Italy not having a military that is a laughing stock? How many goats did they have to kill?
Italy not having a military that is a laughing stock? How many goats did they have to kill?
I am sure the Germans made them an offer they could not refuse. **Start Godfather music**It’s more likely he had to sacrifice a lot of spaghetti.
Wang Jingwei as president is an amusing thought, although he'll need much more support from the military than he did IOTL to make an effective President. Then again, if Sun Yat-sen outright named him successor, he'll have sufficient clout to get things done.Who succeeded him ITTL, anyways? Jiang Jieshi? Wang Jingwei (I think it would be cool if he leads China's war of resistance against Japan instead of becoming the arch-hanjian he was IOTL)? Liao Zhongkai? Soong Qingling? Someone else?
Wang Jingwei as president is an amusing thought, although he'll need much more support from the military than he did IOTL to make an effective President. Then again, if Sun Yat-sen outright named him successor, he'll have sufficient clout to get things done.
Marc A
P.S. The following idea is crack: WI Sun Yat-sen was Frank Underwood to Soong Qingling's Claire?
Depending on M1776's thoughts, I can see Yan Xishan either be an important supporter of Sun Yat-sen (autonomy optional) or a pro-Russian warlord.Anyways, maybe Yan Xishan might also be a major Chinese leader ITTL as well.
Wang Jingwei as president is an amusing thought, although he'll need much more support from the military than he did IOTL to make an effective President. Then again, if Sun Yat-sen outright named him successor, he'll have sufficient clout to get things done.
Marc A
P.S. The following idea is crack: WI Sun Yat-sen was Frank Underwood to Soong Qingling's Claire?
Depending on M1776's thoughts, I can see Yan Xishan either be an important supporter of Sun Yat-sen (autonomy optional) or a pro-Russian warlord.
Marc A
Slobodan Milosevic wasn't even born until 1941 IOTL. Honestly, the biggest problem I have with this timeline is this sense of rote recitation. It's worst in the early sections, with so much material that just recaps completely convergent OTL events, but it persists in the dependence on figures like Milosevic or Churchill or Stalin not because they make sense in the roles you've assigned them, but simply because their names are familiar.
For Churchill, that remark he gave about "half-mongrelized Yankees" in post 125 is another example of something that makes no sense given his basic biographical information. Because Winston? He was half-American himself. It's one thing for Winston to turn against America in light of the broader political climate, but if he'd said what you wrote for him, even fellow Britons who agreed with the sentiment would immediately ask, "What about Jennie, then?" Honestly, the timeline would probably benefit from slowing down, and conducting more due diligence with characters and story, because it comes off as reliant on national and personal stereotype otherwise.
While I do agree that there are many historical inaccuracies throughout this TL, I can’t help but still be entertained by this. What it lacks in historical accuracy, it makes up for how bat-shit insane things are. To me, what this AH is like soft science fiction. Yes, it might not be exactly factual, but it makes up by being enthralling and a good story. I can see why you might be irked by how it seems unrealistic it may be to OTL, but it's honestly a fantastic ride if you just enjoy it.
Could you send a link im now really interested in thisStory of a Party, which has Britain go authoritarian under Lawrence of Arabia,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimitrije_LjotićUsing a 1990's Serbian villain in the 1930's isn't prioritizing story over plausibility, it's just lazy writing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimitrije_Ljotić
This guy would make a better leader for evil!Serbia.
That or J.F.C Fuller. He was a military officer heavily involved with British fascist movements IOTL.And for evil!Britain...honestly, it occurs to me that a real ironic figure to use would be Lloyd-George, given his OTL shift towards Hitlerphilia.
ThanksPretty sure it went unfinished, but here.