Just in case anybody wanted to know what the Galloway plan of union was I have copied it for you to read should you want to.
-
GALLOWAY'S PLAN OF UNION. In September 1774, as the First
Continental Congress debated various means of coercing Parliament toward accepting colonial sovereignty,
Joseph Galloway, a Pennsylvania delegate and prominent supporter of reconciliation with Britain, devised a plan to avert the escalating crisis. Galloway rejected
natural law as a basis for colonial rights, claims against Parliament, or independence. He looked instead to written and
common law and sought a new imperial constitution to protect the colonies' best interests.
Galloway presented his plan to the Congress on 28 September 1774. In it, he called for the establishment of an American legislature that would govern both imperial affairs in America and relations between individual colonies. The legislature would function as a branch of the British Parliament, and legislation passed by the American house would require Parliament's approval. The plan also recommended appointment, by the king and a grand council of the colonial assemblies, of a president-general to oversee the legislature. Galloway's plan for limited colonial sovereignty within unified British institutions found support among moderate delegates led by James Duane,
John Jay, and
John Rutledge. But the plan failed to address the crux of colonial grievances: excessive parliamentary power. Opponents of the plan, led by
Patrick Henry and
Richard Henry Lee, therefore assailed it as a ruse to secure England's dominance over colonial affairs. Delegates rejected the plan by a margin of one vote. Following his defeat, Galloway became an outspoken critic of the
Continental Congress and popular political leaders and eventually became a Loyalist during the Revolution.
-
Will by the looks of it we could have had that in our own timeline had one person voted another way round. But I don't see why this couldn't be possible after a failed American Revolution. Now would such a thing happen post-war that I don't know I would need to look up how the king acted before and after the war and make a call on what he would likely do in such a timeline? I have been told he was mad so maybe he would have everybody killed. If anybody knows if that's true I would like to know.