matters) should be in place.
    • The national government should have as close to a monopoly over education as possible, and should be very involved in curricula.
  • Censorship of media and policing of consumer products to ensure public health and virtue are legitimate uses, and indeed duties, of government.
  • The United States should avoid intervening in other countries' affairs unless there is an overwhelming humanitarian interest in intervention.
Creditist beliefs:
  • The most important issues Americans face are pocketbook issues.
  • Rights are collective in nature, and relate strongly to institutional systems.
    • Women should have more rights as members of the household and not be forced or guided into acting as individuals (e.g. by being part of the wider economy on their own, or acting as primary wage-earners).
  • Immigration should be aimed at ensuring the most economic opportunity for both the native-born and the immigrants in question.
    • It is not the business of government to compel immigrants to assimilate to the dominant culture.
  • Other than interventions in the finance system to boost purchasing power, the market should remain as free as possible.
    • The government should provide zero-interest credit through the Federal Reserve, prohibit the unregulated creation of credit through loans, subsidize products to reduce their list price, and provide each household the share of the national wealth diverted from them by corporate non-wage costs.
    • Government social programs such as the provision of universal health insurance should compete with private business as a "public option".
  • Social engineering is outside the scope of government.
    • The government should not force private businesses to obey its own standards by imposing anti-discrimination ordinances.
    • Education should be provided by the government, but devolved and funded by state and local governments, with the federal government's only role being to resolve disputes and fund/operate schools and programs that could not otherwise be funded/operated.
  • Censorship and overwhelming police power should be avoided where possible.
  • The United States should avoid intervening militarily in other countries' affairs, but should foster trade so long as it does not exploit American workers.
What am I missing?

Anti-Masonic: Once freemasonry is destroyed, all problems will be solved. This is the main platform of the party. They are rather big-tent (a sort of united front against the freemason criminals), however, they lean more towards nationalistic views and can be considered right-wing populists on non-freemasonry issues. Many are Warhawks, and many supported the liberation/invasion (depends on who you're asking) of England to free them from their "freemason overlords". The Anti-Masons usually do well when the rate of acts by terrorists is high, or America is in need of military action. On social issues, they are strangely progressive, as they truly want to unite all races, religions, and creeds in the destruction of freemasonry. There is also a rather large Christian values faction, which mainly just siphon away voters from the Prohibition party.

Readjuster: Formed after the Great American War on the platform of "to break the power of wealth and established privilege", and they stuck to their promises (the fact every other party is anti-elitist as well helps when that's your goal). They are recognized as the left-wing populist party. As of the late 1980s, the Readjusters have grown increasingly popular among the farming community and in the midwest, which has originally been a Prohibition stronghold. On freemasonry, they cannot of course outright defend the freemasons, or they might receive a visit in the night by the Bureau, however, they are as progressive as you can get on the issue without being decried as an elitist-sympathizer, or even worse, an outright freemason. They are the most socially left-wing party, however, that's more a division in factions than an official stance of the entire party.

Prohibition: Some say the Prohibition Party was doomed from the start and that is it was a miracle it lasted so long, but that's not really accurate, what really doomed them was the Readjusters decision to focus on the south and the midwest (both formerly prohibition strongholds) and the strong Christian faction in the Anti-Masons, both parties stealing those who could be considering to vote for the Prohibitionists. However, the last Prohibitionist President Ike Skelton losing re-election was really in a way the nail in the coffin, however, the party officially dissolved in 2017. On the issue of freemasonry, members are usually either indifferent or actively support the suppression of any and all of those are even slightly support the society (or just the legalization of it).
As for the rules:
  1. I'm being pretty loose in my definition of party/faction, but please limit it to historical groups that existed in the country you're writing about, or create a scenario where the that country expands if you want to bring in outside groups.
  2. Alternate party mergers are acceptable as long as the names of the current major or third parties aren't used.
  3. A heterodox blend of political planks makes it more interesting for all involved.
I think that about covers it, have at it and try to have a little fun!
 
Last edited:
Law and Order: Center-right to right-wing, MacArthurism, law and order, strong government, agrarianism (faction)
Originally formed during the Dorr Rebellion, however, they soon grew to great lengths due to the Great Rebellion. As of now, they are the party in power and have a strong grasp over the country's House of Burgesses, most likely due to the recent riots in cities such as Cleaveland and St. Elmo. The party itself campaigns on the promises of strength, justice, and keeping the radicals in check. They are currently led by Premier Joe Pennacchio.
Republican Moderate: Center to center-right, liberal-conservatism, economic conservatism, social liberalism, libertarianism (faction)
Created in an attempt to oppose the religious fanatics of the state along with the dictatorial Alaskan Governor Ben Stevens. However, over time they became a national party and became a party full of moderates and centrists leaning towards the right. They are also the second biggest party in the House, they support religious freedom and economic conservatism. They are currently led by Deirdre Scozzfava.
Nullifier: Center-right to center-right, nullification, economic liberalism, social conservatism, free-trade, states' rights (faction)
The party of nullification and free trade, the Nullifiers were strong for a good many of years before the Republic of Dixie's secession, in which they were banned for treason, however, in the early '80s, they were unbanned and forced to start from the bottom up. However, they are doing well now, and are the third biggest party in the United States' House of Burgesses. They are currently led by Peter Lawler.

Solidarity: Left-wing to center-left, populism, anti-authoritarianism, left-wing populism, workers' rights, social democracy (faction)
The party originated from the Illinois Solidarity Party which had been formed to oppose local lunatic Hermyle LaRouche's antics, however, they eventually moved into the national arena. For a time, they were very strong, especially during the population's progressive sway during the 1990s, they have been slowly and surely losing seats each year, They are currently led by Adlai Stevenson IV.
Southern: Center-left to far-right, southern interests, social conservatism, states' rights, southern secession (faction)
The Southern Party was formed for southern interests, and their interests only. It was a miracle that they were unbanned in the early 2000s by Nullifier Premier James Q. Wilson. They are especially socially conservative, however, there are a few members who could be considered left-wing populists to some extent. They only contain seats that originate from the deep south. Currently led by Roy Moore.
Peoples' Constitutional: Left-wing to left-wing, Chicano nationalism, Mexican-American interests, Christian socialism (faction)
And last, but also least, the Peoples' Constitutional Party. Similar to the Southern Party, the PCs were formed to protect a specific group of peoples' interests. However, unlike the Southerners, the PCs fight for the rights of minorities, well, actually just those of Hispanic origin. There is also a strong Catholic Socialist faction in the party, most likely due to former leader Dolores Huerta. Currently led by Julian Castro.
 
Law and Order: Center-right to right-wing, MacArthurism, law and order, strong government, agrarianism (faction)
Originally formed during the Dorr Rebellion, however, they soon grew to great lengths due to the Great Rebellion. As of now, they are the party in power and have a strong grasp over the country's House of Burgesses, most likely due to the recent riots in cities such as Cleaveland and St. Elmo. The party itself campaigns on the promises of strength, justice, and keeping the radicals in check. They are currently led by Premier Joe Pennacchio.
Republican Moderate: Center to center-right, liberal-conservatism, economic conservatism, social liberalism, libertarianism (faction)
Created in an attempt to oppose the religious fanatics of the state along with the dictatorial Alaskan Governor Ben Stevens. However, over time they became a national party and became a party full of moderates and centrists leaning towards the right. They are also the second biggest party in the House, they support religious freedom and economic conservatism. They are currently led by Deirdre Scozzfava.
Nullifier: Center-right to center-right, nullification, economic liberalism, social conservatism, free-trade, states' rights (faction)
The party of nullification and free trade, the Nullifiers were strong for a good many of years before the Republic of Dixie's secession, in which they were banned for treason, however, in the early '80s, they were unbanned and forced to start from the bottom up. However, they are doing well now, and are the third biggest party in the United States' House of Burgesses. They are currently led by Peter Lawler.

Solidarity: Left-wing to center-left, populism, anti-authoritarianism, left-wing populism, workers' rights, social democracy (faction)
The party originated from the Illinois Solidarity Party which had been formed to oppose local lunatic Hermyle LaRouche's antics, however, they eventually moved into the national arena. For a time, they were very strong, especially during the population's progressive sway during the 1990s, they have been slowly and surely losing seats each year, They are currently led by Adlai Stevenson IV.
Southern: Center-left to far-right, southern interests, social conservatism, states' rights, southern secession (faction)
The Southern Party was formed for southern interests, and their interests only. It was a miracle that they were unbanned in the early 2000s by Nullifier Premier James Q. Wilson. They are especially socially conservative, however, there are a few members who could be considered left-wing populists to some extent. They only contain seats that originate from the deep south. Currently led by Roy Moore.
Peoples' Constitutional: Left-wing to left-wing, Chicano nationalism, Mexican-American interests, Christian socialism (faction)
And last, but also least, the Peoples' Constitutional Party. Similar to the Southern Party, the PCs were formed to protect a specific group of peoples' interests. However, unlike the Southerners, the PCs fight for the rights of minorities, well, actually just those of Hispanic origin. There is also a strong Catholic Socialist faction in the party, most likely due to former leader Dolores Huerta. Currently led by Julian Castro.
Hmmmmmmm 🤔 I'm not thrilled that the name of a modern political party made it into the list but perhaps that rule is too restrictive
 
- Puritan Party: Atl scenario where the Great Awakening leads to a political movement alongside the religious revival.

- National Party: Atl scenario where the military plays a more important role in early US politics. The military takes control and declares that citizenship is only given to those who serve. The US becomes a one party state dominated by military leaders.

- German American Party: German immigration to America occurs in even larger numbers than otl. German Americans demand German be declared a national "protected" language. They also fight against ethnic discrimination.

- Monarchist Party:. The US tries out a Monarchy but it fails and Becomes a Republic. This party tries wishes to see the return of the Monarchy.

- Colonization Party: A party of early abolitionists who focus there effort on the state and local level. Try to encourage slave states to allow slaves to earn their freedom under the condition that they be sent to Liberia after their enslavement ends.
 
Strange Bedfellows: The Second Party System (1828-1854)
I had a rather lengthy idea I've been toying around with for a party system for a work of fiction written in my Power Without Knowledge setting that I might write out today but on an unrelated note I've been mulling over the impact of a more successful Joseph Smith presidential run. I'm not suggesting that he win, or even that he not be assassinated, I'm just trying to puzzle out the consequences of his electoral platform surviving his death. Perhaps some sort of alliance with the Liberty Party?

Smith's platform included provisions shrinking the size of Congress and docking their pay, along with the elimination of courts martial and instituting the death penalty for public officials that didn't defend their constituents' constitutional rights, but what suggests at least some buy-in from the Liberty Party was a program of complete emancipation by 1850, with at least some degree of compensation financed by the sale of public land. Smith also argued for the annexation of Texas and Oregon.

I understand it's a gamble of long odds (especially regarding constitutional changes and territorial expansion) but perhaps a pragmatic move to adopt compensation as a way to attract votes in slave states that would otherwise dig in their heels at any mention of abolition? It would also almost certainly require butterflying away the LDS move to Utah, leaving them a powerful swing constituency in Illinois. The idea of an openly abolitionist party arising in and surviving the 19th century and explicitly focused on the rights of minority religious and ethnic groups has a lot of promise.

*EDIT- In keeping with my new Strange Bedfellows idea for an alternate American history in party systems here's my reinterpretation of the Second Party System:
  • Federalist Party- The sole survivor of the First Party System and the Era of Good Feelings, the Federalist Party was able to claw its way back from the brink in the wake of the shattering of the National Republican Party following the much maligned 1824 election. Advocating a strong central government, Hamiltonian economics and infrastructure spending, the party was aided in its recovery by the influx of anti-Jacksonians leaving the disintegrating National Republicans.
  • Nullifier Party- Intrinsically rooted in the fallout of the Era of Good Feelings, the Nullifier Party was shaped in it's early history by the rise of Andrew Jackson and the fallout of the Nullification Crisis of 1832. Considering himself cheated out of the presidency in 1824 Jackson had joined the Nullifiers out of a belief in populism and states' rights, though he would oppose the doctrine within the party known as "Hard Nullification" (the right of the states to cancel federal laws), instead advocating a policy of limiting government power at the federal level. While in office Jackson tended to side with Southern interests against abolitionism, opposed (but could not dismantle) the Bank of the United States and defied the Supreme Court in the lead up to the Trail of Tears.
  • Liberty Party- As the 19th century went on, national expansion through the annexation of Texas and the Mexican-American War put the issue of slavery at the forefront of the nation's politics. The Federalists would side with northern industrial interests in opposition to the spread of the Peculiar Institution, while Nullifiers, viewing such attempts as federal overreach, became adamant defenders of it. Despite this focus on the issue it wouldn't be until the 1850's that the Liberty Party, the only explicitly abolitionist party in the Union, would gain traction beyond the local level. A party of minority rights and abolitionism, the Libertarians would lead a coalition of freedmen, Mormons and Owenite socialists of all stripes to political action, parlaying a pivotal influence in several midwestern states into a coalition with the Federalists in 1860.
 
Last edited:
NASDAQ Party: Free Trade, Social Liberalism (lean center), Fiscal Conservatism, Trickle-Down Economics, Tax Cuts.

Facismo: Isolationist, Social Conservatism, Fiscal Conservatism, No Government Regulation, No worker's rights, Racist.

American Liberal Party: Social Liberalism, Fiscal Liberalism, Universal Healthcare, Increased taxes on the rich, Bigger social safety net.

MilitaryProtectsUsParty: Pro increased Military-Industrial Complex, Pro Mandatory Conscription, Pro-Gun Rights (Social and economics vary, usually right and right)

Farmer Union Pary: Pro Farm subsidies, Pro increased farm funding, Pro farmer tax breaks (Social and economics vary, normally center-right and left).

National Proletariat Party: Marxism, Marxist-Leninism (Fraction), Maoism (Fraction), Communism, Radical Leftism.

Actually Reasonable Party: Centrism, Social Liberalism (lean center), Fiscal Conservatism (lean center), increased health care affordability, welfare reform.
 
Last edited:
NASDAQ Party: Free Trade, Social Liberalism (lean center), Fiscal Conservatism, Trickle-Down Economics, Tax Cuts.

ProTiFa: Isolationist, Social Conservatism, Fiscal Conservatism, No Government Regulation, No worker's rights, Racist.

American Liberal Party: Social Liberalism, Fiscal Liberalism, Universal Healthcare, Increased taxes on the rich, Bigger social safety net.

Fuck Iraq Party: Pro increased Military-Industrial Complex, Pro Mandatory Conscription, Pro-Gun Rights (Social and economics vary, usually right and right)

Farmer Union Pary: Pro Farm subsidies, Pro increased farm funding, Pro farmer tax breaks (Social and economics vary, normally center-right and left).

National Proletariat Party: Marxism, Marxist-Leninism (Fraction), Maoism (Fraction), Communism, Radical Leftism.

Actually Reasonable Party: Centrism, Social Liberalism (lean center), Fiscal Conservatism (lean center), increased health care affordability, welfare reform.
Number 4 almost certainly puts your idea in current politics territory. Also the goal of the thread is to elevate extinct third parties and historical party factions rather than just create new parties out of whole cloth for political demographics. Perhaps changing it from Iraq to the Philippines and giving a more appropriate name could better ground it in a historical political context?
 
Borrowing from Great Britain in its Pythonesque phase:
Sensible Party
Silly Party
Very Silly Party
Official Monster Raving Loony Party (this one is real)
To avoid a bear attack I will make no effort to attribute modern characteristics to these parties. To each their own ideas.
 
Okay, here's the alternate party systems that evolve in the Heartland story nested within my Power Without Knowledge concept:

Fourth Party System (1896-1916): A period that would mark the decline and eclipse of the Democratic and Republican parties, the Fourth Party System would be defined by the electoral conflict between William McKinley and William Jennings Bryan, each serving for two consecutive terms. Domestically the Fourth Party system revolved around issues of corporate monopolies and citizen's rights, while internationally the Philippine-American War spiralled into the so called "Insurgency Wars" that would rage throughout the East Indies and attract the full attention of an otherwise increasingly isolationist America. The decline of the Fourth Party System would come about through the rise of the...
  • Independence Party: An electoral vehicle for William Randolph Hearst[1], the Independence Party sought to capture populist impulses that Hearst believed were not being catered to, citing the quagmire of the Insurgency Wars and playing on the extreme backlash to Bryan's attempt to implement national Prohibition. Advocating a radical populism that sought to bypass what the party called "the machine politicians", the Hearst administration would coincide with currents among the electorate to seize the power to choose political candidates away from party functionaries. Ironically this populism would be Hearst's undoing, with the backlash to his other foreign and domestic policies exacerbating the rise of the ULP and the end of the Fourth Party System.
Fifth Party System (1916-1948): With the Democratic and Republican parties essentially powerless in the wake of the radical populism that led to the end of the Fourth Party System, and with the Independence Party disintegrating without Hearst on the ticket, the new Fifth Party System would be dominated by issues of the scope of government authority and one's position toward the European Quasi-War[2]. This period would see increasingly toxic partisanship and dramatic shifts in policy as power shifted rapidly through increasingly contested elections, leading some historians to alternatively refer to the period as the Culture Struggle, taken from the German term Kulturkampf.
  • United Labor Party: The election of Henry George as New York Mayor in 1886[3] would be the beginning of the marginalization of Marxism within the United Labor Party, and by the time of its ascendence it would be wholly Geoist, advocating for free trade, tax reform, a formal alliance with the Central Powers, and an end to the growing tide of isolationism. Advocating for a strong central government, the party argued that devolving too much power to the states led to the persecution of dissenters of whatever description.
  • Prohibition Party: Following the failure to adopt the 17th Amendment[4], the Prohibition Party would withdraw all support from the Bryan Administration, shifting focus to opposing the rising, labor focused (and therefore "un-American") and increasingly ethnic ULP, eventually becoming the bastion of WASP culture in the United States. Transitioning to a new focus on state's rights to advance the moral priorities of its constituency, the Prohibition Party would lobby for a weak and isolationist federal government, protective trade, and an affiliation (never "alliance") with the increasingly decentralized Entente.
Sixth Party System (1948-1984): Through the period of the Culture Struggle the rapid shifts between Geoism and Vitalism at the national stage produced intense gridlock and dissatisfaction with the political system, though it would produce interesting and long lasting changes at the local level. Vitalist rhetoric had led to the unintended growth of informal political and cultural identities that transcended not only the state governments but also the US-Canadian border. It would be these shared identities that would give rise to a new organization, the Continental Congress, a lobbying organization and forum for these new cultural units to interact among themselves. Almost wholly removed from international affairs, North America under the grips of the American National[5] Union Party and the Canadian SoCred Party[6] has seen the withering away of not only the ULP's centralized federalism but also the Prohibitionist's strong statism, ceding territory to regionalism that transcends traditional boundaries.
  • National Union Party: Ushered into power by the 1948 election of President William Goodale[7], the National Union Party would attempt to chart a third position between Geoism and Vitalism through a political theory Goodale called Vajraism. Inspired by Anthroposophy, Vajraism divided society into three spheres, political ("Community"), social ("Identity") and economic ("Stability"). While presented as a salve for the nation's wounds in the wake of the Culture Struggle all this has done is created two geographically distinct factions within the party (the western Natural Alliance and the eastern People's Coalition) and left everyone vulnerable to corporations playing one group against another.
[1]-Given altered international events Hearst in 1912 has a blend of his OTL reformist early politics and his post-WWI conservative politics.

[2]-"European" being an increasingly outdated modifier. With both the Geoist Central Powers and the Vitalist Entente spreading their respective systems to their colonies and expanding their membership into other theaters the Quasi-War is the defining ideological split of TTL's 20th century, though actual conflict is limited to diplomatic maneuvering, economic leverage and colonial proxy wars.

[3]-The timeline's POD, butterflying away Teddy Roosevelt's stint as VP in the process.

[4]- National Prohibition. Ironically the fact that votes for women came after prohibition was put to the question is probably what doomed it in the first place.

[5]- "National" in this context meaning "cultural". There's an understood nuance between "country" and "nation" TTL, with the NUP coming down firmly on the side of the latter, to the point that "Separate But Equal" is the motto of the Continental Congress.

[6]- With no World War I, Social Credit arises slightly differently but still catches on in Canada. As in OTL, the more exotic reforms at the provincial level are prevented by the national government, leading to a shift to Prohibitionist-influenced provincial devolution arguments, creating a similar slippery slope to that seen in the alternate US. By the time 1948 comes around National Union and the Socreds are essentially two different masks for the same weird thing.

[7]-Less noxious than OTL but still prone to mysticism and convoluted race theories.
 
Last edited:
ctwxLQS.png

The American political system is described as unique. A firm instillation within the culture of America and the opening up of politics to everyone regardless of if they're interested or not. In spite of the wishes of King George, political factions would gradually emerge. The first of these were members of the royal house, aligned with various merchant classes in the upper portion of the country. Traders and the like. These would come together one rainy October afternoon to form the first major political opposition to the already established Federalist Party. The Democratic Party. For a while, both sides would form a relatively stable "First Party System" from the early 1800s until the 1830s. With the final death of the more well mannered old guard that kept political participation limited and the party system intact, younger members barked at the gates of power and the floodgates were released.

A mess of smaller political parties formed up then fizzled out upon the realization that it took a significant amount of capital in order to run for your local undertaker, let alone possible connections to be nominated Prime Minister. It was no secret that John Calhoun and the President didn't get along. It was about as well known as the fact that the sky was, indeed, blue. Things came to a head within South Carolina when Calhoun was caught writing an angry and defiant letter to the South Carolina Autonomous Collective in 1832.

The idea of Nullification soon spread, and with little in the way of a working supreme court to sort the issue out (and the fact that several judges on the Patriotic Judicial Assembly subscribed to the idea of nullification as a constitutional principle), a working party was hoisted up. However, in order for the party to actually thrive, it needed to have more than just be a "Fuck Andrew Jackson fan-club". They needed more ideas for a broader political base. So they tacked onto the fiery rhetoric of state's rights, promoting itself as the governor's chief defense agaisnt "northern aggression." They championed the idea of Nullification. Despite some warning that northern states could nullify acts passed by southern prime ministers, such as in the instance of northern state's nullification of Prime Minister Millard Fillmore's Fugitive Slave Declaration in the 1860s, those within the south argued that they would be able to get back at them by not following whatever yankee doodle was elected in the north. Political gridlock was known to be inevitable whenever the Nullification Party garnered enough hold of the various bits of government, but not enough to override major Know Nothing policies.



The Know Nothings, personified by "Citizen Know Nothing" in political cartoons, is the newer of the two parties, as part of a merger between nervous Federalists remnants within Massachusetts and the increasingly powerful New York based American Republican Party. Although there were initial proposals to be renamed the American Party, the diehard (and those with deep northeastern pocketbooks) threatened to pull out. Faced with that choice, the reformers backed down, and so the Know Nothing Party banner has proudly carried on. Formulated with a deep fear of increasing German Catholics within the 1840s and 50s, they formed various secret societies and even a paramilitary organization known as the Order of the Star Spangled Banner. This organization, while declared inactive by party heads by 1980, has unofficially served as hired muscle against Nullification rallies, protects controversial Know Nothing politicians and is known to commit acts of terrorism both domestic and foreign. This has earned it enough international condemnation to be labeled as a Terrorist Organization by 13 countries including the United Kingdom of France and England and the Ottoman Empire.

As with it's younger rival, the Know Nothings have evolved over time. No longer as violently anti-Catholic as they once were ,(Burning Churches down didn't improve the image of the party among the common people) the party has instead moved to anti-immigration rhetoric. This is made clear in their push for a limitation in the number of immigrants, mostly focusing on those within poorer African and the various former colonies of north Korea and east Germany. There are a slew of political jabs by the Nullification Party against the not so-secret xhenophobic policies of the Know Nothings.

However, many within the Party took a little bit of what this fellow Andrew Jackson was doing with "mass democracy" and blatantly stole the idea, relabeling it as "Politics for the Masses." While some historians argue it was stolen, and even the most staunch worth defenders conceded it was "adapted from Jackson's platform", Politics for the Masses is different. Instead of being restricted to rich and poor white-males only, it would open up the democratic process to all walks of life. There was an urge within the 1900s and 1910s to open up various bureaucratic and often nonpartisan position for political competition. These extended to the Education System, where President John Williams passed the "Political Education Act of 1918." This opened up for campaigns to not only donate but to manage various political campaigns of students for seats on "Mass Assemblies", with any major change to school policy requiring a wide array of political vote buying or peer pressure from prospective pubescent politicians.

Even the state mandated Church isn't immune from rampant politician. The main body in charge of any alterations to canon Revolutionary Law is also answerable to, granted a smaller pool of more capable archdeacons comprised of the initial 13 colonies, with a rotating selection of random pools of ten members "in any religious profession." Granted this system has lead to controversial pushes, such as a proclamation to include evolution as part of canon law by more scientific and less devoutly religious members (often of the Nullification Party's left-wing), but apart from the occasional story about some president of a stake taking too many investitures for a cushy office job, this aspect of the system isn't as corrupt as the international media declares it to be.
 
In the spirit of the thread's new wider focus, here's a couple of posts for the excellent Fear Nothing But God by @Major Crimson
Hey look I finally did some stuff for FNBG. Gonna do all the parties of the FC and a box for the 2019 Election, I think.

I really like the logo, though the spade head has some weird artifacts which is annoying but v small.

View attachment 585744

View attachment 585742

A long, long overdue return...



The 2019 Fraternal Commonwealth General Election

View attachment 594372


qmj1BaE.png
 
Farmer Union Pary: Pro Farm subsidies, Pro increased farm funding, Pro farmer tax breaks (Social and economics vary, normally center-right and left)
Led to:
Independent Growers Union Party: AKA the Green Farmers Party, Green and Grow Party...
( In derogatory terms also referred to as the
Goatwool Sock Party, the goats )

A split-off from the Farmers Union Party that contends that the latter has become too subservient to the big agricultural businesses, megafarms and meat-packing plants to the detriment of small family farms and independent growers. Quickly gained a following in rural New England, Colorado, New Mexico and parts of California. Also gained support from the microbrewery industry, whole food grocery chains and Willie Nelson...

However while promoting small farms and orchards, they quickly adopted ideas of sustainable green farming which lead to talk radio now openly calling them 'that other green lefties'. The fact that they are also heavily promoting the legalization of marijuana does not help and lately their appeal with traditional small family farms - once their core constituents- has waned. Many of hem now lamenting that they "revolted against being pushed out by corporate megafarms, only to now be pushed out by hippie goat farmers". Still their upward trend has slowed but not stopped andbin the last elections they managed to get as many votes as the FUP.

Platform
: pro small farms, pro sustainable farming, pro farm subsides but vehement watchdog making sure said subsidies are not gobbled up by large agribusiness.
Socially conservative to pro-busines, pro-family and pro states rights. However also pro marijuana and against fracking, pesticides and GMO seeds.

Although not official, in analogy to the Democrat's mule and the Republican's elephants, political cartoonists have taken to depicting the IGUP as a small goat or a goat Inna farmers outfit. Apparently many IGUP members liked the idea and bumper stickers of goats driving tractors, goats headbutting mules and goats p.... against the leg of an elephant have become quite popular in rural parts of the states.


Closely aligned with:

Fraternal Order of Local and Small Businesses:

Originally an action group turned political party, the FOLSBee is - as the name implies- pro-busines but against 'big business' and megacorporations running roughshod over small neighborhood mon-and-pop stores. Unsurprisingly they have a strong following on the local levels, in several smaller towns being the biggest party in city council. Their reach however declines with each superimposed layer of government and their overall impact in the state elections I negligible. Nationally, so far they have only yielded one senator and four congressmen in their 50 years of existence.

The name invokes strong images of early 1900's idyllic New England town streets with lots of stores that are just known by the family name of their owner and it must be said that the FOLSBee is quite successful in playing on the nostalgic feel of that image. Their mythical hero is George Bailey, the community banker protagonist from Frank Capra's 'It's a Wonderful Life'. And like Bailey, their main tenet is that it is a local business' task to help it's community especially when this does not exclude getting ahead themselves as well. Therefore on a national level it should be the government's task to help small businesses helping the community.

As a platform, they are rather conservative, pro gun rights, pro law and order and pro-busines. However they are quite effective as a watchdog making sure that every proposed business law is effectively helping ALL businesses an not just the ones big enough to afford their own lobbyists and their idea of 'a level playing field for all' also ties in with support for education and immigrants' rights.

However like the IGUP, the FOLSBee also has taken on -critics say:'has been infiltrated by' - some rather leftist and environmentalist views. So they tend to promote public transportation over new highways (there are more clients at bus stops then at parking lots) green energy over fossil fuel (no startup will come to our city thinking 'Hey, let's build a car that runs on coal') public housing, a strong social welfare net and lately even state-run healthcare. So much like conservatives paint the IGUP as the party of goat wool sock wearing weed farmers, they taken to deride the FOLSBee as the party of hippie farmers market organic bath salt sellers.
Like the IGUP, this has not really affected their base and although rather small nationally, by coordinating their programs with the IGUP 'goats' they are still on of the more influntial minor pressure parties.

In political cartoons to the FOLSBee is usually represented as a Norman Rockwell-esque 1920's drug store owner. Typically he is standing behind a soda fountain doling out fatherly advice to a donkey or elephant sitting at the drug store counter.
 

PNWKing

Banned
  • Socialist Party: Left-wing. Workplace democracy, democratic socialism
  • Libertarian Party: Center-left to right-wing. Corporatism, lower taxes, limited government.
  • Christian Democracy Party: Center-left. Christianity, Larger role of churches in economy, government in collaboration with churches to administer essential services.
 
Strange Bedfellows: The Third Party System (1856-1894)
Based on a conversation I had about bimetallism (of all things) it became clear that the simplest way to create alternate party systems was simply to maintain the pressure of hot button political issues that are no longer relevant, with existing issue-specific parties boosted accordingly. With that in mind here's an example:

Currency reform- From the end of the civil war through the beginning of the twentieth century, a huge political issue was the currency system, specifically what was backing it. For a brief overview: the US operated a joint gold-backed and fiat currency system during the Civil War and eventually switched back to gold monometallism, with the Populist movement arguing for bimetallism to boost the currency supply. How might it have gone with a de facto fiat system a century before Nixon?
  • National Reform Party- A party created from the merger of the National Labor Reform Party and the Grange (two groups OTL that would produce the Greenback Party), the National Reform Party would be instrumental in pressuring President Chase to veto attempts to return the United States to the gold standard. With the Nullifiers out of power in the wake of the Civil War and the Federalist/Liberty coalition divided over the issue, the Libertarians would bolt the alliance, swelling the ranks of the National Reform Party and elevating them to major party status. Aside from fighting to entrench fiat currency at the Bank of the United States, the NRP also comes down on the side of labor (both industrial and agrarian) against the trusts and the planter class, and on the side of religious and ethnic minorities.
  • Constitutional Unionists- The transition of the Civil War from a conflict about government power to a crusade against slavery had tipped the balance of the Coalition, with Lincoln's change in affiliation to the Liberty Party laying the Federalists low for the second time in less than a century. Seizing on language in the Constitution about the use of gold and silver as legal currency and backed by a mixture of Eastern financiers eager for a return to bullion and Southern elites dismayed to see the poor, both white and black, drawn to the Libertarian-influenced National Reform Party, the newly reorganized Constitutional Union Party would advocate a platform of bimetallism and of ending Reconstruction. They would be stymied on both counts by Salmon P. Chase, having become Chief Justice of the Supreme Court following his presidency, the first president to fill both roles.
*Edit- I came up with a fun little challenge for myself: I'm going to edit this post and my Liberty Party post in order to tie them together. Once that's done I'm going to expand the now unified timeline going forward through analogues of each OTL party system. There's going to be tons of parallelism but still some fun stuff thrown in.
 
Last edited:
Strange Bedfellows: The Fourth Party System (1896-1930)
Up to this point in my little exercise we've seen how the dominant issues of each party system have existed right on schedule, each ending differently than in our history. The fight over slavery in the Second Party System ends in a more successful Reconstruction instead of OTL's Redemption. Rather than a fight over gold or silver, the Third Party System sees the rise of fiat currency in the US. And so we move on to the Fourth Party system, dealing with the Trusts and isolationist tendencies in the Empire of Liberty.

With the new century came a decisive schism in the National Reform Party, one that would tear it in half between Owenite and moderate elements. The turn of the century had seen the so-called Cuban Liberation erupt over the long-term Spanish policy of sheltering Confederate loyalists on the island, with the decisive question coming down to the issue of Cuban Reconstruction. Although a firm party man, having risen to the Presidency after the death of Edward Bellamy, Theodore Roosevelt was nonetheless unwilling to actually occupy Cuba as the radicals demanded, content merely to topple the Redeemer-supported Cuban government and turn over control to the native population.
  • Progressive Party- When the party split as a result, Roosevelt would refashion the moderate wing into the Progressive Party, pursuing his longstanding agenda of dismantling the trusts that had grown unchecked during periods of Constitutional Union governance. Maintaining a focus on a strong central government as a vehicle for reform, Roosevelt would use his two and a half terms to strengthen labor, conserve wild spaces, and secure the development of the Panama Canal.
  • Socialist Party- Formed from the Owenite wing of the NRP, the Socialist Party was disorganized in its early years, with many in the party unwilling to risk throwing the election to the Constitutional Unionists by challenging Roosevelt. By 1908 however they were growing restless, and with the Bull Moose declining to pursue a third full term they saw their chance. Campaigning on a communalist platform blending syndicalism with libertarianism, the Socialists would as feared split the vote.
  • American Party- Rebranding again, the Constitutional Unionists would christen themselves the American Party, casting themselves as the defenders of traditional American values in the face of the Socialist scourge. Although the party would stress isolationism with the outbreak of the Great War, the rise of Communal Republics in the UK and France would be used as a hammer to discredit and suppress the Socialist Party.
With the Third Party System reduced to what amounted to a duopoly between the Progressives and the Americans, the 1920s would see further moderate reforms under Progressive administrations, although wealth continued to accumulate to powerful corporate and elite interests whenever the American Party held the executive. Isolation was seen by many as the proper course, especially as the Communal Republics continued to crop up in the the newly federalized French and British empires and Germany became increasingly reactionary in the face of its new neighbors. The default on loans and reparations payments by the Communalist Entente would lead to the global Panic of 1921, though America's fiat currency would give the country a far more flexible ability to respond than most other nations. Despite this flexibility the Panic would see the growth of a radical new populism obsessed with assigning blame for the Panic squarely at the feet of the Americans.
 
Last edited:
Maybe eventually turn the progressive party into a hybrid Socialist Green hybrid? Green energy, pro labor and maybe regulations on pollution. Maybe in this timeline this hybrid Socialist Green party(maybe still called the progressive party) took the push for the civil rights movement. This would move the democratic party more towards a decentralized America (states decide things like segregation and the like themselves)
 
Top