Caesar is to blame for almost everything.
I hope that this will be explained in a latter post, like the idea that Europa is 'liberal' I get the impression that we missed some important cultural developments, not like that is particularly bad as only so much can be written down in a manner that keeps the whole thing reasonable.
As for French power: The war isn't over. Mark my words. I have surprises yet in store no one has an idea I'm planning. Just wait.
Excellent, with such massive populations and a technological level that favours defence, this is a war that will likely last years. Europa being forced to retreat initially as its world empire starts being ripped away isn't unrealistic if certain factors are active, the Soviet Union after all had to retreat right back to Moscow even though Germany arguably lost the war at Smolensk or even earlier.
What we have seen so far is Europa losing almost every peripheral territory that was a drain on resources or at least had to be defended. Now the loss of the Danubian basin
hurt, but the rest of the Catholic core is largely intact, especially the
crucial imperial core territory of the Rhine-Ruhr.
_____________________________________
The problem I have is that I didn't and still don't know how exactly the Caesar is screwing everything up, maybe I missed something but the only specific thing that comes to mind is him ignoring Quebec which can be interpreted as a Leninist tactic to make sure that the important battle is won, (tough luck Finnish communists). Wasn't this Caesar the same one that killed his father for being a wimp and was single-handedly running the Empire, and doing a good job of it too?
The way this war was presented gave me the strong impression that the Prussians and Russians will win because they are badasses and all the Catholics will forget that the House of Bonaparte-Hapsburg retook the Holy Land, so that the Latin's can be pushed into the gas chambers as they where too dumb to remember what happened to Mexico.
I suppose a deeper issue it that the tone of this work can be sometimes rather off, would a French warlord chosen by the Caesar, in a world where colonialism is even more brutal, where genocide is casual, where the mid 19th century saw a literal crusade against the Muslims, resemble poor old Perrault? Unlike say
this sort of chap? Considering the sort of cultural developments that would that would be occurring in this world I am rather surprised that Perrault didn't challenge the guy who stole his wife to a duel, maybe he could be killed during it as a part of Fascist Keikaku.