Oh ok i see it nowIt wasn't, Mexico kept the Spanish subdivision system during quite some years. The border of California was based on a certain meridian and taking into account the map's curvature it cannot be a straight upwards line.
Oh ok i see it nowIt wasn't, Mexico kept the Spanish subdivision system during quite some years. The border of California was based on a certain meridian and taking into account the map's curvature it cannot be a straight upwards line.
It wasn't, Mexico kept the Spanish subdivision system during quite some years. The border of California was based on a certain meridian and taking into account the map's curvature it cannot be a straight upwards line.
I further patched the 2017 map, fixing even more islands and adding way more disputesView attachment 466488
Now we just need to add the all important dispute over Rockall island
Well I mean the island is already displayed on the WorldA as that little dot to the north-west of Great Britain and Ireland, if we’re doing a claims map it would probably make sense to do so.Please don’t
But the maps doesn't have any border lines and "boxes" for islands and archipelagos, meaning it would be odd for the only "box" around an island to be in Rockall.Well I mean the island is already displayed on the WorldA as that little dot to the north-west of Great Britain and Ireland, if we’re doing a claims map it would probably make sense to do so.
it fits more with the tradition.Wouldn't this fit the NCS better?
View attachment 466775
What specifically is wrong with itAlso I want to say here that the 1946 map is horribly broken.
Is this for January 1946?I did make an improved version, hopefully this fixes all the errors:
Yes, 1st January 1946Is this for January 1946?
If we add so many subdivisions to this map are we gonna have to do that for all the mapsView attachment 466658
needs more subdivisions