McPherson
Banned
In the 1960's the primary anti-submarine torpedo in the USN was the Mk 37. It was an electric torpedo, 19" diameter, swim out, pattern running, with passive/active homing. The early versions though were quite buggy, especially in the area of her batteries. They were notorious for shorting out and overheating. Hot runs, while not exactly common, happened far more often than they should have. A hot running Mk 37 was one of the early theories that tried to explain the loss of the USS Scorpion (SSN-589). This was the leading theory until later study of debris from her wreck pretty well showed that the boat's battery, not a torpedo, was what exploded and caused her loss. By the time I arrived on the USS Darter (SS-576) in 1984 the Mk 37 had been thoroughly developed and was a pretty good weapon. Along with 12 Mk 48s in our forward torpedo room, we carried two Mk 37 Mod 3 versions in our after torpedo room until 1986 when they were finally retired for good.
As long as we are in "the school of the torpedo" I thought we could look at these.
More on the Mark 6 magnetic influence feature in the Mark 5 exploder assembly.
This will clarify the generated electricity function of the impeller/generator and clarifies why Goat Island adopted the peculiar design of the original Mark 5 exploder. It also explains the CYA ball switch feature added late war and highlights how even after the Mark 6 influence feature/Mark 5 exploder assembly was discredited and/or field modified to sort of work the Rube Goldberg crowd found new ways to infuriate and bedevil navy armorers.
Briefly I will add my own "opinion" of this debacle.
It does not matter where the impeller is set or how it operates with respect to torpedo motion as long as the generator produces current load to a discharge capacitor to operate the pickup coil and/or the solenoid (see Pi-2 pictures and compare to the American unit here. Manual on the Pi-1 and 2 torpedo exploders for the German G-7 torpedo family described here as the USN understood the device.). HOWEVER... the Germans used a battery. and they used a linear action in the direction of acceleration arming path. The Whitehead torpedo originally used a set screw impeller mounted on the nose that spun a set of revolutions that operated a spindle cam assembly that unlocked the safety gate on a contact pistol. This was an arming safety. Virtually idiot proof, it relies/relied on the torpedo to swim a period of time away from the launch unit before it armed. The same impeller setup could do double duty as an electric generator. The spinning screw provides the armature rotation. Or the Goat Island "geniuses" could have put the generator in the power unit attached to one of the turbines. (More on that PU in a moment.)
Since the Mark 37 torpedo has been mentioned, here is some information on those fish.
Mark 37C torpedo (Otto fuel).
Mark 37 electric.
Complex does not begin to describe their design and use.
Some info on the WW II tools of the submarine trade.
But back to the design of the American torpedo. Here are a few things to note.
1. Given the technology of the day (or even today) a piston driven internal combustion engine will give more "run time" per given amount of fuel/watts generated than a turbine. This means that while the turbine is lighter and in many cases easier to miniaturize and manufacture, if a three cylinder or four cylinder 150 kwatt engine can be fitted into a torpedo afterbody power unit in the same volume as the two turbine Goat Island setup, that probably will give more run time on the same fuel. If the engineers can swash plate the engine so that it dispenses with the crank and instead roller coasters the torpedo screw armature, that is even better as far as space savings and seawater cooling jacket flow is concerned. BUT then someone needs to design a contra-rotator gearbox and opposite spin flywheel weight to counteract swashplate torque loads. I actually like that as an engineering solution because active angular momentum cancellation through gyroscope effect cures a huge torpedo problem as a good side effect; nose wander. That torpedo will point.
2. A linear fuse in the direction of acceleration with an inertia hammer ball switch saves space in the warhead. An external armature impeller/screw arming safety feature also saves volumetric space better used for hexanite. As for the prong vanes, levers, "whiskers" in keeping with my mania for double duty purpose and features, these "fins" can serve as fore control as well as contact levers/horns to set off the torpedo at oblique strike angles. Note above how the German sailor carries the Pi-2 assembly like a baby? NOW after reading the Mark XVIIII service manual and what bad things happen when you have to dismount the warhead to get at the exploder to service it, does it not make sense to have a SCREW IN MODULE that just slides into the torpedo nose as a complete assembly?
3. Which brings me to the problem about the earth's magnetic field and compasses and how to detect land mines and photo-electric eyes and other goo-gaws. I find it interesting in reading about Christie's little boat ride off Ecuador when he made those tests using a destroyer to fire practice torpedoes at the USS Indianapolis, that to prove the influence feature tripped at the proper time he used an electric eye put into the exercise fish to time the shadow of the cruiser as the torpedo passed under the Indianapolis to compare that to the trip time of the Mark 6 influence feature circuit. NOW THINK ABOUT WHAT I JUST WROTE.... One Mississippi, Two Mississippi, Three Mississippi... What the bloody hell was wrong with Christie? He used an electric eye as a trip feature in the cockamamie torpedo to check another trip feature in the same torpedo! Uhm. He apparently knew the photoelectric eye would work as an under the keel influence device to measure how the magnetic influence feature was working. Why didn't he use the photoelectric eye setup as a fusing feature?
4. John Q. Landmine. Once upon a time, the British army was worried that the Germans would do something cute like apply naval mine warfare to tanks. The British army, being who they were, decided it would be a good idea if they could devise a way to find these mines by not rolling tanks over them. Since the mines expected would be buried in the dirt and should be cheap, plentiful, and made out of steel, a magnetic means to find aforesaid mines would be a bit better than Private Fumbles poking the dirt with his bayonet. The British army guys came up with a contraption that used a magnetically sensitive switch hooked to a tone emitting circuit that would detect the presence of a mass of metal that distorted the magnetic field. They did not use the Earth's magnetic field to do this. Great minds hunting for German land mines think alike. The American army had a slightly different approach that did exactly the same thing. (1936). Someone should have talked to these "army" guys. Both the RN and USN were guilty of the same exact hubris.
Anyway... Goat Island sure could have used a manufacturing process analyst and a systems logic engineer.
Last edited: