So, the Nikists are anti-Republic but might not necessarily be pro-monarchy. I suppose that's their main ideological difference from Roosevelt's National Corporatism?
Does that mean the kingdom still exists by then?
So the American Monarch has a few sub-kingdoms like how the Hapsburg’s were the Kings of Bohemia as well as Austria?
I’m guessing that there’s going to be no shortage of people emigrating to breakaway states when America flirts with authoritarianism.
So, the Nikists are anti-Republic but might not necessarily be pro-monarchy. I suppose that's their main ideological difference from Roosevelt's National Corporatism?
You say that infobox proves this isn't a dark timeline, yet it says that Hoover died in an internment camp.
Welp, I binge-read this, and I loved it! Kudos to you! As for the flag, would it have something to do with one of Spain's overseas colonies?
I was rereading this TL to get up to speed, and found that the May 25th, 2017 update isn’t threadmarked.
Sequoyah seems to be the most internationally well-regarded of the American successor states. How much influence do Native Americans have over it?
Only Panama can be the Capital of the AMERICAN EMPIRE!!!!!@Schnozzberry
Have you decided where the US capital is? I'm thinking that it could stay in NYC since that's where it was when the timeline started. And enough time had passed by the time the chaos had died down that political inertia would likely result in them officially declaring New York City the permanent capital. The Southern States can't even say anything because their power is basically crippled at this point.
Only Panama can be the Capital of the AMERICAN EMPIRE!!!!!
*When someone responds very seriously to a joke.The American Empire in question is going to lose chunks of the OTL United States territory. At very least New England and the Deep South. While it may compensate with other territories, like the entire Oregon territory, it's likely to be roughly the same size if not smaller than OTL.
That went right over my head. I just wanted the chance to discuss how American territory would evolve differently in this timeline.*When someone responds very seriously to a joke.
Didn't schnozz say the royalists still have New York?That went right over my head. I just wanted the chance to discuss how American territory would evolve differently in this timeline.
I still think the age-old principle of "it's too much of a bother to change now" would likely keep the American capital in New York for the foreseeable future.
Didn't schnozz say the royalists still have New York?
I asked in an earlier post if the American empire would have an eastern coastline, and Schnozz said Yes, and that Donald Trup would lead the new Democratic front, or something.What do you mean?
I never said that they'd lack and east coast. Just that it's canon that the Deep South and New England won't be part of America by the present. I'm also saying that apathy and having better issues to deal with would likely result in the capital staying in New York for convenience's sake.I asked in an earlier post if the American empire would have an eastern coastline, and Schnozz said Yes, and that Donald Trup would lead the new Democratic front, or something.
Sure, sounds reasonable?I never said that they'd lack and east coast. Just that it's canon that the Deep South and New England won't be part of America by the present. I'm also saying that apathy and having better issues to deal with would likely result in the capital staying in New York for convenience's sake.