Rainbow's End: South Africa and the Rhodesian Bush War
The White Man's Last Stand - C.R. Swart and H.F. Verwoerd at the emergency prime ministers' conference, May 1961
Selous Scouts (left) and Rhodesian soldiers (right) during the Bush War
Strachey’s strategy in East Africa and Rhodesia had so far been criticised for a number of reasons. Figures on the political right lamented the end of empire and on the left argued that he was simply finding new ways to control colonised states. As the 1950s turned into the 1960s, and it became clear that Westminster would not be changing tack and would be supported by a majority of the Commonwealth, the policy faced increased opposition from white settlers. Since the Devonshire-Webb Report of 1926, successive British governments had made attempts, with a greater or lesser degree of enthusiasm depending on political flavour, to keep to its commitments. In particular, it continued to resist pressure from South Africa to permit the creation of white minority administrations in Northern Rhodesia (3% white) and Kenya (4% white).
The amalgamation of the Rhodesias and Nyasaland into a single federation governed by a liberal and moderately pro-civil rights government headed by Garfield Todd had managed to keep the lid on trouble since 1953. However, Todd’s success in staying in power thanks to the progressive expansion of the franchise to blacks and the support of the civil rights movement lead by Joshua Nkomo (hardly an uncritical one though - Todd once described him as “my closest ally and worst opponent”) had pushed many conservative white settlers towards the avowedly white supremacist Rhodesian Front Party (“RF”). On 11 November 1960, a bomb exploded inside the Parliament Building in the capital city Chamberlain. Initially timed to go off while the lower house was in session, it detonated early but nonetheless managed to kill seven parliamentary workers and injured 21 more.
A white supremacist paramilitary group known as the Selous Scouts claimed responsibility for the attack and began a campaign of violence, mostly consisting of bombing campaigns in predominantly black towns and city neighbourhoods. The RF claimed to be entirely separate from the Scouts (a claim regarded as, at best, dubious by most observers) but provided support for them within Parliament and even a veneer of political legitimacy. Although the force of international opinion was against the RF’s and Scouts’ position, Todd was concerned about the ability of his government to put an end to the violence. The Scouts often attacked with weapons that looked military-grade, raising questions of loyalty not only about some of the upper echelons of the Rhodesian officer corps but also the South African government. Certainly, the British South Africa Police (the incongruously-named Rhodesian police service) and the Rhodesian Army proved notably ineffective at putting down the paramilitary.
A meeting of prime ministers and the Commonwealth Cabinet was hastily convened in Nairobi in November 1960. C.R. Swart, the South African prime minister, proposed that the South African government would act as a mediator between the Scouts/RF and the Rhodesian government. This proposal was given short shrift by the other prime ministers, who (correctly) observed that such an attempt at mediation would suffer from a complete lack of trust from black Africans and seriously undermine the (relatively) peaceful process of decolonisation across the continent. Instead, the majority of the delegates agreed with the New Zealand Prime Minister Walter Nash’s suggestion that troops be sent from across the Commonwealth. When it became clear that the proposal was going to go forward to a vote, Swart, Eric Louw (the South African member of the Commonwealth Cabinet) and the rest of the South African delegation symbolically departed the conference early.
Although it was a symbolic move that went some way to satisfying their supporters’ distaste for what they now often called the “Black Commonwealth,” few in the years afterwards thought that Swart’s move was a good decision. With the cracks now unavoidable in the unity of the ‘Old Dominions’ who had previously served as the unofficial high table of Commonwealth decision making, the space was opened up for new countries to step up and take a bigger role. To this end, Pakistan’s prime minister Ayub Khan and its member of the Commonwealth Cabinet, Feroze Khan, put aside their domestic political disagreements to become two of the major figures of the conference. Of particular note was Feroze’s proposal, adopted by the Cabinet and the ICS, that the troops sent to Rhodesia include Maori units from the New Zealand army, mixed-race regiments from Canada and the UK and the Queen’s African Rifles. Both Ayub and Feroze argued strongly that the Scouts’ insurgency be referred to as a “rebellion” in the conference’s official communique.
The ICS issued a formal request for troops to be sent from every Commonwealth country, a legal nicety that had been a formality on the other occasions where it had been issued. This time, however, Swart flatly refused to honour the request, catalysing another emergency prime minister-Commonwealth Cabinet conference in May 1961. By this time, a ‘Big Four’ of the prime ministers of the UK (Gaitskell), Canada (John Diefenbaker), Australia (Harold Holt) and Pakistan (Ayub) had formed a united front which saw Commonwealth unity and integrity as the most important thing at this moment of crisis. The practical result of this conclusion was that South Africa would either have to be brought into line or expelled. Holt had been in favour of allowing South Africa to remain in the Commonwealth almost up to the beginning of the conference but he was eventually brought round to the expulsion gambit on the basis of preserving greater Commonwealth unity. Diefenbaker, who regarded apartheid as morally unjust and an international embarrassment, appears to have been key in bringing the disparate leaders round to the Big Four’s position and keeping them united.
Swart and Louw seem to have been out of touch with the real decision-making of their opponents and attempted to call the Big Four’s bluff, refusing their offer to remain in the Commonwealth and participate fully in its decision making. Instead, they allowed their nation’s expulsion to be put to a vote. By all accounts, they were terribly surprised when, with South African representatives excluded from the meeting, the remaining representatives at the conference voted unanimously to expel them.
In purely military strategic terms, the expulsion was a mistake: South Africa adopted a republican constitution and the national party moved even further to the extreme right when the virulent Afrkanner nationalist and former Axis-sympathiser Hans van Rensburg won the subsequent election to the nation’s new Executive Presidency. Under van Rensburg, South Africa began to send overt military aid and supplies to the Rhodesian rebels. Nevertheless, the Commonwealth’s united front was a rebuke to many strategists, both Soviet and American, who thought it might be possible to exploit racial divisions within the Commonwealth to peel certain member states off from the others. Furthermore, the symbolic message of ‘zero tolerance’ towards the apartheid government was an enormous boon in efforts to encourage African and Asian nationalist leaders to believe that the Commonwealth was negotiating towards their independence in good faith.
The superior numbers and resources of the Commonwealth forces ensured that they were in complete control of the major population centres by the end of 1962. The Scouts continued a bombing campaign, operating out of bases in South Africa or the Rhodesian bush, but they lost their political cover when the RF signed a peace agreement in April 1963 and Rhodesia was admitted to the Commonwealth as a multi-racial democracy on 31 December 1963. Violence, however, would continue at a lower intensity until the surrender and arrest of the final Scouts paramilitaries in November 1968.