What are the Alaskas like ITTL? Are they still the floating abominations @CalBear so heavily detests?heavy cruiser USS Alaska
What are the Alaskas like ITTL? Are they still the floating abominations @CalBear so heavily detests?heavy cruiser USS Alaska
What are the Alaskas like ITTL? Are they still the floating abominations @CalBear so heavily detests?
My boi Patton finally seeing some action. Now hopefully he can get what he really deserves and lead an actual First United States Army Group charging into Moscow... at least I can dream, can't I?
Junta-led Germany will be interesting.
Right now, what is the likelihood of the coup being successful and seizing power? If it fails, would it be through Hitler loyalists rally around Goering?
How about T34,T29,T32,T30? British Caernarvon? Centurion mk 1? M26E1(M26 with accelerated engine and long 90mm with penetration of M82 shell comparable to PzGr. 43 on long 88(KWK44/71)No worries mate!
The first thing the Allies have access to that can dogfight a 262 would be the P-80, which IOTL was first used in 2/45 (and unlike the nuke or Soviet jets, I can't see how this timetable can really be accelerated). The Corsair (in service by '43) would probably be the next best bet. As well as the OTL "kill them when they land" approach.
Against the Wolf (whose OTL best comparison is either a Jagdtiger with a turret, or an IS-3) , even the M46 would be toast - the 12.8 Pak 44 could get through 7" of armour at 2km while the Patton's maximum armour was 4". My thought is that the Americans would introduce something like the T29 (which would be called M29 ITTL), which at least in some places can survive a 128.
They won't use nukes on Germany because the only way Germany survives to 1945 is if the Red Army is occupying most of the front line, in which case they might as well nuke the USSR instead because that's where all the armies are coming from.
Thanks mate!
FEGELEIN! FEGELEIN! FEGELEIN!
- BNC
Well, he's the highest ranking NSDAP leader still alive, so there's that.Goring doesn't have that great a claim to the title - Hess was still around as deputy Fuhrer ITTL, so Goring can only claim to be Luftwaffe boss, not Hitler's chosen successor (of course, Hess also got blown up).
With, the more or less complete destruction of the KM, would the Allies go for a naval invasion of Germany?
How about T34,T29,T32,T30? British Caernarvon? Centurion mk 1? M26E1(M26 with accelerated engine and long 90mm with penetration of M82 shell comparable to PzGr. 43 on long 88(KWK44/71)
T34 had AP shell which was ablw to penetrate 290mm at P.B.
T30 just had 155mm cannon.
Yes, I know, thats 1945-1946, but can allies somehow speed up development?
You forgot about T34.) if we are to belive documents about T14E3, then:Not sure what the value in that is. They have a pretty firm grip on the Rhineland in 2/44, and if the Red Army doesn't do anything, they are in a good position to conquer the rest of the country over land. If the Red Army does do something, any bridgehead, say north of Berlin, is going to be stomped on very quickly.
To reliably defend against a Wolf, the Allied tank needs to have a minimum of 6" frontal armour (the 128 could smash 7" at 2000m, but as combat conditions mean shots won't be perfect, I'll knock it down a bit). OTL Allied designs that had this in 1944-46 were the Tortoise, Black Prince, possibly the T29 and the T30, as well as anything heavier (I haven't looked up every single tank that existed in 1946, that would take too long). The Centurion doesn't have a great chance against it either, but we can throw that in the list. M26 is far too weak to survive a hit.
To actually kill a Wolf head-on, the AT gun being used has to penetrate ~5" of armour at 30 degree slope (using an armour scheme comparable to an IS-2 or 3). At 1000m, the 105mm gun on the T29 could (barely) do this. The 32lber (94mm) that would go on the Tortoise was also able to penetrate it (Wikipedia says the Tiger II and Jagdtiger would be "easy targets", both of those are slightly heavier than the Wolf), and I imagine the 155 on the T30 would also be able to get a kill within 1000m. The 17lber on the Comet, Black Prince and other British makes could barely do this against unsloped armour, and is probably fine for a side shot, but likely can't kill the Wolf head-on.
Re: timing, the Allies have been fighting the KV-1 and T-34 since early 1941 in Iran, and have been fully expecting to fight some form of Soviet heavy later in the war (unlike OTL, where the PzIV was the best the Germans used until late '42). I pushed the M26's introduction forward to about 10/43, which is an acceleration of ~15 mo. So anything drawn up by OTL 1946 or so can be plausibly used in the war ITTL.
- BNC
IDK. The Soviet logistics would be in far better shape than in OTL (No Barbarrosa), they are far away from Allied bombers (and not only the B29 won't be in combat for some time yet, this time it will be facing jet fighters) and worse come the worse, if they managed to rebuild the rail networks in OTL, they may very well increase their capacity ITTLOne other thing, wouldn’t the Soviets have the same problem supplying the Wolf tank as the Germans did IOTL with the Tigers? That is, rail and bridge transport. It might even be a bigger issue for the Soviets as their rail networks thin out the further east you go. I would imagine these rail lines, and bridges would be under constant allied air attack. They could wind up with large stocks of tanks ready to go, but limited means to deliver them to the front.
Ric350
Allied losses had included five destroyers, 94 aircraft (mostly shot down by the large numbers of AA emplacements on the new German battleships) and the Yamato, but although the Allies would spend months repairing damage, the battle was an unquestionable victory, and second only to Jutland as the largest naval battle in history.
I'm pretty sure APDS has been developed for the 17lbr at this point, although with the accuracy of early APDS I don't know what value that will bring.
One other thing, wouldn’t the Soviets have the same problem supplying the Wolf tank as the Germans did IOTL with the Tigers? That is, rail and bridge transport. It might even be a bigger issue for the Soviets as their rail networks thin out the further east you go. I would imagine these rail lines, and bridges would be under constant allied air attack. They could wind up with large stocks of tanks ready to go, but limited means to deliver them to the front.
Ric350
IDK. The Soviet logistics would be in far better shape than in OTL (No Barbarrosa), they are far away from Allied bombers (and not only the B29 won't be in combat for some time yet, this time it will be facing jet fighters) and worse come the worse, if they managed to rebuild the rail networks in OTL, they may very well increase their capacity ITTL
Lots of smaller ships yes.Pleas tell us that the Yamato at least took down 3 German BBs and lots of smaller ships before being sunk, this kind of fight was precisely what it was built for, it would be really sad that it only participated as a cannon and torpedo sponge without giving back A LOT of punishment in return.
Whats the future of Italy after the war? Italo Balbo is probably alive so he could be a good candidate to replace Mussolini
How many casualties in the battle from both side. Also, is there uhm.. any Japanese captain or admiral want to go down with their ship and lead to unnecessary death.