To refresh the memory, during the Korean Conflict of 1950 three phases of advance occurred. These were essentially:
1. The North Korean advance to the Pusan perimeter, from 25th June 1950,
2. The U.N defense of the Pusan perimeter, the Inchon landings and pursuit to the Yalu River, 15 September 1950 to 25 November, and
3. The Second Phase Offensive with the intervention of the Chinese peoples volunteer army, 25 November to 14 December culminating in the surprise acceptance (OOC our P.O.D) by Chairman Mao of the 11 December ceasefire offer by the United States, re-establishing a border along the 38th parallel.
The acceptance of the ceasefire faced no small amount of resistance from many of those surrounding Mao who though that the U.N forces could be kicked off the Peninsula. Additionally the exact reasoning of Mao in accepting the ceasefire is inadequately covered by Chinese historiography of the conflict & can only be speculated upon. What if he hadn't accepted the U.S offer?
(OOC regarding the plausibility of this P.O.D see Foot, Rosemary. A substitute for victory : the politics of peacemaking at the Korean armistice talks. Ithaca, N.Y. : Cornell University Press, 1990. 30-31)
It was essentially the low point of Allied Morale after the Chinese intervention.)
1. The North Korean advance to the Pusan perimeter, from 25th June 1950,
2. The U.N defense of the Pusan perimeter, the Inchon landings and pursuit to the Yalu River, 15 September 1950 to 25 November, and
3. The Second Phase Offensive with the intervention of the Chinese peoples volunteer army, 25 November to 14 December culminating in the surprise acceptance (OOC our P.O.D) by Chairman Mao of the 11 December ceasefire offer by the United States, re-establishing a border along the 38th parallel.
The acceptance of the ceasefire faced no small amount of resistance from many of those surrounding Mao who though that the U.N forces could be kicked off the Peninsula. Additionally the exact reasoning of Mao in accepting the ceasefire is inadequately covered by Chinese historiography of the conflict & can only be speculated upon. What if he hadn't accepted the U.S offer?
(OOC regarding the plausibility of this P.O.D see Foot, Rosemary. A substitute for victory : the politics of peacemaking at the Korean armistice talks. Ithaca, N.Y. : Cornell University Press, 1990. 30-31)
It was essentially the low point of Allied Morale after the Chinese intervention.)