The Japanese take Darwin in World War II.

What if the Japanese moved forwards with their plans to take Darwin in World War II?
How long does it take for the Australians to retake it?
How does this affect the rest of the war? How does this affect Australian culture?
 
The time to take Darwin was immediately following their air attack on 19 February 1942.

Darwin was seen by both sides as an extension to the Dutch East Indies; it was included in the ABDACOM area and was the southern point on the Malay Barrier: the necessary line of defence of Australia and was recognised as such by the British, Australian and American High Commands prior to the war.

For the Japanese it was critical for the defence of their new possessions in South-East Asia. With Darwin and its surrounds in allied hands the D.E. Indies, Malaya and Borneo were all vulnerable to air and sea attack. The Japanese IOTL chose to neutralise this threat by ‘using a hammer to crack an egg’; employing the strike carriers that three months earlier attacked Pearl Harbour to launch an even larger air attack on Darwin and following it up with heavy bombers based in Ambon. They followed this up with repeated air raids for the next two years.

Just prior to the fall of Singapore in February 1942, General Yamashita submitted a proposal to invade and occupy Darwin and its surrounds, recognising that air attacks alone, no matter how successful, could not eliminate permanently the threat. This would have employed troops then on their way to Bali and Timor and the land and carrier based aircraft that were presently in the area, against which the allies had no more than a dozen P-40 Kittyhawks, a couple of B-17s and three heavy anti-aircraft guns. Landings in late February 1942 would have built on the disorder and confusion of the collapsing Allied command in Java. Yamashita’s plan called for a force of a division to be landed on the coast near Daly River Station and push inland towards Adelaide River and from there north – a total distance of two hundred kilometres, taking Darwin from the landward side. The coastal conditions were well known to the Japanese; in fact they had better maps of the north of Australia than the Australians had.

Once Darwin was in Japanese hands there would have been no possibility of conducting the air raids on South-East Asia that continually hindered Japanese efforts to get the Indonesian oil industry operational, or exports of other strategic resources from E.S. Asian ports that were obstructed by mines dropped by Australian and American B-17s. Nor would the commando raids that tied down so many Japanese troops in the region, 20,000 in Timor alone, have been possible. Japanese bombers operating from Darwin and Batchelor airfields could have hit any target in Queensland down as far as Brisbane, including the docks in Brisbane and Townsville where vitally important war supplies were being unloaded. In the west they could hit any target down to Exmouth, threatening to sever the air link to India. Such bombers could have operated unescorted and unhindered with no Australian modern fighter aircraft closer than Egypt, no more than twenty American P-40s transiting Australia on their way to Java, and only 17 heavy anti-aircraft guns in the entire country.

Once taken Darwin would have been secure: it could not be attacked from the south and an amphibious invasion would have to come from either the east or west. East would have to brave the narrows of the Torres Straits, where they’d have been sitting ducks to air attack from Darwin and Ambon and would have been well beyond the island hopping operations the allies conducted along the New Guinea coastline. An attack from the west would have been equally beyond the range of Allied air support without first building up a string of new bases along the west coast, or otherwise equally vulnerable to prolonged air attack before approaching Darwin.

Far from being at the end of a long supply line vulnerable to air and sea attack, Darwin would have been the anchor that secured Japan’s sea lanes in South East Asia from allied air attacks. It would have substantially changed the Pacific campaign in 1942 and ’43 if not longer.

Possession of Darwin would have made taking Moresby unnecessary, and would have made retaking Northern Papua New Guinea politically unfeasible while Darwin was still in Japanese hands; the A.I.F. divisions returning from North Africa would have instead been employed in an offensive to retake Darwin before any operations beyond Australia could be considered. The Australian A.I.F. and militia divisions represented the bulk of groud forces fighting the Japanese in the Pacific until 1944. (Excluding the Chinese)

As a small note, there would also have been no air evacuation of MacArthur from the Philippine Islands.
 
- We did it, Yamamoto. We took Darwin!!!
- What now, Yamashita?
- Now we can take... more...desert.... at least the Australians are out of the war right?
- Nope, they're drafting more men
- But the Americans...
- I think're they gonna send reinforcements
- Welll...you know that I always wanted to create manga?
 
What if the Japanese moved forwards with their plans to take Darwin in World War II?

How long does it take for the Australians to retake it?

How does this affect the rest of the war? How does this affect Australian culture?
My guess is that the first Ghan will arrive in Dawin in 1944 rather than 2004.

This is because I think that the railway from Adelaide to Alice Springs would gradually be extended northwards to make an overland liberation of Darwin feasible.
 

Pangur

Donor
Well, Darwin turns into a self sufficient POW camp, and Japanese supply lines could be better termed "a target rich environment."
The above sums it up quite nicely. US subs out of Fremantle would have a short trip to work. They Japanese either die of hunger, die at sea, die when a croc has his/her lunch, spiders, snakes and then the Aussies get a crack at them. Bottom line is, they die until they surrender
 
In all honestly this significantly derails the Pacific War, by essentially removing Australia, conceding the Southwest Pacific, and giving the Japanese plenty of oil.
 
How does it remove Australia? Darwin is up on the to end of the country and isolated

Removing Darwin forces the Allies out of New Guinea and the Solomons which, in addition to airbases around Darwin itself, threaten much of the logistics stream to Australia. I don't think the Japanese will be able to cut it off but, combined with Australia political will being focused on liberating Australian soil first, will keep the Aussies from doing much else in the Pacific for a time and renders the place useless as a strategic base.
 
Whoop de do Nuclear cloud over home islands 45 war ends and the Aussies are more pissed against the Japanese
OK, that does it. I'm getting awfully tired of this routine. Every time we talk about scenarios in the Pacific war, somebody comes along and reminds us that whatever we're talking about doesn't change the outcome, implying that the proposed POD is unworthy of further discussion. Yes, we all know about the USA's industrial might and all of the other things that determined the course of the conflict - because they are brought up on an almost daily basis. But you know what? Some of us are interested in the details and not just the big picture.

History comes at various resolutions and sometimes it is interesting to explore the finer ones. Just because a war has a predetermined outcome does not mean it has a predetermined course or that that course is not interesting enough to consider.
 
Last edited:

SwampTiger

Banned
Removing Darwin forces the Allies out of New Guinea and the Solomons which, in addition to airbases around Darwin itself, threaten much of the logistics stream to Australia. I don't think the Japanese will be able to cut it off but, combined with Australia political will being focused on liberating Australian soil first, will keep the Aussies from doing much else in the Pacific for a time and renders the place useless as a strategic base.

Darwin impacts Timor and NEI much more than New Guinea and westward. A simple look at a map shows Darwin has no impact on imports to eastern Australia, and just nuisance issues to western Australia. Japan has no chance of pushing further south. Australia may send a division into the area as it builds airfields and railways north from Alice Springs or west from Broome. Otherwise, just ignore the Japanese.
 
Removing Darwin forces the Allies out of New Guinea and the Solomons which, in addition to airbases around Darwin itself, threaten much of the logistics stream to Australia. I don't think the Japanese will be able to cut it off but, combined with Australia political will being focused on liberating Australian soil first, will keep the Aussies from doing much else in the Pacific for a time and renders the place useless as a strategic base.

And? Supplies to Australia aren't coming through SEA any more. They are going south like the good old days or across the Pacific. No change to OTL. Indeed the Pacific route gets easier with less fighting in the Solomons. Using Darwin as a base to raid the Indian Ocean routes has all the OTL problems that existed using the DEI as a base.

As for getting the Aussies to focus on their home soil? Thanks to a certain dugout dweller, after PNG the Australian army was left in tertiary areas mopping up. Those ops are pretty much the definition of retaking Darwin. It is going to take years to get the transport assets to do it anyway.

As noted elsewhere. As noted above the main things Australia was doing in the second half of the war was providing pilots and reverse lend lease. The pilots might be an issue but the rest will continue.
 
Darwin impacts Timor and NEI much more than New Guinea and westward. A simple look at a map shows Darwin has no impact on imports to eastern Australia, and just nuisance issues to western Australia. Japan has no chance of pushing further south. Australia may send a division into the area as it builds airfields and railways north from Alice Springs or west from Broome. Otherwise, just ignore the Japanese.

The Japanese don't have to move South, as naval and air units operating from the area do it for them.Japanese bombers based in Darwin could've hit any target in Queensland all the way to Brisbane, including the docks in the aforementioned Brisbane and Townsville where war supplies were shipped, while in the west they could hit any target down to Exmouth, threatening the air link to India. Control of Darwin means New Guinea cannot be held since Port Moresby is cut off, and thus the Solomons as well. No overland invasion of Darwin is practical, given the sheer distance of desert that must be crossed; it'd take years to build the airbases and infrastructure to support such. An amphibious invasion is much the same, as attacking from the east would require advancing into the narrow Torres strait while the Japanese have air superiority thanks to Darwin and Ambon, while the Solomons and lack of airbases on the West would also mean combating Japanese air superiority or waiting at least until sometime in 1943 to get the air bases needed.
 
While do not agree with at all with the notion that the Japanese taking Darwin makes Port Moresby and the Solomon Island untenable for the Allies given that Rabaul and bases in northern PNG are much closer to those locations and they failed to do so, IMWO the Japanese taking Darwin is one of the more intriguing COAs they can pursue. It will not win them the war but it will throw a monkey wrench in Allied relations. Washington and London will be happy to let contain the Japanese in place and let it be a giant POW camp the Japanese have to supply. Canberra will not be so sanguine about the issue and will want to recover its territory and liberate its citizens. I would love to see at TL on this.
 
While do not agree with at all with the notion that the Japanese taking Darwin makes Port Moresby and the Solomon Island untenable for the Allies given that Rabaul and bases in northern PNG are much closer to those locations and they failed to do so, IMWO the Japanese taking Darwin is one of the more intriguing COAs they can pursue. It will not win them the war but it will throw a monkey wrench in Allied relations. Washington and London will be happy to let contain the Japanese in place and let it be a giant POW camp the Japanese have to supply. Canberra will not be so sanguine about the issue and will want to recover its territory and liberate its citizens. I would love to see at TL on this.

Taking Darwin cuts off the closest resupply base for New Guinea and places the next closest two, Brisbane and Townsville, under Japanese bomber range as well as gives the Japanese air superiority in the approaches to Port Moresby.
 

SwampTiger

Banned
A half dozen radar stations and airstrips will degrade any threat fairly quickly. It doesn't take much to down a Nell, Betty or Sally. Zeros will be hard pressed to reach these targets. The Japanese failed to suppress Port Moresby from Lae.
 
Top