Sorry updates are taking so long, some pressing OTL obligations, and we're going to see some departures bigger than revised secondaries on a battlecruiser!
I feel that the U.S will not join the war.
These are the Treaty of Versailles and the Washington Naval Treaty of 1922.
On the left side of the poster was a proud Samurai, with a determined facial expression, and his right hand on the hilt of his katana, ready to draw it from its scabbard. To the Samurai's right (the viewer's left), standing shoulder to shoulder with him, was a European knight, his helmet visor open and his armour shimmering; clearly meant to be ambiguously English or French. The knight's piercing blue eyes were focused and conveyed resolve. On the Samurai's left shoulder was a hulking Viking warrior. Long, wavy blond hair flowed from his horned helmet, and he wore an impressive blond beard. His gleaming battle-axe was drawn and ready for action. The flags of France, Britain, and Norway fluttered in the background behind them with the Rising Sun above them and centred.
Subscribed!
You have explained about the Washington Naval Treaty, but how does the Treaty of Versailles look in your world?
Inspired by 'For honor', much?
Unlike American carriers, the Japanese delegated scouting to cruisers and floatplanes and dedicated all of their carrier space to fighters and attack planes.
I feel that the U.S will not join the war.
To be fair, the US probably does still have the Scouting Force, led by Lexington and Saratoga and assisted by the 8 Syren/Teaser hybrids. Difference being there, I guess, is that the US scout cruisers have aircraft that are fully serviceable, vs the Tone class. The gap is less accentuated than OTL.
Honestly, I'd think that the US would be very keen on having a slice of the Chinese pie, even if it would leave Japan less than it wanted; same for the Asia-Pacific region.Well, if anything, the US certainly would not be happy with Japan sitting on China, regardless of which Japan it happens to be. And accidents can happen that spiral out of control, too.
Quite true, but you always downplay that when asking for some new toys
Honestly, I'd think that the US would be very keen on having a slice of the Chinese pie, even if it would leave Japan less than it wanted; same for the Asia-Pacific region.
Uhhh, what does it mean?
Ok, red is soviet, blue is u.s, yellow... Japan maybe?
Oh, thank you. I learn something new today.
the so called "Panzer II.5"
long 150cm cannon
I hope you mean 15cm / 150mm ?
Heh. should that be Panzer II.V?
And yeah, definitely sounds like any sort of combined arms of sorts are going to be impossible. Does the KMT intermix the units throughout due to sheer need, or have they managed to centralize the various tank types in order to increase efficiency, at least slightly?