The NextGen OTL Worlda Series

[SnivyLink]

I have an adaptation on my PC, you'd just have to wait a couple hours

works for me

 

[SnivyLink]

I patched up some more maps:

1648

1803:

1815:

1914:

 

[Diagram]

The maps we are making are part of the NextGen OTL Worlda Series, a modification on the original Worlda series. Those maps were inconsistent with one another, which is why we are making this series in the first place. The patch that you uploaded was for the original Worlda maps, so it will likely be inconsistent and incompatible with this series.

Is difference between them demonstrated somewhere?

 

[SnivyLink]

Is difference between them demonstrated somewhere?

probably earlier in the thread, but i have seen if i layer two maps of the different series's over each other, they don't line up

 

[KolyenuKS]

 

[Wendell]

this is for the original worlda, but maybe we can adapt it somehow

It definitely should be updated to reflect some of the different layers of indigenous land rights/jurisdictions in Canada.

 

[James the AH Fan]

Made some patches to my 1900 map:

 

[Analytical Engine]

There are still errors in regards to Imperial Russian subdivisions in central Asia - the border between Akmolinsk and Turgai governates is missing.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/55/Subdivisions_of_the_Russian_Empire_in_1897_%28governorate_level%29.svg/1162px-Subdivisions_of_the_Russian_Empire_in_1897_%28governorate_level%29.svg.png

 

[Library of Alexandria]

There are still errors in regards to Imperial Russian subdivisions in central Asia - the border between Akmolinsk and Turgai governates is missing.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/55/Subdivisions_of_the_Russian_Empire_in_1897_%28governorate_level%29.svg/1162px-Subdivisions_of_the_Russian_Empire_in_1897_%28governorate_level%29.svg.png

Yeah, both the prussian internals and the Russian sudivisions look like they were lifted right out of the old worlda.

pretty sure I recognise almost all of the added borders from a Kaiserreich map i saw a while ago, actually.

 

[James the AH Fan]

Yeah, both the prussian internals and the Russian sudivisions look like they were lifted right out of the old worlda.

Somebody else did the Russia and Germany ones, not me.

 

[Library of Alexandria]

Somebody else did the Russia and Germany ones, not me.

I'm not accusing you, my guy. Just saying they look off.

 

[ST15RM]

Yeah, both the prussian internals and the Russian sudivisions look like they were lifted right out of the old worlda.

pretty sure I recognise almost all of the added borders from a Kaiserreich map i saw a while ago, actually.

because they were. i will admit that i just copy-pasted the internals. if you have any suggestions id be happy to fix them.

 

[Library of Alexandria]

because they were. i will admit that i just copy-pasted the internals. if you have any suggestions id be happy to fix them.

I can see some major issues with the German/Austrian borders, but I really don't think anything's wrong with Russia.

 

[Flashman]

Shouldn't North and South Carolina be divided in the 1715 map?

 

[Analytical Engine]

I can see some major issues with the German/Austrian borders, but I really don't think anything's wrong with Russia.

If you compare the Imperial Russian borders in OTL Kazakhstan from the Q-bam to the Worlda, there is an internal border missing.

 

[FasterThanRaito]

If you compare the Imperial Russian borders in OTL Kazakhstan from the Q-bam to the Worlda, there is an internal border missing.

... I don't see anything missing, or am I blind? If you do, can you point it out with a marker?

 

[X_Eaglefrost_X]

... I don't see anything missing, or am I blind? If you do, can you point it out with a marker?

I can't see anything either. I looked about three times.

 

[Analytical Engine]

Ok, see the border I've highlighted here in green?

That border is missing from the Worlda maps.

 

[James the AH Fan]

Ok, see the border I've highlighted here in green?

That border is missing from the Worlda maps.

There you go.​

 

[Analytical Engine]

View attachment 525899
There you go.​

Thank you.