Its a little of both, but Venice is definitely closer.
EDIT: The Land faction could be the "Reds" because of the blood of the people and all that, whereas the Naval faction are the "Blues" due to their assosciation with the sea. The Clergy are the whites, and can go one way or another.
Also, all national parks in Nondenominational land would go the USA, and in most cases the Church. Same for Indian reservations?
One way would be to have an electoral college maintained and continue to respond to the votes of the states. You could either have every state maintain its pre-regression electoral votes, or you could have every state regressed to three EVs, two of them going to the sovereign and one going to the clergy.How are people going to vote on the President though? Are President's elected upon death?
But all of them would still maintain theoretical fealty to the President and especially to the Church. Just look at how much land the Papacy held in the HRE.I think that immediately after the Regression, most government land not in the Chesapeake Bay Area was claimed by local warlords. The Church/ Rump USA has some claim but noone gives a shit.
Any Medieval European canals of comparable size?Does the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal still exist? It exists at sea level and is about 11 m deep
One way would be to have an electoral college maintained and continue to respond to the votes of the states. You could either have every state maintain its pre-regression electoral votes, or you could have every state regressed to three EVs, two of them going to the sovereign and one going to the clergy.
Or you could have the EC either suspended or otherwise re-purposed. Since its suspended and therefore no candidate can reach a majority of EVs, the election is automatically thrown to the House the day after Election Day (now a religious holiday). The Senate would still elect the Vice President.
But all of them would still maintain theoretical fealty to the President and especially to the Church. Just look at how much land the Papacy held in the HRE.
Any Medieval European canals of comparable size?
I don't think the Senate should be abolished for two reasons: firstly, symbolic. The Nondenominational Church reveres the Constitution, and each state's right to senatorial representation is practically sacrosanct within the current language of the Constitution. It's technically impossible to amend away a state's representation in the Senate. Secondly is practical: without the Senate, the states would have no say in Church affairs since judicial appointments are approved by the Senate. I think the Articles of Emergency should contain a "gentlemen's agreement" that the Senate will serve as a rubber stamp for all matters internal to Federal land, and legislation pertaining to Federal land will only be introduced in the House. All Church relevant legislation can only be introduced in the Senate, and requires a supermajority. Further, the two Senators each state is entitled to could be divided between one for the government and one for that state's ecclesiastical supervisory.I say that the articles of emergency have suspended the electoral college. Elections are now held only in the regions the government controls and the Senate no longer exists. The Articles of Emergency now dictate that the President is able to appoint a vice President because the states are unable to send representatives to the Senate.
I considered the Chinese Grand Canal, but no Eastern state is even remotely comparable to the Chinese.No medieval canals exist of comparable width. Volume wise maybe the Chinese Grand Canal works. Maybe the Canal has mostly silted up over time though it is still large enough for medieval sized ships to travel through
Yeah, inland almost all federal territory reverts to the Church, but on the coasts they could serve as the avenues for expansion for federal control.I guess that Federal Land would probably revert to Church control.
With the President still sworn in at the Capitol by the Chief Justice.I guess District Supervisors send Ecclesiastic Senators to Washington DC. I presume then that the Senate sits in DC and that the House and Presidency has been moved to Baltimore.
Half are ecclesiastic insofar as they are appointed by the Church, and half are secular insofar as they are appointed by secular sovereigns, but possibly even these are still churchmen that the sovereigns appoint, just loyal ones.Are there secular senators or just ecclesiastic ones?
What role do the Circuit Supervisors play?
Well look at this map.I presume that they act as the local head of the church in a particular state and neighboring territories which do not have an ecclesiastic/district seat.
Perhaps they just don't survive. Not all institutions have to survive. In fact it'd be unrealistic if they did.Well look at this map.
Most of the Circuit Courts exist across multiple states. Additionally, there are multiple Districts for quite a few states.
Maybe Circuits are both reduced and size and increased in number so each state comprises a single Circuit, while the District Supervisors correspond to the current federal district courts?Perhaps they just don't survive. Not all institutions have to survive. In fact it'd be unrealistic if they did.
I'm thinking they should be merged with the District Supervisors.Maybe Circuits are both reduced and size and increased in number so each state comprises a single Circuit, while the District Supervisors correspond to the current federal district courts?
Maybe Circuits are both reduced and size and increased in number so each state comprises a single Circuit, while the District Supervisors correspond to the current federal district courts?