So you're telling me Alaska doesn't have the second amendment. The one place in the US where it's existence is most necessary.Not to get political but what
So you're telling me Alaska doesn't have the second amendment. The one place in the US where it's existence is most necessary.Not to get political but what
Easier to hide stains.Why does a kid’s room need color? I’ve never understood that trope.
I agree horrifying. A few things do jump out.I guess it's time for a truly horrible education:
Vichy France was neutral. It was influenced by Germany, but it was not part of the Axis or an ally of the Axis.I agree horrifying. A few things do jump out.
1) the Vichy government is considered to be an unnamed neutral like Switzerland.
2) Corsica is a neutral, but inside Axis controlled seas. I guess that makes sense...
3) The standard German use of England for the entire UK.
4) The Estonian Islands are shown in Black rather than Striped. Unclear if this is due to the Germans considering them German territory, or just that it is tough to draw the stripes.
By that standard, I believe that Denmark would have been counted as a Neutral until August 23, 1943. The map shows the Axis in Egypt which they'd been pushed back from in December of 1941 (+/- a few months)Vichy France was neutral. It was influenced by Germany, but it was not part of the Axis or an ally of the Axis.
You are wrong. Denmark was occupied by German troops, Vichy France was not.By that standard, I believe that Denmark would have been counted as a Neutral until August 23, 1943. The map shows the Axis in Egypt which they'd been pushed back from in December of 1941 (+/- a few months)
Please look up Case Anton, your statement that Vichy France wasn't occupied is funny.You are wrong. Denmark was occupied by German troops, Vichy France was not.
The map shown was made before Case Anton.Please look up Case Anton, your statement that Vichy France wasn't occupied is funny.
In which case the Denmark was still a Protectorate (who functionally had more of a democracy than Vichy France).The map shown was made before Case Anton.
It very obviously shows the Free Zone. The Free Zone has no German troops, and thus no German authority. Denmark does have German troops, and thus real power is in the hands of the Germans.In which case the Denmark was still a Protectorate (who functionally had more of a democracy than Vichy France).
Seriously, can we figure out when this map had to have been set? At the widest, it must be sometime between the beginning of Barbarossa (June 1941) and the end of 1942 (by which point the Germans had been kicked out of Egypt)
my own take on projection alignments (not using a globe because that's cheating)
So how does this fit into 'Lawful Evil'?
Seriously, can we figure out when this map had to have been set? At the widest, it must be sometime between the beginning of Barbarossa (June 1941) and the end of 1942 (by which point the Germans had been kicked out of Egypt)
https://usamapnew.blogspot.com/2018/02/europe-map-1933.html?m=0
I just found this.
I want to believ it's just someone who is trolling, or an attept at an alternate history map. For the sake of my sanity, I hope it's the first...
Maybe. I think France's borders are somewhere close to OTL pre-WWI. I'm sort of surprised there is no Polish Tributary state and the Russians are nowhere near as bad off as OTL Brest-Litvosk.I'm guessing this is some kind of Central Powers victory AH
Maybe. I think France's borders are somewhere close to OTL pre-WWI. I'm sort of surprised there is no Polish Tributary state and the Russians are nowhere near as bad off as OTL Brest-Litvosk.
Bulgaria certainly gained, and the Ottomans might have in an area off the map, the question is the Italians. Did the AustroHungarians ever talk about making buffer states out of Northern Italy?
Given the quality of the map, does whether or not they actually planned something or whether or not it would be plausible really matter to this mapmaker?Maybe. I think France's borders are somewhere close to OTL pre-WWI. I'm sort of surprised there is no Polish Tributary state and the Russians are nowhere near as bad off as OTL Brest-Litvosk.
Bulgaria certainly gained, and the Ottomans might have in an area off the map, the question is the Italians. Did the AustroHungarians ever talk about making buffer states out of Northern Italy?