The Footprint of Mussolini - TL

Better question: Would the Spanish people and government be okay with an Italian ruling as their king?

If they came to Spain, learned the language and abided by the laws and customs?
Maybe. Its not like the Carlists arent pracically foreigners by now. For that matter the Bourbons had their origins in France.
 
If they came to Spain, learned the language and abided by the laws and customs?
Maybe. Its not like the Carlists arent pracically foreigners by now. For that matter the Bourbons had their origins in France.

And in fairness a lot of dynastic houses are technically foreigners in some sense or another, Spain's ruling dynasty is French in origin, Britain's is German, as is Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark and Norway (and the former monarchies of Romania, Bulgaria, Greece and Russia.)
 
Will Franco choose to restore the monarchy as per OTL? And with Otto now ruling Hungary, does that mean that he could turn to Italy for a non-Bourbon (re: Carlist) candidate?

This has actually been mentioned in the TL:

However Vittorio Emanuele III had other projects. He felt he didn’t have long to live and he yearned for a final achievement to cement his legacy is to make the Savoia the premier European dynasty, by installing parents on vacant or newly created thrones. He did achieve an important result in making his nephew Aimone of Savoia-Aosta King of Croatia, with the name of Tomislav II. It was the price Pavelic paid to Mussolini for Croatia’s freedom and the annexation of Bosnia. This emboldened the king, who plotted to make Aimone’s older brother, Amedeo, the current viceroy of the Africa Orientale Italiana, ruler of a most prestigious government. In this project was supported by his son, Umberto, who apparently wanted Amedeo out of Italy for jealousy issues, the viceroy being much popular than him and above all being suspected to be too near to his wife Maria José. Naturally Vittorio Emanuele looked mostly to Spain – Amedeo’s great father was king for three scarce years and failed miserably, but the nephew was considered much more adept to become King. But Mussolini wasn’t interested in forcing the hand of Franco over this, both in truth preferring Juan Carlos of Bourbon, who was in Rome at the time.
 
Finally we're back on a topic where I could talk (yeah, I don't know squat about US' political history). No offence for anyone, meaning.

Got some questions:
Spain: Become the number two power in the Bloc once rebuilt from the Civil War.

Okay, that seems plausible and maybe foregone. Though, there's a condition required: during the spanish civil war, did the Soviet Union stole spanish gold like OTL, or the fascists somehow were able to preserve part of it? For everyone wondering, the spanish gold amounted to 510 metric tonnes, or 72,6% of spanish gold reserves, one of the biggest of the time. In 1936, the year of theft, that gold was valued roughly 575 millions of dollars, which have become 610 millions in 1945 and 705 millions in 1947 (gold value fluctuated postwar from 37,25 to 43 dollar per gold ounce or 31,1 g). Without these substantial reserves, Spain would need financial aids of abnormal sizes, which ETO and Roman Alliance lack the power to give in the first years of Cold war. The remaining 193 metric tonnes were exchanged in France by the repubblicans, but I don't think Franco will be able to press immediately the french for giving back the money when everyone believe that Moscow still has nukes and his side no. This is a moment when you need to keep allies and tolerable neighbours close for common survival.

Bulgaria: Not getting steamrolled by the Soviets.

Has Bulgaria been freed from soviet spies, or are they still pullulating? In OTL Interwar, there were aplenty (hundreds? thousands?). Here's an example: colonel Nedev, head of the military intelligence until 1944 (don't know since what year).

Turkey: Re-establishing Turkey's eminence, particularly in the Middle East.

If Turkey wants to became again the lynchpin of Middle East, what would be it's relations with Israel? The region is swooped by pan-arabism movements and Turkey isn't an arab nation. Also, still being a secular state, it will not use religion as a coagulant. I sincerily hope not. If I remember correctly, it was the failure of secular pan-arab movements that led to the rise of political islam first (with organizations like the Muslim Brothehood of Egypt), and radicalization after (through some factions, no generalization intended). Turkey should use economic penetration preferably. Other means will soon or later blow in it's face (as OTL continuosly shows for every actor of ME).

Portugal: Establish a secure foreign Empire.

I don't know how Portugal leadership would cope with al the immigrants from Slovakia. First of all, wasn't Salazar considered a misanthrope and a fervent corporativist? The second combined with the first will make him nearly deaf to his allies' request (Mussolini and Franco in primis) to change economic model. Leaving out this, with what resources could Portugal substain a large immigration, above all in it's (still poor) colonies? The only way I could see for now, is to open aforesaid colonies to RA economies, though some years will pass before Italy & Co. could get enough dough to make cakes out of the places. Those colonies have plenty of natural resources, but the needed infrastructures aren't cheap nor fast to build.
And, lastly, we must not forget that in 1951 president Carmona dies. He was replaced by president Francisco Craveiro Lopes, who was more strongheaded than his predecessor. Anyway, Lopes never tried to remove Salazar (which, in turn, removed him in 1958). This will led to a failed coup by the defence minister Moniz in 1961, with the partecipation of Lopes. This could led to some interesting development, in the future. Like, if Salazar will continue to ignore RA, Mussolini could probably "help" Lopes to german-supplex Salazar out of his chair (Benito isn't gentle enough to simply overthrow people, ask Pavelic).

Italy: Becoming the world's third power ahead of Britain, with enough military power to project itself almost anywhere.

Italy has a long way to go, then. The most difficult part is not to get the industries, is to teach and train the hands and minds of men: workes, middle-management, leadership, etc. And Italy desperately need teachers. One of the aspects of the school reform was to limit the number of people who could graduate from university through the harshment of tests. This led to an higher preparation of the graduates, but also an insufficient numbers of them. Also, many professors were dismissed for not swearing fidelty to fascism. Mussolini better soften this measure (like, swearing fealty to not oppose Italy, a more neutral stance). And let's not forget, to open higher instruction to women. Alright, Mussolini will probably never do something like that. We need some eminent figure to compel him to do so. Like, maybe Umberto II's wife, Marié Jose of Belgium. She doesn't seem the type of woman without initiave and boldness.
Still, Italy risk to be just like OTL contemporay China (PRC): abundant resources, investments and researce, but chronic lack of quality works and minds, because of the limits imposed by the state. Or, like the past Soviet Union. In the end, all the resources the soviets thrown in scientifical research were not enough to defeat the USA, who were beaten only when they believed to be (and the Korolev arrived).

OT: it's good to be back in the fray.
 
Last edited:
Hmm, regarding Portugal they have already shown interest in taking in some immigrants at least. So some changes might already be going on in Lisbon we are not aware of. That being said I could see initial disasters happening for as you say the project not having the infrastructure to back it up. As Pavelic's actions remind us, just because its a stupid idea doesn't mean someone won't do it.

As for Salazaar being killed off, I am not certain on that. Pavelic had a lot going to make rubbing him out acceptable. He was the newest statesman of the Alliance, having gotten into power thank to the Fall of Yugoslavia(the fact he had to accept an Italian King and the lose of most of Dalmatia shows how much he needed Italy to get into power), also his actions as dictator were a disgrace that was hampering the RA's relationship with the West; and that was before he invaded Serbia. And with Serbia he was threatening to start WWIII when no one in the RA leadership wanted that.

That DeGaulle wanted his head in a basket was just a cherry on the execution sundae.

So while precedent has been established for the Ra to kill off troublesome members, Salazar would have to cross a few red lines to reach the same spot as Pavelic did. Mussolini and company don't want their allies cutting an exit deal with the West after all, and probably want to attract more members. They will have serious issues if Mussolini is see as trying to turn the Roman Alliance into the Stalingrad Pact.

Italy has a long way to go, then. The most difficult part is not to get the industries, is to teach and train the hands and minds of men: workes, middle-management, leadership, etc. And Italy desperately need teachers. One of the aspects of the school reform was to limit the number of people who could graduate from university through the harshment of tests. This led to an higher preparation of the graduates, but also an insufficient numbers of them. Also, many professors were dismissed for not swearing fidelty to fascism. Mussolini better soften this measure (like, swearing fealty to not oppose Italy, a more neutral stance). And let's not forget, to open higher instruction to women. alright, Mussolini will probably never do something like that. We need some eminent figure to compel him to do so. Like, maybe Umberto II's wife, Marié Jose of Belgium. She doesn't seem the type of woman without initiave and boldness.

As for Mussolini doing reforms, well this is terra incognita I think. On the one hand he is more powerful than ever riding the victory high, with the Ra established and thawing relations with the West minus USA. On the other hand the Soviets have the Bomb and are willing to use it and America cannot be relied on. So perhaps this combination of confidence and fear of the Soviet's lead in the tech/industry gap will lead to Mussolini being willing to make reforms in Italy along the lines you suggest?

One shake up coming to Italy is the death of Victor Emmanuel III with a new king to be crowned. I expect the wars have also made and broken careers in the Fascist regime.
 
Last edited:
Any chance the Chiang will hold out long enough for the US leadership to change and start backing him?

Speaking of Asia I wonder how Kim Il Sung us is doing as ruler of a united Korea?

Or MacArthur's ITTL rule over Southern Japan?
 
Was just rereading and noted this:

All around the world, we see these conflicts with terrorists trying to take on great powers: in France with Corsica and their Algerian holdouts, in Britain with Northern Ireland and Kurdistan with their Arab towns and regions.

Looks like a certain ethnic group will be getting a very different 20th century.
 
ITTL, Turkey may be willing to split off a puppet state which can in turn eat pieces of neighbouring nations to contain all the Kurdish lands - this indirectly increases Turkish power and if there is hostility between Turkey and the Arabs, this gives those a nice target which to hit instead of Ankara or Kostantinyye.
OTL, Turkey will only lose land should Kurdistan come into being.
 
The new kings Belgian wife strikes me as a decent fig leaf for closer ties with the French and British.

Oh, Maria José could surely play an interesting role albeit even as reigning queen could be overshadowed by Elena of Montenegro. She should be more favorable than OTL over Mussolini, from the moment he rejected the German advances. Apparently initially she wasn't hostile to fascism so there is no reason to think she wouldn't be now.

But while her charm could be an asset for Italy, sure, I am not sure she would buy credit between France and Britain. Why? Due of the doubts around the Belgian Royal House and therefore over Leopold III. Paradoxally it may result Maria José would ask Mussolini to help somehow the reputation of his brother to recover.

Also she would have to fend herself from her own husband, especially if the Duke of Savoia-Aosta would be still around...

Speaking of Belgium, I wonder if the massacre of Marcinelle would happen. I think the prelude (immigration treaty between Italy and Belgium of 1946) may still happen because the country needed manpower and well Rome for commercial benefits could concede them. I don't see so many Italians to move as OTL, of course. But enough to go work into the mines maybe.
 
ITTL, Turkey may be willing to split off a puppet state which can in turn eat pieces of neighbouring nations to contain all the Kurdish lands - this indirectly increases Turkish power and if there is hostility between Turkey and the Arabs, this gives those a nice target which to hit instead of Ankara or Kostantinyye.
OTL, Turkey will only lose land should Kurdistan come into being.

Hmm, maybe some kind of population exchange?

Turkey I can't see giving up much if any land to a Kurdish State, by this time they had fought against numerous armed revolts against the Kurds. So perhaps they instead carve a Kurdish state solely from Syria and Iraq? With them encouraging Kurds in Turkey to emigrate while also letting the Kurds pressure the Arabs out to fill in even areas that were Arab majority before with Kurds?

Seems a very risky strategy though. It would enrage the Arabs ad the risk that Kurdistan would one day turn on Turkey would only be mitigated by the Arab state hating both countries too much to break the alliance. The Turks would need to at least relax their Kurdish policy in their borders.

This would be a mess.
 

thorr97

Banned
Turks tolerating Kurds? Tolerating them anywhere? Nope. Sorry, can't see that happening. Especially not tolerating the existence of a Kurdish state on their border. And as this is the same bunch who were perfectly fine with both exterminating all the Armenians they could get hold AND then ignoring the international outcry, they'd most likely be perfectly fine with handling the "Kurdish problem" the same way - if left to their own devices about it.
 
Speaking of Belgium, I wonder if the massacre of Marcinelle would happen. I think the prelude (immigration treaty between Italy and Belgium of 1946) may still happen because the country needed manpower and well Rome for commercial benefits could concede them. I don't see so many Italians to move as OTL, of course. But enough to go work into the mines maybe.

Don't think so. Fascism went incredibly far to raise their population, and redirect people away from emigration and towards settling the colonies. I don't see that changing, but obviously, Sorairo calls the shots.
 
Intermission - Italy in Asia
Here is a new side post - chronologically backdated and presented today for reasons, focusing over Italian interests in China before, during and after WWII, and Italian-Japanese and Italian-Chinese Nationalists relations as well. As usual revised and with decisive contributes in the end by Sorairo. Enjoy!

‘The Two Suns and the Eagle: Italy and Asia’ by John Landing

Traditionally, Italians believed their contacts with China, somewhat romantically, would have started with the voyage of the Polo family during the reign of Kubilai Khan – few knowing of the previous embassy of Giovanni from Pian del Carmine, the influential voyages of the Italian Jesuits in the Qing court, or the attempted exploits of religious synchronization of Matteo Ricci in the Forbidden City. But in the end, the Italian role in the Far East, especially around China and in the 19th century was scarce. One clear piece of evidence was the frustrated attempt to establish a permanent concession at Sun Man Bay, in Fujian, due to American interference at the end of the century.

There was however an important moment for Italy during the Boxer war, accepted into the international coalition with Italian soldiers playing a role in the defence of Beijing’s diplomats. At the end, Italy was rewarded with a small quarter in Tientsin – nothing compared to the other quarters, but at least a concrete presence in the Middle Kingdom. In successive years, aided by the small size of the quarter, the concession was entirely renovated like an Italian town, its major landmark being the square dedicated to Queen Elena with the monument to the winged victory. Despite the scarce Italian presence, the quarter flourished, becoming a large town with about 10,000 souls. However, the Italians continued to play an irrelevant role in the Far Eastern affairs, especially after the end of World War I. Due to Chinese convulsions, the rise of militarism in Japan, and the Anglo-American plots, Mussolini merely wanted to keep Tientsin as a testimony of Italian prestige, nothing more. The most notable event in the interwar period was the honeymoon of Ciano and Edda Mussolini in Tientsin.

Still, in the 1930s, something started to happen. Small but influential cultural exchanges started to increase between Japan and Italy, as the Rising Sun appreciated the Fascist regime for similarities with its own, their shared hostility towards Communism, and the fact Italy had no interest at all in the Far East. The Italian recognition of Manchukuo enforced those ties as well. However, Japan found itself driving towards in a de facto alliance with Germany – which found its realization in 1938 with the stipulation of the Dual Pact in Berlin. At the time, Hitler was burned by the Italian refusal to sign a similar agreement in a moment where Italy and Germany could have been towards a reconciliation due of the lingering Entente disapproval of the invasion of Ethiopia and the joint commitment in the Spanish Civil War. However, Mussolini’s refusal to introduce racial laws against the Jews brought the negotiations into failure. The Japanese remained rather puzzled about the reasons of the Italian refusal, but unlike the Germans they joined anyway.

The Japanese were supportive of the “separate Italian wars” during World War II, recognizing Croatia and expressing appreciation towards the Roman Alliance – there was the hidden hope by keeping good terms with Italy, Mussolini could be inspired to join the war on their side and give a final blow to the Allies. They were also indifferent about Italy not joining the war against the Soviet Union – after all they previously ensured neutrality with the USSR as well. At the same time, they saw Italy as the potential neutral but friendly mediator to barge a peace with the Allies.

In 1943 the Dual Pact found itself on the defensive. However, the Japanese were still in a better overall strategic position than the Germans. The role of Italy as mediator became priority for Japan – messages and contacts were sent through the concession of Tientsin, conveyed towards Rome and Tokyo. Mussolini wasn’t hostile to helping the Japanese. He believed as Germany would likely lose the war, with Hitler and the Nazis being removed for good, Japan could have been still useful as bulwark against the Soviets In the end the Japanese appeared more reasonable than the Germans. Also, despite the failure of Munchen, the Duce still was convinced of his talent of negotiator and being able to barter a peace in the East. Unfortunately for him, the Cairo Conference disabused him of this idea.

Is unclear what until now Mussolini thought of Chiang Kai Shiek and viceversa – probably, mutual disinterest towards each other. But through 1944 eventually their views started to collide. Despite being foraged by the British and the Americans though their infamous “China Lobby”, which dreamed of a Middle Country “democratic and Christian” (and under its influence), the Nationalist leader was ideologically more near to Mussolini than Churchill or Roosevelt. Chiang still resented the series of events which brought him to ally with Mao’s Communists and was determined to get rid of them soon as possible, and certainly the success of the Duce so far impressed him, while starting to become more cold towards Roosevelt, who was believed too friendly with Stalin – fearing through the American consensus that the USSR would end to support actively Mao again.

The German sudden declaration of war to Italy was a shock to the Japanese – even the most ardent pro-German supporter couldn’t deny it was suicide. So the Japanese government hurriedly declared it was a unilateral German move, affirming friendship and neutrality with Italy. Effectively, until the end of January of 1944 Italy and Japan were still neutral, the latter attempting to sign a proper treaty with the former in time, but after the meeting of Churchill and Mussolini in Lisbon, the Duce was convinced by the British of the necessity to declare war to Japan as well. On February 1st 1944, Mussolini issued the declaration of war to the Japanese ambassador in Rome. However, the Italians didn’t touch the Japanese embassy – because it was also the one for the Holy See as well. The Allies closed an eye, being aware to being an important lifeline to negotiate the final terms with the Japanese when their time will come. On their side, the Japanese were forced to occupy the Italian concession of Tientsin and the embassy of Tokyo, which personnel was however moved to the Vatican City one as sign of final courtesy and above all in the hope to keep a final negotiation channel with the Italians, especially after the end of 1944 and during 1945 – at least among the “civil” part of the government and the Imperial court. Hirohito privately started to doubt the “final strategy” of the militarists to repeal the invasion of Japan.

Shortly after the Italian declaration of war, Chiang started to plan a meeting with Mussolini – after all they were allies now. But he needed to do that before the German eventual defeat, when the Allies would turn towards the Japanese entirely. The Italians agreed to host a meeting in Rome, which happened to be few weeks after the Kiev conference, and first of a series of European meetings (Chiang planning to meet De Gaulle in Paris, especially to discuss about Indochina, and then Churchill in London). Despite the fanfare used by Fascist propaganda showing Chiang and his wife Soong Meiling as welcomed in Rome and talking of a smooth success of the talks, in truth the negotiation faced some difficulties due to poor interpreters on both sides – it was resorted for most of the meeting to use English at best.

The first point of the meeting revolved over Chiang’s request from Italy to relinquish the original recognition over Manchukuo. Mussolini wasn’t hostile in principle, but he didn’t wish to back down over something he was clearly wrong to bet over; the Duce preferred to rescind the recognition without going public and going towards a fait accomplit of the Chinese annexation of Manchuria when Japan would surrender. In that sense, Italy would acknowledge the declaration of the Cairo Conference publicly without mentioning Manchukuo. This brought to a rather blunt discussion where Chiang asked Mussolini why at the time Italy acknowledged Manchukuo – Mussolini candidly stated he believed Japan would win the war against China at the time. Mussolini defended himself by stating that the Italian and Chinese relationship was weak because Italy didn’t have strong interests in the Far East. Besides Chiang worked first with the Germans, then the Americans and the British, but him or the Kuomintang never considered to search some form of support from Italy.

This calmed Chiang. The Chinese leader acknowledged Mussolini’s point and stated he was willing to establish deeper ties of friendship and cooperation with Italy after the war. While stating that his China likely wouldn’t join the Roman Alliance, he was still convinced of the necessity to cooperate with the Fascist bloc. He even arrived to explain Mussolini how he was forced to join arms with Mao (speaking of the so called Xi’an Incident where some republican officers captured him to accept an alliance with the Communists) and how the Americans funnelled money to him through the China Lobby of theirs. It was an indirect source of information for Chiang about US politics.

Chiang knew that Roosevelt was willing to make concessions to Stalin, and knew from his supporters in America Wallace was even worse, fearing that the new US president would concede much to the Soviets in the Far East, even against Chinese interests. On this, Mussolini and Chiang agreed, thinking that a common front with the British to support the Chinese claims in successive negotiations could be found. They couldn’t speak for the French, knowing De Gaulle’s Far Eastern policy was all over the recovery of Indochina and may be disinterested to support China – besides France at the time didn’t acknowledge the Cairo deliberations.

Therefore the discussion focused over the last point – to help the Nationalists, Italy needed an operational base in the Far East – or to better say in China proper. For the Duce the most logical choice was the Tientsin concession, but Chiang was rather cold because he honestly wanted to reclaim all the former European concessions (Hong Kong and Macao tied up in other agreements). Mussolini likewise was not thrilled.

Then a new idea came out: what about an Italian base in Taiwan? While both agreeing the island would be annexed to China, Taiwan wasn’t continental China and therefore an Italian presence in that territory, freshly returned to the Middle Country, where a local Chinese presence would have to be built from zero (Japanese culture was really strong back then), would have been more tolerated by the Republicans. Chiang wasn’t hostile to the idea, but wanted such Italian presence to be limited and temporary – Mussolini was able to force a potential duration to last until the year 2000. If Italy obtained the outpost, she would relinquish the Tientsin concession and pay proper rights to China. This point, kept secret between the two sides, was the seal of the agreement between the two leaders.

Chiang left Rome with an improving relationship with Mussolini. The Duce naturally wanted to get that Chinese outpost soon as possible… though it would not be until 1945 when the chance arose. At Potsdam, aside from angering the Western Europeans allies for the Soviet concessions in general, Wallace urged additional support especially from the Western Europeans in ending the Pacific War: ships and planes weren’t sufficient anymore – he needed men. Of course, it amounted to little more than cannon fodder. While he still confided the atomic bombs could force Japan to surrender (much more so to Stalin), the President explained that the enemy government may not surrender, hence keeping the invasion as the last solution. But he requested, in some way, all the Allies to share the eventual pain of this operation. Because Britain was already fighting in that theatre, Wallace asked this tribute especially of the French and the Italians.

Neither De Gaulle or Mussolini were happy about it. The French General wanted to occupy Indochina first and the Italian dictator wasn’t ecstatic to send his men to die gassed in Japan. But both arranged a deal where would send troops but operating under American command only when the invasion of Japan would effectively put in option – so to allow the Western Europeans to free their colonies first, which were less at risk to face chemical attacks as the Japanese supplies were mostly stockpiled in the home islands. Wallace wasn’t fully happy but he caved – he needed those men, because during the year the American public opinion grew wary over the fact they had to shoulder the war with Japan only on their own.

So De Gaulle planned the recovery of Indochina and Churchill of Malaysia and Singapore, but Mussolini planned a more ambitious plan that would mark the Italian role in the Pacific war: a landing in Taiwan. It wasn’t difficult to arrange an agreement with Chiang – the general knew of Potsdam from his American supporters and was livid of rage against Wallace. It wasn’t difficult from him to throw himself in the arms of the Western Europeans for good – whatever the price had to paid to them, he won’t allow Mao to prevail or let the American president to do what he wanted with China.

In the spring of 1945, the Italian Far Eastern expedition, assembled at the end of 1944 and shipped to India, worked initially with the British for the campaign of liberation of Singapore, followed by the landings in Indochina helping the French. Gained a stable base of operation in Indochina, the Kuomintang and its newfound Italian allies on May 29th 1945 began Operation “Bellissima” (Italy’s version of ‘Formosa’) the amphibious assault on Taiwan. Ultimately, the operation proved extremely troublesome. The Italians were not used to these kinds of operations and manpower was obviously quite scarce, given the distances between Taiwan and Italy. Indeed, British advisors had to be called in to help with the planning (which Churchill, seeing it as great to propping up colonialism and opposing Communism, was fine with providing). The Japanese were just as dogged as they were anywhere else in Asia and gave the Italians a sturdy fight, even if they were half-starved and cut off from all help. By the end of June, Taipei would be placed under siege. The Italians, realising they didn’t have the troops to pull off the operation, agreed with Chiang to transport large amounts of KMT troops to finish the job. Ultimately, it wouldn’t be necessary. By the time the Chinese were ready, Japan had already surrendered. Taiwan’s Japanese population (some 300,000) were soon expelled.

With Italy given the go ahead for the base, an under the table agreement was met with Chiang to expand the scope of the base. The terms of peace had horrified him; the Communists were in an incredibly strong position, ironically making Stalin his best friend, as he was the one reining in Mao. Realising he needed all the help he could get, Mussolini gladly provided further men and materials to Fort Mussolini, as it was unimaginatively called. Any plans Chiang had to fight Mao were scrapped – he needed time to organise southern China into an effective region. Chiang’s rule mostly comprised of bought fiefdoms from warlords who he couldn’t trust in any capacity. Ironically, his more limited control helped to drill down authority in the southern regions. The Italians proved willing helpers. On February 28th 1947, anti-government protests rocked Taiwan, concluding in a violent suppression that let to the deaths of some 10-30,000 people known as the ‘White Terror’. Photos from that day and the subsequent reprisals included Caucasian men co-operating with the KMT authorities. Declassified documents would show that OVRA agents had actively trained the Chinese in how to deal with counter-insurgency operations, based on their experiences in Africa.

Fort Mussolini would prove invaluable in the final stage of the Chinese Civil War, known as the ‘Chinese War’ in the West (a term that amuses many Chinese people for the limited scope in its description). As Mao’s troops began their advance down the expanse of China, the Regia Marina bombarded them from the sea, while the Regia Aeronautica provided air cover to the KMT. Limited numbers of Italian troops were provided, though mostly for training and rear-guard actions. Ultimately, this alone would never have been enough to save Chiang, or South China, but most historians acknowledge that if it weren’t for Italy’s early intervention (even then limited due to Italy’s involvement in the First Arabian War), the Chinese War would have ended as soon as it began.
 
I think Italy could make deal with Thailand easily enough the current fascist leader is Mussolini fan and is very sympathetic to his course.

I am sure Field Marshal Phibunsongkhram would be much more willing to sided with RA rather than America in this timeline.
 
Top