@F: "Graham Hancock is ummmmm. Not an Archaeologist. And is full of hokum."
Agreed.
His work is generally well researched, but the extrapolations and conclusions are often wonky unto hilarious. Due care, please !!
Much potential evidence has been submerged by post-glacial sea-level rise / delta settlement, eroded by storms or buried under river-flood mud, its absence providing ample wriggle-room for his wilder speculations.
FWIW, there was a ridge of dry land between India and Sri Lanka, which went under per UK's Doggerland. IIRC, a legendary temple's ruins briefly showed off-shore during the Boxing Day Tsunami's draw-down.
And, within 'historical' times, Helike and several Egyptian Delta ports have sunk due liquefaction, tsunamis etc.
Must be said, 'Port Royal' (1692 etc) is an example of how fast that can happen...
Agreed.
His work is generally well researched, but the extrapolations and conclusions are often wonky unto hilarious. Due care, please !!
Much potential evidence has been submerged by post-glacial sea-level rise / delta settlement, eroded by storms or buried under river-flood mud, its absence providing ample wriggle-room for his wilder speculations.
FWIW, there was a ridge of dry land between India and Sri Lanka, which went under per UK's Doggerland. IIRC, a legendary temple's ruins briefly showed off-shore during the Boxing Day Tsunami's draw-down.
And, within 'historical' times, Helike and several Egyptian Delta ports have sunk due liquefaction, tsunamis etc.
Must be said, 'Port Royal' (1692 etc) is an example of how fast that can happen...