We still only have a tertiary source for that. So I'm not sure if we should put it on there. Show it as occupied, too, not annexed.
That's not quite true though, since Chamdo was occupied by the PRC, yet the PRC recognised that it remained part of "Tibet" even though at the time I believe Xikang was still a province that ostensibly included the Chamdo region. It's complicated.Was Tibet not officially annexed until the 17 point agreement?
EDIT: I just realized the way I worded that was kind of weird so I'll clarify. I put the PRC-controlled part of Tibet with the regular PRC color instead of the occupied color, since I figured that because the PRC claimed Tibet in its entirety, occupying Tibetan territory was effectively annexing it.
also the rest is done now.
Speaking of, should we show lines of actual control?
Aaaaand now I'm expanding that into a full world map.
Hmmm. Will you be wanting to put in Guantanamo Bay. I am wondering what level of lease I take is at an if it would be similar to the he ports in China. Ahhh, and I feel you should put some colors down on the Channel Islands. And did the Republic of Ireland actually claim the North? And what about that bit of Georgia north of Abdkazia here? Was that before a border change? And you will want to extend the claims of Weat Germany in East Germany to the Oder Neisse line or further, as they never gave up the claim until later. What is the light blue in Japan for? Representing American occupation? If so, is that color set? I feel as though it might be too light, considering the man you Islands it would be used for. And had the areas of Baden-Wurtenburg not yet been reunified at this point in time? And is that island in northeastern Greenland white because of ice or because it was overlooked?
Asia, Oceania, Canada, USA, and Caribbean done.
