Prologue
Disclaimer: the usual blah blah blah, views of characters in timeline doesn't necessary reflect the author's views in a meta sense and all that jazz.

If all goes well this timeline will cover a thousand years over the span of an entire solar system and more...
(also if this ends up still getting locked I'm also crossposting on QQ for what its worth)
----------------
The passage of time will always weather away the details and nuances of events. Fifteen volumes of the conquests of three generations of Khans over a period of decades encompassing the breath of two continents have over time been condensed into the feats and glories of a single man within a couple of paragraphs, which in meantime being attributed with numerous feats not of his own doing. Thus the early history of the Greater Europa Reich has been condensed from the forces of millions over decades into the greatness of a single madman. Such condensation is useful for basic education, but a deeper knowledge of history is essential for understanding of the nature of the Greater Europa Reich.

-Dr. James O'Connor, University of Hampden-Sydney, Hampden Sydney, Appalachian Sector. Federation of North America, 2855.

Prologue: origin of the Thousand Year Reich

The formation of the Greater Europa Reich in the 20th century had its origins in the early 19th century, when its spiritual ancestor the Holy Roman Empire, at the time known as the First Reich, and the concept of a united European continent was finally shattered and dissolved for good, ending a legacy that began with the formation of the Roman Republic. In the hundred odd years since the great dissolution the nation states of Europe and their peripherals fought each other with ever increasing violence and brutality, culminating in the Pan European War (at the time known as the Great War or World War I) that also drew in much of the rest of the planet.

(it’s interesting to note that during this period there was a short lived central European nation state claiming to take on the mantle of the HRE, this “Second Reich” lasted less than half a century and was of little note in its accomplishments and territories controlled, which did not even include much of the core of its predecessor)

By the early 20th century, despite many of the individual nation states owning significant territories outside of Europe the continent remained bitterly divided and broken, suffering from economic and social malaise.

Enter the man who will be remembered as the Great Wolf. Though sources were fuzzy as to his origins the present historical consensus was that he was born somewhere in the region then known as the eastern lands, which despite its name was still actually in central Europe and was in fact the heart of the First Reich, a fact that was little noted during his lifetime.

Within the span of his lifetime, he resurrected the dream of Rome and united Europe once more into one nation and one people, harnessing the full scientific, industrial, and military might of a continent and laid the foundation of an empire that lasted over a millennium...
 
Last edited:
The Europa Unification War
The Europa Unification War​

One of the most mythologized wars that took place entirely on Earth, although even within the context of the 20th century it did not have the largest number of casualties*, many of the long term trends of the continent could trace back to the events that occurred during that conflict. Although still somewhat of a hyperbole to claim the war as the forge that unified European as a common national identity it did laid the foundation for the environment to allow that to form.

The origin of what would become known as the Unification War (more commonly known as the Europa Unification War to differentiate from The Consolidation War in Asia which occurred in the same time period) had its origins in the Pan European War of the early 20th century, in which the two Germanies (and some other minor nations of little note) took on the rest of the continent and lost, which ended in further dismemberment of the German lands and people. As the losers of the war the German peoples suffered further humiliations, political instability, and economic malaise. All these variables led to the discreditation of the political concept of democracy and republician forms of governments within the Germanies.

It was under those conditions in which the Great Wolf and his Knights of the Crooked Cross made their presence felt in those shattered lands, quickly gaining the support and adoration of the peoples with promises of bringing back the glories of the by now long forgotten reich**.

Ironically, according to research in recent centuries, the Great Wolf did not start the war with the intention of unifying the peoples of Europe. The general consensus is that his primary motivations at the time were much more localized in nature, that of the unification of the various Germanic peoples and other similar groups. Much of that goal was, surprisingly enough, achieved through peaceful means of diplomacy.

It was most likely that those small successes were the immediate catalyst for the resulting war, as the other regional powers, envious of the resurgence of Germanic power, decided to wage war with the full backing of their massive empires. However, the long term leadup to the conflict was more complex. The Pan European War had been ruinously expensive even for the victors, and in the short peace that followed they had attempted various schemes to recoup their losses, all of which had failed. Thus a war of plunder (despite not working in the previous war) was thought as the solution to economic woes***.

The resulting war was brutal and cruel in the extreme, lasting longer and costing more lives than the Pan European War before it. The full might of industrial society and scientific genius of a continent was utilized in the wholesale slaughter of peoples and destruction of cities. For it was the first war in which effective mass bombing of civilian assets was conducted, mainly by the Perfidious Albion, which also conducted all of its other cowardly and underhanded tactics that it utilized in the last war such as the distant blockade.

The war was a war of quality vs quantity. The superior scientific and physical prowess of the Aryan people against the hordes of colonial mongoloid forces of Albion and Franks (and later on the seemingly endless hordes of Judeo-bolshevik Oriental Despotism).

For over a decade the war waged on. While the Franks and their protectorates fell within a year, while the Albion clawed on until they too were subdued, the first country to be conquered completely via the then novel air and sea power****.

Just in time too as the soon the hordes of Judeo-bolshevik Oriental Despotism attempted their own conquest of the continent. Driven by their morally bankrupt and depraved ideology, they were quickly stopped and soon the entirety of their dark lands was under the guiding light of European civilization, the dark beasts and their evil banished beyond the Ural mountains. By the middle of the century the whole of Europe once again knew peace, a peace more lasting and firm than the previous morally bankrupt one.

Technological-wise the war was marked by rapid advances in technologies and doctrines in integration of said technologies. From the tops of skies to the depths of oceans total war was waged as every terrain was fully utilized for the first time*****.

It was the first war in which vertical dropped forces****** were instrumental in the conquest of an entire country. The first war in which artillery gained a strategic role in the form of theater ballistic missiles. Beyond deployment of ground forces, air assets were utilized in many other roles, both offensive and defensive.

Although unimpressive today, the rate of movement of the armies during the war strained the technologies of the era to their breaking point. For example, the average distance from Königsberg to the A-A line was over 2,000km, much of it effectively wilderness. Said distance was crossed by the armies of the Crooked Cross in under six weeks with vehicles that could do little better than 30kph offroad, while aircrafts were limited in capabilities in both carrying and durability.

Unfortunately, the war was also the first war in which the destruction of civilians was an explicit war goal. Mainly conducted by the Perfidious Albion, their strategic bombing of cities and starvation of civilian populations of Europe through distant blockade (or more popularly known as phantom blockade) led to the needless death of thousands of innocents.

*although it’s common to lump many post war deaths (such as the pacification of Eastern Europe through Generalplan Ost) with the war proper itself due to certain legal technicalities, those inflated claims should be dismissed by any scholarly standard above the pop culture level
**It’s worth noting that in the era before genetic reconstruction/fortification (never mind brain uploading) the average lifespan of a human was slightly above half a century, with the actual optimal state of being a fraction of that.
***A far more cynical fringe theory was that the war was an attempt to remove excess economically unproductive population. The problems with that theory was that due to the losses of the Pan European War should have already fixed any such problem. Also in the era before AI automation the parts of the population considered to be productive was a much higher segment of the overall population. In fact, the war caused significant labor shortages which were felt for the remainder of the century and even beyond.
****Although the royal family of Albion fled to their colony of Canada and vowed to continue the senseless conflict their fate was of a footnote and outside the scope of this chapter.
*****There are many debates as to whether the Pan European War or the Europa Unification War was the first terrestrial three dimensional war, with the archaeological community still heavily divided on the topic.
******although in this case it is airdrop forces rather than the orbital drop forces commonly seen starting from the mid 3rd millennium.
 
Generalplan Ost: civilizing the east
As usual, if you have any question in reading between the lines feel free to ask.
--------------------

Generalplan Ost: civilizing the east​

Throughout the history of Europe pre second unification the continent, in terms of civilization and technological development, could be divided between the advanced west and the barbaric east. The reasons for such are numerous, the geographical size and resulting population density, the proximity of the East to the hordes of mongoloid raiders of the Asian steppes, and the simple inferiority of the racial stock present (often corrupted further by those same Asiatic hordes).

This divide for centuries had significant repercussions to the course of European civilization, as proximity to the lesser races of the other continents often led to corruption and decay of the European racial stock. Witness the slow decline of the Byzantine Empire and eventual conquest by the Arabs and Turks, or the mongolification of the Eastern Europe by the Asiatic hordes to form the slavic race. The pattern was recognized as early as the early 2nd minnellium with the crusades of the Teutonic Knights on the Baltic coasts. However due to the technological and political limitations of the era such efforts had limited results and their effects were temporary at best. The last of these eastern invasions was during the latter days of the Europa Unification War when the hordes of rodina attempted to subjugate the entire continent under the horrors of Judeo-Bolshevik Oriental Despotism.

With the full political and military unification of the continent after the Europa Unification War the opportunity for the first time in the continent’s history to uplift the vast easten untamed wilderness and banishing the corruption along the frontiers of the continent that had been sapping at the strength of European civilization since the time of the Romans and the curse of the continent ever since.

At first the Reich attempted to tame the lands in an orderly and systematic manner, in which the savage natives of the regions were to be culled and tamed for the service of the new settlers, which would be the vanguard that would transform the land and raise its productivity to that of the heartlands. The plan, known as Generalplan Ost, was initially rolled out as a systematic and orderly plan from the government, under the same mentality as the one that won the war.

The commitment for the purification of the east led to the continuation of the war state well after the official cession of hostilities that marked the end of the Europa Unification War, and according to some of the higher estimates at the end of the 2nd millennium there were upwards of over two million full time military personnel protecting the (less than half a million) new settlers from the barbaric hordes. Moreover than the costs of the purification was the lackluster economic development of the newly cleared lands. For reasons unknown the leadership of the Reich at the time decreed that the settlement of the east was to be done for the growth of agricultural production and rural communities, which for all the cultural enrichment of society and population increase did little to contribute to the economic growth of the regions. Paradoxically the few profitable areas of the newly settled easten regions were those next to ore deposits and whose main economic productivity deriving from raw resource extraction, such as the Baku oil fields.

Though never officiated, the Reich had effectively abandoned Generalplan Ost as a formal governmental plan by the first century of the 3rd millennium, as the moral drive of the founding generation was replaced by the bureaucratic budget keeping mundaneness of the mid-early era. The soldiers were demobilized and the economic enticement for settlers were scaled back.

Deprived of the artificial support network, the eastern regions quickly regressed in development and growth. Following economic contractions came moral and social decay as many of the settlements suffered from similar problems as the barbarians they displaced, leading to persistent rumors that the lands themselves were cursed, leading to corruption and degeneration of all those who lived on it. The more logical theories from the last few centuries suggest a “fraying effect” in which the outlying regions of a geopolitical entity, especially those bordering foreign tribes or nations, would inevitably corrupt its inhabitants due to limits of social pressure and rule of law, as well as proximity to foreign corruption. It’s speculated that such forces led to the fall of the Roman Empires as well as the eventual disintegration of both the First and Europa Reichs.

Economically the eastern regions did not catch up to the heartland in terms of economic productivity until the mid 22nd century with the rationalization and automation of agricultural output and resource extraction. Ironically as it joined the heartlands in development it was around the time that it too was called upon to contribute resources and manpower in the development of the Cydonia region of Mars.
 

Garrison

Donor
Honestly this seems more like a story than a TL and it probably should be in the writers section, especially as large parts of it are set in the future and you clearly don't intend to offer any plausible explanations for how Nazi Germany wins WWII.
 
Holy !@#$,the German Millenium made flesh through the eyes of the victors.
Watched.
Thank you!
Though it is through the eyes of the distant descendants of the victors, where the sands of time has washed away even the deepest of horror and leaves a boring banality and a bullshit heroic legend behind. (also not helped with a lot of records went up in flames in one of the wars in the mid 3rd millennium, we'll get to that at some point). It's kinda like how we modern day people lionize the ancient Spartans when in reality they were basically the ancient world's version of North Korea.

Honestly this seems more like a story than a TL and it probably should be in the writers section, especially as large parts of it are set in the future and you clearly don't intend to offer any plausible explanations for how Nazi Germany wins WWII.
I mean if anyone asked I'm more than willing to offer meta explanations...

Both UK & USSR were brought down a few pegs through internal strife before the war. The WWII in this universe was basically a cripple fight in which the Axis barely scraped a victory... and also the US didn't join in, instead focusing on tighter economic & political control of the Americas. The lack of US involvement made this alt WWII two separate wars, with the Nazis & Italy in Europe & Africa doing their own thing while Japan run rampant in the Far East.

There was a sort of Operation Sealion attempted against the UK, which went (predictably) horribly wrong for the Nazi militarily but did managed to break the will of the government of the UK (not necessarily the will of the British people though, that came later...)

There was no invasion from the USSR, and barely an Operation Barbarossa as Nazi Germany simply strolled into a shell of a country already ripped each other apart when the purges of Stalin went out of control and a multi faction civil war, especially after Stalin and a lot of his inner circle died under mysterious circumstances.
To the surprise of nobody despite making their mountains of skulls the whole plan was economically unproductive, and most people don't actually want to leave their cushy urban life to eke out an rural existence in the ass end of nowhere.

Due to this and other really stupid shit the Nazi economy by the late 20th century did crash, hard. The reich survived by the skin of their teeth however by mass murdering the fuck out of all the internal opposition* (think of it as a starving animal beginning to cannibalizing its own body for fuel just to survive a few more moments). As much of the original nazi leadership dies over the decades and their party hack successors seemed to be unable to fix the massive underlying economic issues, gradually what's left of the bureaucracy begin to reassert themselves** and starting instituting actual sensible policies, such as promptly abandoning retarded plans like Generalplan Ost and polices such as blood & soil. Of course, with all the subsidies and protection taken away much of the former European part of Russia promptly collapses into low key anarchy and even straight up wilderness as entire towns and even a few "cities" were abandoned. The actual colonization of Eastern Europe took additional centuries, and were mostly done by mega corporations who had by then automated much of the process (i.e. plopping machines rather than throwing human settlers).

So what ended up happening was instead of blood & soil colonizing the land, it was machine & extraction.

As for why the brief history didn't even bother to note that kind of economic collapse? Well that kind of stuff tend to disappear pretty fast from memory. (fun fact, there were actually a dozen times in OTL 1950s when the USA was in a recession, and yet I never heard about it until I took a 200 level course in college on environmental economics)

*while the external potential opposition were either slowly imploding themselves (Japan, which did lose much of its conquest by the late 21st century in a rather ironic fashion), turtling (USA, who during this period were busy with getting to space and low key planning on interplanetary colonization), or just trying to ignore the whole thing (Italy, who had their own hands full)
**with one major exception that'll be elaborated upon in the future
 

Garrison

Donor
I mean if anyone asked I'm more than willing to offer meta explanations...
Except you will then find you get a lot of questions about the plausibility and factual underpinnings of your story. Your meta 'explanation' raises more questions than it answers TBH, and several bits of it are frankly unbelievable, but since you are clearly writing a highly stylised story and not a plausible TL I'm not inclined to dig down, but honestly it really doesn't seem like something that belongs in Post-1900.
 
but honestly it really doesn't seem like something that belongs in Post-1900.
Isn't the writers' forum for stories that would be consider off topic in the other ones (i.e. not relating to history)? Also I'm going for that shitty pop history book vibe that deals with a time period that's been mythologized to a certain degree, as well as the overton window having shifted to some weird places during the meantime.
 

Garrison

Donor
Isn't the writers' forum for stories that would be consider off topic in the other ones (i.e. not relating to history)? Also I'm going for that shitty pop history book vibe that deals with a time period that's been mythologized to a certain degree, as well as the overton window having shifted to some weird places during the meantime.
Okay then, lets dissect your alt WWII:

Both UK & USSR were brought down a few pegs through internal strife before the war. The WWII in this universe was basically a cripple fight in which the Axis barely scraped a victory... and also the US didn't join in, instead focusing on tighter economic & political control of the Americas. The lack of US involvement made this alt WWII two separate wars, with the Nazis & Italy in Europe & Africa doing their own thing while Japan run rampant in the Far East.

The idea that the US would allow the US to 'run rampant' in the Far East is farfetched, the US had huge interests in the Pacific and you offer no reason for them to ignore that, or for why they don't involve themselves in Europe?

There was a sort of Operation Sealion attempted against the UK, which went (predictably) horribly wrong for the Nazi militarily but did managed to break the will of the government of the UK (not necessarily the will of the British people though, that came later...)

Again this makes no sense, successfully defeating Sealion, the very thing Churchill had been gearing the British up to do throughout the Summer of 1940, would be a massive boost for the morale of the people and the politicians. Why on Earth would winning break the will of the Government? You do understand that the whole reason Churchill became Prime Minister was precisely because he was determined to fight on? Britain has just lifted the threat of invasion and scored a major victory, why would that cause a collapse of will when the arguably worse circumstances of OTL didn't?

There was no invasion from the USSR, and barely an Operation Barbarossa as Nazi Germany simply strolled into a shell of a country already ripped each other apart when the purges of Stalin went out of control and a multi faction civil war, especially after Stalin and a lot of his inner circle died under mysterious circumstances.

And there's just so much handwaving here. The purges were over by 1940 and the USSR was rapidly rebuilding its military and yet you seem to have them go on and Stalin die for no reason other than plot purposes.

So far it seems that these things happen merely because they suit your story, which can be acceptable in a novel, but for a TL you have multiple unconnected POD's(USA, USSR, Sealion) none of which seem to based on any plausible foundation and frankly don't make much sense. And if you intend to invoke the degree of mythologization by your unreliable narrator to cover this, well then that would just reinforce my feeling this is not a TL and maybe if not suited for the Writers section it certainly seems more like Future History.
 

dcd

Banned
Okay then, lets dissect your alt WWII:



The idea that the US would allow the US to 'run rampant' in the Far East is farfetched, the US had huge interests in the Pacific and you offer no reason for them to ignore that, or for why they don't involve themselves in Europe?



Again this makes no sense, successfully defeating Sealion, the very thing Churchill had been gearing the British up to do throughout the Summer of 1940, would be a massive boost for the morale of the people and the politicians. Why on Earth would winning break the will of the Government? You do understand that the whole reason Churchill became Prime Minister was precisely because he was determined to fight on? Britain has just lifted the threat of invasion and scored a major victory, why would that cause a collapse of will when the arguably worse circumstances of OTL didn't?



And there's just so much handwaving here. The purges were over by 1940 and the USSR was rapidly rebuilding its military and yet you seem to have them go on and Stalin die for no reason other than plot purposes.

So far it seems that these things happen merely because they suit your story, which can be acceptable in a novel, but for a TL you have multiple unconnected POD's(USA, USSR, Sealion) none of which seem to based on any plausible foundation and frankly don't make much sense. And if you intend to invoke the degree of mythologization by your unreliable narrator to cover this, well then that would just reinforce my feeling this is not a TL and maybe if not suited for the Writers section it certainly seems more like Future History.
Stop trying to discourage the OP.Kalga,don't worry about this.To me,this seems to look a lot like Man in the High Castle.
 

Garrison

Donor
Stop trying to discourage the OP.Kalga,don't worry about this.To me,this seems to look a lot like Man in the High Castle.
Yes which is a story, not an attempt at a plausible AH. As with so many Nazi victory stories TMITHC skips over the hard part of how they could possibly win. In other cases like SS-GB they have things like Sealion succeeding, a premise that would get torn to pieces were it to be posted in Post-1900. Not remotely trying to discourage the OP writing their story, but if its in Post-1900 its going to be subject to the same sort of questions about its premise and plausibility as any other 'Nazi's victorious' TL. Also as a writer myself I know that critique is valuable, and someone pointing out weaknesses or inconsistencies in a story is way more useful than someone who just tells you its cool. In this case since the OP clearly wants to focus on the future elements of the story better off putting it in Writers or Future History rather than risk getting bogged down in questions about Alt-Sealion.
 
@Garrison I thought that ASB is generally for anything that's explicitly magic/fiat in the sense of ISOT, mind swap, geographical changes, and literal aliens. While anything below such a high threshold was generally considered part of either pre-1900 or post-1900. I'll admit that this timeline is not that rigorous in terms of historical accuracy (I'd like to think it's History Channel (post Ancient Aliens but pre Pawn Stars era) levels of casual rather than academia levels as most of the timelines and the general expectation these days). Meanwhile future history demands a POD that hasn't happened yet while Writer's forum are generally for original fics that are off topic (and yes I have a story over at the Writer's forum, after asking where to post original fics). Therefore, this subforum is the proper place to put this timeline as deemed within the spirit and rules of the forum.

Would it be nice for the pre/post 1900 section to split between casual timelines and academia level timelines? Sure. But since we don't have that right now a lot of timelines of various rigor and plausibility gets crammed into the same place.
 

Garrison

Donor
@Garrison I thought that ASB is generally for anything that's explicitly magic/fiat in the sense of ISOT, mind swap, geographical changes, and literal aliens.
While anything below such a high threshold was generally considered part of either pre-1900 or post-1900. I'll admit that this timeline is not that rigorous in terms of historical accuracy (I'd like to think it's History Channel (post Ancient Aliens but pre Pawn Stars era) levels of casual rather than academia levels as most of the timelines and the general expectation these days). Meanwhile future history demands a POD that hasn't happened yet while Writer's forum are generally for original fics that are off topic (and yes I have a story over at the Writer's forum, after asking where to post original fics). Therefore, this subforum is the proper place to put this timeline as deemed within the spirit and rules of the forum.

Would it be nice for the pre/post 1900 section to split between casual timelines and academia level timelines? Sure. But since we don't have that right now a lot of timelines of various rigor and plausibility gets crammed into the same place.
It is ultimately your call, but then I feel compelled to ask you to answer the points I raised about your multiple PODs none of which make sense. How does successfully defeating Sealion cause a collapse of will in the British government? Why does the USA not only abandon Europe but all its interests in the Pacific? How is the Soviet Union supposed to have disintegrated so completely? Frankly Stalin and some of his closest advisors dying would probably improve their military performance. This doesn't even get into the fact that the Nazi economy was a barely functional kleptocracy that would have been lucky to survive as long as the OTL USSR never mind a thousand years. Are you really saying that because other people have written poorly researched, implausible TL's and gotten away with posting them in Post-1900 that's the low bar you are aiming to cross?
 
How does successfully defeating Sealion cause a collapse of will in the British government?
The fog of war. While the Germans barely managed to threw a few battalions of troops onto the shores of UK, it was done at the cost of the loss of much of the Kriegsmarine and Luftwaffe (and obviously most of the troops in transit didn't make it either) and overall their shitty beachheads were about to be overwhelmed. However, and this is the important part, the UK government (which was not led by Churchill, though that's more of a symptom rather than cause of the issues) thought that they were about to be crushed, and threw in the towel, calling for a ceasefire. Things just snowballed from there.
Why does the USA not only abandon Europe but all its interests in the Pacific?
A combination of factors, from greater disillusionment from the aftermath of the Great War, to central & south america getting more chaotic (thus needing more attention, and all that implies), to the world wide depression of the 1930s contracting the international trade (and the chaos in East Asian certainly not helping matters) and making a sort of "continental autarky" becoming a more alluring concept.
How is the Soviet Union supposed to have disintegrated so completely? Frankly Stalin and some of his closest advisors dying would probably improve their military performance.
The purges ITTL caused a number of coups, which all failed but did their part in destabilizing the country and degrading the performance of the red army to the point where they lost battles like Khalkhin Gol and worse performance in Winter War, leading to more purges and instability. All that finally came to a head when a coup finally succeed... for a given value of success, more like a free for all nonsense broke out.
This doesn't even get into the fact that the Nazi economy was a barely functional kleptocracy that would have been lucky to survive as long as the OTL USSR never mind a thousand years.
That's where the fun comes in...
It's not that the third reich in this case survive as a recognizable entity for a thousand years, but rather something that claimed to be part of it.

For example: Roman lasted from 753BC to either 476AD (fall of Western Roman Empire), 1453AD (fall of Byzantine Empire), 1806 (end of the Holy Roman Empire, who had claimed they were totally the successor of the Western Roman empire),1917 (fall of Russian Empire, who claimed the title of 3rd Rome) or 1922AD (fall of Ottoman Empire, who funny enough claimed the mantle of Rome)... but also don't forget that the Roman Kingdom ended in 509 BC.

The question of this timeline will be: when did the 3rd Reich stopped being the 3rd Reich (there's a reason that some of the mentioning of the entity as the Europa Reich, that's not random word swap) in the 3rd millennium?
Are you really saying that because other people have written poorly researched, implausible TL's and gotten away with posting them in Post-1900 that's the low bar you are aiming to cross?
Yes, and I'm not a big fan of the gatekeeping that expects casual timelines to be out of sight and out of mind, simply because they don't meet academic rigor.
 
the Order-State of Burgundy
The state of paradox: the Order-State of Burgundy​

The Order-State of Burgundy, under the rule of the Knights of Schutzstaffel, has been an interesting study of contrast since its founding in the aftermath of the Europa Unification War. Formed with the intentions of embodying the purity of the Aryan race as well as being a guardian state, the state and the knight order have over the centuries transformed into the cosmopolitan corporate oligarchy that it became the most famous for.

Originally founded as the elite companions of the Great Wolf, the Knights of Schutzstaffel proved themselves as the most loyal of all Aryans in the Europa Unification War and the subsequent purification campaigns. Everywhere where the twin runes appear the enemies of the Reich perish in pillars of smoke and flames. As a reward for their noble service, they were given lands of their own to form a state within a state, so as to keep and maintain the highest virtues of the Reich. The region, encompassing Wallonia and parts of the northeastern regions of the land of the Franks, lands that used to be Germanic in racial makeup, now once again under proper possession of the rightful heirs of Barbarossa.

The early days of the Order State were as expected from the knights of the twin runes. Degenerates and deviants were ruthlessly purged from the land, to be settled by people of the right stock. Much like the eastern Reichskommissariats, the Order State pursued a draconian deurbanization and deindustrialization policy aimed at rooting out the decadence of urban intellectualism that was perceived as the reason for the decay of European civilization. Records remain unclear as to the success of these endeavors although the rapid resurgence of urbanization and industrialization in the country by the late 21st century suggests they were of limited effectiveness.

The high watermark of the Order State during the early period of the Reich was their actions during the ‘Troubled Decades’ at the turn of the millennium, in which the knights were instrumental in preserving the unity of the Reich, rooting out traitors, malcontents, and other degenerates with the same zeal that they shown in the Europa Unification War.

Ever the protector of the Reich, the Knights and their Order state kept their vigil over the continent through its early vulnerable centuries, but not wholly part of the Reich proper. Composed of the finest example of the Aryan race, yet separate from the heartland itself.

It was bitterly ironic that the corruption of the Order State and the Knights came from the very Reich that they swore to protect, and by the late 21st century the once pure and ascetic state had declined into the cosmopolitan urban degenerate landscape that it’s since known for, and the Knights order of battle composed of stocks from all over the continent. Once forsaking their nobility, they became the most depraved and ruthless among all of the Reich in their greed and avarice, exploiting their geographical location for great financial and economic gains, sometimes even at the expense of the Reich itself...
 

Garrison

Donor
The fog of war. While the Germans barely managed to threw a few battalions of troops onto the shores of UK, it was done at the cost of the loss of much of the Kriegsmarine and Luftwaffe (and obviously most of the troops in transit didn't make it either) and overall their shitty beachheads were about to be overwhelmed. However, and this is the important part, the UK government (which was not led by Churchill, though that's more of a symptom rather than cause of the issues) thought that they were about to be crushed, and threw in the towel, calling for a ceasefire. Things just snowballed from there.

And as well as showing a complete lack of understanding of the political situation in the UK in 1940 you throw in yet another unexplained POD by handwaving away Churchill and just assuming some appeaser would get the job instead.

A combination of factors, from greater disillusionment from the aftermath of the Great War, to central & south america getting more chaotic (thus needing more attention, and all that implies), to the world wide depression of the 1930s contracting the international trade (and the chaos in East Asian certainly not helping matters) and making a sort of "continental autarky" becoming a more alluring concept.

This is nothing but a wishlist, you offer no explanation for why any of this happens. You are having the USA be utterly okay with being surrounded by the Axis and completely changing its policy with regard to China and the Pacific, 'because'.

The purges ITTL caused a number of coups, which all failed but did their part in destabilizing the country and degrading the performance of the red army to the point where they lost battles like Khalkhin Gol and worse performance in Winter War, leading to more purges and instability. All that finally came to a head when a coup finally succeed... for a given value of success, more like a free for all nonsense broke out.

That's where the fun comes in...

Again a wishlist, please explain precisely what historical events you are changing to achieve this result.

It's not that the third reich in this case survive as a recognizable entity for a thousand years, but rather something that claimed to be part of it.

So essentially it is just a Future History fantasy.

For example: Roman lasted from 753BC to either 476AD (fall of Western Roman Empire), 1453AD (fall of Byzantine Empire), 1806 (end of the Holy Roman Empire, who had claimed they were totally the successor of the Western Roman empire),1917 (fall of Russian Empire, who claimed the title of 3rd Rome) or 1922AD (fall of Ottoman Empire, who funny enough claimed the mantle of Rome)... but also don't forget that the Roman Kingdom ended in 509 BC.

And arguing those dates requires a plausible explanation for your choice rooted in a clear understanding of the appropriate historical periods.

The question of this timeline will be: when did the 3rd Reich stopped being the 3rd Reich (there's a reason that some of the mentioning of the entity as the Europa Reich, that's not random word swap) in the 3rd millennium?

Again just reinforcing the idea that this is a pure Future History that you want to shoehorn into Post-1900 because it will get more clicks.

Yes, and I'm not a big fan of the gatekeeping that expects casual timelines to be out of sight and out of mind, simply because they don't meet academic rigor.

We aren't talking about academic rigour, just being able to provide some sort of plausible explanation for the basis of your story, and rather than providing that you've just given a longer wish list.
 
Last I checked alternate history doesn't have to be any sort of realistic to be alternate history. Man in the High Castle and Fatherland would both appear in the After 1900 forum if they had been first written on this site, and the obvious intention here is to a write a 'Future Imperfect' TL, not a deep dive into how the Axis actually won. Considering the Future History forum is "For discussion of events which primarily take place in the future," After 1900 seems the correct place for this.
 

Garrison

Donor
Last I checked alternate history doesn't have to be any sort of realistic to be alternate history. Man in the High Castle and Fatherland would both appear in the After 1900 forum if they had been first written on this site, and the obvious intention here is to a write a 'Future Imperfect' TL, not a deep dive into how the Axis actually won. Considering the Future History forum is "For discussion of events which primarily take place in the future," After 1900 seems the correct place for this.
Umm a story about a 1000 year Reich doesn't 'primarily take place in the future'?

And if either of those novels had appeared in Post-1900 you bet they would have faced some questions and that's the point. You can't post expect to post a TL in Post-1900 about a subjected as hackneyed as 'Nazi Victory' without getting questions. Maybe if the OP had stuck to one single simple POD that could be firmed up. Instead they have multiple unrelated POD's that just make less sense the more you drill into them. Now frankly at this point its clear the OP has no good answers for any of the questions and is just writing a fantasy story I don't see any point in continuing any discussion.
 
Umm a story about a 1000 year Reich doesn't 'primarily take place in the future'?
The subject matter (thus far) takes place in the 20th Century, regardless of the method in which the story is told.
Now frankly at this point its clear the OP has no good answers for any of the questions and is just writing a fantasy story I don't see any point in continuing any discussion.
I agree. If you don't like it stop reading it.
 
Top