Most ASB event that happened in OTL

The House of Valois recovering from near-total defeat in the Hundred Year's War, thanks in no small part to a cross-dressing peasant girl who persuaded the highest ranking nobles in France that she was sent by God to defeat the English, comes to mind.
 
The modern-day State of Israel.

The height of European domination of the globe, particularly the British Raj in India.
 
Aristotles came up with far too much shit to be a realistic person.

Would be even more applicable to Sir Isaac Newton.

Japan going from a Feudal society to a Industrialized military might in about 50 years is just bad writing.

This isn't as far-fetched as it is on first sight given that Japan had a very commercialized, urban economy even before the Meiji Restoration (in contrast to say Korea) and had some knowledge of Western science and technology through "Dutch learning" that filtered through Dejima.

Europe from 1914-45. Something like the Great War might have been expected, but it leading to the collapse of four empires and Russia of all countries undergoing Communist revolution? Not to mention that it only sets the stage for further violence culminating in Hitler who is a Germanic expy of Napoleon without any of the latter's redeeming traits and inclined to mass genocide.

Austria being totally excluded from a united Germany.
 
Unless they're surrounded by bigger and powerful states. It will almost be like no HRE emperor by 1300 and Ulm starts to conquer around.

With Rome I can agree. There weren't too much estabelished states around then, making conquest a lot more likelier. But still... it sounds weird.

Do we have any examples that otherwise fit?
 
The guy that wrote OTL can get lazy sometimes:

The Bronze Age collapse, with a globalized world with a set of powerful Empires collapsing in less then a century, with the addition of "Sea People"...Sounds like Deus Ex machina to me.

Alexander the Great was overpowered as hell.

Aristotles came up with far too much shit to be a realistic person.

The Spanish Empire collapsing because....they had too much gold.

Japan going from a Feudal society to a Industrialized military might in about 50 years is just bad writing.
God got bored while writing his great novel
 
Some Alpine duchy managing to unite Italy...and giving away the said duchy.

Some Alpine duchy managing to rule Burgundy, the Spanish, the Portuguese, and the Holy Roman Empires...despite losing the said duchy to a bunch of rebel Swiss.
 

Deleted member 114175

One of not so often mentioned:

French marshall with low background and without any royal blood becomes king of Sweden despite that he was Catholic, republican and Sweden is Lutheran nation. And his descendants are still monarchs of Sweden 200 years later.
And his solution to the loss of Finland was "Why not conquer Norway instead?" which was successful and lasted almost 100 years.
 
Would be even more applicable to Sir Isaac Newton.

Europe from 1914-45. Something like the Great War might have been expected, but it leading to the collapse of four empires and Russia of all countries undergoing Communist revolution? Not to mention that it only sets the stage for further violence culminating in Hitler who is a Germanic expy of Napoleon without any of the latter's redeeming traits and inclined to mass genocide.

Austria being totally excluded from a united Germany.

Collapse of four empires during WW1 is not very ASB, not even implausible. It was already almost inevitable, speciality Ottomans and A-H. But succesful Nazis are very ASB. And fact that they went such maniac genocidal and managed conquer half of Europe so easily.
 
Maybe, strictly speaking, this is not ASB. Yet
maybe it is when you think about it- a slave-
holder, a millionare(@ the least he was pretty well off), a rather shy man who often
seemed more @ home among his books, nevertheless writes a document that states
the case for liberty for all in phrases that
have never been forgotten. He fights for
the common man. He becomes one of the
leading revolutionaries of his time. Whom
am I talking about? Why Thomas Jefferson
of course.
 
Last edited:
So the best choices have probably been said already so here's some less-obvious ones (which may have already been said too)

The dominance of tetrapods over arthropods as the dominant land creatures (in the Carboniferous it was very much the other way around). (Trust me I was there)
No human subspecies survived into the Holocene mammoth-style on any isolated islands or anything.
One empire conquered the Mediterranean and held it all together with ancient technology.
China was never a colonial empire. Nor were any of the Caliphates.
The entire observable universe went to war with some socialist rebels (the Bolsheviks) and lost.
Everything that has (or rather, hasn't) happened in space from the 1970s onward.
Country X got an entire nuclear arsenal, but country Y never had a single nuke (plenty of examples for both of these).
9/11.
Pewdiepie actually winning the Youtube War.
 
Last edited:
I mean no one stopping their rearmament effort or even lifting a finger when Austria and checkslovakia were added to Germany
That was appeasement and made sense at the time, when Communism was the biggest threat to status quo and the traumas of WWI were still pretty fresh on everyone's mind. While we know France and the UK probably could've stopped Nazi Germany's advances dead in their tracks, it came with the risk of another strenuous conflict (since the form of warfare that everyone expected was trench warfare, which was difficult enough to win the first time) when everyone was sick of fighting and afraid of the USSR (and the possibility that they would capitalise on any European conflicts to spread their influence and aid leftist groups). Just letting Nazi Germany get what it wanted and avoiding war seemed to contemporary British and French leaders to be the approach that would guarantee a future free of conflict, saving both money and lives that would otherwise be spent and destroyed senselessly.

Of course, 1939 proved them dead wrong. But we can say that with the benefit of hindsight. We know the extent of Hitler's megalomania and treachery, the Wehrmacht's tactics and the Allies' unpreparedness, and the Nazi's brutality and inhumanity. They didn't, or at least they didn't know those things as well as we do now after the fact.

So was it a poor choice in the long run and a disastrous series of decisions that ultimately resulted in the bloodiest war in all recorded history? Yes. But was it completely irrational and ASB? No, far from it.
 
Um...they weren't unnoticed or ignored. Read about the 1936 Olympics. The fact that so many countries even attended was hugely controversial.

Sure, but ultimately the Nazis covered up the worst of what was going on and only two countries refused to attend.

The CCCP hadnt attended an Olympics since 1920, leaving only the Second Spanish Republic to boycott the 1936 Olympics in particular. Compare this to the much larger Cold War era boycotts...
 
Top