From what I know, the Mughals inherited many political and economic structures from the previous dynasties of the Delhi Sultanate. I understand the Mughals may have not considered themselves ruler of just the lands of the Delhi Sultanate, but from I what remember at one point the Delhi Sultanate controlled most of the Indian subcontinent. Were the Mughals significantly different culturally? I know that the Indo-Persian synthesis in the arts, especially in architecture, happened before the arrival of the Mughals. So thus, what made them different from all the previous Islamic dynasties of Northern India?
@Madhav Deval Based off of your great timeline, I'm assuming you have some knowledge of the differences between the two and why historians do distinguish the two periods in Indian history
@Madhav Deval Based off of your great timeline, I'm assuming you have some knowledge of the differences between the two and why historians do distinguish the two periods in Indian history
Last edited: