The Burning Cauldron: The Neo Assyrian Empire Defended

I assume that Sinbanipal will have to spend some more time in the East for the mop-up campaigns, consolidation of Assyrian authority over the entirety of Iranian plateau, clearer definition/garrisoning of the Eastern borders, sorting out relations with the Persians (which I think are bound to be uneasy: the are too big to be a suitably subservient vassal, but not strong enough to assert full independence).
The logical next step would be consolidation of the flanks: south from Karduniash (Dilmun, Bazu, Magan) as a follow up of the final subjugation of Elam (what a feat!) and northeast along the Caspian Sea (that can be entrusted to Rusas maybe but the Bianili need to be kept under control). Both set the stage for further theaters of action - deeper into Arabia and again against Barbashru and the Colchian hegemony (an obvious enemy needing to be subdued in due time). But that can wait. There's also Egypt and Lydia.
While ascendant again, Assyria may be running the risk of stretching her forces too thin shortly, with a host of surrounding powers which, though each individually too weak to challenge its dominance, can collectively inflict too much of a military burden to sustain long-term.
All these big expansionist campaigns fielding large armies must be enormously resource-intensive.
 
Last edited:
By "Vedas" you are meaning the Puranas here? I am under the impression that the four Vedic hymn collections were from a much earlier period and already extant in their known form by this time, even though only transmitted orally.
Bactria must have been somewhat unified (and OTL under Median hegemony by this point, probably, I should check on my Herodotus but Liverani assumes that Cyaxares and Astyages were its overlords) and Zoroastrian Mazdeism should already be the dominant religious tradition in it territory.
The Medes must be familiar with the region of modern Afghanistan and its surroundings and may be able to entrench themselves, but they are encountering local political structures they will have to integrate with to some degree.

In otl, I believe the consensus is that the Medes extended rule over Bactria only after Assyria was destroyed in 611 BCE. At the time thus, the Median realm was more western oriented.The extent of Median rule currently thus, is the region of Ariana, directly south of Bactria and Kamboja.
 
I assume that Sinbanipal will have to spend some more time in the East for the mop-up campaigns, consolidation of Assyrian authority over the entirety of Iranian plateau, clearer definition/garrisoning of the Eastern borders, sorting out relations with the Persians (which I think are bound to be uneasy: the are too big to be a suitably subservient vassal, but not strong enough to assert full independence).
The logical next step would be consolidation of the flanks: south from Karduniash (Dilmun, Bazu, Magan) as a follow up of the final subjugation of Elam (what a feat!) and northeast along the Caspian Sea (that can be entrusted to Rusas maybe but the Bianili need to be kept under control). Both set the stage for further theaters of action - deeper into Arabia and again against Barbashru and the Colchian hegemony (an obvious enemy needing to be subdued in due time). But that can wait. There's also Egypt and Lydia.
While ascendant again, Assyria may be running the risk of stretching her forces too thin shortly, with a host of surrounding powers which, though each individually too weak to challenge its dominance, can collectively inflict too much of a military burden to sustain long-term.
All these big expansionist campaigns fielding large armies must be enormously resource-intensive.

Surely, Assyria is running on steam, you could say. However it is important to note, Sinsharishkun briefly subjugated the region with an army of only 80,000. Sinbanipal did so seemingly with around say 100,000 on a few fronts (excluding Rusas IV). It has been 8 years since Assyria has engaged in large scale campaigning, so it ideally would possess the resources. But as the campaign entails, almost the entire armies assembled are already returning home. Leaving Sinbanipal, Ipanqazzu and Dugul-Naboo and any appointed governors and so forth. In other words, the strain lasted only a single year, not too terrible. Considering some of the feats of campaigning that Assyria performed through mass conscription in earlier eras.

A key point, is the noble levies. Generally, Assyrian armies post Tiglath-Pileser III avoided raising noble levies, permitting these to act as a reserve. Using the reserves, permitted Sinbanipal to acquire larger than normal armies. Why he did this? Perhaps a clue is the conservative turn as of late for Sinbanipal.
 
Last edited:
By "Vedas" you are meaning the Puranas here? I am under the impression that the four Vedic hymn collections were from a much earlier period and already extant in their known form by this time, even though only transmitted orally.

Oh yeah, I meant the late Vedic texts with their comments on ritual and contemporary history-- but they are appended as epilogues onto the main text of the Vedas. But considering the timeframe Puranas may be more accurate.
 
Some success in the east then. By appealing to the goddess of redemption is the Assyrian King implicitly admitting he commited some sin that resulted in his earlier failures? If so that might effect the royal ideology. Just how exeptable was it for an Assyrian King to admitt to sin? I take it that their position wasn't quite that of the emperors of China who were expected to go begging heaven for forgiveness everytime the rain failed. Was there anything like, say, the Bible accounts of Kings like David and Solomon sinning and being punished (but still being regarded as favoured by God and repenting and keeping the Kingship) in the Assyrian tradition relating to the great gods?
 
Some success in the east then. By appealing to the goddess of redemption is the Assyrian King implicitly admitting he commited some sin that resulted in his earlier failures? If so that might effect the royal ideology. Just how exeptable was it for an Assyrian King to admitt to sin? I take it that their position wasn't quite that of the emperors of China who were expected to go begging heaven for forgiveness everytime the rain failed. Was there anything like, say, the Bible accounts of Kings like David and Solomon sinning and being punished (but still being regarded as favoured by God and repenting and keeping the Kingship) in the Assyrian tradition relating to the great gods?

Yes, though this varied. Kings who were seen as 'religious' would make note not necessarily of individual sins, but of collective sins/failures. This however, was never admitted, but seeking forgiveness and or increasing offerings to specific Great Gods, inferred a redemptive process.

Sinbanipal besought Gula primarily to atone for his sin, the failure at Barbashru and the defeat therein. When Assyrian kings faced such disgrace, we find offerings increase exponentially and public displays of piety occurred, wherein the king was an active participant. However, some kings were less prone to this sort of mentality than others. Some kings displayed themselves as infallible gods whilst others displayed the opposite.

The difference here, lie in Sinabnipal's youth, his recent ascension and the publicity that the event was given by the Kalhu Codex. Whose scribes disliked fallibility when in battle or in any other situation, but beloved acts of piety and subservience to the Great Gods. Scribes in later eras and even at times, contemporaries, mention the sins of past kings and leaders.
 
The Year 591 in Review, a look at the expanding field and the first months of 590 BCE
590-589 BCE



The World and events outside of Assyria and the Iranian Plateau in 591 BCE




Egypt, Nubia and Abyssinia



Psamtik II settled peace with the Southern Protectorate and hence, Assyria in 592 BCE, but the peace came at the price of a fairly expensive tribute, especially grievous was the loss of gold and amber. The treasury was already feeling the devastation of war that Necho II had brought to the realm and ultimately, Egypt needed a decisive victory in the south (for either side) and then a time to recover. As it stood, Psamtik II was in a theoretical war with Assyria since Necho II and his campaign. So, the peace of 592 permitted Psamtik II to at least protect his eastern and north flanks. Psamtik II had also in prior years of 594-592 BCE, concluded alliances with Athens, Sparta, Argive, Miletus, the Cretan states and Rhodes. Psamtik II thus for the later months of 592 and early 591, prepared for his counter to Aspelta, who had seemingly exhausted his resources and likewise, faced a revolt in the city of Meroe south of Napata, with which Aspelta sent armies to destroy.

Psamtik II thus gathered an army by the month of February 591 BCE, with haste, this was made up of native Egyptians numbering some 20,000 and a cadre of mercenary, primarily of Greeks numbering 12,500. Psamtik II appointed his commanders to be the adolescent prince Wahibre only 9 years of age and the young 21 year old star, Ahmose who despite humble origins had risen to fame in the native Egyptian army and in trying times, Psamtik II appointed this upstart to head his armies alongside him.

The Egyptian army received news too of the victory of Eurycratides over the Argives in December of 592 BCE, hence forcing Argos into vassalage under the Spartans. With the thoughts of Sparta hegemony in the Peloponnese looming, the Egyptian army marched in February. With Aspelta facing revolt in the south, his response was slowed and the Egyptian populace in Upper Egypt’s patience was draining. Aspelta thus, with fears, fled Thebes in late February of 591 when news that Psamtik II had bypassed Qau and that he had made peace with Assyria. Thus, according to Greek historian Herodotus, Aspelta feared that, Psamtik II was being supported by Assyria (not just at peace). Psamtik II thus entered Thebes in glory and instituted a forgiveness for all in the city who had betrayed his father. Hence, Psamtik II came to be loved within Thebes and an epithet was added to his name, ‘the merciful.’

Psamtik II left his son Wahbire in Thebes then and marched south of Thebes in the month of March after a four week stay in Thebes overseeing the restoration of Egyptian unity. Psamtik II and Ahmose marched taking Edfu in March after short siege and then proceeded to quicken their pace further capturing town after town, picking up steady momentum. Ahmose particularly successful in this activity, defeating the Nubians at every turn in pitched battles or in sieges, while Psamtik II effectively acted as the agent of unity between the diverse army.

Psamtik II pushed ever further, bypassing the Second Cataract, where he met Aspelta in battle. Therein, Aspelta, already diminished in his authority, was defeated in battle. The Nubian army was destroyed by a combination of arms from the Egyptian army. Afterward, the Egyptian army briefly reached Napata and set siege to the city, after which, Aspelta pledged to peace and renounced his claim to the rulership in Egypt. By July of 591 BCE, Psamtik II returned to Thebes in triumph as the destroyer of the Nubians and restoration of Egypt. The new border was set at the Second Cataract.

Psamtik II for the remainder of 591 BCE, would oversee the issue and topic of Greek relations. These deals were set in place after Psamtik II returned to Sais in September of 591 BCE, where a envoy from the new king of Sparta awaited him. The new king, Leon I had besought Psamtik II seeking to formalize more agreements of an alliance and trade relations. Psamtik II weighed these with the earlier report of Spartan hegemony that had emerged in the defeat of Argos in 592 BCE with that of the Athenian power. Sparta seemed the greater force militarily, and held a growing hegemony, yet Athens possessed a navy and had become acclaimed in their defiance to Sadyattes in the Ionian war. However, Psamtik II chose to formalize friendship with Sparta, bypassing the other Greek realms (aside from Crete, whom the Egyptians exercised extensive relations to). Egypt made a formal alliance with the King of Sparta, Leon I and formulated as a series of mutual friendship pacts, economic ties and an agreement to support each other in times of war, especially Egypt would provide critical aid to Sparta in the event of a Greek or Ionian war. In counter, Sparta would provide military aid to Egypt and likewise, give sole trading rights to Egypt in respect to ‘eastern’ countries. Theoretically, this included a marriage alliance, which was not enacted. Also, interestingly, Egyptian scribes composed the alliance in a trilingual form.

Three forms of the treaty were composed by the Egyptian scribes in Sais. One in a triumphant style in hieroglyphics on the palace in Sais. A second, composed only in Akkadian, sent to Palace Herald of Assyria, Kanisratu-balutu-Assur, for the purpose of disposing of the information to Assyria would more thoroughly deter their anger and likewise, fulfilled the prior treaty of 592 (which stipulated that Egypt must inform Assyria of potentially important alliances). Then a third, to be made in clay and papyrus, one set to be kept in Sais and a second sent to Sparta. This third version was composed in Demotic, Archaic Greek and importantly, Akkadian. This admission and addition of Akkadian is a symbol to the new and growing reality of Assyrian hegemonic authority in the Eastern Mediterranean. As such, the addition of this Akkadian language and cuneiform to the text, would have large effects upon the development of the Greece. This would be the first time that cuneiform text has into Greece since the Bronze Age and the first for Akkadian (in the Bronze Age, Hittite would have been the only known cuneiform usage in Greece, presumably).

In Nubia, Aspelta moved his capitol to Meroe, abandoning Napata as his capitol, yet the city remained a relatively important settlement. The abandoning of Egypt for the moment, gave Aspelta perhaps a greater time to influence matters in Abyssinia, to his southeast. Most important of these neighbors, was the burgeoning city of Aksum and Damat. All these lands were referred to as the Land of Punt, the so-called land of vast golden reserves and immensely important for Egyptian trade and authority. However, oddly perhaps, aside from Nubia, Egyptian cultural influence did not translate to the development of large cities and or overt expressions of Egyptian styles of rule or cultural markers.

Rather, most of these Abyssinian states were influenced more thoroughly by the Arab states across the strait of Aden and the Red Sea in Southern Arabia, especially Yemen. Damat itself though within Abyssinia, was a thoroughly Arabized state along the coast of Abyssinia, east of Meroe. The state of Damat was based upon the priest-king traditional model of Yemen and took the title, mukarrib. The then current mukarrib of Damat in 591 BCE, was a Shaaro-Rebaa. Aksum was similar, except with a less overt Arab influence, acting as a repository for inner-African, Semitic and Egyptian influence, just south of Damat. Its rulers were still referred to as chiefs, however.

To the southeast of Aksum was the land of Nemyw, a land of tribal realms, speaking Cushitic tongues. These peoples had trade links with Damat and Aksum and provided gold, hides, ivory, slaves and other resources to these cities, who in turn traded them to Meroe west and north or to the east with the Yemeni states. Not yet has Nemyw established contact to South Asia or directly to the states of the Persian Gulf, including Assyria.

Yemen and the Death of Karabil-Watar II



In the year 592 BCE, the king of Sheba Karabil-Watar II perished (621-592 BCE) and with it, the stability of the Sheban kingdom. In 592 BCE, he was succeeded by Samah’ali-Zarih who ascended to the throne around October of 592 and already by November rebellion was in the air across Arabia. In the city of Datinat a rebellion erupted at the death of Karabil-Watar II under a new god-king, Athar-Ba’athay I (the bull of Athar, the god of irrigation and storms; associated to Adad), who claimed the remaining former Awan states south of Sheba.

Samah’ali-Zarih engaged this rebel in battle in the month of November 592 BCE and was defeated by the Awan god-king that same month at the battle of Ghilsan. Afterward, the Sheba hegemony began to unravel as varied Awan kingdoms pledged allegiance to Athar-Ba’athay I. This was first Dhiyam, Nasam and Ruqayy, south of Hadrahmut. All of these formed the new Awani kingdom in the region. Samah’ali-Zarih was also faced with a series of rebellions, first in Ma’in, led by a collection of chiefs and then followed by the Qataban city of Timma (only 40-60 km from Ma’rib the capitol of Sheba) and finally by the Dubhan and Mu’far in the southwest, reaffirming their ‘Western Coalition.’ By March of 591 BCE, the Sheba kingdom had only managed to subdue the Qataban and then halted an incursion from the Awan upon the Sheban heartland.

By May, the situation had grown worse for Sheba in the south, when Sheban garrison armies were forced to return to Ma’rib and Timma from the old Western sections of the Awan kingdom. Athar-Ba’athay however was also reaching his limits and was disputed as god-king by some of the western states in the former Awan kingdom, most especially the cities of Dahasum, Tubana’a, Ta’fid and Yuzham. These four formed in middle 591 an alliance called the Quadruple Alliance, each affirming distinct priest-kings, these were:

-Karibi-Bayin of Ta’fid

-Ilu-Karab of Tubana’a

-Haubas-Ba’nulm of Dahasum

-Hazu’ali-Watar of Yuzham

This division in the Awan kingdom permitted Sheba to assure Maswar and Tay’ab to the north of the Quadruple Alliance. Thus, Sheba for the remainder of 591 BCE, maintained its borders with the Awan feuding realms while it dealt with the rebelling Ma’in state in Kaminahu. By November, the Ma’in state had failed to assert any offensives against Samah’ali-Zarih but were able to stop his advance north. Unlike his father, Samah’ali-Zarih was not nearly as energetic or forceful. Whence he faced difficulties, he turned his army south or north and returned to Ma’rib. He, however, was fortunately skilled in maintaining authority in his locality and knew well from his father the skill and forethought that it took to defend a city. In the month of December until January of 590 BCE, a series of new fortifications were prepared in Mar’ib, while the walls at Timma were forcibly demolished and he remains taken to reinforce Mar’ib.

It would seem, that the Sheba kingdom was attempting to empower its own city, at the expense of its Qataban vassals. The result, was that Sheba did not under Samah’ali-Zarih form any identity over an entire region, rather preferring to simply assert a hegemonic presence through the fear of the king’s armies. A fear that was diminishing, even if the Sheba state was fortifying itself. Hadrahmut itself in the west, remained a vigilant ally of the Sheba, and readily assisted the Sheba in the wars against the Awan kingdoms and the Ma’in.

For the remainder of 590 BCE, intermittent warfare was waged between the kingdoms in the region, especially between the Awan states and the Ma’in who were invaded by a an Arab clan called the Banu Khayash, who conquered much land from the Ma’in by the month of August in 590 BCE. This invasion by the Banu Khayash was only a taste for the northern Arab incursions incoming in the next years.



The Assyrian Interior

In 591 BCE, the majority of the Assyrian realm and associated areas were paying service to the monarch by a series of increased tribute. The Phoenician city states however, despite increasing tributes, were extraordinarily prosperous in the years of 599-590 BCE. Leaders of the states, such as Tyre, Baalbek and others purchased readily numbers of deportees, especially from among the Philistines. Also, the expansion of Carchemish from 596-590 BCE, expanded the trade links and routes in Syria. Tyre itself, under a certain Baal III claimed to have expanded the city of Tyre by 1/3rd of the population of his grandfather Baal I. Baal III passed in the year 593 BCE and was succeeded by Ithobaal III who continued an extensive series of expansions of temples in his city and focused upon joint-Phoenician colonizing of Quwe, wherein Tyre represented the foremost city.

As mentioned earlier, Carchemish was reaching a new golden age of power and authority in the region. Ruled directly by Assyria through Akkado-Hittite mayors the city was seen as perhaps the last outpost of Bronze Age Hittite culture within Syria. However, amidst the changes since then, it had become a diverse city of Aramaic, Akkadian, Luwian, Phoenician, Hurrian, Hebrew, Greek and Cimmerian speakers. For the majority of the Assyrian empire since Tiglath-Pileser I, the city was one of the foremost cities of the Assyrian hegemonic sphere that was not within general Sumero-Akkadian society. It however, fell below its western competitor, the Aramaic city of Aleppo after Sargon II sacked the city in 717 BCE and dethroned its Hittite vassal king, Pisiri, the last Hittite derived ruler.

However, Carchemish was rebuilt by Sinnacherib and Assurhadon and reached new heights under Assurbanipal. Though, it remained below its rival Aleppo still. Yet, after the Western Coalition War, Aleppo, Arpad and Hamath all fell firmly below Carchemish, which too was awarded a rimutu from Sinbanipal. From 598-591 BCE, this translated to migration from other cities west of the Euphrates to Carchemish. Likewise, the upward expansion into Anatolia gave the Carchemish city increased importance as the point of entry and exit from Mesopotamia, Syria and Anatolia. Thus, Dugul-Naboo through his own budget and noble revenues, distributed incomes to merchants who would set locations at the waypoint between Ankuwa and Mari and between Damascus and Ankuwa, as such, all roads north and south went through Carchemish.

To the south, Damascus was relatively unchanged. While it was sacked and under occupation like Hamath, Aleppo and others, it did not suffer as critically. It remained a direct Assyrian state. West of Damascus was Baalbek, a vassal state was ruled by a series of appointees by the Phoenician city states. South of both was the Kingdom of Judah, which suffered greatly in the wars of the coalition, but were mightily rewarded. The deportation of much of the population of Philistine, while not wholly wiping away the population, opened the doors for demographic change in the area. Likewise, it removed obstacles in expansions of Hebrew settlement into the west. From 597-588 BCE, these expansions came with support from the Southern Protector and the local Assyrian administers, who permitted these expansions and their settlement. The ending result would be seen in time, but in short Philistine transitioned from an overwhelmingly Philistine area of settlement to one of a plurality wherein Philistines came to be a minority in comparison to arrivals from the Southern Protectorate, Judah and from the lands of Canaan-Phoenicia.

Within the Southern Protectorate matters were much changed since the last topic. From 597-591 BCE, the Protectorate was used to launch raids into Egypt and patrol much of the southern frontier lands. The Protectorate had also expanded its borders by a fair amount, with the annexation of Sinai and the deposition of Edom. As the Nippur Correspondence suggests, this was to better use the Protectorate’s units to be more and more specialized to the defense of the realm at peace. Much easier load thus we may assume for the Assyrian or Karduniash monarch.

The acquisitions of Edom and Sinai came with demographic replacement and deportation. Edomites were often prey of the Arab and Nabtu tribes, who were expressly permitted to raid and pillage these at their wish. Slave taking already a custom in the Arab tribes of the region, gorged themselves on preying on the villages, never taking enough slaves so as to erase the community, but enough to subordinate the locals and to assure their dominance over them.

In the capitol city of the Protectorate was the city of Tima, the crown jewel of Arabia increasingly and an outpost of Akkadian cultural influence. It had grown considerably since the year 610 BCE, into the largest city in Arabia north of Yemen and the most cutting edge technologically. Puzur-Adad, the current Protector General famously established in the name of various Kings (Sinsharishkun, Enusat, Assur-Uballit and Dagon-zakir-shumi), temples to some of the Great Gods and shrines to all. The Goddess Ishtar was becoming more and more prominent in the city, with the three temple sin the city dedicated to Marduk, Ishtar and Gula. These formal temple structures were filled with priests and worshippers from Mesopotamia but also an increasing number of Arab subjects.

Irrigation was also becoming more and more of a priority. Oasis were located and trees were planted there and small scale farming. Arabs who were not actively engaged in war were paid a small stipend if they agreed to work these settlements. Likewise, merchants were ordered and directed to wear around their necks or on their persons stamps in the cylindrical style common in Mesopotamia. These were necessary for trade in the city of Tima, assuming you were not a foreigner. They were intended as a means to increase Akkadian influence in the area and ensure that taxes for mercantile activity were paid, for those wearing said stamps or possessed on their person, were required to make a stamp upon clay upon entry into the city. Anyone who was doing trade in the city, would be asked if they had made a stamp upon clay and if they had, it would be recorded, and their trade would be permitted. If it had not, they would be punished.

Laws were introduced to the region likewise. These laws were traditional Akkadian retribution-based laws. It was similar enough to Arab tribal custom that the laws were generally seen as non-invasive. Shekels were already a known concept in the Nabtu lands, so currency itself was not disliked. Also, Assyria lacked coinage of the true form and as such, there was no distortion to the barter-based economy of the Arabs, easing economic transitions in the area.

All of this, both legal, trade based, religiously and agriculture and most importantly authority was intended and in accordance with the Assyrian mission. Puzur-Adad was not only a Protector General for military purposes as a march of sorts, but also was an overseer of Akkadian expansion, promulgation and fulfillment of the mission.

“Before Sinsharishkun established the Southern Protectorate, the Arabs were people whose lives were abhorrent to the Great Gods…. Their worship was of mounds of sand and of trees in the oasis, they were most inhumane. As a rule, their people did not have kings, but they were ruled by a swarm of men who all claimed lordship and among all things other than impiety, plurality of kingship is the most abhorrent to the Great Gods….. Sinsharishkun established a rule over them and brought to them agriculture, correct trade, a single King through an overseer and taught them most importantly, the submission that is due to masters of the universe.” -Nippur Correspondence



“For the Arab, his lot is to learn the correct passage and submit to his betters. They may say with one mouth that the Lords appointed by the Great Gods are found in but a single Land. Through us doth they see the Light of the Great Gods.” -The Unbroken Chronicle



As such, the mission fundamentally with the Southern Protectorate was to more efficiently establish the principles of the mission of Akkadian kingship upon them. So the Protector General acted as the overseer of this transition and change, whilst also oddly, maintain martial qualities of the Arab peoples so that they may be used in the current manner that the Protectorate is employed in.

It also goes without saying that the greatest partners that the Protectorate holds, is with the Kingdom of Karduniash. With most of the works in the city introduced with the dual names of the two. Increasingly as of 591 BCE however, a new trend has emerged in the Protectorate and spread into several other locales, that of simplifying the current situation of naming both Kings and instead saying:

“In the name of the Brother Kings,, Era name,, month,,, day”

This custom included a series of reliefs in 590 BCE, made in the temple of Ishtar, depicting the two Kings, Sinbanipal and Dagon-Zakir-Shumi as equal pairs in observance to Ishtar, with an Akkadian text reading:

“The Brother Kings, appointed by the Great Gods, Dagon-zakir-shumi and Sinbanipal, praise The Unique Star, Queen of the Universe, Mistress of War and Mother of Man.”

This would be also the case for the first reliefs made in Babylon, Nippur and other cities in Karduniash. It has not spread elsewhere as a custom by 589 BCE, however. What this entails for the future of Assyria, is not known.



Hindustan

By the year 591 BCE, the Mahajanapada period has begun in South Asia and the Vedic period of the Late Bronze and Early Iron Age come to a true end. In the Indus Valley, the region is composed of a series of pastoral and semi-sedentary peoples who dominate the Punjab region down to the far ends of the Indus Valley in the south. These tribes are the Trigarta, the Madra, the Kakaya, and so forth in the Northern Punjab. These realms were strong and fearsome in battle but possessed no large cities or settled regions for agriculture, living a more let us say, Central Asian sort of existence.

To the northwest of the Punjab, was the two Aryan realms, Gandhara and Kamboja. Gandhara was a kingdom of noted power and importance in the mountainous edge of the Hindu Kush, ruling northwest Punjab and the Kashmirs. To the northwest of them, was the Aryan realm of Kamboja (Kabul), an aristocratic republic of sorts. Noted for their horsemanship and their fame as some of the most fearsome among the Aryan in the battlefield. They, nevertheless, act as the first guard of defense for the Subcontinent and the lowest in population of the Aryan lands.

Leaving the west for a time, we go to the heart of agricultural development in the Aryan lands, the Gangetic Plain. Beginning in the western extremes, the oldest of the Aryan realms, is that of Kuru, the ancient kingdom of legend. Once the foremost of the Aryan tribes, the Kuru kingdom has undergone a level of decay, but nevertheless remains very powerful and famed for their chariots (which remain common in the Aryan world, while not so in our traditional Assyrian setting). Southeast of that is Panychaala and Kosala, the rising powers in the early VI century. Kosala especially sits atop as the highest tier of the Aryan states aside from Kuru and the strongest amongst the realms at present. Both have access to the fertile central sectors of the Ganges river, whilst the Kuru to the northwest, edge close to the Indus and the bend of the Ganges northward.

South of Kuru on the Yamuna tributary of the Ganges is the Shurashena, Avanti, Chetiya, Vatsa and Matsya. Avanti sits as the primary power among these realms as an extension of Aryan civilization westward towards the Gujurat. By 591 BCE, each of these realms pays tribute to either Kuru or to Avanti, who itself is an expanding realm, while Kuru is on the decline.

South of Kosala on the Ganges, yet north of Vatsa is the Kaashi. The Kaashi are a strong and powerful realm, renowned in battle and trade. As of 590 BCE, the Kaashi captiol city of Varanasi is the largest in the subcontinent and the most prestigious of all. Exceeding any of the other Aryan states about it. Kaashi, looks to compete with Kosala, Kuru and others for the dominance in the Aryan domains. To its northeast is the Malla, an aristocratic Kshatriya republic out of the city of Kushinagara. Their power is noted as of 591 BCE and their forces seek to challenge all around it, especially Kosala, Kaashi, the Vrji and the Magadhi. To the east of the Malla, is the confederacy of the Vrji, another Kshatriya republic that resembled an assembly of clans. They are weaker than their neighbors, but an important ally for any seeking to oppose a stronger foe. East of Vrji, is the Magadhi, a strong realm out of Pataliputra, they are said to be a despised people by Kuru and others, but otherwise strong and firmly Aryan. Their larger population base and centralized kingship burgeoning by 590 BCE, implies possible greatness for the eastern Aryan kingdom. Even further east is the kingdom of Anga based out of the city of Champa/Malini. The Anga are a relatively famous kingdom for its mercantile fame and trade networks and as the furthest east of the Aryan states. However, it is geopolitically similar to that of Vrji, unable to truly contest the great Aryan powers, but strong enough to pose a series of alliances to block hegemonies from forming.

The Aryan states are not too aware of the situation occurring beyond the Hindu Kush, aside from Kamboja and Gandhara. Relatively, internally focused for the time was the Aryan realms of the Hindu Kush, however, it would be long before they would be forcibly included in a series of turbulent events originating in the west. Surely, Assyria acts as a turbulence in and of itself, forcing everything to be subsumed within it or forcibly ejected.



Greece and Anatolia West of Ankuwa

After the end of the Ionian war with Lydia, Spartan king Eurycratides returned to Sparta and gaining from the death of Lacidaus, Sparta attacked Argos now under a young king Meltas. Meltas, with the Argive army having been diminished in Ionia, was bested in battle and Argos submitted to Sparta in 592 BCE. Eurycratides however was not long for the world, he passed shortly thereafter and was succeeded by Leon I of Sparta who was a young and energetic king of incredible foresight and vigour. His reign would culminate in an expansion of Spartan militarist claims across the region.

Athens was the primary power facing Sparta in 590 BCE, Athens was then under Solon and already in the transition towards a Democracy. The Athenian democracy was already known for its naval power and was expanding influence outward. It had been the salvation of the Ionian League and was expected to bear a great portion in the upcoming war.

The remainder of the Greek city states, such as say Corinth, were partners of these growing partners or lords of their own lands, but otherwise not important of note for the Assyrian or Egyptian observer.

Sadyattes in Lydia meanwhile was engrossed in his bid to remain in power. The invasion of the Skudra/Thracians had badly affected his country, especially economically. Migrants from the north poured into cities in the south and or were forcibly impressed by Sadyattes into his growing field armies. These field armies at the beginning of 594 BCE, were fairly well trained, but by 591 BCE, these armies were a mob of either fanatical devotees of the king, whose godlike qualities were increasingly being expanded or were frightened and scared and poorly fed peasants.

Farms sat empty the closer one reached the northern frontiers and the fortress cities of the north were tightly packed with people as the populace fled to these large cities to avoid the Skudran offensives. Sadyattes grew his armies large so as to garrison towns and possibly promote fear amongst the Skudra kings. However, Sadyattes himself may have even realized that he required time to train a new army for a renewal of northern offensives or hire mercenary, the former of which, he could no longer do and maintain his fame. Thus, the expensive affair of raising a new army would be the lynchpin of his 591 year. How he would attain the money was not known; Sadyattes had many options.

Either find some deal and friendship with the Greeks or the Assyrians or attempt to dig deeper into the noble estates. The Greek route was not possible without ceding land captured to the Ionian league, these new acquisitions and their loot was the primary foundation for his current wealth, that alongside the confiscations. The Assyrian route was simply a paved way to subjugation by Assyria, for trade and relations to Assyria was a request to be subverted and conquered or at least forced to pay tribute. As such, Sadyattes dug deeper into the nobility. In middle 591 BCE, a new edict was promulgated from Sardis, that revoked any privileges of the nobility regarding land taxes. Likewise, a series of restrictions was to be enacted in the Lydian heartland, restricted the amount a land that a person could own without royal permission.

Implicit those who came to argue that their land was justified to be over the limit, would be rejected and all lands exceeding that amount would become royal holdings. Already, peasantry were becoming increasingly under royal control, the intent of the new laws was to bring the same to the nobility, forcing their subordination economically to the royalty and hence take control over their funds for the training of a new centralized army.

A secondary set of new laws was issued in November of 591 BCE, which ordered the production of iron weapons, armor and other military equipment within Sardis. These works were not paid by the royal treasury, but the royalty took the production of a weapons as an advance payment, which would be repaid later. To set this, Sadyattes issued coin notes in copper and gave them as certificates for which later producers could be given gold or silver for their services. Sadyattes formulated all of these laws in a religious veneer, as returning or producing for the Gods. However, even though the peasantry and commoners remained behind him, the situation was becoming intolerable for the upper classes and in the event of a loss in battle and hence loss of that gathered revenue, the royalty would surely collapse.

Sinbanipal Pushes further East.

As 590 BCE begins, the Medes are in a poor position with its king Ainyava and having lost its primary lands. Sinbanipal would spend the first two months of the year 590 consolidating his captures. This would include:

-expanding east, pushing into Drangiana and Parthia

-ensuring Persian submission

-conquering the Ardami confederacy of the Mazandran region

Initial movements east was flanked by spies sent forth to access the situation. They told a story to Sinbanipal beyond belief. The Medes were in migration eastward, they were not returning to the west. Some Medes had moved north into Parthia while some small bands had returned to Assyrian lands and were seeking submission. Dugul-Naboo patrolling the area, captured these bands and sent them to do prostration to the seal of Sinbanipal.

The reality of strained resources, the question of Persia and Ardami, led to Sinbanipal relenting on chasing the Medes for a time. Thus, Sinbanipal recalled Dugul-Naboo, to return to his post in Kalhu, but to leave his Cimmerian contingent whom Sinbanipal ordered to be settled in Hyrcania as garrison. He ordered that Dugul-Naboo saw to the acquisition of brides from slaves and deportees in Assyria to distribute to the Cimmerians. Meanwhile, any Median bands captured were to be deported to Assyria. Sinbanipal settled himself in the city of Ghirsham, while Ipanqazzu was sent to the Ardami to acquire submission from them, this time attacking from the southeast, bypassing their mountain refuges. Assyrian envoys were also en route to Persia carrying the words of Sinbanipal. Enjoining the King Cyrus I to submit to Assyria and make good on his promise to become a subordinate.

Internally, the revived Eastern Protectorate was internally instable at the moment. A plurality of Medes remained in the area, mostly from those left behind by their clans. Otherwise, the new majority was a plurality of Kassites, Lullubi, Elamites, Hyrcanians and so forth. The region was ripe for Assyrian colonization. Elam to the south was under the jurisdiction for now by Sinbanipal, but it was legally to be given as a subordinate officially of the Karduniash kingdom. Victory reliefs were already being constructed in the main cities to commemorate the campaign.

The Median Flight Revisited

The Medes under Ainyava, despite the situation in the west, were leaving the area for the time being. Ainyava ordered the host of clans spread out across the Drangian area to move up the Horayu river toward Kamboja. Conquering the land and forming a new life there. This would be a slow process however of movement, interspersed with farming and assimilation. However, some clans disagreed. These clans were called the Northern Medes, for they in early 590, broke from the main Mede branch and moved north towards the Kwarezm to live amongst the encroaching Dahae steppe nomads.

-----------------------
I hope that this is a good fleshing out of the situation so that we cane move forward with further campaigns and updates. Tell me what you think of the update. We are beginning to expand more and more into the world beyond the traditional Assyrian theatre!
 
Last edited:
Wonderful. This is really coming along

You mention the King of Sparta. Does that mean there is only one?
Isn't it a bit odd for the Assyrians to permitt the Arabs to raid Edom now that Edom has been conquered? Or do they not really object to subject peoples waring between each other on a small scale?
 
Wonderful. This is really coming along

You mention the King of Sparta. Does that mean there is only one?
Isn't it a bit odd for the Assyrians to permitt the Arabs to raid Edom now that Edom has been conquered? Or do they not really object to subject peoples waring between each other on a small scale?

No there are two Spartan kings. But as I understood, the Spartan state usually placed the Argiad line ahead of the other, no? Leon I is the Argiad and the aging Anaxidamus I is the Eurypontid.

Theoretically, it is not warring. The Edomites rebelled and the Arabs arrive periodically and demand and or take slaves from villages.Ultimately such matters are at the discretion of the Protector General who seems to not care or is ambivalent to the lot of the Edomites.
 
Last edited:
Love the political economy notes! Really great actually.

How are writing and alphabets evolving differently than OTL?
 
Love the political economy notes! Really great actually.

How are writing and alphabets evolving differently than OTL?

Rest assured, it will be covered!

The biggest change, is that cuneiform and Akkadian is stronger. Aramaic was made dominant primarily due to the Chaldaen (non Akkadian) Neo-Babylonian realm and the following Achaemenid empire. Without these two, Akkadian remains a dominant force legally, politically and religiously. In fact, Akkadian will be and is making recoveries the stronger Assyria becomes and then more formalized the scribal class becomes. But once again be assured, this will be covered in greater detail not far in advance.
 
In order to not spoil it, I'd prefer to wait to see if Greek writing will be more influenced by Akkadian cuneiform or still be a version of the Phoenician alphabet.
 
The Rediscovery of Dilmun 590-588 BCE
590-588 BCE



The Invasion of the Ardami

In the prior year of 591 BCE, the Urartu King Rusas IV and Buri-Adad attempted to conquer the Ardami state in the mountain heights of the Mazandran. This invasion attempt failed in 591 BCE, after three different attacks, led to stalls at varied mountain fortresses. However, some loot was gained, and the attacks did inhibit the Ardami from interfering in the affairs of the main Assyrian armies ranging in Media proper.

The Ardami were a people inhabiting the Mazandran mountain ranges. They were fearsome in battle, very independent and possessed access to many fortified centers across the region alongside small farming communities in the valleys and near the forts. In the past, the Ardami had been subjects of the Medes, and when Sinsharishkun conquered Media in 607 BCE, the Ardami joined the Government of Gaudama as allies and partners of sorts. When Gaudama I took flag of rebellion as a general vassal under the Eastern Protectorate, the Ardami tribes of the Mazandran joined him. These Ardami proved a critical asset to the Medes in regard to their victories made over the Assyrian holdouts in the region of Hyrcania and then in 593, against Tukutli-shamash, the Medo-Assyrian loyalist in Gilan. Despite this, the Ardami lacked the impetus to assist their Median overlords to the south or the east and after middle 591 BCE, lacked the ability to do so, as their lands were invaded by Rusas IV from the northwest and from the southwest by Buri-Adad and supported by Rabi-Adad of Assyria.

As a rule, the Ardami also lacked a king or a true command structure in this time aside from an assembly of clans. Inability to untie these clans into a single king was not of a major issue. Prior Median overlords simply made deals with each of these clans and hence bypassed the necessity of having a single mouth. The Ardami also possessed a semi-nomadic life way during the winter months that dispersed their people into small travelling parties of hunters and herders, decentralizing even the power that clan leaders held at any given year.

As such, in late January of 590 BCE, Ipanqazzu appeared from the southeast, with a moderate army of Assyrian cavalry and infantry, intended to conquer the region in a fell swoop. Ipanqazzu sent froth messengers who demanded the appearance of clan leaders to submit. Unfortunately, none appeared, all had fled into the hills or were in their pastoral winter lifestyle. As such, Ipanqazzu began attacking tribe after tribe number in massacre or deporting them south. These initial movements did little to persuade any submission in northern Hyrcania and instead led to the Ardami resisting much more fiercely the Assyrian push north. Ipanqazzu experienced however no defeats in the field and his army managed to capture fortress after fortress when moving north and then westward. Those who oddly maintained a traditional nomadic or pastoral life, faired better as many hundreds of Ardami fled northeast towards the steppe region or into Parthia. There, these Ardammi linked with the Northern Medes who were currently in Northern Parthia.

Nevertheless, February was a bloody month of destruction as Ipanqazzu tore through the Ardami until he reached Gilan, wherein the locales there submitted without war after presenting greater defenses to Ipanqzzu than those prior. Ipanqazzu as such, gathered the clan leaders in the Gilan and imposed upon them submission to the Seal of Assyria and then appointed a certain Tribal lord, who held the name Atarsari as lord over Marilik, the largest settlement in the Gilan region. After which, in Late March, Ipanqazzu set forth to return to Sinsharruderi.



Persia and the Assyrian Envoy



The Head Eunuch of Assyria Sin-shi’eretu, was sent with a group of 10 scribes and a guard of many 35 men to the Persian city of Anshan, wherein Cyrus I was seated. Recently, Gaudama I had defeated Cyrus I in the field and the Persian forces remained hostile with the Median host under Ainyava, however no major battles were exchanged between the two since 591 BCE. Cyrus I however, did have an army that was at alert, with regular scouts patrolling the border fringes. As such, immediately, the Assyrian group was met and escorted to the Persian then-capitol of Anshan (Pasagarda has yet to be founded).

“The servant of the Great King entered the city of the Parsa, Anshanu, in the land of their folk. Head Eunuch, Sin-shi’eretu, eponym 4151 represented the Great Gods in the city of Anshanu, his journey was to submit the Lord of the Parsa, Cyrus I to the Ideal Masters. With the seal of the Land in hand, the servant was treated as a grand guest, befitting our status. The King of the Parsa, had felt the Aura of Majesty that informed him that the day of recalcitrance to the Mouth of the Gods, had reached an end. To him was a knowledge that Duranki was upon him and the Great King, whose aura exuded across the Lands, was the executor of the Duranki for whom the Land is subjugated and united solely.” -Kalhu Codex

Without much issue, Cyrus I affirmed submission to the Great Gods and to Sinbanipal, as a vassal-tributary state. Sin-shi’eretu was instructed to conclude further agreements afterward. One of which, was to discuss particulars of vassalage. According to Sinbanipal’s orders Persia was to pay tribute to Karduniash and would be considered a dual-subject of Karduniash-Assyria. Likewise, a contract was drawn up, wherein in event of a death of one of the two kings, Sinbanipal or Dagon-Zakir-Shumi, Cyrus I would support the surviving king in event of a civil war. Likewise, Sinbanipal ordered his stamp to be made for the event of protecting the heirs of the Parsa throne, Cambyses, the prince of Parsa. This remained the only means by which the Assyrian monarch would expressly agree to protect another king, that being an oath to protect a particular heir. This implied a level of protection in event of invasion, but generally did not necessitate such, only that in event of a death of a monarch, the heirs of the subject would be protected by the Assyrian master or the Karduniash master.

This formula was invented by Sinnacherib and Assurhadon and remained the most innovative mode of Assyrian diplomatic exchange aside for the new innovations of Dugul-Naboo. It was an oath made that benefitted the subject on one hand, but also maintained the Akkadian cosmological view. Namely, Akkadian cosmological mentality, was one that ‘exported despotism’ in the same manner that the Great gods did so. According to the legends, the Great Gods distributed kingship unto man at the city of Eridu and instructed them in the ways of the Great Gods. However, the Great gods only taught a single folk, those of Sumer-Akkad, all others are in recalcitrance to the matters of the Great Gods. As such, the mission was to expand the Will of Duranki (the abode of the Great Gods) unto the whole world. Part of this, was instructing those whom they conquered in the ways of the Great Gods. One of which, was the imposition of a single king, a single heir, a single Lord to Rule in place of the Great King (s, Karduniash and Assyria….) and he in the place of the Great Gods.

As such, the idea of protecting only the kingship of the subjects was important. For once an area was subjugated, the main cosmological role those people had to play, was to worship the Great Gods with their government form and their submission to Assyria-Karduniash. A succession crisis impeded such worship and as such could bring calamity.

-----------

Despite affirmations, Cyrus I cannot truly be maintained as a true vassal state. The country has certainly entered the Assyrian sphere but its position and more precisely, loyalty, remained a questionable quantity. Cyrus I however did accept a qepu from amongst the entourage present that acted as the mouthpiece of the Assyrian empire in Parsa and a relay to the Eastern Protector General and the Governate of Elam.

Reform of 590-589 BCE and the Campaign of 589 BCE Announced



After the situation in Parsa had concluded by late January and Ipanqazzu had completed his campaign in Mazandran by March of 590 BCE, Sinbanipal left Ghirshan and travelled to Mania and then to Arbela. At Arbela, he performed sacrifices to Ishtar and then sent Ipanqazzu back to the Eastern Protectorate to act as his enforcer, while Sinbanipal would make his way to Nineveh.

In a recall to the reign of his father, Sinbanipal sought to make similar grand councils as his predecessor. The reform of 590 BCE was to come with an announcement of a new campaign in line with the prior omen.

Upon the arrival into Nineveh in the month of September 590 BCE, Sinbanipal arrived to a capitol much different than when he left. The city had been engorged with massive amounts of deportees. Thousands had been captured from 592-590 BCE, and then transported without the watchful eye of the state to either Mari, Hara, Ankuwa or mainly to Nineveh. All of the captives from the campaign in Iran were immediately the property of Sinbanipal and were his to distribute.

As such, in order to control overpopulation in Nineveh, Sinbanipal issued a rimutu unto certain cities. 25% of all the deportees captured in the 591 campaign were to remain in Assur, another 25% were to be sent to Babylon and distributed. Then the remaining 50% would be given to the Palace Herald to be sent to Mari (the current office of the Palace Herald) and sold and distributed as need.

Making further moves forward, Sinbanipal declared a new campaign of 589 BCE, giving the annual campaign to Adad-apal-Duranki, the Head Sentinel. The 589 campaign was a campaign intended to attack the Arab peoples along the Eastern Coast of Arabia. Adad-apal-Duranki as well, was ordered to re-discover Dilmun and bring it under the hold of Duranki. This was intended perhaps as a punishment for the blunder in Elam made by the Head Sentinel. For the campaign, Adad-apal-Duranki was to utilize resources from the Southern Protectorate, Elam and Karduniash, but only minimal resources from Assyrian holdings. The Nippur Correspondence refers cryptically to this custom as a divisional campaign procedure:



“The Great King ordered division within campaigns. A procedure for which Adad-apal-Duranki partook, to invade and provide restoration to Duranki through the reclaiming of Dilmun, the Birthright of Great God Sin.” -Nippur Correspondence

In short, this division of campaign referred to the conception that in order for Assyria to wage annual campaigns, they required some level of withholding. One way that this was done, was that in campaigns that were not ‘grand’ that is maintaining multiple fronts and with massive foes, a particular bureaucrat was designated with waging a campaign only using resources from a region of his choosing. This permitted after long wars, other areas to recover some resources for later campaigns and permitted a resting mechanism to the Assyrian military structure. This, however, was an innovation. Originally, Assyrian kings only waged campaigns in person. As such, each year, an annual campaign would be waged that had a set time limit upon which the Assyrian king had to return. After the reign of Assur-Dan II, a more fluid and freedom-oriented expansion program developed. Wherein underlings could partake small campaigns instead of the Great King. This had the effect of reserving the majority of the Assyrian army for later campaigns.

In the year 589 BCE this was needed more than few other times. The empire was engorged by loot and needed to distribute such. This was of the utmost necessity, as the massive costs of the campaign were only paid through the redistribution of the loot unto all the state’s creditors. The empire would support indefinite campaigns and constant war, if they were repaid through rimutu and through the opening up of new markets and resources. All of which Assyria provided readily. Rimutu were distributed and was the amin focus of Sinbanipal’s 590-588 reign.

Likewise, Sinbanipal accumulating most of the gold, horses and finery captured in the war, ordered a series of statues to be erected in Kalhu, both of his father and a then another of himself. To offset this act, Sinbanipal ordered too a large renovation of the Temple of Nurgle in the city of Cutha within Karduniash. This temple, called the ‘Abode of the Burned One’ was to be renovated for the first time since the reign of Sargon II and adorned with new and priceless rubies gained in campaigns in the east. Likewise, a collection of Median soldiers who were ritually executed by flaying, their skins were to be transported to the temple and burned. In the opinion of Sinbanipal, Nurgle was his compatriot in the war in the east.

“The Great God Nurgle, the Burner and the Lord of the loot, stood beside me as aI turned Ectbatana into a heap. Great Lord Nurgle took a brick and heaved it from the foundation, I did in coordination, in mimicry of His Lordship. We did tear the bricks, remove the fineries, defile their holy shrines and crushed their idols. Lord Nurgle then held in His mighty hand a whip for which to chastise the masses. He sent forth the fires of devastation and blackened a heap that had piled before us in the once existent city. With whip, He led the host of captured people, the denizens of the Medes to the Land of Piety. There, I gave them as a Rimutu for the pleasure of the Great God Dagon, whose abode is in the trade of goods and the exchange of pleasuring items. Praise to the Great Gods, Gula, who hath gave protection, Ninurta who gave power to slay beasts, Nurgle who tore bricks and set the world aflame, Marduk who turned the tide and Assur who commanded the minds to fight! I, Sinbanipal did those requests of the Great Gods, conquering millions and redistributing them as cattle. For the cause of Duranki, I turned the rebel’s house into a heap. So when passers arrive, who travel from unknown lands, they might say, ‘who once drew the ire of a man of such rage that he with the force of the Great Gods, did turn their home to a heap and set ablaze bricks so that a tower of black arises from the valley?’ They shall pronounce the name, of he who carries the Holy Bolt, they shall say, ‘He is a man of rage, the Great King who brings silence unto the universe.’” -Sinbanipal relief inscription in Kalhu, commissioned under the statue of the Assyrian kings in Kalhu, 588 BCE.



A pressing matter was also the status of newly captured areas. Sinbanipal alongside his main officials present decreed:



-Elam to be decreed as a new vassal realm subject to tribute to the Karduniash monarch. This state was to be called the Governance of Elamtu.

-The region of Gilan was to be ruled by a vassal state of Assyria called the Kingdom of Marilik.

-All lands north of Mount Sadupazabanu (Mount Pale Finger, otl Mount Sahand) were to be the domain of the Great Protectorate or Urartu. While lands south of this would be controlled by the Eastern Protectorate, informally referred to as Marhashi.

-The Eastern Protectorate would pay tribute and be manned by Assyria-proper, rather than Karduniash.



Celebration of Sinbanipal, King Thirteen Years and Aged 25.



In 590 BCE, Sinbanipal turned 25, already 13 years on the throne. He received a large amount of tribute in the year 590 BCE before the summer fall campaign of Adad-apal-Duranki. Tribute was amounted to the following:



-An intricate chariot, four horses, a new set of lamellar armor painted red and a Scythian bow with spells transcribed, from Dagon-Zakir-Shumi of Karduniash

-A collection of Iron swords, axes and knives from King Rusas IV of Urartu.

-A host of cattle and enslaved shepherds from Puzur-Adad, Protector General of the South

-A fine scarf of purple, a golden headpiece with gemstone sockets and a collection of golden bracelets from Ithobaal II king of Tyre.

-A great bull from the royal herds, from Psamtik II, Pharaoh of Egypt.

-A caravan of camels from King Yahu-Dagon I of Moab.

Among other items.

Alongside this day, was the taking of a wife, aside from the generally rapidly growing harem of women for the Great King to sleep with. A more prestigious bride was taken for this case, this time sealing together the dynasty of Urartu with that of Assyria. Sinbanipal took a wife from the young daughter of Rusas IV named Patar who was sent to Assyria at the age of 15 to become the head-wife of the kingdom.

Sinbanipal however, was even at 25, a dutiful king in regard to the production of heirs. The main issue is, each of the four children so far sired by Sinbanipal, all had been females. This was not seen as too big of an issue, yet it was not ideal also. Dagon-Zakir-Shumi to the south for his respecte, had already betrothed himself to a local Karduniash noble lady named Ishtar-Tahi’ati (Ishtar is watching) but at age 16, has yet to produce any children, despite concubines already being assigned to him by the Babylonian elites surrounding him at court.

Of also interesting note in the birthday gifts to Sinbanipal, is the gifts sent from Egypt. Psamtik II by sending gifts, was seeking a means by which to assert a peace with the Assyrian monarch. In respect of the tribute, Sinbanipal ordered Kanisratu-balutu-Assur to extend the treaty with Egypt by three more years, from 590-587 BCE. Giving Psamtik II critical time to repair his country and rebuild what had been destroyed.



Adad-apal-Duranki gathers an army

Adad-apal-Duranki was given specific parameters with which to prosecute his campaign. His goals were clear, conquer the eastern coastline of Arabia and follow it to its course. Reconquest of Bazu and the rediscovery of Dilmun was of paramount priority. Further, Adad-apal-Duranki was only permitted to utilize the forces from the Southern Protectorate, Elam or Karduniash.

Hence, Adad-apal-Duranki for the later section of 590 BCE prepared an army, with the plan to invade Arabia in the Spring of 589 BCE, before the heat had come. His army of experienced Akkadian infantry and cavalry were to be the main skeleton of his army, the shock troops, if you will. Yet, such a force at the moment, only numbered around 3,100 men. Thus, a larger force was needed.

Adad-apal-Duranki for this matter, sought the aid of Dagon-Zakir-Shumi in Babylon. Dagon-Zakir-Shumi in coordination with the wishes of his court provided Adad-apal-Duranki with resources needed him. However, an interesting note is given regarding this:



“King of the Lands, Dagon-zakir-shumi, was surrounded by the Mercantile class and the Lords of Babylon. They gave directives and the merchants longed for the rumors of past, that grand age of discovery in the sea, of tribute from the south. Adad-apal-Duanki, did they give greater supply than expected, they highlighted a mission of import, restore Babylonian mastery over the Southern Sea.” -Nippur Correspondence



Adad-apal-Duranki received a caravan of camels from the Babylonian herds, free reign over the royal armory and an army. This army was however, one acquired by the Karduniash pool of deportees and from mercantile funds to send mercenary.

A mercenary force from Judah under independent captains was called forth to be given to Adad-apal-Duranki, as well as a mercenary host from Tyre, which included exotic soldiers from Northern Africa. The rest of the army that the Karduniash kingdom furnished, was made up of deportees. The deportees gathered for the campaign were primarily Itu and Philistines. However, The King provided a specialty that only kings could furnish, and that was sending a Scythian detachment with Adad-apal-Duranki.

In recent years, the Babylonian elite have attracted the talents of some of the best deportees, especially cavalry. In 590, this intensified. Thousands of Gambulu and Chaldeans were killed in the year of 591 BCE and their rebellion shocked the elites in Babylon. Hearing word often of the skill of the Cimmerians, Scythians and other northern semi-nomadic pastoralists in battle, the lords of the realm sought to acquire them. Karudniash funds were used to purchase deportees from Mari and the Suhum frequently and provide funding to keep their populations large in the Suhum.

Suhum, was on of the major areas of the empire. Relatively sparse in population, arid, flat and ancient. It was, however, the bustling HQ of the Palace Herald and the office for deportees. Here, deportees were processed and held in bondage until purchased by an Akkadian dignitary. However, some deportees were simply left to live as they pleased. Recent influxes of Cimmerians and Scythians especially were prone to this. Adapating to the local area, these migrated in the Suhum, breeding horses, engaging in intermittent feuds with each other and smallscale farming/gardening along the Euphrates River. Their population was being increased through increased birthrates, importation of more of their numbers annually and adoptions of different peoples sent to them to be raised as one of their own. With ne Karduniash funding, this process was pursued extensively.

589 Campaign of Adad-apal-Duranki

In 589 BCE, eastern Arabia was inhabited by Bedouin tribes, small settlements and then major semi-sedentary cities along the coastline. In the past, this area was a rich region, comprising the southernmost sector of the Sumero-Akkadian world.However, since the end of the Bronze Age, contact was limited and the trade links to the east from the Southern Sea, had drained. This had a negative effect on Karduniash, perhaps influencing its economic decline in relation to Assyria.

Later Assyrian kings attempted to rectify the situation. Assurhadon is said to have conquered these areas in 675 BCE, however his conquests were lost in the 652-648 BCE civil war between Karduniash and Assyria. Adad-apal-Duranki’s mission as to reclaim at least portions of this.

The campaign strategy as outlined by the Nippur correspondence was to invade along the eastern coast with a small collection of ships shadowing them intermittently. The Southern Protectorate to the west sent guides and provided scouting into the Nejd, sparsely populated as it was. Adad-apal-Duranki set course and moved forth with his army numbering 21,000 soldiers.

“The Sentinel marched forth south, he engaged the Arabs, who fled before him like deer. Their fight possessed them and the Great gods distributed a terrible aura unto their lot.” -Nippur Correspondence

Apparently Arab tribes south of Karduniash provided little resistance. However, arriving closer to Gerrha, ressitance increased exponentially. Battles were waged in the desert, with Adad-aapl-Duranki winning each decisively. Nearign Gerrha, the Arab king of the city, fled in fear from the city. Meanwhile, the merchants of the city came forth to submit to Adad-apal-Duranki and repented of their king who had fled into the south.

“….Gerrha was a wealthy yet rebellious city. Their populace was recalcitrant yet felt the terro of the aura of the Great gods. Their king, named Yajuju son of nobody fled into the deserts towards the Lahazuzu (Ahasa). Therein, he was slain by a gazelle which gored his chest….. The mercy of Gula abounded, she forgave the city of its misdeeds and the Great Gods resettled the lands once held by them primordially. Duranki was restored in an ancient land. Dagon-Zakir-shumi, king of the Lands, sent settlers, merchants and dignitaries to see the city and restore to it the trappings of a city of Piety and submission.” -Nippur Correspondence.



The huge success of Adad-apal-Duranki in the Arabian coastline had taken him from July of 589 BCE until September of 589 BCE. He spent the month of October in Gerrha, After which, he campaigned south into the Lahazuzu and attacked a local confederacy that had formed there under a certain Arab lord named Yajir Masi’Ujay. Adad-apal-Duranki however, seems to have not faired too well in the Ahsa south of Dilmun, for his army returned to Gerrha in late November. In December however, Adad-apal-Duranki was joined by a ship that arrived from Babylon at Gerrha. Dagon-Zakir-Shumi had constructed a small ship to transport he and a chariot team to personally view Gerrha.

Submitting himself to the Brother King, Dagon-zakir-shumi ordered the creation of relief in the city and begged Adad-apal-Duranki lead him to Dilmun with a small force. This took only a small journey to the island of Dilmun (Bahrain). There, the people were quite degenerated from their prior heyday int eh bronze Age. However, the Great Gods remained worshiped.

The armies of Dilmun were a small city guard that immediately surrendered upon the arrival of the Karduniash king, who entered the town, sparse, underpopulated and foreign. Unhappy to not find a great bustling city and a large garden, Dagon-zakir-shumi, still consecrated himself as the Lord of Dilmun. Appointing merchants in the city of Gerrha as his mayors and then appointing a Babylonian priest of the Great God Sin as his mayor in Dilmun. Adad-apal-Duranki was ordered also, to leave his deportee forces in both towns, as guards.

Adad-apal-Duranki returned in 588 BCE to Nippur marching back north. In his travels, he heard news of the passing of Puzur-Adad in Tima in January and when he arrived at Nippur, he was ordered to appear in Kalhu to discuss the occurrences and circumstances of the Gerrha capture and occupation.

-----------------------------------------
A new update will come in a day or two. Thanks for reading.
 
I would assume that Gerrha would be called something like Hagaru in Akkadian (local Hasaitic inscriptions use HGR, the same word meaning "town" in Sabaean and generally in South Arabia, to refer to that city). Although what little we know about the Hasaitic language suggests closeness to Aramaic more than Ancient South Arabian, the area was influenced a lot by South Arabia, adopting its script entirely (older scholarships sometimes posits a Sabaean "colony" but this does not seem to be right).
The Sabaean hegemony itself is going to notice, however, even if by now they are kinda busy with other matters closer to home.
 
I would assume that Gerrha would be called something like Hagaru in Akkadian (local Hasaitic inscriptions use HGR, the same word meaning "town" in Sabaean and generally in South Arabia, to refer to that city). Although what little we know about the Hasaitic language suggests closeness to Aramaic more than Ancient South Arabian, the area was influenced a lot by South Arabia, adopting its script entirely (older scholarships sometimes posits a Sabaean "colony" but this does not seem to be right).
The Sabaean hegemony itself is going to notice, however, even if by now they are kinda busy with other matters closer to home.

Right, we will tie loose knots regarding naming of areas next update. Though, I do not take the opinion that the area was a colony from the south. I favor the view that the region was originally associated to theSumero-Akkadian world, but after the Bronze Age, drifted into a more Arab cultural complex. As such, by the time of otl, it is an Aramo-Arabic entity with influences from the Akkadian world.

Yes, the Saba are currently in collapse. I doubt they will notice, except in the form of a greater migration from the north.
 
Nurgle seems a rather aggressive god.
Just how much proselytisation (for lack of a better word) do these Assyrian campaigns, of Sinbanipal, involve. Sinbanipal speaks of extending the rule of the great gods to people who are recalcitrant but is it regarded as sufficient that they submit to him as the representative of the great gods on earth or is some actual change in religion required? I think you mentioned earlier submitting rulers being required to read a prayer of praise but does this extend to anything more permanent. Will the Assyrian rulers prehaps begin to require stuff like the building of temples in conquered lands or are they unlikely to care much about what the people of these lands worship so long as they the nations have submitted to the Assyrian state.
 
Nurgle seems a rather aggressive god.
Just how much proselytisation (for lack of a better word) do these Assyrian campaigns, of Sinbanipal, involve. Sinbanipal speaks of extending the rule of the great gods to people who are recalcitrant but is it regarded as sufficient that they submit to him as the representative of the great gods on earth or is some actual change in religion required? I think you mentioned earlier submitting rulers being required to read a prayer of praise but does this extend to anything more permanent. Will the Assyrian rulers prehaps begin to require stuff like the building of temples in conquered lands or are they unlikely to care much about what the people of these lands worship so long as they the nations have submitted to the Assyrian state.

Yes, the Great God Nurgle is probably the most aggressive of all Akkadian deities. This is an exceptional title, considering that most are extremely aggressive deities with very formidable war aspects. Nurgle is the Great God associated with the following:

-fire and forest fires, Nurgle is oft-called by the Assyrians, the 'Burned One' or the 'Burner' the so-called 'pure flame.' His worship oddly includes the keeping of flames.
-looting, pillaging, raiding, etc...
-the flaying of rebel's skin
-disease and illness
-death in general
-snakes
-dogs
-punishment in general

Many of the most heinous crimes related to war and rebellion were punished according to the perceived customs of Nurgle. Hence, why so many of the punishments of these were acts seen as worship to Nurgle. The flaying of skin of rebels would be burned. Other cases of punishment, saw enemy kings or rebels stripped naked and forced into a cage to be devoured by dogs.

Nurgle however, his association with all of these items, his so-called postive, if you could say such a thing existed it was in the struggle to exist. Many kings took his name and utilized it, seeing him as a force for positive in the land. Namely through the distribution of loot and the assertion of domination of the Sumero-Akkadian peoples over their neighbors through struggle. Through Nurgle, the Assyrian people were enriched, so they believed.

Nevertheless, his worship is the smallest of the Great Gods. Many of the common folk supposedly fear his name and there is taboos existent in regards to worshiping him too excessively unless at war, for calling his name inspires rebellion (for the Great God Nurgle is empowered by these sorts of things).

-------------------------------------

Generally, the Assyrian and or Akkadian realms in general, resemble the Aztec Triple-Alliance of Mexia. In that they wage war as a religious mandate. Both sought to attack others, taking grand amounts of loot, that would then be utilized to enrich the interior (Mesopotamia). Assyrian kings in the Bronze Age, destroyed, massacred, enslaved and enforced transient vassalage upon enemy realms. All of these were seen never in the vein of spreading the actual worship of the Great Gods:

Completion of Duranki, that is world conquest. Submitting all peoples to the Kingdom of Assyria, was seen as a fulfillment of a religious duty. The people who were conquered and submitted to Assyria, was good enough as far as worship went. Later, they may be instructed in correct worship, but their submission to the tools of the Great Gods, was a substitution for any rites.

As such, spreading the faith, was noted primarily in terms of conquest of enemies and lording over them. This fulfilled any conversion requirements. This is much like the Arabo-Islamic states of otl, who viewed legal conquest, that is defeating enemy kingdoms and replacing their prior laws with sharia as enough, any religious conversion would occur afterward.

Implementing the supposed laws of the Great Gods in terms of Duranki, that is unifying the world and destroying enemy peoples' pretense of independence, was considered a conversion. Over time, some peoples adopted the religion, through proximity and the prestige of the religion. Yet it was never a conception that a non-Akkadian must worship only these Gods. Rather, they viewed that if someone was submitted to Assyria, they were already agreeing that their gods were lesser than the Akkadian true Great Gods.

Now, Assyria did engage in religiously tinged war and supremacy. They were not the tolerant polytheists so often seen in say the age of Hellenism. Assyrian kings actively practiced god-napping, wherein they would steal enemy peoples' gods and break their statues into pieces and refer tot hem as idols and lesser entities, beneath them. When another people resisted the Assyrian monarch for a prolonged period of time, Assyria resorted to destruction of that peoples' god. In the case of Sargon II, he is noted for defeated Rusas I of Urartu and in victory, Sargon II destroyed the temple to Khaldi, one of the three 'high gods' of Urartu, in theory, Sargon I said the Great Gods slew Khaldi in battle and stole his energy in a sense.
 
Top