Damn it @mplustwerk look what you did, a kid is dead now because of your big mouth
Peers. 'pair' in English is strictly a group of two. Even numbers divisible by two use 'even' instead of 'pair'. That's English for you.jury of ten of his pairs
Rhetoric, singular. Why rhetoric is singular in English and mathematics is plural, I'm sure I don't know.flourishes of greek rhetorics
Peroration.concluded his peroraison
Number times. Plural.A number of time his arrogance
And damn belgian author not taking care he's good enough in English before he starts writting a story thanks for the corrections, I'll put them in in a few minutesPeers. 'pair' in English is strictly a group of two. Even numbers divisible by two use 'even' instead of 'pair'. That's English for you.
Rhetoric, singular. Why rhetoric is singular in English and mathematics is plural, I'm sure I don't know.
If you happened to mean the guys using rhetoric, that would be rhetoricians.
Peroration.
Number times. Plural.
Stupid English language.
Reaching the end of Aurelius. While the succession system seem stable enough it is always at risk of plague, sickness, military disaster and even assassination.
You can't keep a reign of continuous good emperors since even if good for the Empire it will slow down further institutionalization and separation of state and monarchy since the system established by the divine Hadrian seems good enough and gathers the force of unmovable tradition.
The succession is probably what I find most ASB about this story really. There is a reason why the line of succession was so informal. The senitoral class would have never accepted an open monarchy before the third century crisis. The princeps was theoretically a kind of super magistrate and a magistrate isn't allowed appoint a successor.
Technically yes, it could lead to a kind of sequestration of power, leading to later instability as new families try to get into the circle. On the other any such scheme would require control of the senate for decades, two or three generations : not really possible as many would not have the patience to play such a long gameCould a system of power swapping between a few powerful families emerge? Family A gives emperorship to fam B who gives it to C who gives it back to A. Not necessarily that neat but provided they have no familial ties it is technically legit while wrecking the intent of the law.
Sounds like the papacy!Technically yes, it could lead to a kind of sequestration of power, leading to later instability as new families try to get into the circle. On the other any such scheme would require control of the senate for decades, two or three generations : not really possible as many would not have the patience to play such a long game
Most of those loosing jobs inside the empire would be slaves or women, not men. On the other hand craftsmen (metalworker, woodworkers,...) will thrive. Women will be able to find alternative activities or eventually keep homegrown production while industry provides for city centers because of transport costs...I wonder how roman luddites might look... I imagine that craftsmen in places further away from the technological bases of Italia and Gallia would be pretty pissed off about far away machinery stealing their profits. not to mention the germans, persians and scyths who are lagging further and further behind... will they adopt guerrilla tactics when the roman advantage in population and equipment becomes too large to bear?