Thanks ! I'm trying to keep it great so that no one needs to make it great again later on
Thanks too for the great comments, to which I'll now try to reply in one structured message which I'll put in "spoiler" mode so that those who want to read the story without reading my take on things before time may do so.
Well I tend to think monotheism will always win out over polytheism in the long run because it's a superior in terms of cohesiveness and ideological consistency, and just more appealing than non-rigid Greco-Roman polytheism/syncretism. Polytheism needs to be reformed like Hinduism to become more ideological to stand a chance. Or I would expect monotheism to make a comeback, OTL the more persecuted they were, the more viable they became in the long run. Jizya seems to be effective at dealing with the problem of the remaining Jews in the empire, better than threatening execution and risking revolts, more lucrative as well. Plus with the new eastern often Zoroastrian subjects, that might be a solution. (not sure whether Zoroastrians would consent to sacrificial rites to the emperor)
My concern with revolts is that splitting the provinces won't stop one famous/influential general from gaining support from all the regional troops of multiple provinces, especially if he promises them increased pay/benefits/power...
I also have a concern with the Romans preventing any travel across the Tigris. That is a recipe for mass revolt among local subjects who are used to trading and travelling across the river, and might have family/relatives across the line...
Although Romanization was effective, it ultimately brings everyone Gauls, Germans, Spaniards, Syrians, Africans on the same level plane. Which means more potential for civil war between provincial elites...
Turning deficit provinces into surplus provinces won't make them more dependent on Rome, it will decrease the dependency. It was the rich eastern provinces historically that broke off to form the Eastern/Byzantine Empire, because they/eastern provinces no longer needed the west. Gaul and Britannia was more firmly attached to Italy/Rome precisely because they were deficit provinces. If you make all the provinces self-sustaining and rich by themselves, able to support themselves and take care of local security, then why do they need the empire? Better infrastructure/improvements also would lead to more local/regional self-sufficiency as opposed to being attached to Italy and faraway provinces. Better roads/canals would lead to more trade nearby as opposed to across the Mediterranean. Better machinery would produce more local food self-sufficiency, and more local trade and production for local consumption.
OTL, Rome became less and less important as power moved to the provinces. How is that expected to be different TTL if the empire is even larger making it even less sensible to administer everything from Rome?
The Senatorial/Equestrian role distinction as outlined is viable and seems effective for administering the empire. It gives Senators far more power and influence than they ultimately ended up with OTL.
For preventing revolts might I make a few military reform suggestions.
1) Make the Praetorian Guard an all-cataphract cavalry force (20,000+) in emulation of the Parthians. This gives the emperor a fast, mobile force/central army that punches above its own weight in numbers. Even though it would be ruinously expensive.
2) Reinstitute the Imperial German Bodyguard to protect the emperor and reduce the influence of the Praetorian Guard, this would reduce the chance of plots and assassination attempts by the Praetorians.
3) Institute a Byzantine Theme System for the Auxilia. Distinctions between citizen and peregrini are disappearing and that removes the incentive for military service as well as distinctions between Legions and Auxilia. The Auxilia will have to be paid more, given more generous retirement stipends like the Legions which will ruin the Empire financially. On the other hand, give landless subjects state land to farm on, in return each extended family on a plot of state land has to always supply one man in the Auxilia. The soldier won't have to be paid as being allowed to farm on the land would be the compensation. The soldier's descendants will continue to serve in the Auxilia creating a military class loyal to the empire first. The soldier will be less likely to rebel, mutiny, participate in civil wars because that would mean the confiscation of the land from his extended family. Soldiers will be sent far away from the province where their theme is located. Situate the themes in frontier provinces to supply additional trained manpower/ex-soldiers during military emergencies.
As for place names, instead of using modern day references (Basra), here's a map that will help you see all the ancient day equivalences. It also shows provincial borders, all urban settlements in the empire, where all the mines are located, oases, historical river names, and travel times by ship across the empire. Super detailed.